1. Sequencing, Cost-Efficiency and Fiscal-Sustainability
of Social Protection:
An Overview
Yanchun Zhang/AI. Blateau
UNDP
Mitigating Vulnerabilities & Promoting Resilient Growth
Sequencing, Cost-Efficiency and Fiscal-Sustainability of Social Protection – Policy Dialogue
Seoul, Korea, 1 November 2012
2. Outline
I. Motivation
II. Sequencing
III. Cost Efficiency
IV. Fiscal Sustainability
2
3. I. Motivation
SP is increasingly recognized for its productive role;
Faster economic growth in developing countries makes
social protection more affordable;
Many questions remain to be answered to link theory to
practice.
3
6. Informal-Semiformal SP arrangements limitations
Inadequate protection : potential collapse; too
small payouts
May exclude poorest or discriminate certain
social groups
6
7. Triggers
Internal triggers: Change of political or
economic context within the country
Rapid economic and income growth
Democratization
Post-conflict
External triggers
Economic crises
Climate change
7
9. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-efficiency vs. cost-effectiveness
Direct and indirect costs
Direct and indirect benefits
Cost benefit analysis
9
10. Costing Tools
ILO (2008): 7 sub-Saharan African countries,
5 Asian countries
HelpAge International (2011): 50 low- and
middle-income countries
WHO (2010): 49 low-income countries
Save the Children (2009): 57 developing
countries
UNICEF and ODI (2009): 5 West African
countries
10
12. Benefits
Brazil’s Bolsa Família
South Africa’s grant (including the old-age
pension, disability grant and child support
grant)
India’s Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act
12
14. Fiscal Space and Fiscal Sustainability
A fiscally sustainable social protection system
is the one that does not undermine a
government’s overall fiscal position and
underlying trends in the medium- and long-
term.
Fiscal space is the available budget room that
a government can use to spend on a desired
purpose
14
15. A Dynamic and Comprehensive Framework
A dynamic approach is needed because many types
of social protection expenditures require not only
some budgetary room today but also the availability
of future budgetary resources.
A comprehensive approach is needed because fiscal
space created for social protection may immediately
or ultimately crowd out spending on other
programmes.
15
16. Practice of Social Protection Fiscal Sustainability
Analysis
Viet Nam
16
21. Financing options
Economic growth leading to Increasing tax revenues
Improving revenue collection
Reallocating expenditures
Increasing spending efficiencies & reducing leakages
Introducing innovative financing mechanisms
Increased aid & transfers
Borrowing
Debt restructuring
Key factor : political will
21
22. Conclusion
Connecting the dots between vulnerability assessment,
costing exercise, fiscal space evaluation and benefits
simulation.
Embedding SP in a national development strategy
Public support;
Political will;
Public-private partnerships;
Scaling up formal SP while engaging existing schemes.
22
Notes de l'éditeur
Definition of SP : interventions that reduce poverty, vulnerability ( transitory eg shocks) & improve human welfare.SP includes : - Social inssocial assistanceLabor market interventions 3 types SP :Contributory : benefits against contribeg ins against ageing, disability , sickness, death or unemployment - Most provided by gvt- formal sector &Some ins schemes fro risks to livelihoods by # actors than gvt Non contributory social assistance : Transfers programmes for poor & vulnerable to poverty & shocks ( CCT, CT, in kind transfers, fee waivers, utility subsidiesLabour market interventions : protect people in labourmaket or poor able to work.3 types SP arrangements :Informal : family- friends, Function of tradition-culture etc..Semi formal based on voluntary – membership ass, CSOs, trade unions.cty credit groups , burial societies..( eg ROK, CMB), churchesFormal : central local gvt- private actors ( banks/ins comp)- micro ins as complem to SPHybrid pension systems (Chile) 2008 inc poor & informal workers
Inadequate :Risk affects everyone in pool ( coviariate risk egnat disaster, ,,)If pool Horizontal ( all poor) more ineffective that “vertical” rich & poor)formal SP can be useful top complement/strengthen ctyarrgteg access to commercial re-insuranceToo big membership : lack admin/managerial capacityExclude :Poorest : too poor to contribute in cash or kind to poolDiscrimination : ethnic, migrant, religion, gender..)May reinforce the poor’s dependent status wo making them resilient to shocks.
Internal :Many planned eco broadened public Social ass coverage to previously excluded groups when switching to market eco Liberalization, increased ext competition , pressure on public accounts Korea one of LDCs in 60s : as growth picked up & wealth increased gradually implemented formal sector workers 4 main spporgrammes : Industrial Accident comp Ins(64)Medical Ins (1977); Npension Ins (88) Emplyt Ins 952008 elderly people hv universal basic pension, earned Income tax credit & ins scheme for lt care Lam : democratization late 80s, early 90s generated strong pop demand for SP which helped in design of innovative, domestically designed poverty & vulnerability reduction programmesegBoslaescola/Familia Brazil-Progresaoportunidadesmex- Chile solidario ChiIn a number of cases the provision of universal or SP was embedded in the new Constitutions ( eg Brazil 1998)+ Political will & fed leadership as key driver to broaden coverage, efficiency & areas of coverage of SP with SP high on Fed gvt agenda 2000 & moved increasingly toward integrated programme SP, ext of basic services, food security : break vicious circle of social excl, lack of opp , low incomes poor health.Afr CS, citizens media also drivers of change egSAfr also using rights written in Constitutions. Again Political will critically contributed to SA having one of the most comprehensive SP sys in Sub Sahafr.Succesfulupscaling of SP in Afr countries most time linked to strong political will at fed/central levelTransition from confl;ict to more stable regime opp to impl/broaden SP schemes egLiberia.SRL gvt invested in lan=bour market intervnetions for the young. Also helps build trust.SP key to build more peaceful & equal nation in SA w focus on child grants, Non cont pensions, labor market policies for job