The document summarizes an aquatic feasibility study and planning presentation for the Urbana Park District. It outlines the process used, which included identifying user groups, assessing needs, evaluating existing facilities, developing site concepts and cost analyses. It also describes various aquatic components considered for competitive, recreational and instructional programming, such as pools for swimming, diving, water polo and synchronized sports. Recreational components discussed include water slides, wave pools and other water features.
34. Urbana Park District Aquatic Feasibility Study and Planning Presented By: RATIO and Counsilman ▪ Hunsaker June 24, 2010
Notes de l'éditeur
TERRY
More vendors makes pricing competitive Smaller units will have less interactive features Themed but costs more
Get costs for these
Master Blaster uphill water slide can cost $3 m Swirl pool slide with one flume can add $200,000 to project, ways to lower cost by attaching catch pool into main body of water design Drop slide needs deeper water Build platform for 2 slides and catch area for 2, then second slide can be added later
Seeing more indoor wave pools, turbines to deliver waves very expensive. Challenge to make space multi-use, lap lanes lessons and aerobic classes Thrill for teens Cost space but also wave pool equipment ($150,000-$300,000)