SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Philo 1
   MIDTERM
   Stephanie F. Branzuela
      TF(7:30-9:00)AM

PROF. FRANKLIN Q. CLITAR
Judgment..
• The second act of the intellect by which it
  pronounces the agreement or disagreement
  between terms and ideas.

• It is the act by which the intellect compares
  and expresses the objective identity or non-
  identity between ideas. Ideas in themselves
  are neither true nor false.
• Example : The term “ lady ” and the term “
  beautiful ” are neither true nor false. But
  when the intellect compares these two
  terms and expresses whether they agree
  or disagree in a statement, then we can
  say whether the statement is true or false.
  Thus, the sentence “The lady is
  beautiful.” could now be said to be true or
  false. The intellect making judgment
  therefore either affirms or denies.
Proposition
• external sign of judgment w/c express
  declarative sentence.
• provides reason, explanation to support a
  judgment made expresses an idea, explanation
  feeling or emotion.
• can be analyzed as either true or false
• definition a statement which affirms or denies
  something about a reality or object.
Components of A Proposition
1. Subject term- being talk about the predicate.

   a) Quantifier- words w/c determines the quantity.

2. Copula- are expressed in the verb ‘to be’
         - determines the quality.

3. Predicate term- the one that describe the subject.
2 kinds of Proposition
• Affirmative Proposition-
  Expresses agreement between
  two terms

• Negative Proposition- Expresses
  disagreement between two
  terms
Quality of the Proposition
    The quality of proposition is determined by the quality
    of the copula

Affirmative
     whenever the predicate term accepts
    something of the subject term
             All roses are flowers.

Negative
     whenever the predicate term negates or
    denies something of the subject term
            A squash is not an eggplant.
A. Proposition in terms of
               Quality
              (Copula)
1. Affirmative proposition that uses
   affirmative Copula
2. Negative proposition that uses negative
   Copula
  B. Truth and Falsity (proposition in terms of
                      Reality)
1. True proposition- is the proposition that
   agree to the reality
2. False proposition- is a proposition that
   disagree the reality
C. Proposition in terms of Quantity (Quantifier)
1. Particular Proposition- is a proposition that uses
    particular subject term.
Ex. Some, several, few and etc.
• Several movie directors are passionate.
2. Universal Proposition- is a proposition that uses
    singular, indefinite, collective and universal w/c
    focuses on subject term.
Ex. This, that, all, every, each, any, group and no
    quantifier but it’s ends in ‘S’
• All government officials are natural-
    born citizens.
Combination of a Quantity
  and Quality of Proposition
1. Universal Affirmative Proposition- A”
   Proposition“
2. Particular Affirmative Proposition- “I”
   Proposition
3. Universal Negative Proposition- “E”
   Proposition
4. Particular Negative Proposition- “O”
   Proposition
Proposition Quantity      Quality


A          Universal or   Affirmative
           Singular
E          Universal or   Negative
           Singular
I          Particular     Affirmative


O          Particular     Negative
 All affirmative propositions share their
extensions to the subject terms and by doing so
the predicate gives some of its parts to the subject
 subject is drawn to the extension of the
predicate


 In Negative propositions the subject is
excluded from the extension of the predicate
 No relationship exists b/w the subject and the
predicate
Special types of Proposition
I.    Categorical Proposition
      a proposition whose Predicate is Directly attributed
       to the Subject.
      Answerable by true or false and yes or no directly.
      Predicate is always pointing our the subject directly.
      proposition by which the affirmation or denial b/w
       two concepts is expressed in an Absolute, Immediate,
       Direct or Unconditional manner
     Ex. Mangyans are the minorities from Mindoro.
Kinds of Categorical
A. Single Categorical Proposition- a
   proposition having 1S and 1P, whose P is
   directly attributed to the S.
Ex. Rema is pretty.
     2 types of Single Categorical Proposition
a) Simple Proposition- is a proposition w/a
    1S,1P and has NO MODIFICATION to the
    S,P and to the C.
Ex. She is simple.
b) Composite Proposition- is a proposition w/a
    1S,1P and has a MODIFICATIONS to the
    S,P,C and to the S and P.
Ex. The boy at the back is late.(S is modified)
     The boy is 15 mins. Late.(P is modified)
     The boy must be late.(C is modified)
2 types of Composite
a. Complex- Subject, Predicate, subject and
   predicate are modified.
b. Modal- Copula is modified.
Modal Proposition- is a proposition whose
   Copula is modified in order to show the
   MANNER or MODE how the Predicate
   belong to the Subject.
Kinds of Modal
1. Necessary Modal- a proposition
   whose copula is modified in order to
   show that the P MUST BELONG or
   (necessarily belong) to the S.
FORMULA: MUST BE
Ex. A circle must be round.
2. Impossible Modal- a proposition
   whose copula is modified in order to
   show that the P CANNOT/DOES NOT
   belong to the S.
FORMULA: CANNOT BE
Ex. A square cannot be round.
3. Possible Modal- a proposition whose copula
   is modified in order to show that the P CAN
   BELONG/MIGHT to the S.
FORMULA: CAN BE/MIGHT BE
Ex. I might be shopping tomorrow
4. Contingent Modal- is a proposition whose
   copula is modified in order to show that the
   P NEED NOT BELONG to the S.
FORMULA: NEED NOT BE/LONG
B. Multiple Categorical Proposition- a
   proposition w/c is a combination of two or
   more proposition uses
   1S,2P,2S,1P,2S,2P,2S,3P,3S,2P,3S,3P and etc.
Ex. Argene is handsome and smart.
o Argene is handsome.
o Argene is smart.
Kinds of multiple proposition
1. overtly multiple- plainly multiple(obviously)
2. covertly multiple- it appears to be single but actually
      multiple.

  • Copulative- is a proposition that has 2 or more
    SUBJECT/ PREDICATE combined into 1.
     It uses conjunction such as AND.
     E.g.
       mira and steph are dancer and singer.
     Mira is dancer.
     Mira is singer.
     Steph is dancer.
     Steph is singer.
• Adversative-combination of 2 proposition
  that are opposed to each other, with the
  conjunction; BUT, YET, ALTHOUG, EVEN
  THOUGH.
  E.g.
• We bathed the dog, but we couldn’t get him
  clean.
• You see yet do not hear.
• This technology, although not a foolproof way
  to monitor abusers, might give victims
  advance warning that danger is approaching.
• Even though she is ignorant but she is fine.
• Relative- 2 proposition that is combines,
  where the predicate have relation in terms of
  times and places; WHILE, AFTER, BEFORE.
e.g.
     Before you go, turn of the light.
     She is watching while eating.
     After the class, I play volleyball.
• Causal- combination of 2 proposition of it is
  cause/reason for the other. BECAUSE, FOR
   e.g.
      You got 5 because you didn’t take your
     examination test.
• Comparative- combination of 2 proposition
  expresses degree of comparison.
   • (GREATER, MORE THAN)
   E.g.

    Zerods is more smarter Than Earl.

More Related Content

What's hot

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMCATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMashelle14
 
Hypothetical proposition
Hypothetical propositionHypothetical proposition
Hypothetical propositionlp tangcuangco
 
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/SyllogismsMediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/SyllogismsShane Guillergan
 
Methods of paragraph development
Methods of paragraph developmentMethods of paragraph development
Methods of paragraph developmentpinebits
 
Intro logic ch 4 categorical propositions
Intro logic ch 4 categorical propositionsIntro logic ch 4 categorical propositions
Intro logic ch 4 categorical propositionstemkin abdlkader
 
Writing a restaurant review - EAPP
Writing a restaurant review - EAPPWriting a restaurant review - EAPP
Writing a restaurant review - EAPPMariechris David
 
The categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogismThe categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogismanandhjose
 
Categorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCMCategorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCMRoyPerfuma
 
Categorical propositions
Categorical propositions Categorical propositions
Categorical propositions anandhjose
 
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4  the square of oppositionPart ii, lesson 4  the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of oppositionshovanam Prakash
 

What's hot (20)

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMCATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
 
Hypothetical proposition
Hypothetical propositionHypothetical proposition
Hypothetical proposition
 
judgment and proposition
judgment and propositionjudgment and proposition
judgment and proposition
 
Nature of the idea
Nature of the ideaNature of the idea
Nature of the idea
 
Categorical propositions
Categorical propositionsCategorical propositions
Categorical propositions
 
Inversion
InversionInversion
Inversion
 
A Powerpoint on Logic
A Powerpoint on LogicA Powerpoint on Logic
A Powerpoint on Logic
 
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/SyllogismsMediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
 
Methods of paragraph development
Methods of paragraph developmentMethods of paragraph development
Methods of paragraph development
 
Reasoning (Logic)
Reasoning (Logic)Reasoning (Logic)
Reasoning (Logic)
 
Logic Ppt
Logic PptLogic Ppt
Logic Ppt
 
Logic hand outs#4
Logic hand outs#4Logic hand outs#4
Logic hand outs#4
 
Intro logic ch 4 categorical propositions
Intro logic ch 4 categorical propositionsIntro logic ch 4 categorical propositions
Intro logic ch 4 categorical propositions
 
logic - workbook summary
logic - workbook summarylogic - workbook summary
logic - workbook summary
 
Writing a restaurant review - EAPP
Writing a restaurant review - EAPPWriting a restaurant review - EAPP
Writing a restaurant review - EAPP
 
The categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogismThe categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogism
 
Categorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCMCategorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCM
 
Categorical propositions
Categorical propositions Categorical propositions
Categorical propositions
 
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4  the square of oppositionPart ii, lesson 4  the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
 
Contraposition (LOGIC)
Contraposition (LOGIC)Contraposition (LOGIC)
Contraposition (LOGIC)
 

Viewers also liked

Logic - Three mental operations
Logic - Three mental operationsLogic - Three mental operations
Logic - Three mental operationsKarisse Ramoso
 
Logica silogismo parte 1 concepto y proposicion 11°
Logica silogismo parte 1  concepto y proposicion   11°Logica silogismo parte 1  concepto y proposicion   11°
Logica silogismo parte 1 concepto y proposicion 11°Lina Vega
 
Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism3842
 
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)Daryl Melo
 
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W SoundCategorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W SoundHilltop Estates
 
Ensayo estudio comparado
Ensayo estudio comparadoEnsayo estudio comparado
Ensayo estudio comparadoabelantonioo
 
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015Inge Nix
 
Philosophy lecture 03
Philosophy lecture 03Philosophy lecture 03
Philosophy lecture 03Mr-Mike
 
Bringing the world into the classroom through educational
Bringing the world into the classroom through educationalBringing the world into the classroom through educational
Bringing the world into the classroom through educationalSheila Mae Sabordo
 
Name that fallacy
Name that fallacyName that fallacy
Name that fallacymollysdad
 
Simple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative Statements
Simple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative  StatementsSimple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative  Statements
Simple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative StatementsBIZ University
 

Viewers also liked (19)

Logic - Three mental operations
Logic - Three mental operationsLogic - Three mental operations
Logic - Three mental operations
 
LOGIC: Ideas & Terms
LOGIC: Ideas & TermsLOGIC: Ideas & Terms
LOGIC: Ideas & Terms
 
Logic hand outs#3
Logic hand outs#3Logic hand outs#3
Logic hand outs#3
 
Logica silogismo parte 1 concepto y proposicion 11°
Logica silogismo parte 1  concepto y proposicion   11°Logica silogismo parte 1  concepto y proposicion   11°
Logica silogismo parte 1 concepto y proposicion 11°
 
Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism
 
Logic
LogicLogic
Logic
 
Square of opposition
Square of oppositionSquare of opposition
Square of opposition
 
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W SoundCategorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
 
Ensayo estudio comparado
Ensayo estudio comparadoEnsayo estudio comparado
Ensayo estudio comparado
 
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
 
Propositional logic
Propositional logicPropositional logic
Propositional logic
 
Philosophy lecture 03
Philosophy lecture 03Philosophy lecture 03
Philosophy lecture 03
 
Powerpoint present simple-affirmative
Powerpoint present simple-affirmativePowerpoint present simple-affirmative
Powerpoint present simple-affirmative
 
Bringing the world into the classroom through educational
Bringing the world into the classroom through educationalBringing the world into the classroom through educational
Bringing the world into the classroom through educational
 
Name that fallacy
Name that fallacyName that fallacy
Name that fallacy
 
Logic
LogicLogic
Logic
 
Simple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative Statements
Simple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative  StatementsSimple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative  Statements
Simple Present Tense Affirmative And Negative Statements
 

Similar to judgment(proposition)

Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal PropositionsHypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal PropositionsEm Dangla
 
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptxEdelmarBenosa3
 
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies Dr. Russell Rodrigo
 
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences theLecturette
 
Grammar in brief
Grammar in briefGrammar in brief
Grammar in briefavocado1111
 
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpointsagebennet
 
60 a intro to argument
60 a intro to argument60 a intro to argument
60 a intro to argument1aromagnoli
 
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptxmarlon ramos
 
Agreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdf
Agreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdfAgreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdf
Agreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdfsdfghj21
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptDavid574571
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptLeianMartin1
 

Similar to judgment(proposition) (20)

Judgment
JudgmentJudgment
Judgment
 
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal PropositionsHypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
 
JUDGMENT.pptx
JUDGMENT.pptxJUDGMENT.pptx
JUDGMENT.pptx
 
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
 
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
 
Sentences.pptx
Sentences.pptxSentences.pptx
Sentences.pptx
 
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
 
subject verb agreement
subject verb agreementsubject verb agreement
subject verb agreement
 
Eduction (ph1)
Eduction (ph1)Eduction (ph1)
Eduction (ph1)
 
Grammar in brief
Grammar in briefGrammar in brief
Grammar in brief
 
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
 
60 a intro to argument
60 a intro to argument60 a intro to argument
60 a intro to argument
 
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
 
Syntax - Verb Group Vgrp
Syntax - Verb Group Vgrp Syntax - Verb Group Vgrp
Syntax - Verb Group Vgrp
 
Agreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdf
Agreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdfAgreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdf
Agreement with Indefinite Pronouns An.pdf
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
 
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.pptVerb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
Verb-Tense-PowePoint.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdfGerald Furnkranz
 
Opportunities, challenges, and power of media and information
Opportunities, challenges, and power of media and informationOpportunities, challenges, and power of media and information
Opportunities, challenges, and power of media and informationReyMonsales
 
Referendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election ManifestoReferendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election ManifestoSABC News
 
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeRohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeAbdulGhani778830
 
Brief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert OppenheimerBrief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert OppenheimerOmarCabrera39
 
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkcomplaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkbhavenpr
 
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the roundsQuiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the roundsnaxymaxyy
 
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest2
 
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpkManipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpkbhavenpr
 
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep VictoryAP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victoryanjanibaddipudi1
 
Top 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdf
Top 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdfTop 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdf
Top 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdfauroraaudrey4826
 
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.NaveedKhaskheli1
 
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012ankitnayak356677
 

Recently uploaded (13)

57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
 
Opportunities, challenges, and power of media and information
Opportunities, challenges, and power of media and informationOpportunities, challenges, and power of media and information
Opportunities, challenges, and power of media and information
 
Referendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election ManifestoReferendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
 
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeRohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
 
Brief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert OppenheimerBrief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
 
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkcomplaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
 
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the roundsQuiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
Quiz for Heritage Indian including all the rounds
 
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
 
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpkManipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
Manipur-Book-Final-2-compressed.pdfsal'rpk
 
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep VictoryAP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
 
Top 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdf
Top 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdfTop 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdf
Top 10 Wealthiest People In The World.pdf
 
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
 
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
 

judgment(proposition)

  • 1. Philo 1 MIDTERM Stephanie F. Branzuela TF(7:30-9:00)AM PROF. FRANKLIN Q. CLITAR
  • 2. Judgment.. • The second act of the intellect by which it pronounces the agreement or disagreement between terms and ideas. • It is the act by which the intellect compares and expresses the objective identity or non- identity between ideas. Ideas in themselves are neither true nor false.
  • 3. • Example : The term “ lady ” and the term “ beautiful ” are neither true nor false. But when the intellect compares these two terms and expresses whether they agree or disagree in a statement, then we can say whether the statement is true or false. Thus, the sentence “The lady is beautiful.” could now be said to be true or false. The intellect making judgment therefore either affirms or denies.
  • 4. Proposition • external sign of judgment w/c express declarative sentence. • provides reason, explanation to support a judgment made expresses an idea, explanation feeling or emotion. • can be analyzed as either true or false • definition a statement which affirms or denies something about a reality or object.
  • 5. Components of A Proposition 1. Subject term- being talk about the predicate. a) Quantifier- words w/c determines the quantity. 2. Copula- are expressed in the verb ‘to be’ - determines the quality. 3. Predicate term- the one that describe the subject.
  • 6. 2 kinds of Proposition • Affirmative Proposition- Expresses agreement between two terms • Negative Proposition- Expresses disagreement between two terms
  • 7. Quality of the Proposition The quality of proposition is determined by the quality of the copula Affirmative  whenever the predicate term accepts something of the subject term All roses are flowers. Negative  whenever the predicate term negates or denies something of the subject term A squash is not an eggplant.
  • 8. A. Proposition in terms of Quality (Copula) 1. Affirmative proposition that uses affirmative Copula 2. Negative proposition that uses negative Copula B. Truth and Falsity (proposition in terms of Reality) 1. True proposition- is the proposition that agree to the reality 2. False proposition- is a proposition that disagree the reality
  • 9. C. Proposition in terms of Quantity (Quantifier) 1. Particular Proposition- is a proposition that uses particular subject term. Ex. Some, several, few and etc. • Several movie directors are passionate. 2. Universal Proposition- is a proposition that uses singular, indefinite, collective and universal w/c focuses on subject term. Ex. This, that, all, every, each, any, group and no quantifier but it’s ends in ‘S’ • All government officials are natural- born citizens.
  • 10. Combination of a Quantity and Quality of Proposition 1. Universal Affirmative Proposition- A” Proposition“ 2. Particular Affirmative Proposition- “I” Proposition 3. Universal Negative Proposition- “E” Proposition 4. Particular Negative Proposition- “O” Proposition
  • 11. Proposition Quantity Quality A Universal or Affirmative Singular E Universal or Negative Singular I Particular Affirmative O Particular Negative
  • 12.  All affirmative propositions share their extensions to the subject terms and by doing so the predicate gives some of its parts to the subject  subject is drawn to the extension of the predicate  In Negative propositions the subject is excluded from the extension of the predicate  No relationship exists b/w the subject and the predicate
  • 13. Special types of Proposition I. Categorical Proposition  a proposition whose Predicate is Directly attributed to the Subject.  Answerable by true or false and yes or no directly.  Predicate is always pointing our the subject directly.  proposition by which the affirmation or denial b/w two concepts is expressed in an Absolute, Immediate, Direct or Unconditional manner Ex. Mangyans are the minorities from Mindoro.
  • 14. Kinds of Categorical A. Single Categorical Proposition- a proposition having 1S and 1P, whose P is directly attributed to the S. Ex. Rema is pretty. 2 types of Single Categorical Proposition a) Simple Proposition- is a proposition w/a 1S,1P and has NO MODIFICATION to the S,P and to the C. Ex. She is simple. b) Composite Proposition- is a proposition w/a 1S,1P and has a MODIFICATIONS to the S,P,C and to the S and P. Ex. The boy at the back is late.(S is modified) The boy is 15 mins. Late.(P is modified) The boy must be late.(C is modified)
  • 15. 2 types of Composite a. Complex- Subject, Predicate, subject and predicate are modified. b. Modal- Copula is modified. Modal Proposition- is a proposition whose Copula is modified in order to show the MANNER or MODE how the Predicate belong to the Subject.
  • 16. Kinds of Modal 1. Necessary Modal- a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P MUST BELONG or (necessarily belong) to the S. FORMULA: MUST BE Ex. A circle must be round. 2. Impossible Modal- a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P CANNOT/DOES NOT belong to the S. FORMULA: CANNOT BE Ex. A square cannot be round.
  • 17. 3. Possible Modal- a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P CAN BELONG/MIGHT to the S. FORMULA: CAN BE/MIGHT BE Ex. I might be shopping tomorrow 4. Contingent Modal- is a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P NEED NOT BELONG to the S. FORMULA: NEED NOT BE/LONG
  • 18. B. Multiple Categorical Proposition- a proposition w/c is a combination of two or more proposition uses 1S,2P,2S,1P,2S,2P,2S,3P,3S,2P,3S,3P and etc. Ex. Argene is handsome and smart. o Argene is handsome. o Argene is smart.
  • 19. Kinds of multiple proposition 1. overtly multiple- plainly multiple(obviously) 2. covertly multiple- it appears to be single but actually multiple. • Copulative- is a proposition that has 2 or more SUBJECT/ PREDICATE combined into 1. It uses conjunction such as AND. E.g. mira and steph are dancer and singer. Mira is dancer. Mira is singer. Steph is dancer. Steph is singer.
  • 20. • Adversative-combination of 2 proposition that are opposed to each other, with the conjunction; BUT, YET, ALTHOUG, EVEN THOUGH. E.g. • We bathed the dog, but we couldn’t get him clean. • You see yet do not hear. • This technology, although not a foolproof way to monitor abusers, might give victims advance warning that danger is approaching. • Even though she is ignorant but she is fine.
  • 21. • Relative- 2 proposition that is combines, where the predicate have relation in terms of times and places; WHILE, AFTER, BEFORE. e.g. Before you go, turn of the light. She is watching while eating. After the class, I play volleyball.
  • 22. • Causal- combination of 2 proposition of it is cause/reason for the other. BECAUSE, FOR e.g. You got 5 because you didn’t take your examination test. • Comparative- combination of 2 proposition expresses degree of comparison. • (GREATER, MORE THAN) E.g. Zerods is more smarter Than Earl.