1. Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update

3. ? ? ? ? ? ?

4. What the hell kind of call was that!?!

5. ? ? ? ? ? ?

6. The Basics What are the details of the TPEP process?

7. The Criteria How do the new teacher and principal criteria relate to each other?

8. A 4-Tiered System How does using a four-tier system change people’s thinking?

9. Next Steps In the end, what should be taken into account in the evaluation?

10. The Basics What are the details of the TPEP process?

11. 4-Tiers Criteria State Basiclanguage linking achievement Details of achievement linkage Specific protocols and timelines Pilot Districts Rubrics for criteria Framework of Instruction Formula for summative ranking

12. Timeline 2010-11 Pilot districts develop “models” to use in implementing the new evaluation standards. These models will likely include indicators, rubrics and protocols. 2011-12 The pilot districts will use the new models. End of 2011-12 Superintendent Dorn is charged with analyzing the work of the pilots and making a recommendation to the legislature.

13. 4-Tiers Criteria State Basiclanguage linking achievement Details of achievement linkage Specific protocols and timelines Pilot Districts Rubrics for criteria Framework of Instruction Formula for summative ranking

14. 4-Tiers Criteria State Basiclanguage linking achievement ? ? ? Details of achievement linkage Specific protocols and timelines Pilot Districts Rubrics for criteria Framework of Instruction Formula for summative ranking

15. Timeline 2010-11 Pilot districts develop “models” to use in implementing the new evaluation standards. These models will likely include indicators, rubrics and protocols. 2011-12 The pilot districts will use the new models. End of 2011-12 Superintendent Dorn is charged with analyzing the work of the pilots and making a recommendation to the legislature. 2012-13 All districts will do the preparation work needed to use the new models. 2013-14 All districts will use the new models as the basis for evaluating their teachers and principals.

16. Timeline 2010-11 Pilot districts develop “models” to use in implementing the new evaluation standards. These models will likely include indicators, rubrics and protocols. 2011-12 The pilot districts will use the new models. End of 2011-12 Superintendent Dorn is charged with analyzing the work of the pilots and making a recommendation to the legislature. 2012-13 All districts will do the preparation work needed to use the new models. 2013-14 All districts will use the new models as the basis for evaluating their teachers and principals. Regional Implementation Grants 5-10 Districts in each ESD may apply to receive resources for implementing the new evaluation models one year early.

17. Timeline 2010-11 Pilot districts develop “models” to use in implementing the new evaluation standards. These models will likely include indicators, rubrics and protocols. 2011-12 The pilot districts will use the new models. End of 2011-12 Superintendent Dorn is charged with analyzing the work of the pilots and making a recommendation to the legislature. 2012-13 All districts will do the preparation work needed to use the new models. 2013-14 All districts will use the new models as the basis for evaluating their teachers and principals. Regional Implementation Grants 5-10 Districts in each ESD may apply to receive resources for implementing the new evaluation models one year early. Regional Implementation Grant districts use the new evaluation models for at least 20% of their teachers, all provisional and all principals.

18. The Criteria How do the new teacher and principal criteria relate to each other?

19. TEACHER EVALUATION CRITERIA

20. PRINCIPAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

21. Teachers: “fostering and managing a safe, positive learning environment.” “collaborative and collegial practices focused on improving instructional practice and student learning.” Principals: “creating a school culture that promotes the ongoing improvement of learning and teaching for students and staff.” “providing for school safety.”

22. Teachers: “using multiple student data elements to modify instruction and improve student learning.” Principals: “development, implementation, and evaluation of a data-driven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements.”

23. Teachers: “providing clear and intentional focus on subject matter content and curriculum.” Principals: “assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment with state and local district learning goals.”

24. Teachers: Implementing the instructional framework Principals: “monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and assessment practices.”

25. Teachers: “communicating and collaborating with parents and school community.” Principals: “partnering with the school community to promote learning.”

27. A 4-Tiered System How does using a four-tier system change people’s thinking?

28. Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

29. Exemplary Proficient Basic Unsatisfactory

30. Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

32. Exemplary ? Proficient ? Basic Unsatisfactory

33. Under what circumstances might teachers and principals consider evidence gathering as a positive thing in their evaluations?

34. Wary/Welcome Activity Why might teachers and principals be wary of a 4-tier evaluation system? Why might they welcome it?

36. Satisfactory, That is not enough as to say one is average, or adequate or moderate. I want to be loved for who I am.

37. Next Steps In the end, what should be taken into account in the evaluation?

39. Teacher Evaluation Criteria

40. Principal Evaluation Criteria

44. E2SSB 6696 When available, student growth data that is referenced in the evaluation process must be based on multiple measures that can include classroom-based, school-based, district-based, and state-based tools. As used in this subsection, “student growth” means the change in student achievement between two points in time. SIG (MERIT) Implement rigorous, transparent and equitable evaluation systems for teachers and principals which are developed with staff and use student growth as significant factor. Identify and reward school leaders and teachers who have increased student achievement and graduation rates; identify and remove those who, after ample opportunities to improve professional practice, have not done so. Implement such strategies as financial incentives and career ladders for recruiting, placing and retaining effective teachers

47. Data Content Instruction Culture Community

48. Three Task Forces Training

51. Many Present Teacher-Evaluation Models

52. Governors State University Principal Evaluation Model

53. SIG/Merit Evaluation Model

54. Arne Duncan’s Principal Evaluation Model

55. Resources

57. Gallupstudentpoll.com Track your students’ engagement, hope and well being

58. Success at the Core http://successatthecore.com Videos and facilitators’ guides designed to develop schools’ leadership teams and individual teachers’ skills in the classroom.

59. AWSP’s Online GPS (Great Principals’ Strategies)

60. PRINCIPAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

62. College Entrance Requirements At Stewart Elementary School, we want students to begin thinking about college early, so we display the college entrance requirements in our hallway. This helps to set the tone that this is a place to learn, and if students work hard, they will all be prepared for learning after high school.