Harley AAUP 5.18.10

Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: Faculty Values and Needs in Twelve Disciplines Diane Harley, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California, Berkeley Project Website and Associated Document Links: http:// cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc AAUP, June 18, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT Copyright 2010, Center for Studies in Higher Education

Why Study Users? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Motivations and Approach ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Distinguish: In-progress communication VS fully peer-reviewed archival publication ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Methods ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Informants ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Interview Protocols/Topics ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Identified Faculty Needs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Current Publishing Landscape ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The current publishing landscape (cont’d) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The current publishing landscape (cont’d) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

T&P as flexible system? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Peer Review and Advancement Process ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Peer Review in Promotion and Publishing are Separate but Deeply Intertwined ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Peer review is the coin of the realm ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Peer Review: Problems and New Models. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Abbott’s "generational paradigms" (AAUP 2008) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Steve Pinker vs Nick Carr Crowdsourced “Digital Humanities Now” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Faculty Expectations re SC ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Perceptions: Enhanced Capabilities of Electronic Communication (Electronic not always = to OA) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Giving it Away? Sharing Publications ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Giving it Away? Sharing Publications ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Barriers to Sharing Data ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Collaboration ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Conclusions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Mythology ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in Twelve Disciplines Diane Harley, Principal Investigator Center for Studies in Higher Education University of California, Berkeley Project Website and Associated Document Links: http:// cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication http:// escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc [email_address] Copyright 2010, Center for Studies in Higher Education

Harley AAUP 5.18.10

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

En vedette

En vedette (7)

Similaire à Harley AAUP 5.18.10

Similaire à Harley AAUP 5.18.10 (20)

Plus de Association of University Presses

Plus de Association of University Presses (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Harley AAUP 5.18.10