While teachers’ peer observation is receiving widespread interest, and is being implemented in numerous institutions in different fields of education around the world (more than 40% of US colleges and universities now use classroom peer observation), it is still looked upon with much wariness within most Arab countries ELT context, which is presently leading to consensual reluctance to incorporating it within the MENA regions’ ELT community and public schools alike. In the light of this, touchstones of this paper are twofold: on the one hand, it is an attempt to dissociate the traditional notion of observation from the modern one, based on reflective aims rather than evaluative ends. On the other hand, it endeavors to promote a systematic incorporation of peer observation within the professional and pedagogical continuous training of Moroccan public schools. Will peer observation’s implementation be an easy task? Of course not; otherwise, we would not be talking about “ELT global challenges.” To reach this end, the paper comprises five main parts

1. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
Towards
a
Reflective
Classroom
Peer-­Observation
Abdeslam
Badre
ii. Introduction
While teachers’ peer observation is receiving widespread interest, and is being
implemented in numerous institutions in different fields of education around the world
(more than 40% of US colleges and universities now use classroom peer observation), it is
still looked upon with much wariness within most Arab countries ELT context, which is
presently leading to consensual reluctance to incorporating it within the MENA regions’
ELT community and public schools alike. There appears to be some controversial
uncertainty, if not allodoxaphobia, over the rationale and the outcomes of such an
invaluable pedagogical tool. Part of this reluctance springs from a perpetual confusion in
the mind of some educationalists (by this I mean both teachers and practitioners) between
peer observation and regular observation at one level, and summative versus formative
observation at another level. The other part of this negative attitude is traced back in time
during pre-service and while-service observations teachers had with their senior teachers
or advisors. In either cases and particularly with in-service teachers, observation is
associated with evaluation and not with professional development per see. It is often
viewed as a potentially threatening experience in which teachers are often reluctant to take
part once they complete their initial training (Freeman, 1982).
In light of this, touchstones of this paper are twofold: on the one hand, it is an
attempt to dissociate the traditional notion of observation from the modern one, based on
reflective aims rather than evaluative ends. On the other hand, it endeavors to promote a
systematic incorporation of peer observation within the professional and pedagogical
continuous training of Moroccan public schools. Will peer observation’s implementation
be an easy task? Of course not; otherwise, we would not be talking about “ELT global
challenges.” To reach this end, the paper comprises five main parts: 1) types and purposes
of observation; 2) traditional view versus reflective view on observation; 3) phases of
Observation; 4) strengths and downsides of peer observation; and 5) observation
instruments. Before tackling the first subsidiary part, I would like to establish a brief
definition of the concept “reflective/reflection” from an applied linguistic perspective.
i. Concept definition: “Reflection”
D.A. Schon (1983) defines “reflection” as an “active persistent and careful
consideration of any belief or presupposition of knowledge.” J. Dewey (1987) took
Schon’s definition to a higher level, and talked about “reflection-in-action, ” which he
defines as a “reflective conversation with the material of a given situation/context.” In his
Experiential
Learning
Theory,
David
A.
Kolb
proposes
four
principal
stages
one
of
which
is
“Reflective
Observation
(RO)
for
effective
learning.
Shared
among
these
1

2. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
three
definitions
is
the
notion
of
“persistent
consideration”
of
one’s
“knowledge”
of
classrooms’
practices.
The
intent
of
this
“persistent
consideration”
should
lead
observers,
accordingly,
to
the
consideration
-­‐if
not
analysis-­‐
of
the
internal
as
well
as
external
factors
that
govern
a
teaching
situation,
before
questioning
the
pedagogical
motives
or
judging
the
teacher’s
instructional
decisions.
Reflective
observation,
in
this
regard,
drives
home
the
idea
of
multiplicities
of
learning-­‐teaching
styles,
along
with
teacher’s
in-­‐action
remedial
decisions
in
the
mind
of
the
observer.
I. Types and Purposes of Observation
 Regular Observation: it is the event of having pre-service or a novice in-service
teacher observing one of the senior’s teachers’ classes before the former has
his/her class observed by an advisor or a senior teacher who is supposed to a
provide an oral or written feedback on what has been observed. A discernible
feature of this type of observation is the asymmetrical power-relationship that
governs both the observed teacher and observer. Observation in this context tends
to be more judgmental and feedback is represented in a more official manner.
Because of its evaluative nature and horizontal power-sharing structure, novice
teachers tend to bread a negative impression toward this form of observation.
 Peer Observation: unlike the previous type, peer observation is arranged between
peer teachers, usually teaching the same instructional levels, and with relatively the
same professional experience. It is not a compulsory event in the sense that a
teacher may deliberately ask to observe his/her colleague’s class or have his/her
colleague observe one of the classes for the sake of exchanging feedback and
optimizing teaching strategies. The nature of feedback in this vein may range from
a verbal “thank you for having me in your class” statement into a face-to-face
verbal or/and written feedback session.
 Three-way observation: this third form of observation was first introduced at an
American college and then has slowly started to spread among other colleges. Its
framework is similar to the regular observation with the inclusion of a student’s
perspective. The rationale behind having a student taking part in teacher’s
observation is originated from a learner-centered premise, which underlines the
pivotal value of students’ reflections on teachers’ practices.
Besides
its
educational
as
well
as
pedagogical
benefits,
classroom
observation
serves
administrative
purposes.
For
instance,
while
formative observation assists in
improving teachers’ teaching tools and promoting cooperative teaching environment,
summative observation involves the evaluation of teaching effectiveness used for merit,
and/or promotion, or other purposes of the same nature.
Gains from Observation, however,
remains dependent on the way the nature of teaching is understood by observers and
observed alike.
To
be
remembered
here
is
the
idea
that
both formative and summative
observations can be based on the same observation instruments, though both forms differ
in procedures and aims.
2

3. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
II. Traditional view versus Reflective view on classroom observation
For quite a long period of the recent past, classroom observation typically consisted of
subjective data based on personal and anecdotal accounts of effective teaching. Novice
teachers’ teaching skills’ acquisition depended on the mastery of specific repertoire of
observable behaviors that included but not limited to:
 How teacher starts and ends a lesson
 How teacher allots times within a lesson
 How teacher assigns tasks to students
 How teacher organizes learning groups
 How teacher monitors students’ task performance
 How teacher asks questions
 How teacher reinforces students’ answers
In short, the observer role was limited to observe, describe, and then comment on the
“how” dimension of the observed. Being as such, not only did the feedback use to be
reductionist and subjective, for it used to be based on a biased data collection and analysis,
but also it used to threaten novice teachers’ creativity and lack of confidence toward their
own teaching style.
With the advent of systematic classroom observation method, objective and
reliable measures of observation started to be implemented; thus a debate on reflection on
teaching, learning, and observation have become more of necessity than a choice.
Classroom observation within this conceptual framework goes beyond a focus on the
identification of the techniques and strategies experienced teachers employ. It has become
as an opportunity for teachers to develop a critically reflective stance to their own
teaching: Observers main task has become an objective data collection through the use of
systematic instruments that can be used to develop deeper understanding of HOW and
WHY the observed teachers teach the way they do. Accordingly, paving the way for both
cooperating and observed teachers to develop reflective approaches to teaching the same
lesson in various ways.
III.
Phases
of
Observation
III.1. Pre-Observation Conference Guidelines
The aim behind holding the pre-observation conference is for the observed teacher
to assign the observer a goal for the observation and a task to accomplish. The task would
involve collecting information about the lesson goals, objectives, used
strategies/methodology, and form of assessment. Both teachers may agree upon
observation procedures or instruments to be used during this session and arrange a
schedule for the observations. The following is a list of questions that the observer might
ask the observed teacher:
 What is the main goal of your course?
 What is the main goal of the course session to be observed?
3

4. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
 What is your specific objective for the course session to be observed? In other
words, what do you expect the learners to be able to know and do by the end of
your session?
 What strategies/ methods will you use to help the learners to reach this objective?
 How will you assess whether the learners reached this objective? In other words,
how will they show that they know and can do what you expected of them?
 Do you have any concerns that you would like the observer to address?
III.2. While-observing phase
The second stage of observation is a time wherein the visitation takes place. Using the
agreed-upon tools and procedures, the teacher observing should complete the observation
task without interfering in the performance of the teacher being, or in the teaching learning
process in progress. The main criteria that are controlled through different forms of
systematic checklists or grids are:
 Organization of the lesson: the opening, structuring, transitioning, and closure of
the lesson.
 Time management: allotment of time of different activities during the lesson.
 Students’ performance on tasks: the strategies, procedures, and interactions
patterns employed by students in completing tasks.
 Time on task: the extent to which students were actively engaged during task.
 Teacher’s questions & students’ responses: the types of questions the teacher asks
during a lesson, the way students respond, and the way the responses are either
reinforced or refuted.
 Teacher’s explanation: the way the teacher explains vocabulary, grammar, and/or
syntactic items during the lesson.
 Teacher’s action zone: the extent to which the teacher interacts with some
students more frequently than others during the lesson.
 Students’ performance during pair/group-work activities: Teacher’s arrangement
of students into small groups, monitoring of students’ time-on-task during group
work, the dynamics of group work activities, students’ use of L1 Vs. L2 during
group work, and the kind of responses they make.
 Classroom interaction: the way the teacher monitors both teacher-student and
student-student interactions.
 Use of textbook: the extent to which the teacher resorts to the textbook during the
lesson and the types of departure made from it.
4

5. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
Annex I at the end of this paper displays the above-motioned items, along with other
relevant questions. The model is adapted from Jack C. Richards’ classroom observation
form.
III.3. Post Observation Conferencing Guidelines
The post observation session is the time where both teachers meet again for data
presentation and Analysis; and the “how to” and “why” dimensions are questioned and
justified for the sake of understanding, reinforcing and suggesting different alternatives.
No judgments or evaluative are to be made: the teacher observer’s task here is on the one
hand, to highlight the strongest points, activities, strategies, and techniques used by the
performing teacher; on the other hand, s/he may inquire about the reasons and rationales
of unclear situations then go no suggesting some alternatives.
Schedule this conference within a week of the observation. As to the timing of the post-
observation conference, the sooner it is held the more effective its outcomes are going to
be. In other words, teachers should not hold the meeting weeks or months after the
observation took place, because in the latter’s case it would be difficult to discuss or
explain what have happened during the observation. Also, it is always recommended for
the observer to start his/her feedback with a positive comment while providing an honest
feedback.
V. Strengths and downsides of peer observation
Highlighted in this last section are both the strengths and downsides of peer
observation
V.1. Advantages of Peer Observation
 Gaining new ideas and perspectives about teaching from colleagues
 Both observer and observe may improve teaching ability
 Good training for teacher training and ELT management
 Teachers might take feedback better if it comes from other teachers : they might
take suggestions on how their class could have been improved better if it comes
from a fellow teacher
 Letting teachers pair themselves up can also help make sure they get comments
from someone whose opinion they respect and they will be happy to get
constructive criticism from
 Teachers can get different feedback from different people : This is obviously a
good thing, and one which can be further developed by matching teachers with
people who have very different teaching styles and by having each observer
especially looking for different things
5

6. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
 Both the person being observed and the person observing learn This is the biggest
advantage of peer observations. Teachers observing not only learn how to observe,
but also see different ways of doing things in other people's classrooms and can see
both good things and bad things that will make them reflect on what goes on in
their own classroom
 makes the teachers understand how difficult observing and feedback can be When
teachers have experienced trying to put a positive spin on criticism of someone's
lesson, they should hopefully understand the difficulties the DoS has next time
they are being officially observed
 It can boost a teacher's confidence Although teachers observing other people's
lessons can tend to underestimate how much hard work the teacher is putting in,
they still get a much more realistic picture of how other teachers are doing than
they would get from just hearing the laughter coming through the wall.
V.2. Disadvantages of Peer Observation
As mentioned in the introduction, implimenting classroom peer observation as a
pedagogical tool is both a gain and a challenge, especially within the context of Moroccan
public schools that are already facing a number of structural, logistic, and human capital
challenges. Thoughout this paper arguments on the befefits of peer obervation have been
highlighted. This, of course, does not mean that peer observation is free of any
shortcomings. There is a relative consensus among pratictioners over some weak points
that I have outlined below.
 Possible bias relating to the observer's own beliefs about teaching
 Without a systematic approach--including observer training, multiple visits, and
use of reliable observation instruments--peer observation may not be a valid
method for summative evaluation
 Teachers seeing a "worse" teacher can get lazy. The negative version of a teacher's
confidence being boosted by seeing the less than perfect lessons of others is that
they could think "My lessons are already better than that. What was I putting all
that effort into them for?"
 Teachers need training on how to observe and be observed. At a basic level,
teachers need to be introduced to a range of different observation tasks (looking at
classroom interactions, use of time, language used by the teacher, staging etc) and
different ways of writing that data down in a factual way.
 It can actually take teachers more time management as well as training to observe
each other,
 Teachers might think they know better than the person who observed
 The feedback might not be as useful as feedback from the senior teachers
 The feedback might be insensitive
 The fact that it is extra work might give people a bad attitude
 The students might get the idea that something is wrong: especially those students
might have been in EFL classes long enough that they know that if an observer
appears it usually means that another student has been complaining, in which case
6

7. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
you can imagine they might start to doubt their teacher is they have observers in
every couple of weeks! Solutions include having regular observations as a selling
point in the school brochure (for reasons of class quality and teacher development),
and telling them that the observer is there to learn from watching their expert
teacher rather than to judge them
Conclusion
To sum it up, just like all forms of observations, and/or professional development tools, an
effective classroom peer observation requires an observation instrument designed to
portray the classroom environment as accurately and reliably as possible; not to reflect the
teacher observing view or evaluation of the observed teacher’s performance. This is why
the observers are not to ask questions or participate in activities during class; such
behavior can detract from and invalidate the observations. He/she can be briefly
introduced to the students, with an equally brief explanation of why the observer is
present; then move on. The observer should be in the observed classroom a way ahead of
class starting time. Additionally, both teachers should invest some times reviewing and
discussing the results from the completed Classroom Observation Instruments. Finally, it
is always important for the observer to begin the conference with a positive comment and
still provide honest, constructive feedback.
7

8. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
Classroom Observation Form
Observer: Date:
Observed teacher: Time:
Observed Period: Level:
Students Category: Room Number:
1. Organization of the lesson: the opening, structuring, transitioning, and closure of
the lesson.
2. Time management: allotment of time of different activities during the lesson.
3. Students’ performance on tasks: the strategies, procedures, and interactions
patterns employed by students in completing tasks.
4. Time on task: the extent to which students were actively engaged during task.
5. Teacher’s questions & students’ responses: the types of questions the teacher asks
during a lesson, the way students respond, and the way the responses are either
reinforced or refuted.
6. Teacher’s explanation: the way the teacher explains vocabulary, grammar, and/or
syntactic items during the lesson.
7. Teacher’s action zone: the extent to which the teacher interacts with some
students more frequently than others during the lesson.
8. Students’ performance during pair/group-work activities: Teacher’s arrangement
of students into small groups, monitoring of students’ time-on-task during group
work, the dynamics of group work activities, students’ use of L1 Vs. L2 during
group work, and the kind of responses they make.
9. Classroom interaction: the way the teacher monitors both teacher-student and
student-student interactions.
10. Use of textbook: the extent to which the teacher resorts to the textbook during the
lesson and the types of departure made from it.
8

9. January, 2010 Abdeslam
Badre
Key
Readings
1. Latham G P, van den Berg P, Wiersma U J, (1995). Dutch Reactions to Behavioral
Observation, Behavioral Expectation, and Trait Scales. Group & Organization
Management (USA) . Vol.: 20; Issue: 3; P.: 297-310.
2. Edwards M R, (1996). Improving performance with 360-degree feedback. Career
Development International (UK). Vol.: 1; Issue: 3; P. 5
Web-bliography
1. Alex Case, (2008). UsingEnglish.com
2. Jack C. Richards and Charles Lockhart. “Teacher Development Through Peer
Observation.”
9