1. ADHER Partner Meeting
DRAFT
MINUTES
Milos, 25-28 June 2010
In attendance: Apologies from:
Yvonne von Beck, MEWCAT, GR Barbara Vogrinec, CPZ, SI
Marc Pillich-Wright, BLSH, RO Fabrizio Boldrini, VM, IT
Merve Duygulu, AHEM, TR
Nerute Kligiene, MII, LT
Agenda items:
1. Curricula, Leaflet to be produced, work division
This item was not actually discussed at the meeting. But to clarify its inclusion in minutes, it refers to;
i) A global learning plan for the participants – over the course of the mobility visits, we should have an outline of a
learning plan that all participants can say they have followed, in part or in full.
ii) The leaflet (or newsletter, as it is referred to in other documents) is to be produced to accompany the formal report
written by each HOST partner after each mobility visit. The leaflet should be produced in English (for global
dissemination) and the host partner’s own language (for local dissemination).
iii) Work division, refers to the Work Package documents distributed by AHEM.
2. Exchange of good practices and methodologies among countries
Marc showed the participant feedback form written and used by BLSH for the mobility visit to Italy. It was agreed that the form
would be distributed for adaptation and use by all partners.
3. Defining the responsibilities for every partner for the next 2 months
It was decided that in addition to the Work Package 2 responsibilities of each partner organisation; the only additions would be
MEWCAT’s evaluation report for the Milos Mobility Visit and MII’s preparations for the Vilnius Mobility Visit which will be held
during 17-20 September 2010.
4. Expressing ideas about promotion measures to increase civil society involvement
Each of the partner countries has varying methods of encouraging civil involvement in cultural events and education – each
equally justified. It was decided that these different methods would be indicated and evaluated by the host partners in their own
individual evaluation reports after each mobility visit.
5. Analysis of problems about cultural heritages at local level
As with the methods mentioned in Item 4, each of the partner countries has different ways of dealing with the threats to their
own cultural heritage. It was decided that these threats would be identified and evaluated by the host partners in their own
individual evaluation reports after each mobility visit.
6. Making studies on “ADOPT YOUR HERITAGE” booklet
It was decided that the final evaluation document for the project would take the form of a brochure/catalogue. The final size
format of the brochure will need to be confirmed at a later date.
However, the layout of the information within was decided upon;
i) A summarised introduction, written in ‘layman’s terms’ to the global objectives of the project.
ii) Chronological description of each mobility visit (organisation, location, chosen heritages, reasons for choosing,
participant feedback, and photos.
iii) Testimonials and contacts page.
To ensure that each partners’ contribution is in the same/similar format, Marc will generate a ‘form-type’ model for each partner
to complete.
7. Evaluating the workshop and the meeting by the participants
The overall consensus from the group was that the workshop and meeting hosted by Yvonne and MEWCAT was a great
success.
The workshop itself at the Milos Conference Centre was very informative, in particular the very comprehensive presentation by
Gina, the curator of the Milos Folk Museum.
Leonidas’ wonderfully enthusiastic tour of Milos’ focal points and of course the freshly made cheese pies and Baklava at Stella’s
bakery will stay in mind for some time to come!