Large scale construction projects suffer from cost and time overruns that are typically a symptom of productivity problems and directly affect overall industry profitability. As a result, methodologies have been developed to reduce the risk of overruns and improve project outcomes. A number of these methods are based upon Lean production principles that focus on identifying value, eliminating waste and creating a smooth flow of materials, information and work. The application of Lean to construction is based upon treating the construction site as a temporary production line and is referred to as Lean Construction.
Agile methods have been found to improve the reliability of project delivery in complex environments, by decomposing the scope into small manageable parts, then completing these parts in order of greatest value. Although Agile and Lean methods share many common values and principles, Agile methods have not been properly investigated as a means of reducing the overruns associated with large scale construction projects.
1. Agile and Lean
for
Construction
September 2011 Engineering Innovation.
Friday, 23 September 2011
2. Construction Project Overruns Engineering Innovation.
Sydney Opera Channel Tunnel Boston Arterial
House Final cost 80% Tunnel
Final cost 15 more than was Final cost 196%
times more than originally planned more than was
was originally originally planned
planned
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
3. Project Overruns Engineering Innovation.
Construction Industry Software Industry
Source: 2002 Journal of the American Planning Association Source: 2009 Chaos Report - Standish Group
• 90% projects exceed costs • 68% projects exceed cost or
time or did not satisfy scope
• Overruns of between
50% to 100% • Average overruns of 43%
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
4. Cause of Construction Overruns Engineering Innovation.
• Poor or incomplete design and documentation
• Client scope change during construction
• Mistakes during construction
• Delays in decision making or instructions
• Poor communication and information dissemination
• Poor planning and scheduling
• Weather
• Labour skills, availability or disputes
• Incorrect material types or quantity
Sources:
Baloyi and Bekker - Causes of construction cost and time overruns 2010
Memon, Rahman and Azis - Preliminary Study on Causative Factors Leading to Construction Cost Overrun 2011
Alwi, Hampson and Sherif - Non Value-Adding Activities in Australian Construction Projects 2002
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
6. Construction Productivity Engineering Innovation.
Manufacturing Construction
57%
26%
62% 10%
12% 33%
Non-Value Added Support Activity Value Added
Source: Construction Industry Institute
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
7. Lean and
Construction
Engineering Innovation.
Friday, 23 September 2011
8. Lean Fundamentals Engineering Innovation.
Lean originated as an approach to improving manufacturing
systems by focusing on creating value and eliminating waste.
Lean has now come GOAL: Shortest Time, Best Quality, Lowest Cost,
Greatest Safety and Highest Morale
to represent a way of
FLOW PEOPLE QUALITY
thinking and a set of Continuous Leaders as
Quality Control
practices that can be Flow
Pull Systems
Coaches
Collaboration
Error Proofing
applied to almost any Integrated Seeing the Real
Root-Cause
Analysis
work process. Logisitics Thing
Standardise Visual Continuous
Process Management Improvement
Philosophy / Principles
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
9. Lean Construction
fully occupied and profitable.! This is an example of the waste of
common in mass production. Engineering Innovation.
These features highlight the importance of the influence of Ford’s
conscious design of the production system set in place for the Empire
Lean Construction is an adaption of Lean
They lead us to identify it as a mass construction system4.
principles and practices to the design and Empire State Building
execution of construction projects.
Lean Construction supplements traditional
construction management approaches by
focusing on:
1. Creating material and
information flows
2. Maximising value generation
3. Using plan, execute and
control paradigms
Fig. 2: Construction of the Empire Source: Willis and Friedman 1998
State Building (Willis and Friedman
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011 Introducing the term mass construction to define practices to create
10. Lean Construction Engineering Innovation.
Shared Principles
• Optimisation of entire system through collaboration and systematic
learning
• Continual improvement and pursuit of perfection involving everyone
in the system
• Focus on delivering the value desired by the owner/client/end-user
• Creating flow though systematically eliminating obstacles to value
creation and elimination of processes that create no value (waste)
• Creating pull production
Key Differences
• Construction projects are unique (one-of-a-kind) prototypes
• Multiple suppliers act under different commercial arrangements
• Construction environments are typically outdoors and/or difficult to
control
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
11. Seven Wastes within Lean Engineering Innovation.
1. Waiting Extra Waste:
2. Motion 8. Under-Utilised
People
3. Over Processing
4. Over Production
5. Transportation
6. Inventory
7. Correction / Defect
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
12. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Waiting Waste
Also known as delay, waiting
refers to the periods of inactivity
that occur because a preceding
activity didn’t deliver on time or
finish completely. Waiting waste
increases cycle time during
which no value-added activity is
performed
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
13. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Motion Waste
This term refers to the extra
steps taken by people to
accommodate inefficient process
layout, defects, reprocessing,
overproduction or excess
inventory. Motion takes time and
adds no value to the product or
service. To move and add value
is called work. To move and not
add value is called motion.
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
14. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Over Processing Waste
This term generally refers
to unnecessary steps in operations,
such as reprocessing, double-
handling, added communication
and double-checking which adds no
value to the product or service.
Over-processing is often inserted
into a process as a result of
dealing with defects,
overproduction or excess inventory.
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
15. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Over Production Waste
Overproduction occurs when
operations continue after they
should have stopped. It’s
producing more than is needed,
faster than needed or before it is
needed. This results in product
being produced in excess of what’s
required, products being made too
early, and excess inventory carrying
costs.
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
16. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Transportation Waste
This is unnecessary motion or
movement of products or materials
that does not directly support
immediate production, such as
materials being transported from one
job-site to another or materials being
transported from the job-site back to
the Building Partner. Ideally transport
should be minimised for two
reasons: It adds time to the process
during which no value-added activity
is being performed, and the material
is exposed to handling damage.
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
17. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Inventory Waste
This refers to any supply (materials
or goods) in excess of what is
required to build the current homes
under construction. Inventory
includes raw materials, work-in-
process and finished goods. Though
not all inventory is unnecessary
waste, excess inventory can quickly
build-up and tie-up dollars and
resources. All Inventory requires
additional handling and space.
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
18. Lean Wastes in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Correction Waste
These are products, materials or
services that do not meet
expectation or conform to
specification. Corrections and
defects are anything not done
correctly the first time and must
be repaired, sorted, re-made or re-
done, as well as materials which are
scrapped due to defects.
Source: http://leanhomebuilding.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/the-7-wastes-on-the-construction-site/
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
19. Challenges for Lean in Construction Engineering Innovation.
Prototypes
Construction projects are unique (one-of-a-kind) prototypes
Environment
Field environment is unpredictable - weather, access, ...
Communication
Teams are geographically separated adding complexity to sharing information
Supply Chain
Projects are typically deliver by multiple suppliers engaged through adversarial
contract agreements
Systems/Tools/Education
Limited systems to support Lean Construction and limited understanding within
the construction industry
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
20. Fundamental Difference Engineering Innovation.
Unique and Project Based
Repeated and
Process Based
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
21. Agile and
Construction
Engineering Innovation.
Friday, 23 September 2011
23. Agile Engineering Innovation.
Agile is an umbrella term for a set of values, principles
and practices.
Management!
Practices!
Technical! Social/Team!
Increase Value Practices! Practices!
Values &!
Principles!
Reduce Risk
Manage Complexity
Empirical control, Continuous monitoring, Heuristics
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
24. Agile Fundamentals Engineering Innovation.
AGILE TECHNICAL
AGILE TEAM PRACTICES
PRACTICES Test-Driven Development
Continuous Integration
Colocation Automated Deployment
Daily Stand Ups Incremental Design and Architecture
Iteration Planning Acceptance Test-Driven Development
Customer Showcase Refactoring
Retrospective Technical Spikes
Adaptive Release Plan Exploratory Testing
Cross-Functional Team Collective Code Ownership
Requirements as Stories Definition of Done
Planning/Story Wall Ubiquitous Language
Informative Workspace PRACTICES
Burn Up/Down Charts
Parking Lot Diagrams
Success Sliders
Planning Poker AGILE PRINCIPLES
Simplicity
PRINCIPLES Transparency
Frequent Delivery
Customer Involvement
Technical Excellence
Team Work
AGILE VALUES VALUES
Self Organisation
Emergent Design
Working Deliverables Continuous Improvement
Human Interactions Sustainable Pace
Customer Collaboration
Responding to Change
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
25. Construction Complexity Engineering Innovation.
Issue Plan
Update Plan
Ideal Plan Construction Site
• Construction projects are not inherently complex - but because of the challenges
encountered during execution they can become complex.
• Because it is difficult to maintain an up-to-date plan - the plan rarely reflects the actual
sequence in which tasks are completed
• Majority of construction tasks are completed based on tacit knowledge and improvisation
at the operational level
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
26. Agile and Complexity Engineering Innovation.
The principles and practices in Agile help reduce the risks associated
with complexity.
Setting and agreeing clear goals and boundaries
Break problem into small pieces and completing in the order of greatest priority
Defer design decisions to the last responsible moment
Retrospection and continuous improvement
Clear definition of done
Measure progress and adapt plans
Encourage group wisdom through team work and cross-functional collaboration
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
27. Brief History Engineering Innovation.
Development of methods to address construction productivity
were conceived at a similar time to development of Agile methods
First paper
published Last Planner
on Scrum System WorkFace
Toyota
method Published Planning
Production
System Published
Lean first First XP
published considered book
applicable for Agile
published Manifesto
construction
1988 1992 1995 1999 2000 2001 2007 Now
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
28. Last Planner
and
WorkFace Planning
Engineering Innovation.
Friday, 23 September 2011
29. Last Planner System Engineering Innovation.
Method for controlling and providing certainty around materials,
resources and work-face dependencies by using a collaborative
approach to pull scheduling.
Last Planner System
Master Schedule Set milestones
and key dates
Should Specify handoffs
Phase Schedule
Do between trades
Can Make ready and
Do Look-Ahead Plan initiate re-planning
as required
Will
Improving
Weekly Work Plan
Feedback Do
& Learning Doing
Progress Tracking
& Done
Measure progress and remedy issues
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
30. Last Planner System Engineering Innovation.
Project Controls
Project Monitoring &
Planning Controlling Master Schedule
Constraints
Field Execution
Weekly Work
Planning
Daily
Standup! Measure
Weekly Work
Plan Kickoff Progress
Make
Ready!
Retrospective
Execute
Field Work!
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
31. Weekly Work Engineering Innovation.
Master Schedule
6 Week Look Ahead
Should Do Can Do
Activities Activities
KANBAN PLANNING BOARD
Can Do Will Do Doing Done
ACTIVITY ACTIVITY ACTIVITY Will Do
ACTIVITY
Activities
ACTIVITY ACTIVITY ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
ACTIVITY ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
Limit
ACTIVITY
Work
ACTIVITY in
ACTIVITY Progress
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
32. WorkFace Planning Engineering Innovation.
WorkFace Planning involves the creation of small, well defined, field
installation Work Packages that support the construction workforce.
A typical Work Package supports one rotation (5 to 10 days) of a work
crew and is based on activities that are extracted directly from the
construction schedule/plan.
Material and Equipment
availability is confirmed Materials,
before Work Packages Equipment
are issued
Master / Phase WorkFace Work
Schedule Planning Packages
A buffer of Work
Packages is maintained
to ensure field work
Drawings, crews are optimally
Specifications utilised
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
33. Agile and Construction Engineering Innovation.
Agile Construction
Iteration/Sprint Planning Weekly Work Plan
User Story Work Package
Story Elaboration WorkFace Planning
Customer Showcase Site Inspection
Retrospective Weekly Review
Burn-Up/Down Charts S-Curve
Adaptive Planning Look-Ahead Planning
Copyright Ennova 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
34. Thank You
Agile and Lean
for Construction
Adrian Smith
Hugh Hofmeister
Engineering Innovation.
Friday, 23 September 2011