2. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 2
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information in this presentation has been prepared as at April 17, 2014. Certain statements contained in this document constitute “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward-looking information” under the provisions of Canadian
provincial securities laws. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “expect”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “will”, “planned”, and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements or information.
Such statements and information include without limitation: statements regarding the timing and closing of the transactions contemplated by the Arrangement
between Agnico Eagle, Yamana, and Osisko Agreement (“Transaction”), statements regarding synergies resulting from the Transaction, statements regarding the
effect of the Transaction on Agnico Eagle’s net asset value, operating cash flow, free cash flow, production, reserves, resources, total cash cost, all-in sustaining
costs, and debt levels, statements regarding timing and amounts of capital expenditures and other assumptions; estimates of future reserves, resources, mineral
production, optimization efforts and sales; estimates of mine life; estimates of future internal rates of return, mining costs, total cash costs, minesite costs, all-in
sustaining costs and other expenses; estimates of future capital expenditures and other cash needs, and expectations as to the funding thereof; statements and
information as to the projected development of certain ore deposits, including estimates of exploration, development and production and other capital costs, and
estimates of the timing of such exploration, development and production or decisions with respect to such exploration, development and production; estimates of
reserves and resources, and statements and information regarding anticipated future exploration; the anticipated timing of events with respect to the Company’s
mine sites and statements and information regarding the sufficiency of the Company’s cash resources. Such statements and information reflect the Company’s
views as at the date of this document and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements
and information. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Agnico Eagle
as of the date of such statements, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. The material factors and
assumptions used in the preparation of the forward looking statements and information contained herein, which may prove to be incorrect, include, but are not
limited to, the assumptions set forth herein and in management's discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) and the Company's Annual Information Form (“AIF”) for the year
ended December 31, 2103 filed with Canadian securities regulators that are included in its Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013
(“Form 40-F”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as well as: that the Transaction is completed on the terms and in the timeframe
expected, that there are no significant disruptions affecting operations; that production, permitting and expansion at each of Agnico Eagle's properties proceeds on a
basis consistent with current expectations and plans; that the relevant metals prices, exchange rates and prices for key mining and construction supplies will be
consistent with Agnico Eagle's expectations; that Agnico Eagle's current estimates of mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and metal recovery are
accurate; that there are no material delays in the timing for completion of ongoing growth projects; that the Company's current plans to optimize production are
successful; and that there are no material variations in the current tax and regulatory environment. Many factors, known and unknown could cause the actual results
to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward looking statements and information. Such risks include, but are not limited to: the volatility
of prices of gold and other metals; uncertainty of mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and mineral recovery estimates; uncertainty of future
production, capital expenditures, and other costs; currency fluctuations; financing of additional capital requirements; cost of exploration and development programs;
mining risks; community protests; risks associated with foreign operations; governmental and environmental regulation; the volatility of the Company’s stock price;
and risks associated with the Company’s byproduct metal derivative strategies. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other factors that may affect the
Company’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this document, see the AIF filed on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and included in the Form 40-F filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov, as well as the Company’s other filings with the Canadian securities regulators and
the SEC. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements and information. For a detailed
breakdown of the Company’s reserve and resource position see the AIF or Form 40-F.
3. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 3
NOTES TO INVESTORS
Note Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This document presents estimates of future “total cash cost per ounce”, “minesite cost per tonne”, and “all-in sustaining cost per ounce” that are not recognized
measures under United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”). This data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers.
These future estimates are based upon the total cash costs per ounce, minesite costs per tonne and all-in sustaining costs per ounce that the Company expects to
incur to mine gold at the applicable sites and do not include production costs attributable to accretion expense and other asset retirement costs, which will vary over
time as each project is developed and mined. It is therefore not practicable to reconcile these forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable
GAAP measure. A reconciliation of the Company’s total cash cost per ounce, all-in sustaining cost per ounce, and minesite cost per tonne to the most comparable
financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with US GAAP for the Company’s historical results of operations is set forth in the Company’s MD&A
available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and included in the Company’s Form 40-F available on EDGAR at www.sec.gov, as well as the Company’s other filings
with the Canadian securities regulators and the SEC.
Note Regarding Production Guidance
The gold production guidance is based on the Company’s mineral reserves but includes contingencies and assumes metal prices and foreign exchange rates that
are different from those used in the reserve estimates. These factors and others mean that the gold production guidance presented in this disclosure does not
reconcile exactly with the production models used to support these mineral reserves.
4. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 4
Record First Quarter 2014 production of 366,421 ounces builds on 2013 operational
success:
– Record annual 2013 gold production of 1.10 Moz with total cash costs of $672/oz, and all-in
sustaining costs of $952/oz
Strong 1Q 2014 cash flow allows US$130 million repayment to revolving credit facility
Joint bid with Yamana Gold for Osisko Mining Corporation on April 16, 2014 –
acquisition is a good strategic fit and enhancement to Agnico Eagle’s already strong
business platform
HIGHLIGHTS
5. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 5
Bid Price • C$8.15 per Osisko share
• C$3.9 billion equity value
Consideration
Offered
• C$2.09 in cash per Osisko share, equal contribution by Agnico Eagle and Yamana
• 0.07264 of Agnico Eagle common shares (value of C$2.43 per share), 0.26471 of Yamana common shares (value of C$2.43 per share)
• C$1.20 per share in Spinco common shares
Structure • Joint offer to acquire 100% of Osisko’s outstanding common shares
• Agnico Eagle and Yamana become equal partners in Osisko’s Canadian Malartic mine and a suite of high potential exploration projects in
Ontario and Quebec
• Canadian Malartic mine to be operated through a joint operating committee
Premium • 11% premium to the implied value of the current Goldcorp hostile bid
• 10% premium to Osisko’s close on April 15, 2014
Financing • Agnico Eagle and Yamana will each fund C$501 million in cash
• Remaining consideration in Agnico Eagle and Yamana shares plus shares in Spinco
Conditions • Osisko shareholder vote (66 2/3% of shareholders voting)
• Regulatory and court approvals
Other Terms • C$195 million break fee shared equally by Agnico Eagle and Yamana
• Shareholders of Osisko, including all directors and officers, holding approximately 4.5% of the shares, have entered into voting agreements
with Agnico Eagle and Yamana
• Non-solicitation and 5-day right to match superior proposal provision
• C$10 million cost reimbursement to each of Agnico Eagle and Yamana under certain circumstances
Indicative
Timetable
• Osisko shareholder vote expected to be held later in May 2014
• Closing expected early June 2014
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
Note: Based on closing prices from April 15, 2014.
6. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 6
Value per Osisko Share (C$/Share)
C$2.1
0
C$1.20
Spinco
C$2.43
AEM Shares
C$2.43
YRI Shares
C$2.09
Cash
C$8.15
C$4.42
G Shares
C$2.92
Cash
C$7.34 +11%
Goldcorp Offer Agnico/Yamana Offer
Note: Based on closing prices from April 15, 2014.
Agnico Eagle and Yamana joint offer of C$8.15 delivers superior value
7. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 7
TRANSACTION RATIONALE
Accretive to per share financial metrics and operating metrics
Simple, low risk acquisition – Canadian Malartic is an asset without
permitting, construction capital or start up risk
Builds on the Northern Business Platform – Canadian Malartic is forecast to
produce an average of ~600,000 ozs gold per year for 14 years (100% basis)
Minimal share dilution – OSK shareholders will own 16.7% of Agnico Eagle. In
line with previous deals
Manageable debt levels – added debt is manageable in the context of a larger
business generating stronger free cash flow
Expecting synergies with existing Québec operations
Kirkland Lake assets enhance and add flexibility to development project
pipeline
Maintains strategy of operating in supportive regions with low political risk
8. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 8
Source: Osisko press release (March 20, 2014).
*Assumes half year production post acquisition
** Includes 5% NSR to Spinco
CANADIAN MALARTIC PRODUCTION AND COST PROFILE (100% BASIS)
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2014* 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
CashCosts(US$/oz)
AttributableGoldProduction(koz)
Gold Production Adjusted Cash Cost**
9. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 9
FINANCIAL POSITION
CASH, EXPECTED CASH FLOWS, AND AVAILABLE CREDIT PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY
Long-term Debt Maturities
2017 2020 2022 2024
Notes Outstanding (millions) $115 $360 $225 $100
Coupon 6.13% 6.67% 5.93% 5.02%
All Amounts Are In US$, (Unless Otherwise Indicated) Dec 31, 2013
Cash And Cash Equivalents (millions) $170
Outstanding Debt (billion)* $0.87
Available Credit Facilities (billion)* $1.13
Common Shares Outstanding, Basic (FY 2013 WeightedAverage, millions) 172.9
Common Shares Outstanding, Fully Diluted (FY 2013 Weighted Average, millions) 172.9
*Includes $130 million of repayments on revolving credit facility completed in 2014
10. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 10
BENEFITS TO AGNICO EAGLE
Accretive to financial and operating metrics – NAV, EPS, CFPS,
FCFPS, production, reserves, and resources.
Approximately 20% increase to forecasted production profile
through 2016
Expected to improve total cash cost and all-in sustaining cost (AISC)
profiles
Synergies with existing Abitibi operations – Creates Québec’s largest
gold producer with 4 mines within ~50 km. Synergies to be further
quantified
Potential to optimize the Canadian Malartic mine plan – Agnico
Eagle’s operational experience at Meadowbank and Yamana’s expertise
from Chapada will prove helpful
Enhances the exploration and development pipeline
11. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 11
204,380 234,837 218,980 235,000 295,000 300,000
781,080
808,974 880,355
955,000
955,000 975,000
133,000
296,000
315,000
$580
$640
$672
$667
2011A 2012A 2013A 2014E* 2015E* 2016E*
ENHANCES FORECASTED PRODUCTION PROFILE
APPROXIMATELY 20% GROWTH FROM 2014 THROUGH 2016
Payable Gold Production Profile
* Canadian Malarctic production is 50% of the LOM estimate from Mar 20, 2014 Osisko press release
Note: 2014 estimate assumes half year ownership
985,460 1,043,811
1,099,335
1,323,000
1,546,000
1,590,000
Northern Business (oz) Southern Business (oz) Canadian Malarctic Cash Cost
12. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 12
ENHANCES AGNICO EAGLE’S RESERVE AND RESOURCE BASE
GOLD RESERVES & RESOURCES(1) (M OZ)
Note: As of December 31, 2013
(1) Based on updated resource estimate for Osisko announced on March 20, 2014
16.9
9.7 10.1
21.6
15.4
13.2
P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources
+59% +31%+28%
13. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 13
489
375
545
296 223
176
310
245
309
100
257
75
32
296
Goldcorp Agnico Eagle Detour Yamana Barrick AuRico
2015E Gold Production (koz)
Red Lake
Hemlo Young-
Davidson
Detour
Lake
Canadian
Malartic
(50%)
Porcupine
Eleonore
Musselwhite
Cochenour
Meadowbank
LaRonde
Goldex
Lapa
Canadian
Malartic
(50%)
GOLD PRODUCTION IN CANADA
Agnico Eagle Property
Osisko Property
Falco Pacific Property
(Osisko – 12% Ownership)
Operating Mine
Highways
Legend
Combining Canadian Malartic and Agnico Eagle
would create in-region synergies in Québec
Acquiring 50% of Osisko would create Québec’s
largest gold producer
Gold Producers in Canada (1)
Val-d’Or
Cadillac
Town of
Malartic
Rouyn-
Noranda
Canadian
MalarticUpper Beaver –
Kirkland Lake
LaRonde
Lapa
Goldex
Regional Overview
ACQUISITION ENHANCES EXISTING ABITIBI PLATFORM
(1) Source: Agnico Eagle management guidance, Osisko LOM Mine Plan for Canadian Malartic (announced on March 20, 2014) and analyst consensus estimates
LaRonde
Goldex
Lapa
29km
19km
17km
Distance to Malartic
14. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 14
Proven and Probable Reserves:
281.2 Mt @1.04 g/t Au
Global M&I Resources:
327.0 Mt @1.06g/t Au
Global Inferred Resources:
48.1 Mt @0.75 g/t Au
CANADIAN MALARTIC EXPLORATION POTENTIAL
ODYSSEY TARGET APPEARS SIMILAR TO GOLDEX
Odyssey Targets (UG)
2.5 g/t Au over 42.7 m
7.2 g/t Au over 7.5 m
historical Lac Minerals DDH
3.03 g/t Au over 38.1 m
2.53 g/t Au over 42.6 m
2.12 g/t Au over 70.1 m
1.83 g/t Au over 51.8 m
6.45 g/t Au over 14.0 m
Source: Reserve and resource estimates based on Osisko press release dated March 20, 2014. Odyssey drill results based on Osisko press release dated April 2, 2014.
15. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 15
$93
$98
$92
$90
$81
$90
$87
$83 $82
$79
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Meadowbank Cost Per Tonne (C$ per tonne)
SUCESSFUL OPTIMIZATION AT MEADOWBANK MINE
15% IMPROVEMENT IN OPERATING COSTS FROM 2011 TO 2013
2011 2012 2013
16. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 16
*2014 Prod. : 215K oz
* Reserves: 3.9 Moz @ 5.0 gpt Au
* Indicated Resources: 4.2 Mt @ 2.12 gpt Au
*2014 Prod. : 80K oz
* Reserves: 0.3 Moz @ 6.0 gpt Au
* Indicated Resources: 1.6 Mt @ 4.28 gpt Au
PANDORA & WOOD PANDORA – JV PROJECTS
PROPERTIES ARE CONTIGUOUS TO THE LAPA MINE
New Intersections
2013: 15.1 g/t Au over 11.8m
2012: 3.81 g/t Au over 41m
2011: 28.86 g/t Au over 4.9m PANDORA CLLF Targets
PN14-02: 1.2 g/t Au over 46.5m
PN14-03: 1.8 g/t Au over 45.4m
PN14-05 : 4.6 g/t Au over 34.7m
PN14-06 : 1.1 g/t Au over 58.5m
Pandora
Source: Modified from Globex Investor Presentation March 2014
17. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 17
KIRKLAND LAKE PROJECTS
35 M OZ OF HISTORICAL GOLD PRODUCTION IN THE DISTRICT - MAIN TARGETS
UPPER BEAVER & CANADIAN KIRKLAND
230km2 hosting five deposits with disclosed NI 43-101 resources of 2.1 Moz indicated and 1.8 Moz inferred
BIDGOOD (OP)
Ind: 1.5 Mt @ 1.7 g/t Au, 76 k oz
Inf: 0.3 Mt @ 2.0 g/t Au, 21 k oz
AK (UG)
Ind: 1.2 Mt @ 4.5 g/t Au, 164 k oz
Inf: 1.5 Mt @ 4.2 g/t Au, 207 k oz
ANOKI / MCBEAN (UG)
Ind: 1.4 Mt @ 4.7 g/t Au, 217 k oz
Inf: 1.6 Mt @ 4.7 g/t Au, 237 k oz
MACASSA MINE + SMC
P+P: 1.5 Mt @ 17.9 g/t Au, 0.8 M oz
M+I: 1.5 Mt @ 22.7 g/t Au, 1.0 M oz
Inf: 1.2 Mt @ 23.0 g/t Au, 0.8 M oz
(UG) Ind: 0.24 Mt @ 4.3 g/t Au, 33 k oz
(UG) Inf: 3.6 Mt @ 4.8 g/t Au, 557 k oz
(OP) Ind: 1.7 Mt @ 1.9 g/t Au, 104 k oz
(OP) Inf: 1.3 Mt @ 1.9 g/t Au, 76 k oz
UPPER BEAVER (UG)
Ind: 6.9 Mt @ 6.6 g/t Au, 1.5 M oz
Inf: 4.6 Mt @ 4.9 g/t Au, 712 k oz
Canadian Kirkland
Upper Beaver
Source: Modified from Osisko reports and Kirkland Lake Gold reports
18. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 18
LOW POLITICAL RISK, MINING FRIENDLY JURISDICTIONS
HELPS CREATE A MANAGEABLE BUSINESS
72%
68%
64%
60% 59%
54%
52%
40% 40%
AEM NEM ABX NGD GG AUY KGC IAG EGO
NA Gold Producers Political Risk Ranking
Production weighted Fraser Institute Policy Potential Index scores by company (2012-2015). Pre-Osisko transaction
Source: Fraser Institute, Barclays Research
19. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 19
PROJECT PIPELINE EXPECTED TO PROVIDE FURTHER GROWTH
ExpansionEXPANSIONS FEASIBILITY EXPLORATION
Kittila Plant Expansion
Potential Kittila Shaft Hanhimaa
IVR
Goldex Satellites
Meliadine
NORTHERNBUSINESS
Pinos Altos Shaft
Pinos Altos Satellites
Tarachi and La India
SOUTHERNBUSINESS
Kirkland Lake
20. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 20
Strong H1 2014 production expected at Meadowbank due to increased grades and
accelerated stripping at Goose deposit
Commercial production expected at La India in Q1 2014
Continuing evaluation of satellite deposits at Pinos Altos and Goldex, which could enhance
production and cost profiles
Updated Meliadine technical study in Q4 2014
Update on a production shaft and Rimpi Zone development at Kittila in late 2014
Completion of 750 tpd mill expansion at Kittilla by mid-2015
Installation of new ore conveyor at LaRonde Deep in 2015 – should help reduce costs and
congestion
FUTURE CATALYSTS
21. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 21
AGNICO EAGLE – A PREMIUM GOLD EQUITY
RUNNING A
MANAGEABLE
BUSINESS
Delivering
on
Production
Guidance
20%
Production
Growth
Through
2016*
2014 AISC
below $1000
per ounce
Highest
Reserve
Grade
amongst
North
American
Peers
Balance
Sheet
Flexibility
Low Share
Count after
57 Years
32 years
of
Consecutive
Dividend
Payments
Low Political
Risk
Long term
Experienced
Management
Diversified
Technical
Expertise
*Post-Osisko bid
25. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 25
NORTHERN BUSINESS – FINLAND AND CANADA
HIGHER CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS, BUT GENERALLY LONGER LIFE
PRODUCTION ASSETS
2014 FORECAST HIGHLIGHTS
LARONDE
215,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$671/oz
Cooling plant now operational
– provides additional flexibility to mining plan
Production from deeper, higher grade area of the mine
expected to ramp up substantially through 2016
MEADOWBANK
430,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$629/oz
Record low minesite costs per tonne in the fourth
quarter 2013 expected to continue in 2014
Higher grades at Goose expected to persist into 2014,
leading to strong first half production
KITTILA
150,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$759/oz
750 tpd mill expansion remains on budget with start-up
expected in mid-2015
Production shaft and Rimpi zone development under
consideration
GOLDEX
80,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$799/oz
Throughput expected to increase to 6,000 tpd in 2015
Continuing evaluation of satellite deposits
– potential to enhance production and cost profile
LAPA
80,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$850/oz
Improved minesite costs due to ongoing cost saving
measures
Positive exploration at Zulapa 8 zone could extend
mine life
26. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 26
SOUTHERN BUSINESS – MEXICO
LOWER CAPITAL COST ASSETS WITH POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT
CASH FLOW GENERATION
2014 FORECAST HIGHLIGHTS
PINOS ALTOS
145,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$532/oz
Strong mill performance continued in 2013
Shaft sinking project at Pinos Altos on schedule
for 2015 startup which should allow for better
matching of mill and mining capacity
CRESTON
MASCOTA
40,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$754/oz
Phase 3 leach pad construction at Creston Mascota
expected to be completed by late March 2014
Stronger production expected in 2H 2014 with
commissioning of a new agglomerator
LA INDIA
50,000 ozs
at a total cash cost of
$743/oz
Commercial production expected in Q1 2014
Throughput continues to ramp up - stacking rates
currently averaging approx. 12,000 tpd
27. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 27
ESTIMATED PAYABLE GOLD PRODUCTION (2014 – 2016)*
2014 2015 2016
Estimated Mid Point (oz) Total Cash Cost ($/oz) Estimated Mid Point (oz) Estimated Mid Point (oz)
Northern Business
LaRonde 215,000 $671 245,000 285,000
Lapa 80,000 $850 75,000 45,000
Goldex 80,000 $799 100,000 90,000
Kittila 150,000 $759 160,000 170,000
Meadowbank 430,000 $629 375,000 385,000
955,000 $692 955,000 975,000
Southern Business
Pinos Altos 145,000 $532 165,000 170,000
Creston Mascota 40,000 $754 40,000 40,000
La India 50,000 $743 90,000 90,000
235,000 $615 295,000 300,000
Total Gold Production 1,190,000 $678 1,250,000 1,275,000
2014
Ag Production (000’s oz) Zn Production (tonnes) Cu Production (tonnes)
Northern Business 1,027 7,830 5,126
Southern Business 2,173 - -
Total Byproduct Production 3,200 7,830 5,126
Estimated Byproduct Production – 2014
*Pre-Osisko bid
28. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 28
GOLD AND SILVER RESERVES AND RESOURCES*
DECEMBER 31, 2013
Gold Silver
Tonnes
(000’s)
Gold
(g/t)
Gold
(ounces) (000’s)
Tonnes
(000’s)
Silver
(g/t)
Silver
(ounces) (000’s)
Reserves
Northern Business 93,618 4.60 13,841 24,127 19.59 15,192
Southern Business 55,800 1.69 3,024 28,703 64.32 59,354
Total 149,418 3.51 16,865 52,830 43.89 74,546
Measured & Indicated
Resources
Northern Business 86,869 2.96 8,276 4,242 32.53 4,436
Southern Business 70,171 0.61 1,378 13,935 33.63 15,066
Total 157,040 1.91 9,654 18,177 33.37 19,502
Inferred Resources
Northern Business 69,674 3.77 8,434 10,536 14.72 4,986
Southern Business 99,795 0.53 1,686 17,707 26.28 14,962
Total 169,470 1.86 10,121 28,243 21.97 19,948
See AEM Feb 12, 2014 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources. Reserves are not a subset of resources
*Pre-Osisko bid
29. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 29
COPPER, ZINC AND LEAD RESERVES AND RESOURCES*
DECEMBER 31, 2013
Copper Zinc Lead
Tonnes
(000’s)
Copper
(%)
Copper
(tonnes)
Tonnes
(000’s)
Zinc
(%)
Zinc
(tonnes)
Tonnes
(000’s)
Lead
(%)
Lead
(tonnes)
Reserves
Northern Business 24,127 0.25 59,519 24,127 0.67 161,108 24,127 0.04 9,964
Southern Business
Total 24,127 0.25 59,519 24,127 0.67 161,108 24,127 0.04 9,964
Measured & Indicated
Resources
Northern Business 4,242 0.16 6,981 4,242 1.61 68,127 4,242 0.16 6,793
Southern Business
Total 4,242 0.16 6,981 4,242 1.61 68,127 4,242 0.16 6,793
Inferred Resources
Northern Business 10,536 0.27 28,118 10,536 0.55 58,463 10,536 0.05 5,176
Southern Business
Total 10,536 0.27 28,118 10,536 0.55 58,463 10,536 0.05 5,176
See AEM Feb 12, 2014 press release for detailed breakdown of reserves and resources. Reserves are not a subset of resources
*Pre-Osisko bid
30. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 30
NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES
Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources
This document uses the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources”. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the
SEC does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.
Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Resources
This document also uses the term “inferred resources”. We advise investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it.
“Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of
an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-
feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Scientific and Technical Data
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited is reporting mineral resource and reserve estimates in accordance with the CIM guidelines for the estimation, classification and reporting of resources and
reserves.
Cautionary Note To U.S. Investors – The SEC permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically
and legally extract or produce. Agnico Eagle uses certain terms in this presentation, such as “measured”, “indicated”, and “inferred”, and “resources” that the SEC guidelines strictly
prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 40-F and other U.S. filings, which
may be obtained from us, or from the SEC’s website at: http://sec.gov/edgar.shtml.
In prior periods, reserves for all properties were typically estimated using historic three-year average metals prices and foreign exchange rates in accordance with the SEC guidelines.
These guidelines require the use of prices that reflect current economic conditions at the time of reserve determination, which the Staff of the SEC has interpreted to mean historic
three-year average prices. Given the current lower commodity price environment, Agnico Eagle has decided to use price assumptions that are below the three-year averages. The
assumptions used for the mineral reserves estimates at all mines and advanced projects as of December 31, 2013, reported by the Company on February 12, 2014, are $1,200 per
ounce gold, $18.00 per ounce silver, $0.82 per pound zinc, $3.00 per pound copper, $0.91 per pound lead and C$/US$, US$/Euro and MXP/US$ exchange rates of 1.03, 1.32 and
12.75, respectively.
The Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) requires mining companies to disclose reserves and resources using the subcategories of “proven”
reserves, “probable” reserves, “measured” resources, “indicated” resources and “inferred” resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability.
31. AGNICO EAGLE | THE OSISKO ACQUISITION | 31
NOTES TO INVESTORS REGARDING THE USE OF RESOURCES
A mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include
adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A
mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allows for losses that may occur when the material is mined. A proven mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of a measured
mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. A probable mineral reserve is the economically mineable part of an indicated, and in some circumstances, a
measured mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.
A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals in or on the
Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics
and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. A measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral
resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the
appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed
and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are
spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity. An indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities,
shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine
planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed. An
inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and
reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from
locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
A Feasibility Study is a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project that includes appropriately detailed assessments of
realistically assumed mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental considerations together with any other relevant operational
factors and detailed financial analysis, that are necessary to demonstrate at the time of reporting that extraction is reasonably justified (economically mineable). The results of the study
may reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project. The confidence level of the
study will be higher than that of a Pre-Feasibility Study.
The effective date for all of the Company’s mineral resource and reserve estimates in this presentation is December 31, 2013. Additional information about each of the mineral projects
that is required by NI 43-101, sections 3.2 and 3.3 and paragraphs 3.4 (a), (c) and (d) can be found in the technical reports referred to in the AIF and Form 40-F, which may be found at
www.sedar.com. Other important operating information can also be found in the AIF and technical reports that is included in the Form 40-F available on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
The mineral reserve and resource information has been reviewed and approved by Daniel Doucet, Corporate Director, Reserve Development, under the supervision of Alain Blackburn,
Senior Vice-President, Exploration. Both Mr. Doucet and Mr. Blackburn are designated P.Eng. with the Ordre ingenieurs du Québec and qualified persons as defined by NI 43-101.
