SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  4
Evaluation Question 3
What kind of media institution might
distribute your media product?
Web 2.0 – How could we fund and distribnute?
• The Age of Stupid was crowd
funded, this is when an amount of
individuals or groups put forward
money to help with creative projects
or small business. People pledged
between £500 & £35,000 and by the
end totalled their budget to £450,000
from 223 different people. Also the
live premiere was broadcasted via
satellite to 42 other locations and only
had 1% carbon emissions compared
to normal cinema openings. Our film
could opt to use a similar method to
finance the film.
• Web 2.0 which has completely affected audiences and has changed the way films are
produced, from production to distribution to exhibition, changing how the creative
triangle can perform their jobs. The definition of Web 2.0 is due to the interactive
ability for the users, this is the ability to upload, download and change the internet.
From the intuitional side of the industry the internet had enabled non-industrial/
independent film companies to compete with the industrial/ Hollywood style
companies, democratising the film industries right down to the amateur film makers.
Art House Cinema
• Our film is considered to be an
indie film so is more likely to be
shown at a art-house cinema.
Low production value and gritty
style adds to the idea that it would
fit better with an art house
audience. So a common
distributer for this kind of genre
may be more likely, for example
Art House Films.
• But the plot of the film my not be
intellectual enough for audiences
of this kind.
Film Festivals
• Our film is more likely to find its
fame in film festivals, as where
many film do. Here we could find
a distributor if we didn’t already
have one. Smaller distributors
may be able to find us here, e.g.
Vertigo films. Especially if it is a
British film festival.
Mainstream cinema
• Mainstream distributor such
as 20th
Century Fox would be
very unlikely to invest in our
film as it is not a likely
blockbuster and does not keep
to the high production value of
tentpole films.
• These films are more directed
towards mass audience with
large box office takings. Our
indie thriller would appeal to a
more niche audience and so is
not likely to reach the income
they hope for.
• This also links to the fact our
movie is not likely to be shown
in the mainstream multiplex
cinemas either.

Contenu connexe

Tendances (20)

Eval q 3 fini
Eval q 3 finiEval q 3 fini
Eval q 3 fini
 
Task 3 distribution powerpoint
Task 3 distribution powerpointTask 3 distribution powerpoint
Task 3 distribution powerpoint
 
Question 3
Question 3 Question 3
Question 3
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Distribution
Distribution Distribution
Distribution
 
Evaluation q3
Evaluation q3Evaluation q3
Evaluation q3
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Evaluation Question 4
Evaluation Question 4Evaluation Question 4
Evaluation Question 4
 
Question3
Question3 Question3
Question3
 
Powerpoint
PowerpointPowerpoint
Powerpoint
 
Exhibition
ExhibitionExhibition
Exhibition
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
Evaluation question 3 – what kind of media
Evaluation question 3 – what kind of mediaEvaluation question 3 – what kind of media
Evaluation question 3 – what kind of media
 
Eval q 3 fini
Eval q 3 finiEval q 3 fini
Eval q 3 fini
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 

En vedette

Question 6 (1)
Question 6 (1)Question 6 (1)
Question 6 (1)gwithers97
 
Question 4 Evaluation
Question 4 Evaluation Question 4 Evaluation
Question 4 Evaluation mpavey
 
Questions 1,2,6 complete
Questions 1,2,6 completeQuestions 1,2,6 complete
Questions 1,2,6 completeAlexMcDowell
 
Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)
Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)
Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)08boydem
 
Eval 4 & 5
Eval 4 & 5Eval 4 & 5
Eval 4 & 5gp167
 
Evaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media Studies
Evaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media StudiesEvaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media Studies
Evaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media Studieshannahbennett98
 
Coursework evaluation CK
Coursework evaluation CKCoursework evaluation CK
Coursework evaluation CKGrand_Hog
 
Q1,2 and 6 for media evaluation
Q1,2 and 6 for media evaluationQ1,2 and 6 for media evaluation
Q1,2 and 6 for media evaluationdandy1204
 
Evaluation - Kurtis Hetherington
Evaluation - Kurtis HetheringtonEvaluation - Kurtis Hetherington
Evaluation - Kurtis Hetherington09hethek
 

En vedette (20)

Question 6 (1)
Question 6 (1)Question 6 (1)
Question 6 (1)
 
Evaluation 6
Evaluation 6Evaluation 6
Evaluation 6
 
Question 4 Evaluation
Question 4 Evaluation Question 4 Evaluation
Question 4 Evaluation
 
Media Q1
Media Q1Media Q1
Media Q1
 
Questions 1,2,6 complete
Questions 1,2,6 completeQuestions 1,2,6 complete
Questions 1,2,6 complete
 
Coursework eval
Coursework evalCoursework eval
Coursework eval
 
Q1 Evaluation
Q1 EvaluationQ1 Evaluation
Q1 Evaluation
 
Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)
Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)
Group 6 Media Studies AS - Question 2 (Max Boyden)
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Eval 4 & 5
Eval 4 & 5Eval 4 & 5
Eval 4 & 5
 
Q1
Q1Q1
Q1
 
Media Q2
Media Q2Media Q2
Media Q2
 
Evaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media Studies
Evaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media StudiesEvaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media Studies
Evaluation questions 1 and 2 - AS Media Studies
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
Coursework evaluation CK
Coursework evaluation CKCoursework evaluation CK
Coursework evaluation CK
 
Q1,2 and 6 for media evaluation
Q1,2 and 6 for media evaluationQ1,2 and 6 for media evaluation
Q1,2 and 6 for media evaluation
 
Question 6
Question 6Question 6
Question 6
 
Coursework eval2
Coursework eval2Coursework eval2
Coursework eval2
 
Evaluation - Kurtis Hetherington
Evaluation - Kurtis HetheringtonEvaluation - Kurtis Hetherington
Evaluation - Kurtis Hetherington
 
Evaluation 6
Evaluation 6Evaluation 6
Evaluation 6
 

Similaire à Media Q3

Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf JoshuaDudusola
 
Institutions
Institutions Institutions
Institutions CLEKmedia
 
The film industry today jtw key terms
The film industry today jtw  key termsThe film industry today jtw  key terms
The film industry today jtw key termsjude.holmes
 
Distirbution
DistirbutionDistirbution
Distirbutioned4071
 
Production funding
Production fundingProduction funding
Production fundinglucasmcnally
 
What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why? What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why? Cat4488
 
Media ownership skyfall ill manors
 Media ownership skyfall ill manors Media ownership skyfall ill manors
Media ownership skyfall ill manorssandraoddy2
 
The british film industry2
The british film industry2The british film industry2
The british film industry2romanyangel4
 
Sample questions
Sample questionsSample questions
Sample questionsEmma Leslie
 
Media evaluation question 1
Media evaluation question 1Media evaluation question 1
Media evaluation question 1nikkinoodlebowl
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3LivThomas
 

Similaire à Media Q3 (20)

Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf
 
Institutions
Institutions Institutions
Institutions
 
The film industry today jtw key terms
The film industry today jtw  key termsThe film industry today jtw  key terms
The film industry today jtw key terms
 
Distribution
DistributionDistribution
Distribution
 
Distirbution
DistirbutionDistirbution
Distirbution
 
Production funding
Production fundingProduction funding
Production funding
 
Production funding1
Production funding1Production funding1
Production funding1
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3Evaluation 3
Evaluation 3
 
Presentation 3
Presentation 3Presentation 3
Presentation 3
 
What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why? What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your product and why?
 
Media ownership skyfall ill manors
 Media ownership skyfall ill manors Media ownership skyfall ill manors
Media ownership skyfall ill manors
 
The british film industry2
The british film industry2The british film industry2
The british film industry2
 
Task 3
Task 3Task 3
Task 3
 
Task 3 2
Task 3 2Task 3 2
Task 3 2
 
Sample questions
Sample questionsSample questions
Sample questions
 
Media evaluation question 1
Media evaluation question 1Media evaluation question 1
Media evaluation question 1
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
Final question 3
Final question 3 Final question 3
Final question 3
 
Final question 3
Final question 3 Final question 3
Final question 3
 

Media Q3

  • 1. Evaluation Question 3 What kind of media institution might distribute your media product?
  • 2. Web 2.0 – How could we fund and distribnute? • The Age of Stupid was crowd funded, this is when an amount of individuals or groups put forward money to help with creative projects or small business. People pledged between £500 & £35,000 and by the end totalled their budget to £450,000 from 223 different people. Also the live premiere was broadcasted via satellite to 42 other locations and only had 1% carbon emissions compared to normal cinema openings. Our film could opt to use a similar method to finance the film. • Web 2.0 which has completely affected audiences and has changed the way films are produced, from production to distribution to exhibition, changing how the creative triangle can perform their jobs. The definition of Web 2.0 is due to the interactive ability for the users, this is the ability to upload, download and change the internet. From the intuitional side of the industry the internet had enabled non-industrial/ independent film companies to compete with the industrial/ Hollywood style companies, democratising the film industries right down to the amateur film makers.
  • 3. Art House Cinema • Our film is considered to be an indie film so is more likely to be shown at a art-house cinema. Low production value and gritty style adds to the idea that it would fit better with an art house audience. So a common distributer for this kind of genre may be more likely, for example Art House Films. • But the plot of the film my not be intellectual enough for audiences of this kind. Film Festivals • Our film is more likely to find its fame in film festivals, as where many film do. Here we could find a distributor if we didn’t already have one. Smaller distributors may be able to find us here, e.g. Vertigo films. Especially if it is a British film festival.
  • 4. Mainstream cinema • Mainstream distributor such as 20th Century Fox would be very unlikely to invest in our film as it is not a likely blockbuster and does not keep to the high production value of tentpole films. • These films are more directed towards mass audience with large box office takings. Our indie thriller would appeal to a more niche audience and so is not likely to reach the income they hope for. • This also links to the fact our movie is not likely to be shown in the mainstream multiplex cinemas either.