Bahare Shariat Jild 4 By SadurshSharia Mufti Amjad Ali Azmi
ADVANCE-Purdue Integrated Research Team progress report
1. ADVANCE-Purdue
Integrated research progress
Alice Pawley, co-PI
Assistant professor
School of Engineering Education
Affiliate, Women’s Studies Program
on behalf of the integrated research team
2. where we’re going
1. IRT staffing and organization
2. Internal evaluation research
progress
3. NSF data indicators progress
4. Non-evaluation research
progress
Theoretical framework
A.
Study progress: Academic Career
B.
Pathways study, Climate survey,
Institutional Ethnography
5. Successes and challenges
6. Next steps
8. where we’re going
1. IRT staffing and organization
2. Internal evaluation research
progress
3. NSF data indicators progress
4. Non-evaluation research
progress
Theoretical framework
A.
Study progress: Academic Career
B.
Pathways study, Climate survey,
Institutional Ethnography
5. Successes and challenges
6. Next steps
9. T#,$&)+55&(4quot;'?quot;%)
JT)C<ICFDA>.@&(@$U.DHG)VAC<A=GL!.)JAC;W))
5&%'quot;4_'?5quot;*W) •! T^+$)53)
•! .&5E4($)&$*$'&+,>X'*$()&$+5--$quot;('?5quot;*)&$)B&5%&'-*)
•! I.)35&)D5-B04'quot;+$) !quot;*?#@?5quot;'0)
'quot;()B504+4$*)
Internal evaluation
'quot;()A#,4+*) =$*$'&+,)
!quot;#$%&'#$()&$*$'&+,) •! D55&(4quot;'#$)(4**$-4quot;'?5quot;)'+?E4?$*) •! I.)35&)<4E$&*4#1) •! L@-'quot;)=$*5@&+$*U
•! D55&(4quot;'#$)&$*$'&+,)+5-B5quot;$quot;#2*6)53)4quot;#$&4-)&$B5&#*) •! .&5E5*#]*)T^+$) R5&K043$)
5&%'quot;4_'?5quot;'0)+,'&#)) •! C^&-'?E$)C+?5quot;) •! quot;4E)G$quot;'#$)H'+@0#1)
35&)0$'($&*,4B)#$'-)
T^+$) !quot;35&-$#&4+*)
2<=CHJ)E`a7)[MUb[UOc6)
AQ#$"'0)$E'0@'#5&)
!quot;#$%&'#$()&$*$'&+,)#$'-)
Susan Geier, Deb Bennett
2R55(&@S7)AE'0@'?5quot;)'quot;() !quot;#$"'0)'(E4*5&1)'quot;()+5quot;*@0?quot;%)
.'/0$1)23'+404'#5&67)8$quot;quot;$97):$4$&7)
C**$**-$quot;#)D$quot;#$&)35&);'#,$-'?+*) 2H55&7)5#,$&*)J8C6))
;5%,'('-7);'+<$&-4()
'quot;()G+4$quot;+$)A(@+'?5quot;7)T,45)G#'#$6) !quot;#$%&'(1*2quot;1$-3(4*)*-$150&(
=$$(>=,5'(*)
.##/0&()**+#,-( )**+#,-(quot;1(0-(#**6*6(
!quot;#$%&'()**+#,-(
C+'($-4+)
Progress:
!quot;*?#@?5quot;'0) FGH> <4E$&*4#1)H5&')
D'&$$&) D04-'#$) AE'0@'?5quot;)
A#,quot;5%&'B,1) C<ICFDA) $E'0@'?5quot;)
*@&E$1) &$*$'&+,)
.'#,/'1*)
2!A6) <'#')J550K4#) &$*$'&+,)
2CD.6)
Programmatic evaluation
C<ICFDA>
.'/0$1)20$'(6) .'/0$1)20$'(6) .'/0$1)20$'(6) .@&(@$)&$B*W)
:GM)
:$4$&)2NOP6)
L5$%,) L5$%,) :GM) .5*#(5+)
Y5K4quot;4)20$'(6)
8$quot;quot;$9)
• Developing process of integrating
20$'(6)
.5*#(5+) .5*#(5+) .5*#(5+) =$$(>=,5'(*)
2D5quot;*@0#'quot;#6)
=$$(>=,5'(*) H55&)
;5&0$1) ;5&0$1)
T#,$&)J8C)
evaluation early in programmatic
C**$**-$quot;#)
D55&(4quot;'#$()/4#,).'/0$1) Y$1)#5))'BB54quot;#-$quot;#*)
=$*$'&+,)D$quot;#$&)
.'/0$1)Z)MOP) ;5&0$1Z:C)B$&),5@&)
=$*$'&+,):&5@B7)G+,550)53) D55&(4quot;'#$()/4#,)
L5$%,Z):G)NOP) :GM)Z):G)NOP) 2C=D67)#,&5@%,)
Aquot;%4quot;$$&4quot;%)A(@+'?5quot;) .&5E5*#]*)T^+$)
.5*#(5+)Z)[OOP) <4*+5E$&1).'&K)
planning process.
• Formative assessment conducted at
WISELI/PCFS search chair workshop
(1/09) to inform development and
implementation of PCFS search
committee workshop series
• Report processed and distributed to
leadership team
System-level evaluation
• Developing process for overarching
systems-level evaluation in collaboration
with external evaluation team and non-
evaluation research team.
(Also discussed at 2:30) 2.
11. where we’re going
1. IRT staffing and organization
2. Internal evaluation research
progress
3. NSF data indicators progress
4. Non-evaluation research
progress
Theoretical framework
A.
Study progress: Academic Career
B.
Pathways study, Climate survey,
Institutional Ethnography
5. Successes and challenges
6. Next steps
12. metaphor as theoretical model
How well does a
“pipeline” metaphor model the
STEM faculty careers of women
(particularly women of color)?
... Academic Career Pathways Study
(Lakoff & Johnson 1980; Berryman 1983; Xie & Shauman 2003)
4A.
13. metaphor as theoretical model
How well does a
“chilly climate” metaphor
model the STEM faculty
careers of women
(particularly women of
color)?
... Institutional Climate Survey
(Lakoff & Johnson 1980; Hall & Sandler 1982; Xie & Shauman 2003)
4A.
14. metaphor as theoretical model
How might other models
better represent the lives
of women STEM faculty,
?
particularly women of
color?
... Institutional Ethnography
(Acker, 1990; Smith, 1987, 1990; Campbell 1998)
4A.
16. T#,$&)+55&(4quot;'?quot;%)
JT)C<ICFDA>.@&(@$U.DHG)VAC<A=GL!.)JAC;W))
5&%'quot;4_'?5quot;*W) •! T^+$)53)
•! .&5E4($)&$*$'&+,>X'*$()&$+5--$quot;('?5quot;*)&$)B&5%&'-*)
Institutional climate survey
•! I.)35&)D5-B04'quot;+$) !quot;*?#@?5quot;'0)
'quot;()B504+4$*) 'quot;()A#,4+*) =$*$'&+,)
!quot;#$%&'#$()&$*$'&+,) •! D55&(4quot;'#$)(4**$-4quot;'?5quot;)'+?E4?$*) •! I.)35&)<4E$&*4#1) •! L@-'quot;)=$*5@&+$*U
•! D55&(4quot;'#$)&$*$'&+,)+5-B5quot;$quot;#2*6)53)4quot;#$&4-)&$B5&#*) •! .&5E5*#]*)T^+$) R5&K043$)
5&%'quot;4_'?5quot;'0)+,'&#)) •! C^&-'?E$)C+?5quot;) •! quot;4E)G$quot;'#$)H'+@0#1)
35&)0$'($&*,4B)#$'-)
T^+$) !quot;35&-$#&4+*)
2<=CHJ)E`a7)[MUb[UOc6)
AQ#$"'0)$E'0@'#5&)
with Saranya Srinivasan, Susan Geier
!quot;#$%&'#$()&$*$'&+,)#$'-)
2R55(&@S7)AE'0@'?5quot;)'quot;() !quot;#$"'0)'(E4*5&1)'quot;()+5quot;*@0?quot;%)
.'/0$1)23'+404'#5&67)8$quot;quot;$97):$4$&7)
C**$**-$quot;#)D$quot;#$&)35&);'#,$-'?+*) 2H55&7)5#,$&*)J8C6))
;5%,'('-7);'+<$&-4()
'quot;()G+4$quot;+$)A(@+'?5quot;7)T,45)G#'#$6) !quot;#$%&'(1*2quot;1$-3(4*)*-$150&(
=$$(>=,5'(*)
.##/0&()**+#,-( )**+#,-(quot;1(0-(#**6*6(
!quot;#$%&'()**+#,-(
Purdue Center for Faculty Success
C+'($-4+)
!quot;*?#@?5quot;'0) FGH> <4E$&*4#1)H5&')
Institutional Climate Survey
D'&$$&) D04-'#$) AE'0@'?5quot;)
A#,quot;5%&'B,1) C<ICFDA) $E'0@'?5quot;)
*@&E$1) &$*$'&+,)
.'#,/'1*)
2!A6) <'#')J550K4#) &$*$'&+,)
2CD.6)
C<ICFDA>
April 2009
.'/0$1)20$'(6) .'/0$1)20$'(6) .'/0$1)20$'(6) .@&(@$)&$B*W)
:GM)
:$4$&)2NOP6)
L5$%,) L5$%,) :GM) .5*#(5+)
Y5K4quot;4)20$'(6)
8$quot;quot;$9)
20$'(6)
.5*#(5+) .5*#(5+) .5*#(5+) =$$(>=,5'(*)
2D5quot;*@0#'quot;#6)
=$$(>=,5'(*) H55&)
;5&0$1) ;5&0$1)
T#,$&)J8C)
C**$**-$quot;#)
D55&(4quot;'#$()/4#,).'/0$1) Y$1)#5))'BB54quot;#-$quot;#*)
=$*$'&+,)D$quot;#$&)
.'/0$1)Z)MOP) ;5&0$1Z:C)B$&),5@&)
=$*$'&+,):&5@B7)G+,550)53) D55&(4quot;'#$()/4#,)
L5$%,Z):G)NOP) :GM)Z):G)NOP) 2C=D67)#,&5@%,)
Aquot;%4quot;$$&4quot;%)A(@+'?5quot;) .&5E5*#]*)T^+$)
.5*#(5+)Z)[OOP) <4*+5E$&1).'&K)
Progress:
• Modified WISELI survey for Purdue
• Developing measures of validity against other
climate instruments
This questionnaire was developed to better understand issues related
to quality of working life for faculty at Purdue University.
• Received expert feedback on instrument for
This is part of a larger research project, ADVANCE-Purdue, funded by
the National Science Foundation, and conducted through
the Purdue Center for Faculty Success.
validity measure More information about PCFS is available at
http://www.purdue.edu/dp/advance/
• Applied for IRB approval 3/11/09
Goals:
PLEASE RETURN THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED TO:
ADVANCE Research Team, Haas Hall Rm 202B.
• Implementation in April 2009
• Data analysis progressed for July 1 annual
report
4B.