1. Ourston Roundabout Engineering
Progress with
Roundabouts to Date
Mark Lenters, President,
Ourston Roundabout Engineering Inc.
mlenters@ourston.com
www.ourston.com
1
Progress by State
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 2
1
2. 1990: The First U.S. Modern
Roundabouts
Town Center Drive, Summerlin, Nevada
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 3
U.S. Since 1990
• 1990: Modern roundabouts built in Las Vegas.
• 1995: UK style roundabouts replace signals &
create “Roundabout Valley” in Avon/Vail, CO.
• 1997: HCM adds roundabouts
• 2000 and 2010: FHWA Roundabouts: An
Informational Guide
• 2010 HCM soon to be released
• US Currently building ~ 350 per year, and
rising.
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 4
2
3. National Collision Statistics
• Original 24 roundabouts before and after
(c.
(c 2000)
• Reduction in injuries = 76%
• Combined reduction of all crashes = 40%
• Follow-up study combining results of 55
sites 1998 - 2003:
• 70% reduction in injuries
• 35% reduction in all collisions combined
• Similar to international statistics
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 5
National collision statistics
for multi-lane roundabouts
Reduction in All Types
Intersection Type Before of Collisions with
Roundabouts
Traffic Signals 67%
All-Way Stop Control 12%
Two-Way Stop Control
19%
Suburban
Two-Way Stop Control
18%
Urban
Note: Results based on a study of 26 multi-lane intersections
converted to multi-lane roundabouts with 3 years of before
and after data (source: NCHRP Report 572, 2006)
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 6
3
5. Teaching drivers
..at the
at
roundabout
entry during
opening
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 9
Ourston Roundabout Engineering
Roundabout Site
Selection
Mark Lenters, President,
Ourston Roundabout Engineering Inc.
mlenters@ourston.com
www.ourston.com
10
5
6. Identifying Candidate
Intersections
Local and State Initiatives:
• Safet Improvements
Safety Impro ements
• Congestion relief
• Development permit
The Key mindset:
- Be sure to solve a problem if a
roundabout is to be used!
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 11
Selection process includes:
1. Initial planning level assessment performed
as pa o a s udy to e a ua e the o e a
part of study o evaluate e overall
appropriateness of a roundabout;
2. Roundabout study considers site-specific
conditions:
• A safety assessment
• Operational performance
• Cost comparison
3. Requirements for drainage, lighting and
public outreach.
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 12
6
7. Locations where roundabouts are
suitable:
1. Safety
– Intersections with historically high crash rates.
– Roads with a historical problem of excessive speeds
speeds.
– Intersections with more than four legs or with difficult skew
angles
2. Operations
– A high % of turning movements and intersections that
must accommodate U-turns.
– High traffic volumes at peak hours
– Intersections where widening one or more approach may
be difficult or cost-prohibitive.
– Ramp terminal intersections
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 13
Locations where roundabouts are
suitable:
Cont’d…
• Intersections with high traffic growth (A single-lane
roundabout staged f expansion t two lanes)
d b t t d for i to t l )
• Transitions between rural and urban - gateways
3. Traffic Control
• Existing two-way stop-controlled intersections that do not
meet signal warrants.
• Intersections or corridors where traffic calming is a
desired outcome of the project.
4. Aesthetics
• Focal point for a community, gateway or themed
development
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 14
7
8. Initial Screening ADT Thresholds
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 15
Typical Roundabout Capacity Ranges
Typical Daily Service
Typical Inscribed Circle
Roundabout Type Volume2 (vpd)
Diameter1.
4-leg roundabouts
Mini-Roundabout 45-80 ft (14-28 m) Less than 30,000
Urban Single-Lane 100 -150 ft (30 – 50 m) less than 25,000
Urban Multilane
160 - 215 ft (50 – 65 m) 25,000 to 55,000
(2-lane entry)
Urban Multilane
(3 or 4-lane 215 - 275 ft (65 – 85 m) 55,000 to 80,000
entry)
Rural Single-Lane 130 -150 ft (35 – 55 m) less than 25,000
Rural M ltil
R l Multilane
165 - 215 ft (50 – 65 m) 25,000 to 55,000
(2-lane entry)
Rural Multilane
215 – 300 ft (65 – 85 m) 55,000 to 70,000
(3-lane entry)
1 Diameters are for general guidance.
2Capacities vary depending on entering volume and turning / circulating flow.
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 16
8
9. Conditions that may eliminate
roundabout:
1. Coordinated signal system (platooned
traffic)
2. R/W impacts
3. Inadequate SSD
4. Steep grades
5. Minor improvement is that are more cost-
e ect e
effective:
• No R/W required
• Extend left turn bay
• Add turn bay in existing median
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 17
Conditions that may eliminate
roundabout:
6. Intersections in close proximity to a signalized
intersection (e.g., coordinated arterial signal systems)
7. Locations with steep grades and unfavorable
topography that may limit visibility or an acceptable
layout for a roundabout.
8. Intersections in close proximity to an at-grade railroad
crossing.
9. Intersections where an unacceptable delay to the major
p y j
road could be created (90% main street traffic).
10. Heavy pedestrian or bicycle movements that may
require signals.
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 18
9
12. Corridor – Golden, CO
• 4 Signals changed to RBTS
• 60% ddrop i C h R t
in Crash Rate
• 94% drop in injuries
– From 31 in 3 yrs to only one:
a median opening left turn
crash
• No Pedestrian crashes
• Single lane RBT has fewest
23
Space and cost savings in
a corridor...
Avon Colorado - Arterial Corridor, 1997
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 24
12
13. Replaced traffic signals
at main intersection
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 25
Two decades of planned expansion
Second interchange for Wal-Mart in 2003
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 26
13
14. Two interchanges in Vail, 1995
Interchange intersections previously controlled by police.
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 27
Unusual Geometry
Avoided impacts to
buildings & parking lots
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 28
14
15. Pedestrian Signals At
Roundabouts
Ourston Roundabout Engineering 29
www.ourston.com
www.ourston.co
Closely Spaced Intersections
Lee Rd @ Whitmore Lake Rd and US-23, Metro Detroit
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 30
15
16. Rural High Speed
Hwy. 85/Hwy. 17, 2006
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 31
Access Management
Loveland, CO
Narrow Median possible
because roundabouts
b d b t
allow U-turns
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 32
16
17. Rocky Mountain Avenue - 2008
Business is still thriving
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 33
Closely Spaced Intersections
Lee Rd @ Whitmore Lake Rd and US-23, Metro Detroit
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 34
17
18. Contiguous Roundabouts
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 35
Access Management
• Minor driveways can be designated as in
intersection leg for access near entries or exits
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 36
18
19. Transition Between Urban Forms
(Clearwater Beach, FL)
Commercial with
angle parking
Photo: City of Clearwater FL
r,
Residential
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 37
J.F.K. Middle School, Clearwater, FL
(>50 others like it in the U.S. being tracked)
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 38
19
20. Non-Conforming Circle Becomes a Roundabout
(Long Beach, CA, 1992)
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 39
Ourston Roundabout Engineering
Achieving Success
Using Roundabouts
Mark Lenters, President,
Ourston Roundabout Engineering Inc.
mlenters@ourston.com
www.ourston.com
40
20
21. The Recipe for Successful Use of
Roundabouts
• Lead with an Area-Wide Policy:
– Roundabouts shall be considered when…
– Conduct Alternatives Analyses (life cycle)
– Top-down consensus building
– Only use roundabouts to solve a problem
1.Assemble general policy tools
2.Develop project specific tools
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 41
General and Specific Outreach Tools
General Tools Project Specific Tools
• Case studies • Scale model
• Testimonials • Animation/simulation
• National statistics • Renderings
• How-to videos • Project web page
• Web-cam • Project brochure
• Driver training
• Website
• Brochures
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 42
21
22. Scale Model (1:87 = ‘HO’ scale)
Ourston Roundabout Engineering www.ourston.com 43
Coordination of Geometry and
Lane Designation
44
22
23. SB Pioneer Road Movement
Ourston Roundabout Engineering 45 www.ourston.com
NB Belt Line Road Movement
Ourston Roundabout Engineering 46 www.ourston.com
23