RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...
Poster RDAP13 Model for Developing Data Management Policy Language
1. Model for Developing Data Management Policy Language
Research Data Access and Preservation, 2013
Wendy Mann Bill Corey Tom Wilson Nathan Hall
George Mason University University of Virginia University of Alabama Virginia Tech
Representatives from four ASERL libraries analyzed existing institutional data management policies in order to develop model data management policy language.
Outlined below is an illustration of data sharing and management milestones and a timeline of the ASERL Data Policy Working Group's process.
External Data Management Policy and Practice Context
December, 2009
February 26, 2003 International Journal of Digital Curation January 18, 2011 July, 2011
NIH-OD-03-032 September, 2007 NSF Data Sharing Policy
publishes first findings of the Data Curation ARL offers first E-Science
Final NIH Statement on Sharing NSF announces RFP for takes effect
Profiles Project. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i3.117 Institute
Research Data DataNet Project
February, 2013
May, 2010 January, 2011
June 17, 2009 OSTP Policy Memorandum
March 1, 2004 University of Virginia launches Top tier journals implement
March 1, 2002 Digital Curation Centre Federal agencies with more
Digital Curation Centre launched Scientific Data Consulting Joint Data Archiving Policy October, 2011
NIH NOT-OD-02-035 publishes Data Management Plan than $100 million in R&D
in the United Kingdom Group Official Launch of DMP Tool
Draft Statement on Content Checklist expenditures must make
Sharing Research Data publications and digital data
of federally funded research
freely available to public.
Southeastern Universities
Additionally, digital data must be
Research Association (SURA)
accounted for and managed.
DMPTool Partners
ASERL only
SURA only
ASERL & SURA
Clemson University
Emory University
George Mason University
Georgia Institute of Technology
March 2011
Georgia State University SURA Information Technology Meeting:
James Madison University
Johns Hopkins University Institutional Responses to
North Carolina State University
Old Dominion University NSF DMP Requirements
Rice University
Texas A&M University
Tulane University Blue = ASERL + SURA Institutions
University of Alabama Green = SURA Institutions
University of Florida
University of Kentucky NOTE: Did not include SURA member
University of Miami
University of Regina, SK Canada on this map.
University of Memphis
University of New Orleans
University of North Carolina at Chapel
Labeled locations = Universities with data
Additional Institutions Consulted: management policies or documents consulted
Hill Australian National Data Service
University of Texas at Austin Monash University (AU)
for this project.
University of Virginia University of Cambridge (UK)
Virginia Commonwealth University University of Edinburgh (UK)
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State
University
Digital Curation Centre (UK)
Council on Government Relations (US) April 2011
ASERL Spring Membership Meeting
Round-Robin discussion:
January 2013 February 2012 Roles for Libraries in Digital Curation,
ASERL & SURA membership June 2012 Data Policy Watch Management and Compliance with
SURA
February 6, 2013 endorse ‘Model Language November 2012 September 2012 website created for
Writing of initial draft of Federal Requirements presentation.
ASERL & SURA for Research Data ASERL membership October 2012 Draft sent to ASERL for review RDCC Policy Review Task Force
Data Management Policy
Official Announcement: Management Policies’ ‘endorsed in principle’ Draft revision after ASERL sends draft to language
‘Model Language for Research 1st feedback cycle members for review
Data Management Policies’ February 2012
December 2012 April 2012 Formation of
Draft revision after November 2012 Reviewers are ASERL members, select ASERL Research Data
Formation of
3rd feedback cycle Draft revision after information technology, academic, Coordinating Committee (RDCC)
ASERL-RDCC Data Policy
2nd feedback cycle legal, information security, librarian
Working Group
and information policy professionals.
Draft Research Data Management Policy Language Process