Energy Harvesting for Wireless Sensor Networks

1. DEVELOPMENT OF A WIRELESS SENSOR
NETWORK POWERED BY ENERGY
HARVESTING TECHNIQUES
Daniele Costarella
Grand Hotel Mediterraneo - Florence - July 9th, 2013

2. Outline
• Energy Harvesting Basics
• What are the benefits? Where is it useful? Important aspects.
• Piezoelectric, Thermoelectric and Solar Sources
• Selecting the Right Transducers, piezogenerator models,
capabilities, limitations
• Converting Harvested Energy into a Regulated Output
• Rectification, start-up, efficiency, and over-voltage concerns
• Integrated solution in a WSN
• Challenges Design of a EH-WSN node, prototyping
• Data analysis
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 2

3. Common EH Systems
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 3

4. Energy Harvesting Basics
• Energy Harvesting is the process by which energy readily available
from the environment is captured and converted into usable electrical
energy
• This term frequently refers to small autonomous devices, or micro
energy harvesting
• Ideal for substituting for batteries that are impractical, costly, or
dangerous to replace.
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 4

5. Common EH Sources
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 5
Energy Source Performance
(Power Density)
Notes
Solar:
• Outdoor, direct sunlight
• Outdoor, cloudy
• Indoor
15 mW / cm2
0.15 mW /cm2
10 uW / cm2
Power per unit with a
Conversion efficiency of 15%
Mechanical
• Machinery
• Human body
• Acoustic noise
• Airflow
100-1000 uW /cm3
110 uW / cm3
1 uW / cm2 @ 100 dB
750 uW / cm2 @ 5 m/s
Ex. 800 uW / cm3 @ 2mm e 2.5
kHz
Ex. 4 uW / cm3 @ 5 mm and 1
Hz
It depends on the specific
conditions with respect to the
Betz limit
Thermic
• Temperature gradients
• EM radiation
1-1000 uW / cm3 Depends on the average
temperature.
Distance: 5 m from a 1W source
@ 2.4 GHz (free space)

6. Design challenges in conventional WSN
• Sensor node has limited energy supply
• Hard to replace/recharge nodes’ batteries once deployed, due to
• Number of nodes in network is high
• Deployed in large area and difficult locations like hostile environments,
forests, inside walls, etc
• Nodes are ad hoc deployed and distributed
• No human intervention to interrupt nodes’ operations
• WSN performances highly dependent on energy supply
• Higher performances demand more energy supply
• Bottleneck of Conventional WSN is ENERGY
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 6

7. Energy Harvesting in Wireless Sensor
Networks
• Wireless Sensor nodes are designed to operate in a very
low duty cycle
• The sensor node is put to the sleep mode most of the time and it is
activated to perform sensing and communication when needed
• Moderate power consumption in active mode, and very
low power consumption while in sleep (or idle) mode
• Advantages:
• Recharge batteries or similar in sensor nodes using EH
• Prolong WSN operational lifetime or even infinite life span
• Growing interest from academia, military and industry
• Reduces installation and operating costs
• System reliability enhancement
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 7

8. Wireless Sensor Node
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 8
Power unit
Piezoelectric
generator
Solar source
TEG
Sensing
subsystem
Sensors
ADC
Computing
subsystem
MCU
• Memory
• SPI
• UART
Communication
subsystem
Radio
Main subsystems

9. Wireless Sensor Node
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 9
25%
15%
60%
Computing Subsystem
Sensing Subsystem
Communication Subsystem
Power consumption distribution for a wireless sensor node

10. • Vibrating piezos generate an A/C output
• Electrical output depends on frequency and acceleration
• Open circuit voltages may be quite high at high g-levels
• Output impedances also quite high
Energy sources
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 10
• TEGs are simply thermoelectric modules that convert a
temperature differential across across the device, and
resulting heat flow through it, into a voltage
• Based on Seebeck effect
• Output voltage range: 10 mV/K to 50 mV/K
• A solar cell converts the energy of light directly into
electricity by the photovoltaic effect
• The output power of the cell is proportional to the
brightness of the light landing on the cell, the total area
and the efficiency

11. Energy Storage
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 11
Option 2: Capacitors
• Efficient charging
• Limited capacity
Option 3: Super Capacitors
• Small size
• High efficiency
• Very high capacity ( from 1 up to 5000F or so)
Option 1: Traditional Rechargeable Batteries
• Inefficient charging (lots of energy converted to heat)
• Limited numbed of charging cycles

12. Supply management: LTC3588
• The LTC3588 is a high efficiency
integrated hysteretic buck DC/DC
converter
• Collects energy from the piezoelectric
transducer and delivers regulated
outputs up to 100mA
• Integrated low-loss full-wave bridge
rectifier
• Requires 950nA of quiescent current
(in regulation) and 450nA in UVLO
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 12

13. Anatomy of the WSN node
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 13

14. Battery Output vs. EH Module Output
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 14

15. Energy Available vs. Time
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 15

16. Demoboard Project
• Design of a multisource Energy
Harvesting Wireless Sensor Node
• Development of a demoboard with
Energy Harvesting capabilities,
including RF communication and
Temperature sensor
• Additional supercap for longer
backup operation
• Very customizable to the end users’
needs
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 16

17. Power supply circuit
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 17
Piezo
Solar
TEG
Supercap
Primary Charge

18. Prototyping
On board:
• 40-Pin Flash Microcontroller
with nanoWatt XLP Technology
• Low Power 2.4GHz GFSK
Transceiver Module
• Low Power Linear Active
Thermistor
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 18

19. Signal analysis
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 19
Fig. A: Duty cycle Fig. B: TX pulse length (Zoom View)

20. Data analysis
• Web interface
• Real time graphics
• History
• Views
• Temperature
• Supercapacitor Voltage
• Input Voltage
• Charging
• Backup status
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 20

21. Data analysis: examples
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 21
Fig. A: Temperature Fig. B: Input Voltage (VIN)
Fig. C: Supercap charging Fig. D: Supercap discharge

22. DEMO

23. Board specifications
Feature Description
Sources: Solar / TEG / Piezoelectric
Input voltage ranges: Solar: 5 ÷ 18 VDC
TEG: 20 ÷ 500 mVDC
Piezoelectric: max 18 VAC
Temperature Sensor: 0 ÷ 50 °C
Resolution: 0.4 °C
Wireless communication: 2400-2483.5 MHz ISM (GFSK)
Transmission rate: 1 and 2 Mbps support
Current/Power IDLE mode: 9 uA / 30 uW
Current/Power TX mode: 18.9 mA / 62 mW
Maximum TX distance: 100 m
Backup operation: > 24 h
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 23

24. References
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 24
Energy Harvesting Technologies
Springer
By Shashank Priya and Daniel J. Inman
Covers a very wide range of interesting topics
My Master Thesis
Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”
By Daniele Costarella
Available online: http://danielecostarella.com

25. Thank you
July 9th, 2013 Energy Harvesting Demoboard 25
@dcostarella
http://it.linkedin.com/in/danielecostarella