1. On Von Neumann Pokerwith Community Cards Reto Spöhel Joint work with Nicla Bernasconi and Julian Lorenz TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAA
2.
3. Outline Introduction von Neumann Poker von Neumann Poker withcommunity cards Outlook: the Newman model Conclusion
4. Research on poker Thegame of poker has beenstudiedfrommany different perspectives: game-theory[this talk] artificalintelligence (heuristics) machinelearning (opponentmodeling) behaviouralpsychology etc. In thegame-theoreticapproach, oneassumes best play for all playersinvolved. allowsdevelopment and application of mathematicaltheories neglectsmanyotherfactors
5. Game-theoreticresearch on poker almostexclusivelyfortwo-playergame twomainlines of attack: simplifiedmodels of „real“ poker e.g., 2 suitswith 5 cards each solutionbybrute-forcecalculation; lots of computational power needed moreabstractmodels, whichhopefullycapture essential features of poker[this talk] e.g., handsarenumbersu.a.r. from [0,1] hopefullyanalyticallysolvable mostimportantmodel: von Neumann poker
6. Von Neumann Poker Pchipsare in thepot at thebeginning. X and Y are dealt independent handsx,y2[0,1] u.a.r. X maymake a bet of aor pass („check“). If X checks, bothhandsarerevealed („showdown“), and theplayerwiththehigher hand winsthepot. If X makes a bet, Y caneithermatchthe bet („call“) orconcedethepot to X („fold“). If Y folds, X winsthepot (and gets his bet back). If Y callsX‘s bet, bothhandsarerevealed and theplayerwiththehigher hand winsthepot and thetwobets. In thefollowingweassumeforsimplicityP = a = 1.
7. Von Neumann Poker Itseemsthat X has an advantage, since Y canonlyreact. So howshould X play to maximize his expectedpayoff? Clearly, alwayscheckingguaranteeshim an expectedpayoff of P/2 = 1/2. Similarly, X cannothopefor an expectedpayoff of morethan P=1, since Y canalwaysfold.
8. Von Neumann Poker At firstsight, onemightguessthat X should bet thebetter half of his hands, i.e., iff x ¸ 1/2. However, once Y realizesthatthisisX‘sstrategy, he will onlycallwithhands y ¸ 2/3, sincethen he wins P+a=2 chipswithprobability at least 1/3 he loses a=1 chipswithprobability at most 2/3 i.e., „thepotoddsare in his favor“. 1 call bet 2/3 1/2 fold check 0 x y
9. Von Neumann Poker X‘sexpectedpayoffcanbefoundbyintegratingoverthehands of x and y and is: P ¢ 1/8 + P ¢ 1/2 ¢ 2/3 + (P+a) ¢ 1/18 – a ¢ 1/9 = 1/8+1/3 = 11/24 < 1/2 X loses money! y 1 -a call bet-call bet P+a 2/3 2/3 0 1/2 bet-fold check fold check P P 0 x 0 x y 1/2
10. So X has no advantageover Y and shouldnever bet? NO! Withthepreviousstrategy, most of X‘s good handsgo to wastebecause Y just folds. However, X caninduce Y to callmoreoftenbyincludingbluffs in his strategy! von Neumann gave an equilibrium pair of strategies Y‘sstrategyis best response to X‘sstrategy X‘sstrategyis best response to Y‘sstrategy von Neumann, 1928 X can achieve an expected payoff of 5/9, which is optimal. Von Neumann Poker
32. i.e., when Y has just enoughincentive to callevery bet of X without X wastingmoney on bluffs.5/9 = 0.555… value of thegame 1/2 = 0.5 q0 = 1/3
33. An improvedmodel Wheredoesthediscontinuity at q0 come from? Wefixedthe bet sizea (arbitrarily) beforethegamestarted. Whatifweallow X to look at his hand and then bet anyamounta ¸ 0 he likes? …and withflipprobability q, 0 · q < 1/2 Newman, 1959 Bernasconi, Lorenz, S., 2007+ X can achieve an expected payoff of (16-q)/(28-8q), which is optimal. X can achieve an expected payoff of 4/7, which is optimal.