This document discusses avatars and online identity in virtual worlds like Second Life. It begins by defining avatars as manifestations rather than representations, and explains how avatars allow users to explore different identities and aspects of themselves. It notes that online identities can be fluid and change over time. The document then discusses how different avatar forms can receive different responses, shaping distinct identities. It questions what is considered "real" - the physical self or inner identity. Finally, it discusses implications like how online worlds allow focus on inner identities rather than outward appearances, and how online experiences may transfer to impact real-life identities.

2. What is an avatar? Sanskrit: avatara incarnation, representation manifestation In Hinduism: 10 great avatara of Vishnu Krishna = dancing sex symbol! Buddha = guru Matsya = fish Kalki = white horse Each avatar is a manifestation (not a representation )of some aspects or characteristics of Vishnu relevant to a specific time, place and purpose. One comes to know the whole through knowing and integrating the parts.

7. What are the implications? Increasing number of people both work and play in SL They have commitments inworld and in RL (real life) For many, RL is one part of their life What are the impacts for them of their online identities? Aspects of the inner identity is being reinforced by SL experiences – transference must happen

8. What are the implications? Are our physical selves just another avatar, another manifestation of who we are in this time and this place and for this purpose? And if so, what will be the implications of that?