FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
Frequent Asserted Franchisee Causes of Action Against Franchisors
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. “ No defendant may escape liability for actual fraud through the use of general disclaimers” Healy v. Carlson Travel Network Assocs. (dicta)
10. Negligent Misrepresentation In Illinois, a defendant is not liable unless it is engaged in the “ business of supplying information ” First Midwest Bank, N.A. v. Stewart Title Co. , 2005 WL 119802 (1 st Dist. 2005) Some courts reject this argument categorically
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26. Discrimination as a Defense to Termination Seventh Circuit: “ discrimination requires proof of “arbitrary disparate treatment among similarly situated individuals or entities.” Canada Dry Corp. v. Nehi Beverage Co., Inc., But this holding is in question.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31. “ Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. … As a peacemaker the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. There will still be business enough."
![CLAIMS BY FRANCHISEES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ifa-2006-franchise-litigation-cdc-portions-combined-2-100729173331-phpapp01/85/Frequent-Asserted-Franchisee-Causes-of-Action-Against-Franchisors-1-320.jpg)
![CLAIMS BY FRANCHISEES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()