![Who We Are… What We Do… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
Similaire à May 5, 2011 society of marketing professionals services forum
Similaire à May 5, 2011 society of marketing professionals services forum (20)
Plus de Massachusetts School Building Authority
Plus de Massachusetts School Building Authority (7)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
May 5, 2011 society of marketing professionals services forum
- 1. SMPS Panel Discussion: An Update on the Massachusetts School Building Authority May 5, 2011 Katherine Craven Executive Director Steven Grossman Chairman, State Treasurer Massachusetts School Building Authority www.MassSchoolBuildings.org
- 4. MSBA Dedicated Sales Tax 1 Cent of Statewide Sales Tax Old Program Prior Grants Inherited: $5.1B Paid-to-Date: $2.7B Old Program Waiting List Inherited: $5.5B Paid-to-Date: $4.6B New Program Committed: $1.4B Paid-to-Date: $301M
- 9. Building With Us Scope Definition PEAK
- 10. Capital Pipeline Local Clearance Massachusetts School Building Authority PEAK
- 11. Capital Pipeline Scope Definition Massachusetts School Building Authority PEAK
- 12. Capital Pipeline Scope Monitoring Massachusetts School Building Authority PEAK
- 16. More than one quarter of a Billion dollars in OPM & Designer Fees * Does not include OPM and Designer Fees associated with repair projects Over $74 Million in OPM Fees* 93 1 16 24 Owner’s Project Manager Over $181 Million in Designer Fees* 127 6 3 40 Designer Total Total Completed To Date Completed Activity this Period MSBA District Collaboration District Action to Complete
- 17. Potential Future Work MSBA Funded* Projects for 2011 Massachusetts School Building Authority * Project approved by MSBA Board of Directors **Based on Average OPM Fee of 3.7% of Construction ***Based on Average Design Fee of 12.8% Construction Estimated Filed-Sub Bids Date Estimated Value of Construction Estimated Value of OPM Fees** Estimated Value of Design Fees** First Quarter $116 M $4.3 M $14.8 M Second Quarter $316 M $11.7 M $40.4 M Third Quarter $112 M $4.1 M $14.3 M Fourth Quarter $255 M $9.4 M $32.6 M
- 18. Potential Future Work MSBA Estimated* Projects for 2012 Massachusetts School Building Authority * Districts Invited into Capital Pipeline but not approved by MSBA Board of Directors **Based on Average OPM Fee of 3.7% of Construction ***Based on Average Design Fee of 12.8% Construction Estimated Filed-Sub Bids Date Estimated Value of Construction Estimated Value of OPM Fees** Estimated Value of Design Fees** Low End $250 M $9.2 M $32.0 M More Likely $600 M $22.1 M $76.6 M High End $950 M $35.1 M $121.3 M
- 21. Upcoming Work www.MassSchoolBuildings.org Massachusetts School Building Authority PEAK
- 22. Green Initiatives $300 million for windows, boilers & roofs
- 25. Green Repair Program Status 186 Projects – 74 Projects authorized for PFA’s 40% Complete
- 29. Model School Program Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
- 34. Model School Districts – Phase V
- 35. JUST RELEASED: The Needs Survey Statewide School Facilities and Findings
- 38. Massachusetts K-12 Enrollment * 2003 was the peak enrollment year.
- 40. Construction Activity by Decade
- 46. Questions? Contact: Katherine Craven Executive Director Steven Grossman Chairman, State Treasurer Massachusetts School Building Authority www.MassSchoolBuildings.org Katie Timmins Green Repair Project Manager 617-720-4466 [email_address]
Notes de l'éditeur
- Since 2004, the MSBA has made over $7.6 Billion in payments to cities, towns and regional school districts. We inherited 428 Waiting List Projects from the former program and we have made tremendous progress in moving those forward. We’ve completed 767 out of 789 backlogged audits. Those audits have saved over $1.1 billion in costs and $2.9 Billion in avoided local interest We created and implemented the ProPay system which allows municipalities to be reimbursed for project costs while they are incurred. Under the former program, cities, towns and regional school districts often had to wait years to get their first payments.
- The former program operated on a first come, first served basis. The MSBA prioritizes projects based on greatest need and urgency and places heavy emphasis on planning and study. We work with districts to confirm problems and to identify solutions that are financially prudent while still addressing their educational program needs. The MSBA has established a Designer Selection Panel for projects valued at more than $5 million. It’s a 15-member panel that includes 3 representatives from the school district whose project is being considered. Districts locally procure their OPM for projects valued at more than $1.5 million and the MSBA reviews that selection. The MSBA has developed standard OPM and Designer contracts to ensure that everyone who works on an MSBA-funded project understands what the roles, responsibilities and rights of the parties are. All of our financial commitments to cities, towns and districts are memorialized in standard Agreements.
- Districts who would like to be considered for funding must submit a Statement of Interest, which is simply a clear and concise statement of the problems at the school facilities in the district. SOI’s may be submitted electronically during a time period designated by the MSBA. The most recent window for submitting SOI’s closed in January. In FY2008, the first year the MSBA began accepting SOI’s, we received 423. The number of new SOI’s has dropped dramatically since then. And during our most recent SOI window, we received only 31 new requests for funding.
- Prior to 2000, construction activity averaged about 38 million square feet per decade with one notable exception in the 1980’s when two recessions and the adoption of Proposition 2 ½ limited the ability of cities and towns to make capital improvements.