4. RIA WG Scope of Effort Provide RIA platform architecture which supports the next generation web application execution platform providing interactive, rich and responsive user experience, and high implementation productivity. Provide RIA component model with publicinterface definition, component architecture, packaging, and deployment, which guarantees interoperability. Provide RIA description language specification of RIA with the abstract syntax and the semantic property. 4
5. RFI Overview “Specifications for RIA Component Interoperability” Request for Information To promote industry consensus on technical specifications for interoperable RIA components. To collect information from stakeholders about Requirements for interoperable RIA components. Technical perspective enabling the interoperability. 5
6. Stakeholder RIA Application Developer To build RIA Application through composition of RIA Components. RIA Component Vendor To define RIA components. (Interfaces, Behaviors, etc) To implement and publish RIA components. RIA Platform Vendor To provide RIA components running platform. To manage RIA component deployment processes. 6
8. From RIA Application Developers Industry they are involved, and System they are building. Sort of RIA Platform they are working on. Benefits of RIA platform for client application. Requirement for the interoperable RIA components. 8
9. From RIA Component Vendors Target RIA platform. Sort of RIA Component (Chart, Grid, etc). Component Definition. Requirements for the interoperable RIA components. Technical issues and mission features. 9
10. From RIA Platform Vendors Technical mechanism for interoperable RIA component. Technology for component packaging and deployment. 10
15. Features Call a method() in B RIA PlatformA RIA PlatformB Get an attribute in B Add a event handler in A into B Dispatch an event as calling the event handler in A 15
17. RIA Application Developers (1/4) ■What sort of industry and system do you work in ? - Industry. (e.g. Finance, Telecommunication, Education, Government) _______________________________________ - System (e.g. CRM, ERP, SCM) _______________________________________ 17
18. RIA Application Developers (2/4) ■Which technologies have been adapted as client application platform ? Please mark all adapted RIA platforms, and describe in case of Others. □ Pure Web, e.g. Ajax technology. □ Web with Plug-in, e.g. ActiveX, Java Applet □ Virtual Machine or Sand-box, e.g. Adobe Flex, MS Silverlight. □ Others ( ) 18
19. RIA Application Developers (3/4) ■ What are the main benefits of RIA platform? Please mark all benefits to you, and describe in case of Others □ Graphic effects and Look & Feel □ High performance with low system usage. □ Interactive data visualization. □ Local device utilization □ Stateful network session □ Direct(Socket) connection to legacy system □ Others ( ) 19
20. RIA Application Developers (4/4) ■Do you have any need for supporting interoperability among heterogeneous RIA platform.? If so, What are the missing features, problems and/or issues with implementation? Please describe in more detail. 20
21. RIA Component Vendors (1/4) ■What is your target RIA platform ? Please mark all target RIA platforms, and describe in case of Others □ MS Silverlight / WPF □ Adobe Flex □ Ajax Framework □ Others ( ) 21
22. RIA Component Vendors (2/4) ■ What sort of RIA component do you provide? Please mark all and describe if you mark Others. □ Interactive data visualization components □ Grid, □ Chart , □ Others □ Local Device Interface □ Network □ Others ( ) 22
23. RIA Component Vendors (3/4) ■How do you define interfaces of RIA component ? Do you use any global standard for defining interfaces? Do you find insufficient features from the standards? If then, Please explain in more detail. 23
24. RIA Component Vendors (4/4) ■ Do you need to integrate your components with RIA applications and/or components running on different platforms? If so, what are the issues, problems and/or missing features making them collaborate? 24
25. RIA Platform Vendors (1/2) ■ Whatis technical mechanism for enabling RIA component to be interoperable? Please describe in more detail. 25
26. RIA Platform Vendors (2/2) What kind of technology do you provide for component packaging and deployment? 26
27. Response Due Date 31 May 2010 Language English, Japanese, Korean Who would be supposed to response ? Samsung Electronics, Hyundai Capital, etc (In Korea) Hitachi System (In Japan) And so forth… 27