SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  28
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Editors, peer reviewers,
 authors, publishers:
      Who’s who?

             Chris Graf
          Wiley-Blackwell
       chris.graf@wiley.com
        +44 1865 476 393
•   Editors
•   Peer reviewers
•   Editorial boards
•   Authors (loads on authors)
•   Publishers
Editors


Objective                 Subjective

                               
Editors, authors, publishers - Who\'s who?
Good enough?
Editors

• Serve a journal‟s interests
  – Which depend on…


• Most encourage enquiries

• Editor‟s word is (nearly) always final
Peer reviewers
Analysis (expand in comments to editor as required)
                                                           4                1
                          Rating (higher score=better)            3   2
                                                         (high)           (low)

1. Relevance to practising clinician                          

2. Originality                                                    

3. Validity (hypothesis, study design, methods,
                                                                  
statistics)

4. Conclusion (reasonable? supported by results?)             

5. Tables/figures (appropriate? informative?)                 

6. Writing clear and accurate (title, abstract, text)         

7. Please enter your total score here                    22
Editorial board
•   Advice
•   Direction
•   Network
•   Sometimes peer review
•   Sometimes authors
•   Sometimes…
Authors (1999)
       • 2,500/11,500 responded
       • What authors want
            – Motivations when authors publish
            – Considerations when choosing a journal




Swan A. „What Authors Want‟: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of
contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999;12(3):170-172
Authors (1999): Motivations
          50%
          45%
          40%
          35%
          30%
          25%
          20%
          15%
          10%
            5%
            0%
                   Tell peers      Career         Personal     Funding       Financial
                                                  prestige                    reward

                          Authors' first choice     Authors' second choice


Swan A. „What Authors Want‟: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of
contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999;12(3):170-172
Authors (1999): Choices
          100%
           90%
           80%
           70%
           60%
           50%
           40%
           30%
           20%
           10%
             0%




Swan A. „What Authors Want‟: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of
contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999;12(3):170-172
Authors (2003): Online
       • 1,250 authors
       • Views on electronic publishing
            – Print more important than online
            – Speed through online not a priority
            – Peer-review process is the most valued
            – Followed by provision of citation-linking



Swan A, Brown S. Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new
technology. Learned Publishing (2003)16,28–33
Authors (2004): Online
       • 3,787/107,500 responded
       • Views on electronic publishing
            – “many aspects of author behaviour are
              highly conservative”




Ian Rowlands, Dave Nicholas and Paul Huntington. Scholarly communication in the digital
environment: what do authors want? Learned Publishing (2004)17, 261–273
Authors (2005): Mismatch
       • “a big gap between the scholars‟
         views on journal publishing…

       • … and journal publishers‟ views…

           … partly ascribed to a
           misunderstanding of the publishing
           process”
Nicholas, D., Jamali, M., Hamid, R., Huntington, P. and Rowlands, I. In their very own words:
Authors and scholarly journal publishing. Learned Publishing (2005)18:212–220.
Authors (2006)
       • 5,513 authors on issues relating to
         the scholarly communication system




Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. The changing scholarly communication landscape: an
international survey of senior researchers Learned Publishing (2006), 19, 31–55
Authors (2006)




Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. The changing scholarly communication landscape: an
international survey of senior researchers Learned Publishing (2006), 19, 31–55
Authors (2006)




Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. The changing scholarly communication landscape: an
international survey of senior researchers Learned Publishing (2006), 19, 31–55
Authors (2008): Quality
       • 13 authors, focus groups
       • Perceptions of journal quality
       • Three most important attributes
            – Reputation
            – Time to publication
            – Readership



John J. Regazzi, Selenay Aytac. Author perceptions of journal quality. Learned Publishing,
(2008)21:225–235
Authors (2008): Quality




John J. Regazzi, Selenay Aytac. Author perceptions of journal quality. Learned Publishing,
(2008)21:225–235
Authors (2010): No change?
       • 160 interviewees, 45 institutions
       • Needs and practices
            – “[scholarly communication habits], which
              rely heavily on various forms of peer
              review, may override the perceived
              „opportunities‟ afforded by new
              technologies, including those falling into
              the Web 2.0 category”

Harley Diane et al. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An
Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. UC Berkeley: Center for Studies
in Higher Education. http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc
Publishers
• Run an editorial business

• May publish under contract, may
  publish an “owned” journal

• Line of independence between
  publisher and editor
Publishers
• Care about
  – Brand, reputation
  – Their journal editors, Impact Factor,
    authors, readers and readership, ethics
  – What they publish, their products
  – Money
Publishers
• Spot gaps
  – Some research is still hard to publish
  – Archives of Drug Information
  – Allows pharma to “publish the results of
    studies and make freely accessible to
    the public the results of research studies
    that would otherwise remain unavailable
    on-file”
Publishers
• Make things happen
  – New author services, e.g. EXPEDITED
  – Slides, audio, video, Twitter, YouTube
  – Datasets?
  – Enhanced Articles
1957
2004
2010
www.justgiving.co.uk/cyclemadagascar

Contenu connexe

Tendances

2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslidesNathalie Cornée
 
Digital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic Librarians
Digital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic LibrariansDigital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic Librarians
Digital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic LibrariansJeffrey Beall
 
Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...
Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...
Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...Erin Owens
 
Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017
Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017
Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017Michaela Kurschildgen
 
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRsBibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRsJamie Bisset
 
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly Publishing
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly PublishingEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly Publishing
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly PublishingErin Owens
 
Citation Metrics and Journal Rankings
Citation Metrics and Journal RankingsCitation Metrics and Journal Rankings
Citation Metrics and Journal RankingsArielNeff
 
Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley
Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley
Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley nulibrary
 
Building successful research collaboration
Building successful research collaborationBuilding successful research collaboration
Building successful research collaborationQSR International
 
Getting your manuscript published -- what reviewers and editors want
Getting your manuscript published  -- what reviewers and editors wantGetting your manuscript published  -- what reviewers and editors want
Getting your manuscript published -- what reviewers and editors wantProfessor Abd Karim Alias
 
Scopus: a changing world of Research
Scopus: a changing world of ResearchScopus: a changing world of Research
Scopus: a changing world of ResearchCiarán Quinn
 
Planning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivo
Planning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivoPlanning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivo
Planning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivoQSR International
 
Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014
Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014
Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014Ciarán Quinn
 
Introduction to Scopus by the TrainingDesk
Introduction to Scopus by the TrainingDeskIntroduction to Scopus by the TrainingDesk
Introduction to Scopus by the TrainingDeskElsevier TrainingDesk
 
Harvard referencing endnote applications
Harvard referencing endnote applicationsHarvard referencing endnote applications
Harvard referencing endnote applicationsNishad Nawaz
 

Tendances (20)

Institutional Repositories @ Savannah State
 Institutional Repositories @ Savannah State  Institutional Repositories @ Savannah State
Institutional Repositories @ Savannah State
 
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
2014 09-04-foster-metricsworkshopslides
 
Digital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic Librarians
Digital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic LibrariansDigital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic Librarians
Digital Repositories: Essential Information for Academic Librarians
 
Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...
Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...
Making an Impact: The Impact Factor's Intent, Benefits, Limitations, and Comp...
 
Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017
Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017
Scopus training at NUI Galway - 31st Jan 2017
 
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRsBibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
 
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly Publishing
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly PublishingEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly Publishing
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Scholarly Publishing
 
+Sc gm fr mars 2016
+Sc gm fr   mars 2016+Sc gm fr   mars 2016
+Sc gm fr mars 2016
 
Citation Metrics and Journal Rankings
Citation Metrics and Journal RankingsCitation Metrics and Journal Rankings
Citation Metrics and Journal Rankings
 
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
 
Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley
Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley
Scopus, ScienceDirect and Mendeley
 
Building successful research collaboration
Building successful research collaborationBuilding successful research collaboration
Building successful research collaboration
 
Paper writing
Paper writingPaper writing
Paper writing
 
Getting your manuscript published -- what reviewers and editors want
Getting your manuscript published  -- what reviewers and editors wantGetting your manuscript published  -- what reviewers and editors want
Getting your manuscript published -- what reviewers and editors want
 
Scopus: a changing world of Research
Scopus: a changing world of ResearchScopus: a changing world of Research
Scopus: a changing world of Research
 
Planning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivo
Planning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivoPlanning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivo
Planning and organizing your project to ensure success with NVivo
 
Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014
Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014
Scopus author seminar maynooth_29 10 2014
 
Introduction to Scopus by the TrainingDesk
Introduction to Scopus by the TrainingDeskIntroduction to Scopus by the TrainingDesk
Introduction to Scopus by the TrainingDesk
 
Harvard referencing endnote applications
Harvard referencing endnote applicationsHarvard referencing endnote applications
Harvard referencing endnote applications
 
Wnl sponsor 2 scopus
Wnl sponsor 2 scopusWnl sponsor 2 scopus
Wnl sponsor 2 scopus
 

En vedette

From socially to scholarly and back again
From socially to scholarly and back againFrom socially to scholarly and back again
From socially to scholarly and back againKudos
 
L12 yem good play_toward_conclusion
L12 yem good play_toward_conclusionL12 yem good play_toward_conclusion
L12 yem good play_toward_conclusionChormvirak Moulsem
 
Research skills & ethics in science life
Research skills & ethics in science lifeResearch skills & ethics in science life
Research skills & ethics in science lifeHossam Alhelaly
 
1.Science Vs Ethics
1.Science Vs Ethics1.Science Vs Ethics
1.Science Vs EthicsFlyerlemon
 
Science and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War II
Science and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War IIScience and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War II
Science and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War IIPriyatham Bollimpalli
 
How to write_scientific_paper
How to write_scientific_paperHow to write_scientific_paper
How to write_scientific_paperSabiq Muhammad
 
Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)
Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)
Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)Dr Ghaiath Hussein
 
Research ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconductResearch ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconductDr Ghaiath Hussein
 
Ethics In Research
Ethics In ResearchEthics In Research
Ethics In ResearchGrant Heller
 

En vedette (11)

From socially to scholarly and back again
From socially to scholarly and back againFrom socially to scholarly and back again
From socially to scholarly and back again
 
L12 yem good play_toward_conclusion
L12 yem good play_toward_conclusionL12 yem good play_toward_conclusion
L12 yem good play_toward_conclusion
 
Research skills & ethics in science life
Research skills & ethics in science lifeResearch skills & ethics in science life
Research skills & ethics in science life
 
1.Science Vs Ethics
1.Science Vs Ethics1.Science Vs Ethics
1.Science Vs Ethics
 
Science and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War II
Science and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War IIScience and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War II
Science and Ethics: The Manhattan Project during World War II
 
How to write_scientific_paper
How to write_scientific_paperHow to write_scientific_paper
How to write_scientific_paper
 
SCHS Topic7 research ethics
SCHS Topic7 research ethicsSCHS Topic7 research ethics
SCHS Topic7 research ethics
 
Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)
Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)
Research Ethics for JPCFM (Jan2011)
 
Research ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconductResearch ethics & scientific misconduct
Research ethics & scientific misconduct
 
Ethics In Research
Ethics In ResearchEthics In Research
Ethics In Research
 
Verb phrase
Verb phraseVerb phrase
Verb phrase
 

Similaire à Editors, authors, publishers - Who\'s who?

Effective Publication Practices
Effective Publication PracticesEffective Publication Practices
Effective Publication Practiceschrisgraflinkedin
 
Academic Social Networks and Researcher Ranking
Academic Social Networks and Researcher RankingAcademic Social Networks and Researcher Ranking
Academic Social Networks and Researcher RankingAmanyalsayed
 
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative ResearchNUI Galway
 
Publishing tips UNISA 2019
Publishing tips UNISA  2019Publishing tips UNISA  2019
Publishing tips UNISA 2019Terry Anderson
 
Taylor & francis how to get published
Taylor & francis how to get published Taylor & francis how to get published
Taylor & francis how to get published raboudi amina
 
Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014
Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014
Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014Kul Bhushan Saxena
 
May 17 editors ag_mexico city
May 17 editors ag_mexico cityMay 17 editors ag_mexico city
May 17 editors ag_mexico cityhiginiols
 
Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODL
Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODLPublication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODL
Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODLTerry Anderson
 
Good Practice Publishing
Good Practice PublishingGood Practice Publishing
Good Practice PublishingCrossref
 
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint.
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint. Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint.
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint. TIB Hannover
 
Poster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptxPoster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptxWasiqAli28
 
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authorsEditage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authorsCrossref
 
The publishing process
The publishing processThe publishing process
The publishing processRoger Watson
 
Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...
Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...
Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...HKBU Library
 
15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx
15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx
15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptxBARATH800940
 
Publication Strategies in the Social and Cultural Sciences
Publication Strategies in the Social and Cultural SciencesPublication Strategies in the Social and Cultural Sciences
Publication Strategies in the Social and Cultural Sciencesuherb
 
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)HKBU Library
 

Similaire à Editors, authors, publishers - Who\'s who? (20)

Effective Publication Practices
Effective Publication PracticesEffective Publication Practices
Effective Publication Practices
 
Academic Social Networks and Researcher Ranking
Academic Social Networks and Researcher RankingAcademic Social Networks and Researcher Ranking
Academic Social Networks and Researcher Ranking
 
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative Research
 
Publishing tips UNISA 2019
Publishing tips UNISA  2019Publishing tips UNISA  2019
Publishing tips UNISA 2019
 
Final delasalle for uksg
Final delasalle for uksgFinal delasalle for uksg
Final delasalle for uksg
 
Taylor & francis how to get published
Taylor & francis how to get published Taylor & francis how to get published
Taylor & francis how to get published
 
Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014
Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014
Enhancing research publication quality fiib 2014
 
May 17 editors ag_mexico city
May 17 editors ag_mexico cityMay 17 editors ag_mexico city
May 17 editors ag_mexico city
 
Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODL
Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODLPublication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODL
Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODL
 
Good Practice Publishing
Good Practice PublishingGood Practice Publishing
Good Practice Publishing
 
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint.
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint. Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint.
Opportunities: Improve Interoperability ... from a library viewpoint.
 
Poster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptxPoster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptx
 
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authorsEditage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
 
The publishing process
The publishing processThe publishing process
The publishing process
 
Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...
Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...
Publishing in academic journals: Tips to help you succeed - Taylor and Franci...
 
15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx
15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx
15_1014_ASB_Where_to_Publish_Presentation.pptx
 
Publication Strategies in the Social and Cultural Sciences
Publication Strategies in the Social and Cultural SciencesPublication Strategies in the Social and Cultural Sciences
Publication Strategies in the Social and Cultural Sciences
 
Demystifying open access
Demystifying open accessDemystifying open access
Demystifying open access
 
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
Publishing in Wiley Materials Science Journals - Wiley (February 2015)
 
4534 Seminar
4534 Seminar 4534 Seminar
4534 Seminar
 

Editors, authors, publishers - Who\'s who?

  • 1. Editors, peer reviewers, authors, publishers: Who’s who? Chris Graf Wiley-Blackwell chris.graf@wiley.com +44 1865 476 393
  • 2. Editors • Peer reviewers • Editorial boards • Authors (loads on authors) • Publishers
  • 3. Editors Objective Subjective    
  • 6. Editors • Serve a journal‟s interests – Which depend on… • Most encourage enquiries • Editor‟s word is (nearly) always final
  • 7. Peer reviewers Analysis (expand in comments to editor as required) 4 1 Rating (higher score=better) 3 2 (high) (low) 1. Relevance to practising clinician  2. Originality  3. Validity (hypothesis, study design, methods,  statistics) 4. Conclusion (reasonable? supported by results?)  5. Tables/figures (appropriate? informative?)  6. Writing clear and accurate (title, abstract, text)  7. Please enter your total score here 22
  • 8. Editorial board • Advice • Direction • Network • Sometimes peer review • Sometimes authors • Sometimes…
  • 9. Authors (1999) • 2,500/11,500 responded • What authors want – Motivations when authors publish – Considerations when choosing a journal Swan A. „What Authors Want‟: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999;12(3):170-172
  • 10. Authors (1999): Motivations 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Tell peers Career Personal Funding Financial prestige reward Authors' first choice Authors' second choice Swan A. „What Authors Want‟: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999;12(3):170-172
  • 11. Authors (1999): Choices 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Swan A. „What Authors Want‟: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing. 1999;12(3):170-172
  • 12. Authors (2003): Online • 1,250 authors • Views on electronic publishing – Print more important than online – Speed through online not a priority – Peer-review process is the most valued – Followed by provision of citation-linking Swan A, Brown S. Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology. Learned Publishing (2003)16,28–33
  • 13. Authors (2004): Online • 3,787/107,500 responded • Views on electronic publishing – “many aspects of author behaviour are highly conservative” Ian Rowlands, Dave Nicholas and Paul Huntington. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? Learned Publishing (2004)17, 261–273
  • 14. Authors (2005): Mismatch • “a big gap between the scholars‟ views on journal publishing… • … and journal publishers‟ views… … partly ascribed to a misunderstanding of the publishing process” Nicholas, D., Jamali, M., Hamid, R., Huntington, P. and Rowlands, I. In their very own words: Authors and scholarly journal publishing. Learned Publishing (2005)18:212–220.
  • 15. Authors (2006) • 5,513 authors on issues relating to the scholarly communication system Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers Learned Publishing (2006), 19, 31–55
  • 16. Authors (2006) Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers Learned Publishing (2006), 19, 31–55
  • 17. Authors (2006) Ian Rowlands and Dave Nicholas. The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers Learned Publishing (2006), 19, 31–55
  • 18. Authors (2008): Quality • 13 authors, focus groups • Perceptions of journal quality • Three most important attributes – Reputation – Time to publication – Readership John J. Regazzi, Selenay Aytac. Author perceptions of journal quality. Learned Publishing, (2008)21:225–235
  • 19. Authors (2008): Quality John J. Regazzi, Selenay Aytac. Author perceptions of journal quality. Learned Publishing, (2008)21:225–235
  • 20. Authors (2010): No change? • 160 interviewees, 45 institutions • Needs and practices – “[scholarly communication habits], which rely heavily on various forms of peer review, may override the perceived „opportunities‟ afforded by new technologies, including those falling into the Web 2.0 category” Harley Diane et al. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education. http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc
  • 21. Publishers • Run an editorial business • May publish under contract, may publish an “owned” journal • Line of independence between publisher and editor
  • 22. Publishers • Care about – Brand, reputation – Their journal editors, Impact Factor, authors, readers and readership, ethics – What they publish, their products – Money
  • 23. Publishers • Spot gaps – Some research is still hard to publish – Archives of Drug Information – Allows pharma to “publish the results of studies and make freely accessible to the public the results of research studies that would otherwise remain unavailable on-file”
  • 24. Publishers • Make things happen – New author services, e.g. EXPEDITED – Slides, audio, video, Twitter, YouTube – Datasets? – Enhanced Articles
  • 25. 1957
  • 26. 2004
  • 27. 2010