Asr An Innovative Water Resource Management Solution Awwa
1. Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)An Innovative Water Resource Management SolutionAWWA, Michigan Section71st Annual ConferenceSeptember 15, 2009by: Chris Brown, PhDArlene Anderson-Vincent
2.
3. Artificial Recharge: Process of adding water to an aquifer for the purpose of restoring or managing groundwater resources. Example, restoring shallow groundwater levels to their past elevations.
4.
5. What is ASR? Water is captured from a source recharged into an aquifer stored recovered for use used Source: NAS
6. Artificial Recharge Purposes Conserve and dispose of runoff and flood waters; Supplement the quantity of ground water available; Reduce or eliminate decline in the water level of ground water reservoirs; Reduce or balance salt water intrusion; Store water to reduce costs of pumping and piping; Store water in off-seasons for use during the growing seasons; Conserve energy in geothermal applications; and, Remove suspended solids by filtration through the ground.
7. Why ASR ? Provide longer term storage of water resource – helps with restoration; Cost effective compared to surface reservoirs (e.g., water not subject to ET); Provides effective means to provide water for ecological restoration purposes (“in-stream” uses), water supply and agricultural use; Long experience in USA; Flexibility in well siting/minimal real estate; and, Easier to secure and protect from purposeful destruction or contamination.
8. “Begin with the End in Mind” – ASR Uses Emergency water supply; Seasonal water supply or help meet peak demands; Agricultural use using “lesser quality” of water; Ecological use to meet minimum flows and levels; Improve water quality in an unproductive aquifer; Minimize salt-water intrusion along the coasts or from deeper aquifers; Reduce subsidence; and, Disinfection By-product or nutrient reduction.
9. A Bit of ASR History Concept developed in Israel, USA, and Australia over last 30 years; Much theoretical work completed by Louisiana State U, U Florida, and U Wisconsin (1966 to 1980); First USA ASR project – Wildwood, 1968; First Florida ASR project – Manatee/Peace River, 1983; “High Plains States Artificial Recharge Act” – 1983; and, USGS/COE studies in 1983 to 1985 on south Florida ASR in brackish water aquifers.
10. Regulation of ASR Projects Regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program; ASR wells are under “Class V” wells in UIC program; and, Programs regulated by primacy states or the US EPA; First UIC permit is typically a “construction or testing” permit good for 3 to 5 years; and, After that owner can apply for an extension of testing period or an operational UIC permit.
11. ASR Project Data Portland, OR Salem, OR Beaverton, OR Seattle, WA Huron, SD Green Bay, WI Oak Creek, WI Ankeny, IA Salt Lake City, UT Washoe County, NV Wildwood Wichita Las Vegas, NV Norfolk, VA Chesapeake, VA Calleguas, CA Myrtle Beach, SC Charleston, SC Hilton Head, SC Lancaster, CA Alamogordo Highlands Ranch, CO Denver South, CO San Antonio Lee County Cocoa Beach Ft. Myers St. Lucie Shell Creek International Sites Florida Sites Willunga, Australia Bolivar, Australia ## Northern India Lytchett Minster, England Windhoek, Namibia Andrews Farm, Australia Clayton, Australia Tampa Palm Bay Peace River Hialeah Boynton Beach Broward County Lee County Olga Springtree Delray Beach Eastern Hillsboro Fiveash Manatee Rd
12.
13. Numerous projects in the United States recharge excess surface water into land application basins or into injection wells;
15. Hydrogeology in Michigan is compatible with ASR projects; and,
16.
17. ASR Myths ASR is an unproven technology; ASR is the best technology ever !!; Reality – ASR has been utilized in the USA and worldwide. As with any technology, there have been notable successes and a few failures.
18. ASR Myths ASR is very costly; ASR is inexpensive; Reality – ASR costs can fall within a rather large range. Cost optimization can minimize the costs and maximize the benefits. Typical costs in the $1 to $2 per thousand gallons water recovered.
19. Potential Water Quality Issues Disinfection By-Products Giardia Cryptosporidium parvum E. coli
20. Mixing Zone MixingZone Native Water Native Water Surficial Aquifer Confining Layer POSSIBLE REACTIONS Dissolutionof Aquifer Oxidation/Reduction Release of: Trace Elements Radionuclides Organic Carbon Ion-exchange Mercury methylation Storage Aquifer POSSIBLE REACTIONS Bio-fouling Suspended Solids Clogging Must Also Evaluate Geochemical Issues
22. Questions ? Thank you for the opportunity to provide this presentation. For additional information, please feel free to contact Chris Brown, PhD, (904) 363-3430, cjbrown@golder.com Arlene Anderson-Vincent, (517) 482-2262, aanderson-vincent@golder.com