NeuroDevNet KT Core Sustainability
•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•
1 j'aime•1,045 vues
The document discusses the development of an evaluation framework and database for tracking services provided by the Knowledge Translation Core of NeuroDevNet, a federally funded research network. It addresses factors that should be considered for sustainability, including ongoing relevance to priorities, leadership to ensure outcomes are met and oversee modifications, and using cost-effective strategies like leveraging existing databases and limiting data entry requirements. Sustainability requires considering who will guide the system into the future and how the tracking of services can adapt while remaining financially viable.
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Similaire à NeuroDevNet KT Core Sustainability
Similaire à NeuroDevNet KT Core Sustainability (20)
Plus de Institute for Knowledge Mobilization
Plus de Institute for Knowledge Mobilization (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
NeuroDevNet KT Core Sustainability
- 1. www.neurodevnet.ca WORKING TOGETHER FOR HEALTHY BRAINS Anneliese Poetz, PhD – Manager, KT Core David Phipps, PhD, MBA – Lead, KT Core Canadian Knowledge Mobilization Forum Thursday May 14, 2015 – 11:00am – 12:15pm (Session D, M-450) Montreal, Quebec
- 2. What is NeuroDevNet Federally funded NCE Programs of research: FASD, CP, ASD – Sleep, SDOH, HE Supported by: – NI, NE, KT
- 3. KT Core Services “KT maximizes the impact of research and training in neurodevelopmental disorders”
- 4. Evaluation Framework Phipps, D. (2013)
- 5. Data tracking: MS Access
- 6. Process 1. Map services onto CPPI evaluation framework 2. Identify indicators for tracking each service 3. Design and develop database for tracking (& reports to be generated) 4. Fully define indicators
- 7. What factors should be considered with respect to sustainability?
- 8. Sustainability 1) Relevance 2) Leadership 3) Financial Source: “Factors to consider in the Development of a Sustainability Action Plan” http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41947.html
- 9. Sustainability - Relevance How does tracking services (database & indicators) fit with our priorities? Source: “Factors to consider in the Development of a Sustainability Action Plan” http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41947.html Progress ReportingInternal Management Decisions
- 10. Sustainability - Leadership Who will be responsible for ensuring outcomes are met? Who is responsible for continued modifications? Source: “Factors to consider in the Development of a Sustainability Action Plan” http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41947.html INDICATOR DEFINITION
- 11. Sustainability - Financial Can cost-effective strategies be used? Source: “Factors to consider in the Development of a Sustainability Action Plan” http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41947.html MS Access Employee time (data entry) Revisit requirements/ update system
- 12. www.neurodevnet.ca WORKING TOGETHER FOR HEALTHY BRAINS Discussion Question: What factors should be considered with respect to sustainability? David Phipps, PhD, MBA Lead, Knowledge Translation Core NeuroDevNet dphipps@yorku.ca Anneliese Poetz, PhD Manager, Knowledge Translation Core NeuroDevNet apoetz@yorku.ca
Notes de l'éditeur
- What is NeuroDevNet? What we do, why we’re here (high level) Federally funded NCE ~80 researchers/trainees (FASD, ASD, CP) Knowledge and Technology Exchange and Exploitation “…seek to shed light on the causes of neurological disorders, and to share this knowledge to health care professionals, policy makers, and communities of interest… NeuroDevNet works across traditional disciplinary boundaries and sectors to ensure our findings are translated into tangible diagnostic, preventative, therapeutic, social, economic, and health benefits for all.”
- DJP: Briefly outline the services the KT Core provides
- DJP: briefly describe the CPPI evaluation framework
- MS Access used to track service provision via indicators that are mapped onto CPPI when data is entered.
- This is the process that led us to our current system for tracking our services using a database and indicators.
- This is the process that led us to our current system for tracking our services using a database and indicators.
- Based on the “Factors to consider in development of sustainability action plan” on CIHR’s website, the 3 factors that are relevant to our database and indicators system are: Relevance Leadership Financial (cost-effectiveness of the system)
- Relevance – How does tracking services/database & indicators fit with priorities (ours, Networks’ NCE’s)? management decisions progress reporting Leadership – Who will be responsible for ensuring outcomes are met? - each program/project responsible for ensuring their own KT outcomes are met. KT Core’s responsibility is to discover, articulate, and publicize success stories within the Network (part of Evaluation services) - Who is responsible for continued implementation of the innovation and making modifications as new knowledge is brought forward? - KT Core will revisit the indicators to update as needed. This includes both which indicators to continue using/not using (which ones to add/delete) as well as updating indicator definitions. Financial – Can cost-effective strategies be used? - Database we constructed was in MS Project – costs include: 1) license (through York, cheap), 2) employee time to enter data, 3) revisiting requirements for updates to database/system - If your organization has more complex needs/requirements, it may cost you $$$ to gather requirements (Business Analyst), hire a developer to create a custom database, employee’s time to enter data on an ongoing basis, pay developer to maintain/update system after it has been created and is being used, revisit requirements in future to update the system as needs evolve
- Relevance – How does tracking services/database & indicators fit with priorities (ours, Networks’ NCE’s)? management decisions progress reporting Leadership – Who will be responsible for ensuring outcomes are met? - each program/project responsible for ensuring their own KT outcomes are met. KT Core’s responsibility is to discover, articulate, and publicize success stories within the Network (part of Evaluation services) - Who is responsible for continued implementation of the innovation and making modifications as new knowledge is brought forward? - KT Core will revisit the indicators to update as needed. This includes both which indicators to continue using/not using (which ones to add/delete) as well as updating indicator definitions. Financial – Can cost-effective strategies be used? - Database we constructed was in MS Project – costs include: 1) license (through York, cheap), 2) employee time to enter data, 3) revisiting requirements for updates to database/system - If your organization has more complex needs/requirements, it may cost you $$$ to gather requirements (Business Analyst), hire a developer to create a custom database, employee’s time to enter data on an ongoing basis, pay developer to maintain/update system after it has been created and is being used, revisit requirements in future to update the system as needs evolve
- Relevance – How does tracking services/database & indicators fit with priorities (ours, Networks’ NCE’s)? management decisions progress reporting Leadership – Who will be responsible for ensuring outcomes are met? - each program/project responsible for ensuring their own KT outcomes are met. KT Core’s responsibility is to discover, articulate, and publicize success stories within the Network (part of Evaluation services) - Who is responsible for continued implementation of the innovation and making modifications as new knowledge is brought forward? - KT Core will revisit the indicators to update as needed. This includes both which indicators to continue using/not using (which ones to add/delete) as well as updating indicator definitions. Financial – Can cost-effective strategies be used? - Database we constructed was in MS Project – costs include: 1) license (through York, cheap), 2) employee time to enter data, 3) revisiting requirements for updates to database/system - If your organization has more complex needs/requirements, it may cost you $$$ to gather requirements (Business Analyst), hire a developer to create a custom database, employee’s time to enter data on an ongoing basis, pay developer to maintain/update system after it has been created and is being used, revisit requirements in future to update the system as needs evolve