Limitations Of Traditional Grammar
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Limitations Of Traditional Grammar

on

  • 36,137 vues

 

Statistics

Vues

Total Views
36,137
Views on SlideShare
36,137
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
5
Downloads
580
Comments
4

0 Ajouts 0

No embeds

Accessibilité

Catégories

Détails de l'import

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Droits d'utilisation

© Tous droits réservés

Report content

Signalé comme inapproprié Signaler comme inapproprié
Signaler comme inapproprié

Indiquez la raison pour laquelle vous avez signalé cette présentation comme n'étant pas appropriée.

Annuler
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
    Processing...
  • Slide share has been the crucial part of my studies particularly in linguistics, but would you try to post the strength of traditional grammar and how it has influenced modern grammar?
    Are you sure you want to
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
    Processing...
  • Thank you.It helped me with my linguistic lesson so much.Good luck
    Are you sure you want to
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
    Processing...
  • slideshare really helps me for my report and doing my lesson plan! THANKYOU so much!
    Are you sure you want to
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
    Processing...
  • its good work
    Are you sure you want to
    Votre message apparaîtra ici
    Processing...
Poster un commentaire
Modifier votre commentaire

Limitations Of Traditional Grammar Limitations Of Traditional Grammar Document Transcript

  • DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS Assignment On “Limitations of Traditional Grammar” Presented to: Muhammad Irfan Lodhi (Visiting Faculty) Submitted by: Muhammad Asif Saleem. Class: M. Phil. (Linguistics) Roll No. 20 Session: 2008-10. Department of Linguistics The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
  • Limitations of Traditional Grammar What is traditional Grammar? Traditional Grammar is the speculative work of the medieval and the prescriptive approach of the 18th Century grammarians basically it refer back to the Aristotelian orientations towards the nature of language as it is shown in the work of the ancient Greeks and Romans. There are ideas about sentence structure deriving form Aristotle and Plato ideas about the parts of speech deriving from the socio-grammarians. Limitations of traditional Grammar. 1. In one respect traditional grammar is a set of rules on which the English language is based on the other hand it is a pile of an inappropriate rules and short coming because if this type of grammar was perfect and appropriate then there would be no need for so many models of modern grammar. 2. Traditional Grammar is basically structured on indo-European classical languages. So, it is a poor model for the grammars of languages that differ from Greek, Latin and Sanskrit. 3. It does not discern between all linguistic level such as phonetic, morphology, syntactic and semantic. 4. In its essence it is normative and prescriptive rather than explicit and descriptive. As Frank Palmer says “most of the rules of grammar have no real justification and there is no serious reason condemning the errors they prescribe. What is correct and what is not correct is ultimately only a matter of
  • what is accepted by society, for language is a matter of conventions with in society. If every one says, “It is me” then surely “it is me” is correct English its rules are not rational, it is inconsistent and in adequate as description of actual language in use. 5. It rejects not only the contemporary usage but also the functional and social varieties of Language. 6. In its approach it is diachronic (Historical) rather than synchronic. It tries to incorporate a living language like a dead one. Fries in his book, “the structure of English” challenges traditional grammar by the calling them not insightful, pre-scientific, prescriptive and having a literary bias. 7. There may be about two hundred definitions of the sentence, yet they are not able to differentiate between. The girl is weeping. The weeping girl. According to rules of the traditional grammar “noun” is the name of a person, place or thing yet it can not include pink, blue and purple in the list of nouns although there are the names of color. 8. It is also noticed that traditional grammar gives importance to the written form of language and it rejects the facts that spoken form is prior to the written form. On the other hand it does not cover even the whole range of the written language but it is bound to specific kinds of writing, the more formal styles, in particular it gives a general conception of the nature of language in essentially aesthetic terms.
  • 9. Traditional Grammar uses meaning as the primary tool of linguistic analysis. Total meaning of a language utterance can not be analyzed in the present stage of our knowledge. Meaning is a complex entity to understand of which a forma description of language should form the base. Similarly it is going to treat because there is a various categories of meaning there are two major types of meaning (1) Social Meaning (2) Linguistic Meaning and Linguistic meaning is divided into tow sub-categories (1) Lexical meaning (2) Structural meaning similarly lexical meaning is divided into three sub-divisions(1) notional meaning (2) referent ional meaning (3) contextual meaning. How did language arise in the first place? There are many questions such like but TG has not an adequate notion of a linguistic rule. It appeals only to intuition. The rules are not adequate and whole some the learner has to use his own common sense or judgment in matters of unstated rules. This grammar concentrates on giving rules and defining terms but its rules and definitions are even not satisfactory and they are not scientifically sound. John Lyons says, “The Traditional Grammarian tended to assume, not only that the written language was more fundamental that the spoken, but also that a particular form of the written language, namely the literary language was inherently purer and more correct that all other forms of the language written and spoken, and that it was his task, as a grammarian, to preserve this form of the language from corruption”. ( An introduction to theoretical linguistics). In its approach traditional grammar shows itself as God given, neat, Holy and does not allow the consideration for language change and ignores the fact that grammar of language show also change as the language changes.
  • Conclusion. Despite the fact that traditional grammar is informal, unscientific full of contradictions and inconsistencies, inexplicit, inadequate, and prescriptive uneconomical and unwholesome and it ignores spoken language, language change, contemporary usage and all the varieties of language. T is still crucial unit of English language. It is not in so much what traditional grammar actually tells us about language that is the real worrying factor as what it does not tell us. Thus there is no need for whole scale change, it surely needs to be mended rather than ended. This is what palmer has to say in his book “Grammar”. “Provided we are aware of the problem, we can use the traditional parts of speech and their terminology as the basis for word classification.” References 1. Frank Palmer (Grammar) 2. John Lyons (introduction to the theoretical linguistics). 3. Fries ( the Structure of English)