15. 6 useful questions that forms can help with
Assessment/Choice
Partnership/ongoing work
Review & Close
• “What’s the problem?”
• “What do you want to change?”
• “How are we getting on together?”
• “How are things going?”
• “Have we done as much as we need to?”
• “How has this been generally?”
18. How it can feel to try out new ideas and approaches
Apprehension
Integrated in
practice
Feeling Clunky
Learning taken from
the Closing the Gap
Project
Neus Abrines
Jasmine Hoffman
26. Balancing the seesaw of service and therapeutic
need
(with thanks to UPROMISE)
SERVICE EVALUATION
CLINICAL MEANINGFULNESS
SDQ
RCADS
CGAS
Goals
Symptom rating scales
Session rating scales
CHI-ESQ
27. 6 useful questions that forms can help with
Assessment/Choice
Partnership/ongoing work
Review & Close
• “What’s the problem?”
• “What do you want to change?”
• “How are we getting on together?”
• “How are things going?”
• “Have we done as much as we need to?”
• “How has this been generally?”
33. Introducing the RCADS: 2 ways
• In the following video, a clinician will introduce
the RCADS to a young person and ask her to
complete it in two different ways:
http://vimeo.com/57925678
While watching, consider
• What are the pros and cons of asking a young
person to complete measures in these ways?
• What might you do differently?
• What questions might the young person have?
34. Interpreting RCADS Scores
• What do you
make of this?
• What might you
want to discuss
in supervision?
•
What do you want to
know?
•
What questions would
you ask?
35. Feeding back scores to clients
• The following video clip shows a therapist
discussing scores on a measure with a young
person: http://vimeo.com/57925681
• Do you think this was done in a collaborative
manner?
• How could it have been more collaborative?
Intros – various hat – HPFT, CORC IAPTWHAT WANTEDHOW HAS USED TOOLS
Who are you all? CYP-IAPT or PbR both , neitherWho have used outcomes and feedback tools at all?Who used session by session?What do you want to know? – in pairs
Evaluation vs clinical useSee- saw?
MENTION THAT THEY DON’T HAVE TO BE DIVIDED THIS WAY - JUST FOR EASE OF USEAnother way of looking at the measures – points at which they are useful, types of information you can get at each point
5 minsModality: didactic (intro to task)Alternative supervisor version: Clinician = supervisor, YP= supervisee: Supervisor has to convince supervisee of importance of using measuresClinician=supervisor
5-10 minsModality: Whole/small group discussionLO: 1/2/3Group discussion 10 mins
5-10 minsModality: Whole/small group discussionLO: 1/2/3
Brainstorm in your groups, make notes on post-its and stick somewhere!Activity: Brainstorm and short whole group discussion about preconceptions about PROMS and PREMS10 minsModality: Discussion (whole group)Learning objective: 1Participants get their view about “forms” out in the open – hopefully share positive and negative views and experiences of “forms”
10 minsModality: Whole group discussionLO: 1
MENTION THAT THEY DON’T HAVE TO BE DIVIDED THIS WAY - JUST FOR EASE OF USEAnother way of looking at the measures – points at which they are useful, types of information you can get at each point
Eg - sot when been a bad week – flag up need to talk
Trainer acts as supervisor, trainees advise on scores
What going on here?Need for triangulation SFQ15 year old anxietyGoals to get on with life and see friends – anxiety got in the way
Three sectionsAssessment Session by sessionDemographics and session dataScoring aids and clinical cutoffs
Who are you all? CYP-IAPT or PbR both , neitherWho have used outcomes and feedback tools at all?Who used session by session?What do you want to know? – in pairs