מצגת מאת אלק שרפ הכוללת גישות וקוי מנחה ייחודיים וברי ביצוע לשיפור תהליכים עסקיים בארגון.

1. quot;¯ quot;
¯
Alec Sharp
Consultant
Clariteq Systems Consulting Ltd.
West Vancouver, BC, Canada
asharp@clariteq.com
-
NooL
http://bpmintro.wordpress.com/

2. Traction
for
“Process”
Clariteq Systems Consulting ,
25
¯
¯ / •
(¯ , , )
¯ •
,Use Cases)
(
(Data Modeling) •
¯
: ¯
“Workflow Modeling” (Artech House 2001)
.(2008 - )
:
–quot; ¯ quot; .... quot;
quot;... , ,
2

3. Traction
* WfMC
for
“Process”
,
,Six Sigma BPR -
, ¯
¯
, ¯
, – , ¯ quot; quot;
.¯
! ... – •
quot; -(Business Process Reengineering) BPR
quot;.. ! •
.“Six Stigma” - – Six Sigma •
quot; – BP
?quot; ¯ quot; ,quot;? ¯ •
,BPMN – ¯ •
quot;BPRquot; – BPM
... •
The Workflow Management Coalition - WfMC *
3

4. Traction
quot;¯ quot;
for
“Process”
–1
. –quot; ¯ quot;
.quot; quot; ¯ –2
. ¯ quot;¯ quot;–3
.quot; quot; –4
quot; quot;quot; quot; –4
. ¯
:
: ,
•
•
•
4

5. Traction
?quot; quot; ¯
for
“Process”
... ¯
... ¯
?quot; quot; :
..
¯¯ •
/ •
¯ •
•
(Alignment ) •
¯ •
•
. •
'¯ •
5

6. Traction
?quot; quot; ¯
for
“Process”
(Outsourcing) •
, •
•
•
•
¯ •
•
quot;? quot;•
quot;! – quot;•
quot;! ¯ ¯ – , , quot;•
... ¯
. ,quot; ¯ quot; ¯
6

7. Traction
quot; quot; /
for
“Process”
... ,¯
¯ quot;
,
quot;.
quot;. ¯ ¯ quot;
7

8. Traction
quot; quot;
for
“Process”
, ¯
! ¯ , ,
:
:
-
-
quot;¯ quot; quot;¯ quot;-
( ¯ )
:
-
-
:
-
- -
: ¯
Oracle - CRM - -
:
-
: ¯
e-Business - - use case -
8

9. Traction
?
for
“Process”
, :
.
(quot; quot;)
Workflow
, ,.
( )
.
–quot; quot;– :
.quot; quot;–
:quot; quot;
.quot; – quot; ¯ .1
.quot; quot; ¯ .2
: ¯ .3
. ¯ -
.quot; quot; -
, , , , , , ¯! ¯ .4
.' ¯ ,
9

10. Traction
? ¯ ¯ :
for
“Process”
! ,
¯
&
:
1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1
¯
:
:
:
: '
, ,
.( )
10

11. Traction
for
“Process”
Workflow
:
” ¯“
-
quot;“
...
¯
” ¯
quot;¯ , quot;–
:
¯ – quot;
quot;...
11

12. Traction
quot; quot;¯ ,
for
“Process”
¯
¯
1:1 1:M 1:1 1:M 1:1
¯
1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 M:1
12

13. Traction
¯ , ¯ ,
for
“Process”
•
1:1 1:1 1:1
¯
•
•
-
1:M
1:M
1:1 1:1 1:1
¯ 1:1 1:1
M:1
¯ -
13

14. Traction
¯
for
“Process”
. ¯ 1:1 .1
. quot; - quot; ¯ .2
. ( ) - ¯ .3
. .4
(Token) quot;
,¯ quot; quot; quot; .5
quot;← quot;
.(quot; quot;, )
:
:
¯
1:1 1:1 1:1
:
, :
.
14

15. Traction
? :¯
for
“Process”
: ,
.quot; – quot;
. ,
¯
¯
1 - ¯ 1
:
: :
:
¯ ¯:
WIP :
¯ ,
.quot; quot;:
¯ ( )
.
. :
15

16. Traction
! ¯
for
“Process”
¯
:
( )
- - ¯ • .¯ , •
¯ – ¯ •
.¯
. .¯ •
.quot; quot;– • ¯ •
, • .
. ¯¯ •
Functional ) quot; quot;
(Silos
¯ ,
.Functional Silo
16

17. Traction
for
“Process”
1 2 3 4
: ¯
¯ •
¯ •
¯ •
¯ ¯ •
¯ •
¯
17

18. Traction
¯
for
“Process”
. ¯ ¯ .1
. ¯ quot; quot; .2
. .3
:quot;
¯
¯
¯
1 2
?
:
, ¯¯ /
!
:
3 ¯
: ¯ : :
- ¯ ¯ ¯
(setup)
18

19. Traction
¯
for
“Process”
quot;. ,¯ , , ,¯ quot;
'.
... ¯
•
.quot; ¯ quot; –
•
. ¯ ¯–
•
¯ ¯–
. , ...
... ,
•
.quot; quot;
•
.
19

20. Traction
quot; quot; ¯
for
“Process”
, ,
- ¯ ¯ ¯
(Differentiator)
... ,
. , , ,
¯ ,
.
¯
¯
.
,
. ,
:
The Discipline of Market Leaders
Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersma
Addison-Wesley 1995
20

21. Traction
IT - Workflow :
for
“Process”
, ,
¯, ,
*
* * ¯
( ) Workflow
• • • ¯ • • •
• • • •
•¯ quot; ¯ quot;• • – •
• • • •
, • ¯ (Handoffs)
–
¯
.¯
21

22. Traction
¯ ¯
for
“Process”
, ,
¯, ,
*
* * ¯
( ) Workflow
• - • •
• • •
•
•
• •
¯ • •
¯ •
¯ • ¯ •
• • ¯ •
•
- ¯ •
•
workflow •
¯ •
22

23. Traction
:
for
“Process”
, ¯ ¯ –
.
..
) swimlane
( •
ANSI •
!
Data Flow Diagram (DFD) •
- - -
Process Action •
IDEF0 •
- ARIS EPC •
(Event-response Process Chain)
(BIM) •
¯ •
OMG
(OMG BPMN BPD)
Workflow
UML - •
( )
.. •
!
,
.
23

24. Traction
for
“Process”
:
quot; ¯ quot;
! ¯
24

25. Traction
Swimlane
for
“Process”
Complete semester enrollment (partial)
yes
Submit
Prepare Provide
Decide to
enrollment
enrollment supporting
proceed
package
package documentation
Give up
no
yes
Decide if
Submit
supporting
enrollment
Note - This is simplified - we haven't
documentation
package
shown the quot;transport mechanisms.quot;
needed
no
days later!
no
Confirm Decide if Enroll student
Prepare
course waiver per Etc.
confirmation
prerequisites required instructions
yes Must be printed
and signed.
!
Approve or
– • reject waiver
request
¯ ¯ •
¯
•
Grant
quot; – • Financial Aid
quot;
25

26. Traction
¯
for
“Process”
¯
quot; ,¯
...
¯ ) •
(
) •
(?
•
( , ,)
,
...
-
¯.
quot;.
.quot; quot;
26

27. Traction
quot; Workflow
quot; –
for
“Process”
!
quot;
¯
.quot;
!
27

28. Traction
Workflow
for
“Process”
: – (1
. , ¯
!¯ !¯
. , ¯¯ – (2
! ¯ ,
:quot; quot; – ¯ (3
. ¯
28

29. Traction
¯
for
“Process”
:
. quot; quot; -
•
←
quot; DB
. (quot; ¯ ¯ )
) OOAD ← O-O
.( ¯•
) E-R ) UML •
,( ←(
.' ¯ ,workflow
workflow ← BPMN •
.
:
, ,
.
quot;! ¯quot; •
use case
quot;! quot;•
29

30. Traction
!
for
“Process”
! ¯ ¯
30

31. Traction
for
“Process”
• • ¯•
(context) quot;
¯• quot; - ¯quot; • quot;•
• , •
) • •
(BPMN -
, ,quot; quot;• •
quot; ,' ¯ , (quot; quot;) •
.quot; •
.. , , •
!
– ¯ •
, , quot;
. ¯quot;
– •
quot; quot;(handoff)
.quot; quot;
31

32. Traction
–
for
“Process”
, ¯
¯ ¯,
.
:quot; quot; !
¯ 20% -¯ •
•
,
.
32

33. Traction
for
“Process”
¯ ¯ .1
.¯
. .2
, - .3
.
.4 ¯ quot;
.¯ quot;! ¯
quot;! quot;
. .5
quot; , quot;
,
. ¯
Thanks!
Alec Sharp
asharp@clariteq.com
33