![References ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/writingworkshop5handout-12869767695536-phpapp02/85/Writing-Workshop-5-Handout-1-320.jpg)
![References ,[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (16)
Similaire à Writing Workshop 5 Handout
Similaire à Writing Workshop 5 Handout (20)
Notes de l'éditeur
- Give credit Allow reader to find original material Many (slightly) different styles Editors know where you are already submitted Vancouver Style, late 1970s
- Use complete citation when reading, preparing biblio Science omits article titles, but you may not get accepted by Science
- Unpublished data, letters, phone calls are inappropriate Remember purposes: reader has no access to this information If necessary, cite in text (e.g., personal communication) Journal editor may delete, may require permission from person Author-year: use for early drafts easy to add/delete refs long text interruptions, especially in Intro increased production cost Number from alpha list: decreased production cost easy to find who is working in field ref info not available in text if important, cite author/date in sentence “ Streptomycin was first used to treat tuberculosis in 1945 (13).” Number in order of citation: decreased production cost difficult to add/delete works by same author separated in list
- Chest, October 1998
- Chest, October 1998
- Check instructions to authors Ask if you don’t find information about abstracts Transplant team: publish in surgery and nursing journals Reporting same subjects/results: misrepresents the evidence
- Publication is editor’s decision, not author’s
- Pubs process: review, production, indexing, abstracting