1. How To Grade for Learning by Ken O’Connor Introduction “ Learning is not linear… Instead learning occurs at a very uneven pace and proceeds in may different directions.” (Burke 1993) pg 4
2. Grades are not inherently bad. It is their misuse and misinterpretation that is bad.- Guskey (1993, 7)
3. Many common grading practices...... Make it difficult for many youngsters to feel successful in school. –Canady and Hotchkiss (1989, 68)
5. Standards Based Assessments Focus on Outputs What students will know and do Rather than Inputs Opportunities provided to students or what teachers are expected to do.
6. Standards Based Assessments Focus on Outputs What students will know and do Rather than Inputs Opportunities provided to students or what teachers are expected to do. Standards determine what, teachers determine how.
13. Students succeed academically only if they want to succeed and feel capable of doing so. If they lack desire or confidence, they will not be successful.
14. The essential question is: How do we help our students want to learn and feel capable of learning?
15. The essential question is: How do we help our students want to learn and feel capable of learning? Student responsibility for their own learning can be achieved most effectively by consciously involving students in the assessment process.
16. Relevant to students and the real world Authentic Learning/ Authentic Assessment
17. Relevant to students and the real world Authentic Learning/ Authentic Assessment The students are provided with opportunity to demonstrate what they know and can do.
18. Why Grade? Communciate achievement Provide Information Select, identify, or group students
21. 1. Grading is not essential for learning. “ teachers do not need grades or reporting forms to teach well, and students can and do learn well without them: (Guskey 1996)
22. Three C’s of Motivation Content (things worth knowing) Choice (autonomy in the classroom) Collaboration (learning together) 1. Grading is not essential for learning. “ teachers do not need grades or reporting forms to teach well, and students can and do learn well without them: (Guskey 1996)
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. Grading Practices that Inhibit Learning Inconsistent grading scale Failing to match testing to teaching Practicing "Gotcha" teaching Grading first efforts Penalizing students for taking risks
33. Grading Practices that Inhibit Learning Inconsistent grading scale Failing to match testing to teaching Practicing "Gotcha" teaching Grading first efforts Penalizing students for taking risks Establishing inconsistent grading criteria Worshiping averages Using zero's indiscriminately Following the patterns of assign, test, grade, and teach.
34. Grading Practices that Inhibit Learning Inconsistent grading scale Failing to match testing to teaching Practicing "Gotcha" teaching Grading first efforts Penalizing students for taking risks Establishing inconsistent grading criteria Worshiping averages Using zero's indiscriminately Following the patterns of assign, test, grade, and teach. Failing to recognize measurement error Suggesting that success is unlikely
35. Grading Practices that Inhibit Learning Inconsistent grading scale Failing to match testing to teaching Practicing "Gotcha" teaching Grading first efforts Penalizing students for taking risks Establishing inconsistent grading criteria Worshiping averages Using zero's indiscriminately Following the patterns of assign, test, grade, and teach. Failing to recognize measurement error Suggesting that success is unlikely
36. Grading Practices that Inhibit Learning Inconsistent grading scale Failing to match testing to teaching Practicing "Gotcha" teaching Grading first efforts Penalizing students for taking risks Establishing inconsistent grading criteria Worshiping averages Using zero's indiscriminately Following the patterns of assign, test, grade, and teach. Failing to recognize measurement error Suggesting that success is unlikely