SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  52
Marijuana
  Legalization
    Issues:
Where Can We Go?
              Kevin A. Sabet, Ph.D.
  Director, Drug Policy Institute and Assistant
         Professor, University of Florida
 President, Policy Solutions Lab, Cambridge, MA
              www.kevinsabet.com
Disclosure

Neither I nor any member of my family
has a relationship with any proprietary
entity concerning services discussed in
            this presentation.

Neither I nor any member of my family
 has a relationship with the alcohol or
           tobacco industry.
Why Are We Having
 This Discussion?
Because They Have
   Been Brilliant…


And We Have Not Been!
All or nothing?
Legalization vs. Prohibition
They‟ve organized at the state
 level to push their initiatives.
They have major donors who
    fund their work and
         messages.
They‟ve secured legislative
 champions at all levels –
  local, state and federal.
They‟ve gotten the attention of
 editorial boards and media –
  including print, television
       and social media.
They‟ve mobilized major
 grassroots and student
       supporters.
They are present and active
  in every single academic,
 think-tank, UN, and other
international and domestic
 discussion on drug policy.
How Can We Turn This
      Around?
Marijuana legalization could pass:
       In one poll, National support is 50%
                                                                                                     100%
                                                                                                     90%
                                                                                                     80%
                                                                                                     70%
                                                                                                     60%
                                                                                                     50%
                                                                                                     40%
                                                                                                     30%
                                                                                                     20%
                                                                                                     10%
                                                                                                     0%
         Year             1975           1980    1985     1990      1995   2000     2005      2010
                                        Do not support legalization      Support Legalization
Sources: Gallup http://bit.ly/olrSEQ and GSS
But Have We Seen This
       Before?
Percentage of U.S. 12th Grade Students
                Reporting Past Month Use of Cigarettes
                     and Marijuana, 1975 to 2009
           40


           30
                                                                      Cigarettes
 Percent




           20

                                                                      Marijuana
           10


            0




Source: The Monitoring the Future study, the University of Michigan
Is the late 1970s…

        In 5 years, 11 states “decriminalized” marijuana


NORML bragged, 1978: Keith Stroup “We are trying to get
marijuana reclassified medically. If we do that, (we'll do it in
at least 20 states this year for chemotherapy patients) we'll
be using the issue as a red herring to give marijuana a good
name.” (Emory Wheel, 1978)


2012: MASSCANN/NORML spokesman: “Stepping stone to
legalization? I hope so. That‟s the plan. Decrim 2008, Medical
2012, Legal 2016. Yes we want to legalize! We will completely
legalize for everybody in 2016.” (YouTube, 2012)
Legalization Resurgence


 Brilliant PR: “Marijuana is Medicine”

Tight Marijuana Legalization Racesin „12

     Our Side Often Feels Dejected
    (public grantees “cannot lobby”)
Generational trends in support
                 for legalization (Caulkins)
                                               Percent Favoring Legalization by Birth
Percentage Favoring Legalization




                                   50%
                                                           Cohort (GSS)
                                   45%

                                   40%

                                   35%

                                   30%

                                   25%

                                   20%

                                   15%

                                   10%
                                         1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007

                                                        Overall                         Silent Generation (1925-1945)
                                                        Baby Boomers (1946-1964)        Generation X and Y (1965-2000)
In 2012

  Three States Voting on Marijuana
     Legalization: OR, WA, CO

  WA and CO are most worrisome –
professionally run campaigns with $$$

   Four States to Vote on “Medical”
              Marijuana
Factors Leading to Increase


           Outspent

Messenger problem (generational
          familiarity)

      Seen and framed as
     sensible alternative
We Must Always Emphasize


   We Don‟t Have All The Answers

Current Policies Can Be Reformed, But
 Legalization is Unnecessary for That

     Legalization Exposes Us to
         Unknown Risk
Ultimately the Question is this:

  “Is the right to get high and buy legal pot in a
   store worth the risk to kids in the form of
 greater addiction and learning deficits, the risk
   to society when we have another legal entity
 advertising an addictive substance, and the risk
to our economy in the form of greater safety and
    health costs (like car crashes or the costs to
  health care and the costs of a newly regulated
                      system)?”
We Lose When We…

   Say that Current Policy Needs No
    Changes, “Everything is Great”

    Go on the Defensive About Law
       Enforcement Resources

   Don‟t Integrate Doctors, Health
Workers, Teachers, Soccer Moms in Our
                Work
Going Through the
   Arguments
Current Use of Major Substances in
           the General Population, 2009
Past Month Use (Ages 12 or Older)

   60
                                                                     51.9
   50

   40

   30
                                         23.3
   20

   10            6.6

    0
             Marijuana                Cigarettes                Alcohol


                       2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health
         Source: SAMHSA,                                              (September 2010).
Alcohol & Tobacco:
 Money Makers or Dollar Drainers?



  Alcohol              Tobacco


Costs                 Costs
              $185                $200
               bil.                bil.


                         $25
     $14
                          bil.
     bil.

   Revenues            Revenues
“If Only We Treated It Like Alcohol…”




   2.7 million                              847,000
      Arrests for alcohol-related           Marijuana-related
            crimes in 2008                   arrests in 2008
       (Does NOT include violence;
   Includes violations of liquor laws and
          driving under the influence)
Effect of Legalization on
      Price & Consumption


RAND: Price Will Drop More Than 80%


     Consumption Will Increase


     Tax evasion a major concern
What incentives do legal
corporations have to keep price low
     and consumption high?


     Alcohol: “Drink Responsibly”
                  and
               Tax Low
Legalization: Experience
            Elsewhere?

No modern nation has tried
legalization, though most Western
countries do not imprison people for
simple marijuana possession.

 -   The Netherlands, Portugal, Italy use rates lower for some
     drugs since 10 yrs ago; higher for others.
 -   The Dutch experienced a three-fold increase in marijuana use
     among young adults after commercialization expanded.
Estimated Number of Sentenced Prisoners and Drug
            Offenders Under State Jurisdiction, 1985 to 2009

                                              1,400,000
              Number of Sentenced Prisoners                                      All Offenses
                                              1,200,000

                                              1,000,000

                                               800,000

                                               600,000

                                               400,000                                            263,800                251,400
                                                                                   224,900
                                                                     148,600
                                               200,000
                                                     38,900
                                                                                                Drug Offenses
                                                      0
                                                          1985
                                                          1986
                                                          1987
                                                          1988

                                                          1990

                                                          1992
                                                          1993
                                                          1994
                                                          1995
                                                          1996
                                                          1997

                                                          1999

                                                          2001
                                                          2002
                                                          2003
                                                          2004
                                                          2005
                                                          2006

                                                          2008
                                                          1989

                                                          1991




                                                          1998

                                                          2000




                                                          2007

                                                          2009
                                               Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2009 (December 2010); Prisoners in
                                                                                  1996 (June 1997).
6/2011
Underground Markets and
              Crime
RAND: Mexican DTOs earn 15-25% of revenue from
marijuana.

It is highly likely that legalization would not
eliminate black markets for drugs.

State Legalization: 2-4% impact on DTO revenues
(California)

  -    Most legalization proposals call for taxes on
       drugs, which increases likelihood that markets will
       remain endemic.
  -    TCOs involved in numerous illegal trades
Taxes Necessary to Prevent a
Price Collapse Are Enormous
• Excise taxes create gray markets
• Most relevant metrics are
  – Price per unit weight
  – Price per unit volume
• Canada tried but had to repeal
  ~300% excise taxes on tobacco
Cross Sectional Relationship Between
  Tobacco Tax & Evasion (Caulkins)
                               50%

                               45%                                                   y = 0.1141x + 0.0018
                                                                                          R² = 0.5559
                               40%
  Consumption from Smuggling




                               35%

                               30%

                               25%

                               20%

                               15%

                               10%

                               5%

                               0%
                                 $0.00   $0.50   $1.00   $1.50    $2.00    $2.50     $3.00    $3.50     $4.00
                                                           Excise Tax ($ per pack)
Placing a $50 per Ounce MJ Tax on the
Same Scale (assuming 20 grams per pack)
                               450%

                               400%

                               350%
  Consumption from Smuggling




                               300%

                               250%

                               200%

                               150%

                               100%

                               50%

                                0%
                                      $0   $10   $20        $30        $40    $50   $60
                                                       Excise Tax per Ounce
Marijuana‟s Health Effects

Most people who use marijuana once will
      stop, and not get addicted.

1 in 6 kids who try marijuana will become
                 addicted.

   For the group of people who keep
smoking marijuana, the health harms are
     underappreciated and costly.
Potency: Increased THC Content
                  in Seized Marijuana

                       PERCENT THC FROM 1983 TO 2009
10%
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
 0
      ’85        ’90                         ’95                       ’00           ’05

                 Sources: The University of Mississippi Potency Monitoring Project
Long Term Effects
                                      of Marijuana

                    ESTIMATED PREVALENCE OF DEPENDENCE AMONG USERS
  32




                                                                                                                         23


                                                  17
            15

                                                                     11
                                9
                                                                                         8
                                                                                                            5



Tobacco   Alcohol         Marijuana           Cocaine           Stimulant         Analgesics Psychedelics               Heroin
           Source: Wagner, F.A. & Anthony, J.C. From First drug use to drug dependence; developmental periods of risk
             for dependence upon cannabis, cocaine, and alcohol. Neuropsychopharmacology 26, 479-488 (2002).
282                   351
                            Heroin               Stimulants              358
           175                                                       Hallucinogens
         Inhalants
                                                                                             451
 126                                                                                      Tranquilizers
Sedatives
                      Dependence on or Abuse
                            of Specific Illicit Drugs
                                              in the Past Year Among
                                             Persons 12 or Older, 2008
                                                                                                1,411
                                                                                                Cocaine
                  4,199
                 Marijuana
                                                                   1,716
                                                                 Pain Relievers


          Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Office of Applied Studies.
    Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2009 Discharges from Substance Abuse Treatment Services, DASIS .
Increased Marijuana Treatment
              Admissions 1993 and 2007

                                   PERCENT OF ADMISSIONS
60%
                                                                                                   19932007
50%


40%


30%


20%


10%


0
      Alcohol                     Cocaine                             Heroin                    Marijuana

                Source: Treatment Episode Data Set, US Health and Human Services, 1993 & 2007
Marijuana and Kids

    The adolescent brain is especially
      susceptible to marijuana use.

That means that when kids use, they have
 a greater chance of addiction since their
         brains are being primed.

If used regularly before 18, new research
  shows that IQ drops by 8 points at age
 38, even when that person has stopped.
Let‟s Not Go Back Here

The Liggett Group: “If you are really
and truly not going to sell [cigarettes] to
children, you are going to be out of
business in 30 years.”

R. J. Reynolds: “Realistically, if our
company is to survive and prosper, over
the long term we must get our share of
the youth market.”
Lorillard: “The base of our business is
the high school student.”

Phillip Morris: “Today's teenager is
tomorrow's potential regular
customer… Because of our high share of
the market among the youngest
smokers, Philip Morris will suffer more
than the other companies from the
decline in the number of teenage
smokers.”
There are many ways
to reduce
incarceration and
other related
consequences
without legalizing
drugs.
Solutions
                                        Smart      International
Prevention   Treatment    Recovery   Enforcement       Efforts
The future is uncertain…
                                         Extrapolation of Percentage Favoring
                                          Legalization Given Cohort Turnover
                                                  (Jonathan Caulkins)
Percentage Favoring Legalization




                                   70%

                                   60%

                                   50%

                                   40%

                                   30%

                                   20%

                                   10%

                                   0%
WWhat did we learn in
                                           California? (Caulkins)
                                 9%
                                                                                                             VOTEDNO
                                           Swing Voters
Outwardly Against Legalization




                                 8%                                                      Income
 Voting No On Prop 19 Minus




                                                                Liberal                 $40K-$80K

                                 7%                                                           Female
                                                                                                                Age 55+
                                                                                                                Parents of Children in
                                                                                                                Public Schools
                                 6%                                                       Income                                         Conservative
                                                                             Overall       $80K+
                                 5%
                                                                                                    < HS
                                 4%                                                    Male
                                                                                                    Education


                                 3%                                        Age
                                                                          18-34          Income
                                                                                          Under
                                 2%                                                       $40K
                                                                                                                          Immigrant

                                 1%
                                                                                                    Latino

                                 0%
                                      0%                  20%           40%          60%                                  80%                           100%
                                                                 Percent Voting No on Prop 19
• 1 in 11 of those who voted „No‟ agree
  that marijuana should be legalized
  but did not like the specifics of Prop
  19

• Focus on Specifics of Proposal, NOT
  generalizations

• Form partnerships with key groups
  – Immigrant populations
  – 55+
  – Females, Soccer Moms, Public Schools
Immediate Steps for All of Us

Recruit Younger Generation as Leaders

    Go Out of Our Way to Not Look
Inflexible, We Must Reclaim “Reform”

         Pick Battles Wisely

   Think Like “Google” or “Apple”
          Not “Microsoft”
THANK YOU!
KEVINSABET@GMAIL.COM

 WWW.KEVINSABET.COM

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA
Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA
Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA Health And Wellness
 
Legalization of marijuana presentation
Legalization of marijuana presentationLegalization of marijuana presentation
Legalization of marijuana presentationDamaris Lopez Rios
 
Legalization of Marijuana
Legalization of MarijuanaLegalization of Marijuana
Legalization of Marijuanalazylo
 
Medical Marijuana Legalization
Medical Marijuana LegalizationMedical Marijuana Legalization
Medical Marijuana LegalizationHerbal Mission
 
Ethics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdf
Ethics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdfEthics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdf
Ethics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdfSasha Nazarchuk
 
Legalization Of Marijuana
Legalization Of MarijuanaLegalization Of Marijuana
Legalization Of MarijuanaHerbal Mission
 
Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana
Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana
Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana Damian Prajer
 
The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)
The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)
The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)Justin Cramer
 
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Miller
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - MillerCannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Miller
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - MillerCannabisSummit
 
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - Orens
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - OrensCannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - Orens
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - OrensCannabisSummit
 
Legalization Of Cannabis
Legalization Of CannabisLegalization Of Cannabis
Legalization Of CannabisHerbal Mission
 
Cannabis Investment Thesis
Cannabis Investment Thesis Cannabis Investment Thesis
Cannabis Investment Thesis Douglas Leighton
 
Powerpoint for research paper
Powerpoint for research paperPowerpoint for research paper
Powerpoint for research paperdemarcus5479
 
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the WorkplacePolicies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplaceshrm
 
Legalizing Marijuana[1]
Legalizing Marijuana[1]Legalizing Marijuana[1]
Legalizing Marijuana[1]annajensen
 

En vedette (18)

Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA
Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA
Where Is Marijuana Legal in the USA
 
Legalization of marijuana presentation
Legalization of marijuana presentationLegalization of marijuana presentation
Legalization of marijuana presentation
 
Legalization of Marijuana
Legalization of MarijuanaLegalization of Marijuana
Legalization of Marijuana
 
Medical Marijuana Legalization
Medical Marijuana LegalizationMedical Marijuana Legalization
Medical Marijuana Legalization
 
Ethics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdf
Ethics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdfEthics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdf
Ethics legalization of marijuana.final online.pdf
 
Legalization Of Marijuana
Legalization Of MarijuanaLegalization Of Marijuana
Legalization Of Marijuana
 
Marijuana Legalization
Marijuana LegalizationMarijuana Legalization
Marijuana Legalization
 
Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana
Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana
Ending the Prohibiton of Marijuana
 
The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)
The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)
The Legalization of Marijuana Final (1)
 
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Miller
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - MillerCannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Miller
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 1 - Miller
 
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - Orens
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - OrensCannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - Orens
Cannabis Science & Policy Summit - Day 2 - Orens
 
Legalization Of Cannabis
Legalization Of CannabisLegalization Of Cannabis
Legalization Of Cannabis
 
Investing in Hemp - 1st Edition
Investing in Hemp - 1st EditionInvesting in Hemp - 1st Edition
Investing in Hemp - 1st Edition
 
On Cannabis
On CannabisOn Cannabis
On Cannabis
 
Cannabis Investment Thesis
Cannabis Investment Thesis Cannabis Investment Thesis
Cannabis Investment Thesis
 
Powerpoint for research paper
Powerpoint for research paperPowerpoint for research paper
Powerpoint for research paper
 
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the WorkplacePolicies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
 
Legalizing Marijuana[1]
Legalizing Marijuana[1]Legalizing Marijuana[1]
Legalizing Marijuana[1]
 

Similaire à Sabet presentation

Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12
Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12
Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12Brandon Williams
 
Open Spaces, Healthy Places
Open Spaces, Healthy PlacesOpen Spaces, Healthy Places
Open Spaces, Healthy PlacesOpenSpaceCouncil
 
Best practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.final
Best practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.finalBest practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.final
Best practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.finalBrandon Williams
 
Addictions
AddictionsAddictions
Addictionstomeczak
 
End Prohibition powerpoint
End Prohibition powerpointEnd Prohibition powerpoint
End Prohibition powerpointLEAP
 
Len 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thauLen 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thauOPUNITE
 
Tomorrow Will Not Be Like Yesterday
Tomorrow Will Not Be Like YesterdayTomorrow Will Not Be Like Yesterday
Tomorrow Will Not Be Like YesterdayApril Roeseler
 
Measuring Effect on Employees
Measuring Effect on EmployeesMeasuring Effect on Employees
Measuring Effect on EmployeesJimAddison
 
Communicating Longevity Risk to the Public
Communicating Longevity Risk to the PublicCommunicating Longevity Risk to the Public
Communicating Longevity Risk to the PublicPablo Mereles
 
Pres hsr mar5_pintor
Pres hsr mar5_pintorPres hsr mar5_pintor
Pres hsr mar5_pintorsoder145
 
Health disparities plenary (4)
Health disparities plenary (4)Health disparities plenary (4)
Health disparities plenary (4)CDC NPIN
 
Buildingasocialbusiness3
Buildingasocialbusiness3Buildingasocialbusiness3
Buildingasocialbusiness3joshuamross
 
Smoking and lung cancer and now Covid
Smoking and lung cancer and now CovidSmoking and lung cancer and now Covid
Smoking and lung cancer and now CovidRobert J Miller MD
 

Similaire à Sabet presentation (20)

Rusche 2 presentation
Rusche 2 presentationRusche 2 presentation
Rusche 2 presentation
 
Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12
Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12
Tobacco wb webinar 6.22.12
 
Open Spaces, Healthy Places
Open Spaces, Healthy PlacesOpen Spaces, Healthy Places
Open Spaces, Healthy Places
 
Best practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.final
Best practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.finalBest practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.final
Best practicestobaccocontrol.trc. 10.21.11.final
 
LDI Health Policy Seminar 1_14_11 Lawrence R. Jacobs, PhD
LDI Health Policy Seminar 1_14_11 Lawrence R. Jacobs, PhDLDI Health Policy Seminar 1_14_11 Lawrence R. Jacobs, PhD
LDI Health Policy Seminar 1_14_11 Lawrence R. Jacobs, PhD
 
Sam dc-1-2
Sam dc-1-2Sam dc-1-2
Sam dc-1-2
 
Addictions
AddictionsAddictions
Addictions
 
Alcohol # 1 concern march 16 2016
Alcohol # 1 concern march 16 2016Alcohol # 1 concern march 16 2016
Alcohol # 1 concern march 16 2016
 
End Prohibition powerpoint
End Prohibition powerpointEnd Prohibition powerpoint
End Prohibition powerpoint
 
JPMGuidetoRetirement
JPMGuidetoRetirementJPMGuidetoRetirement
JPMGuidetoRetirement
 
Len 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thauLen 6 gorman thau
Len 6 gorman thau
 
Tomorrow Will Not Be Like Yesterday
Tomorrow Will Not Be Like YesterdayTomorrow Will Not Be Like Yesterday
Tomorrow Will Not Be Like Yesterday
 
Measuring Effect on Employees
Measuring Effect on EmployeesMeasuring Effect on Employees
Measuring Effect on Employees
 
Page County 2018 Needs Assessment Update
Page County 2018 Needs Assessment UpdatePage County 2018 Needs Assessment Update
Page County 2018 Needs Assessment Update
 
Tobacco Use
Tobacco Use Tobacco Use
Tobacco Use
 
Communicating Longevity Risk to the Public
Communicating Longevity Risk to the PublicCommunicating Longevity Risk to the Public
Communicating Longevity Risk to the Public
 
Pres hsr mar5_pintor
Pres hsr mar5_pintorPres hsr mar5_pintor
Pres hsr mar5_pintor
 
Health disparities plenary (4)
Health disparities plenary (4)Health disparities plenary (4)
Health disparities plenary (4)
 
Buildingasocialbusiness3
Buildingasocialbusiness3Buildingasocialbusiness3
Buildingasocialbusiness3
 
Smoking and lung cancer and now Covid
Smoking and lung cancer and now CovidSmoking and lung cancer and now Covid
Smoking and lung cancer and now Covid
 

Plus de dcuniversegirl (20)

Mead presentation
Mead presentationMead presentation
Mead presentation
 
Voth presentation
Voth presentationVoth presentation
Voth presentation
 
Electronic (e) cigarettes ntpc march 2014
Electronic (e) cigarettes ntpc march 2014Electronic (e) cigarettes ntpc march 2014
Electronic (e) cigarettes ntpc march 2014
 
Trends 2
Trends 2Trends 2
Trends 2
 
Rap pres susan pintar
Rap pres susan pintarRap pres susan pintar
Rap pres susan pintar
 
Rap pres steve wiener
Rap pres steve wienerRap pres steve wiener
Rap pres steve wiener
 
Rap pres jon hager
Rap pres jon hagerRap pres jon hager
Rap pres jon hager
 
Pintar
PintarPintar
Pintar
 
Ac ask powerpoint
Ac ask powerpointAc ask powerpoint
Ac ask powerpoint
 
Pohl presentation
Pohl presentationPohl presentation
Pohl presentation
 
Pinson presentation
Pinson presentationPinson presentation
Pinson presentation
 
Lynam presentation
Lynam presentationLynam presentation
Lynam presentation
 
Kallal presentation
Kallal presentationKallal presentation
Kallal presentation
 
Jones presentation
Jones presentationJones presentation
Jones presentation
 
Dutchover presentation
Dutchover presentationDutchover presentation
Dutchover presentation
 
Bath salts
Bath saltsBath salts
Bath salts
 
Rx otc
Rx otcRx otc
Rx otc
 
Underage drinking
Underage drinkingUnderage drinking
Underage drinking
 
Meth
MethMeth
Meth
 
Heroin
HeroinHeroin
Heroin
 

Sabet presentation

  • 1. Marijuana Legalization Issues: Where Can We Go? Kevin A. Sabet, Ph.D. Director, Drug Policy Institute and Assistant Professor, University of Florida President, Policy Solutions Lab, Cambridge, MA www.kevinsabet.com
  • 2. Disclosure Neither I nor any member of my family has a relationship with any proprietary entity concerning services discussed in this presentation. Neither I nor any member of my family has a relationship with the alcohol or tobacco industry.
  • 3. Why Are We Having This Discussion?
  • 4. Because They Have Been Brilliant… And We Have Not Been!
  • 6.
  • 7. They‟ve organized at the state level to push their initiatives.
  • 8. They have major donors who fund their work and messages.
  • 9. They‟ve secured legislative champions at all levels – local, state and federal.
  • 10. They‟ve gotten the attention of editorial boards and media – including print, television and social media.
  • 11. They‟ve mobilized major grassroots and student supporters.
  • 12. They are present and active in every single academic, think-tank, UN, and other international and domestic discussion on drug policy.
  • 13. How Can We Turn This Around?
  • 14. Marijuana legalization could pass: In one poll, National support is 50% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Year 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Do not support legalization Support Legalization Sources: Gallup http://bit.ly/olrSEQ and GSS
  • 15. But Have We Seen This Before?
  • 16. Percentage of U.S. 12th Grade Students Reporting Past Month Use of Cigarettes and Marijuana, 1975 to 2009 40 30 Cigarettes Percent 20 Marijuana 10 0 Source: The Monitoring the Future study, the University of Michigan
  • 17. Is the late 1970s… In 5 years, 11 states “decriminalized” marijuana NORML bragged, 1978: Keith Stroup “We are trying to get marijuana reclassified medically. If we do that, (we'll do it in at least 20 states this year for chemotherapy patients) we'll be using the issue as a red herring to give marijuana a good name.” (Emory Wheel, 1978) 2012: MASSCANN/NORML spokesman: “Stepping stone to legalization? I hope so. That‟s the plan. Decrim 2008, Medical 2012, Legal 2016. Yes we want to legalize! We will completely legalize for everybody in 2016.” (YouTube, 2012)
  • 18. Legalization Resurgence Brilliant PR: “Marijuana is Medicine” Tight Marijuana Legalization Racesin „12 Our Side Often Feels Dejected (public grantees “cannot lobby”)
  • 19. Generational trends in support for legalization (Caulkins) Percent Favoring Legalization by Birth Percentage Favoring Legalization 50% Cohort (GSS) 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Overall Silent Generation (1925-1945) Baby Boomers (1946-1964) Generation X and Y (1965-2000)
  • 20. In 2012 Three States Voting on Marijuana Legalization: OR, WA, CO WA and CO are most worrisome – professionally run campaigns with $$$ Four States to Vote on “Medical” Marijuana
  • 21. Factors Leading to Increase Outspent Messenger problem (generational familiarity) Seen and framed as sensible alternative
  • 22. We Must Always Emphasize We Don‟t Have All The Answers Current Policies Can Be Reformed, But Legalization is Unnecessary for That Legalization Exposes Us to Unknown Risk
  • 23. Ultimately the Question is this: “Is the right to get high and buy legal pot in a store worth the risk to kids in the form of greater addiction and learning deficits, the risk to society when we have another legal entity advertising an addictive substance, and the risk to our economy in the form of greater safety and health costs (like car crashes or the costs to health care and the costs of a newly regulated system)?”
  • 24. We Lose When We… Say that Current Policy Needs No Changes, “Everything is Great” Go on the Defensive About Law Enforcement Resources Don‟t Integrate Doctors, Health Workers, Teachers, Soccer Moms in Our Work
  • 25. Going Through the Arguments
  • 26. Current Use of Major Substances in the General Population, 2009 Past Month Use (Ages 12 or Older) 60 51.9 50 40 30 23.3 20 10 6.6 0 Marijuana Cigarettes Alcohol 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Source: SAMHSA, (September 2010).
  • 27. Alcohol & Tobacco: Money Makers or Dollar Drainers? Alcohol Tobacco Costs Costs $185 $200 bil. bil. $25 $14 bil. bil. Revenues Revenues
  • 28. “If Only We Treated It Like Alcohol…” 2.7 million 847,000 Arrests for alcohol-related Marijuana-related crimes in 2008 arrests in 2008 (Does NOT include violence; Includes violations of liquor laws and driving under the influence)
  • 29. Effect of Legalization on Price & Consumption RAND: Price Will Drop More Than 80% Consumption Will Increase Tax evasion a major concern
  • 30. What incentives do legal corporations have to keep price low and consumption high? Alcohol: “Drink Responsibly” and Tax Low
  • 31. Legalization: Experience Elsewhere? No modern nation has tried legalization, though most Western countries do not imprison people for simple marijuana possession. - The Netherlands, Portugal, Italy use rates lower for some drugs since 10 yrs ago; higher for others. - The Dutch experienced a three-fold increase in marijuana use among young adults after commercialization expanded.
  • 32.
  • 33. Estimated Number of Sentenced Prisoners and Drug Offenders Under State Jurisdiction, 1985 to 2009 1,400,000 Number of Sentenced Prisoners All Offenses 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 263,800 251,400 224,900 148,600 200,000 38,900 Drug Offenses 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1990 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 1989 1991 1998 2000 2007 2009 Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2009 (December 2010); Prisoners in 1996 (June 1997). 6/2011
  • 34. Underground Markets and Crime RAND: Mexican DTOs earn 15-25% of revenue from marijuana. It is highly likely that legalization would not eliminate black markets for drugs. State Legalization: 2-4% impact on DTO revenues (California) - Most legalization proposals call for taxes on drugs, which increases likelihood that markets will remain endemic. - TCOs involved in numerous illegal trades
  • 35. Taxes Necessary to Prevent a Price Collapse Are Enormous • Excise taxes create gray markets • Most relevant metrics are – Price per unit weight – Price per unit volume • Canada tried but had to repeal ~300% excise taxes on tobacco
  • 36. Cross Sectional Relationship Between Tobacco Tax & Evasion (Caulkins) 50% 45% y = 0.1141x + 0.0018 R² = 0.5559 40% Consumption from Smuggling 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 Excise Tax ($ per pack)
  • 37. Placing a $50 per Ounce MJ Tax on the Same Scale (assuming 20 grams per pack) 450% 400% 350% Consumption from Smuggling 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 Excise Tax per Ounce
  • 38. Marijuana‟s Health Effects Most people who use marijuana once will stop, and not get addicted. 1 in 6 kids who try marijuana will become addicted. For the group of people who keep smoking marijuana, the health harms are underappreciated and costly.
  • 39. Potency: Increased THC Content in Seized Marijuana PERCENT THC FROM 1983 TO 2009 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0 ’85 ’90 ’95 ’00 ’05 Sources: The University of Mississippi Potency Monitoring Project
  • 40. Long Term Effects of Marijuana ESTIMATED PREVALENCE OF DEPENDENCE AMONG USERS 32 23 17 15 11 9 8 5 Tobacco Alcohol Marijuana Cocaine Stimulant Analgesics Psychedelics Heroin Source: Wagner, F.A. & Anthony, J.C. From First drug use to drug dependence; developmental periods of risk for dependence upon cannabis, cocaine, and alcohol. Neuropsychopharmacology 26, 479-488 (2002).
  • 41. 282 351 Heroin Stimulants 358 175 Hallucinogens Inhalants 451 126 Tranquilizers Sedatives Dependence on or Abuse of Specific Illicit Drugs in the Past Year Among Persons 12 or Older, 2008 1,411 Cocaine 4,199 Marijuana 1,716 Pain Relievers Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Office of Applied Studies. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2009 Discharges from Substance Abuse Treatment Services, DASIS .
  • 42. Increased Marijuana Treatment Admissions 1993 and 2007 PERCENT OF ADMISSIONS 60% 19932007 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0 Alcohol Cocaine Heroin Marijuana Source: Treatment Episode Data Set, US Health and Human Services, 1993 & 2007
  • 43. Marijuana and Kids The adolescent brain is especially susceptible to marijuana use. That means that when kids use, they have a greater chance of addiction since their brains are being primed. If used regularly before 18, new research shows that IQ drops by 8 points at age 38, even when that person has stopped.
  • 44. Let‟s Not Go Back Here The Liggett Group: “If you are really and truly not going to sell [cigarettes] to children, you are going to be out of business in 30 years.” R. J. Reynolds: “Realistically, if our company is to survive and prosper, over the long term we must get our share of the youth market.”
  • 45. Lorillard: “The base of our business is the high school student.” Phillip Morris: “Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer… Because of our high share of the market among the youngest smokers, Philip Morris will suffer more than the other companies from the decline in the number of teenage smokers.”
  • 46. There are many ways to reduce incarceration and other related consequences without legalizing drugs.
  • 47. Solutions Smart International Prevention Treatment Recovery Enforcement Efforts
  • 48. The future is uncertain… Extrapolation of Percentage Favoring Legalization Given Cohort Turnover (Jonathan Caulkins) Percentage Favoring Legalization 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
  • 49. WWhat did we learn in California? (Caulkins) 9% VOTEDNO Swing Voters Outwardly Against Legalization 8% Income Voting No On Prop 19 Minus Liberal $40K-$80K 7% Female Age 55+ Parents of Children in Public Schools 6% Income Conservative Overall $80K+ 5% < HS 4% Male Education 3% Age 18-34 Income Under 2% $40K Immigrant 1% Latino 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Voting No on Prop 19
  • 50. • 1 in 11 of those who voted „No‟ agree that marijuana should be legalized but did not like the specifics of Prop 19 • Focus on Specifics of Proposal, NOT generalizations • Form partnerships with key groups – Immigrant populations – 55+ – Females, Soccer Moms, Public Schools
  • 51. Immediate Steps for All of Us Recruit Younger Generation as Leaders Go Out of Our Way to Not Look Inflexible, We Must Reclaim “Reform” Pick Battles Wisely Think Like “Google” or “Apple” Not “Microsoft”

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. Over time, younger generations will become the main voters. Over the long term, voter turnover will lead to the rise of a generation that, following recent trends, will be more amenable to legalization efforts. I think you should flag how the generation gap has shrunk, as well as the fact that some still remains.Support among boomers has been more volatile
  2. Preliminary Evaluation of Marginal Differences Between Opposition for Prop 19 and Opposition for General Legalization by Demographic “California voters put up the largest number ever recorded for a legalization referendum, in a year when conservatives took back the House and typically lower mid-term election turnout patterns held. Given the high level of support for legalization in this survey, and the unusual circumstances of this election year, it is very unlikely that Prop 19 was the final word on this issue” Source: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, 2010