Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Phosphorus scenario analyses in the EU-27 food system - Kimo van Dijk
1. Phosphorus scenario analyses in the
EU-27 food system
Present and future P flows and dynamics
Kimo van Dijk MSc, Wageningen University
2nd Scientific European Phosphorus Workshop,
Wageningen, 6 February 2013
2. Introduction
Phosphorus (P) is essential and non-renewable at human time
scale
EU has almost no mineral P sources and dependents on import
Transition towards sustainable use of P is necessary:
● Higher P use efficiency & more/better recycling
● 4R principle is usefull:
• Reduce the inputs
• Reuse organic P rich materials
• Recycle wastes
• Redefine and redesign
3. Objectives & research questions
To develop a dynamic model for the analysis of the
effects of changes in drivers and nutrient management
strategies on P dynamics in the food chain.
What would be the P dynamics & food production in EU-
27 in case of a stop of P import via
● Q1: mineral fertilizers?
● Q2: mineral fertilizers and animal feed?
Q3: What are effects of best management practices
(BMPs) on food production and P use efficiency?
4. Dynamic Food System model
Mass balance principle
Miterra-Europe model
EU-27 at country level,
timesteps of a year
Entire food system
P imports, exports, losses
and internal flows
Flows described
dynamically as function of
sector input
Crop P uptake as function
of soil P stock and P
application
6. Dynamic crop P uptake
Mitscherlich yield response curve:
Puptake= [a – b * exp (-c* Papplication)] * d
Crop P Yield Response Types (1=high, 5=low response)
CPYRT Crop types
CPYRT 1 Vegetables, cut flowers, tree nurseries
CPYRT 2 Potatoes, maize
CPYRT 3 Sugar beet
CPYRT 4 Oil crops, other root crops, legumes, summer cereals, bulb flowers
CPYRT 5 Cereals, grassland, fruit tree, citrus trees, olive trees
7. EU-27 P flow analyses & data
Different sources:
Miterra-Europe, CAPRI,
FAOSTAT, Eurostat,
reports, articles and
experts
P flow = physical flow x
P content
‘Top down’ data
integration VS ‘bottom
up’
Assumptions were
necessary
P flows in the EU-27 food system for 2005 in Gg P/year, showing the imports (I) , exports (E),
losses of and internal upward/downward flows between sectors (indicated with square
blocks), the width of the arrows representing the magnitude of the flow.
8. Scenarios & BMPs
The scenarios are:
● BAU: present (~2005), Business as Usual
● S1: future, no P import via fertilizer, BAU
● S2: future, no P import via fertilizer & feed, BAU
● S3: future, no P import via fertilizer, BMPs
● S4: future, no P import via fertilizer & feed, BMPs
The Best Management Practices (BMPs) are:
● BMP-1: 25 % lower P losses in each sector
● BMP-2: 75 % higher crop P use efficiency
No changes in other drivers and factors, such as
population, agricultural area, crop types etc.
9. Per ha EU-27 crop P uptake per scenario
for 2005-2300
11. Total P import, export, losses and balance
per scenario in 2050
12. Per capita food production & processing P
flows per scenario in 2050
13. Total P in food available per capita per
Member State per scenario in 2050
14. Changes in total P in food per capita in EU-
27 per scenario for 2005-2300
15. Changes in dry matter crop yield in EU-27
per scenario for 2005-2300
16. Conclusions
The EU-27 is heavily dependent on the import of P via mineral
fertilizer (70%), animal feed (20%) and food products.
Soil P is an important stock to take into account in P dynamics,
because of its buffering capacity and large size (~150.000 Gg P)
A stop on P fertilizer import has a large effect on food production,
mainly on the longer term
A stop on P import via fertilizer and animal feed makes the effect
even more pronounced, causing a larger and earlier drop in food
production
The effects can be mitigated by the implementation of best
management practices in nutrient management
Additional data is necessary, especially for downscaling to the
regional level
17. Thank you for
your attention
Do you have
questions, comments or data?
Email: kimo.vandijk@wur.nl