So einfach geht modernes Roaming fuer Notes und Nomad.pdf
Lecture 2
1. Lines of evidence
1. Direct observation of change in natural populations
2. Direct observation of change under artificial
selection
3. Homologous traits
4. Homologies tend to be nested
5. The fossil record
1
2. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
2 http://www.thebody.com/nmai/cycle.html
3. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
env
2 http://www.thebody.com/nmai/cycle.html
4. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
3
5. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
3
6. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
3
7. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
3
8. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
4
9. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
4@?71+2=03+/9?A9=0=?=02@9:B++C<
%
$&$$$($
$
5-=+/2>/+*21?=02@
$&$$$!$
&
)
' (
$&$$$'$
!quot;#$! #quot;#$quot; %quot;#$quot; !quot;#$quot; #quot;#$# %quot;#$#
)*+,-.+/*0,-1/12-3/456)/7280+9:;1<
4
10. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
4@?71+2=03+/9?A9=0=?=02@9:B++C<
%
$&$$$($
$
5-=+/2>/+*21?=02@
$&$$$!$
&
)
' (
$&$$$'$
!quot;#$! #quot;#$quot; %quot;#$quot; !quot;#$quot; #quot;#$# %quot;#$#
)*+,-.+/*0,-1/12-3/456)/7280+9:;1<
5
14. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
565:7
!quot;#$%&'%()*+$&#,-$%.)/.#,#)#,&(
565:5
0()*+$&#,-$.12$$34
56597
56595
56587
56585
56557
< < < < < <
; ; ; ; ; ;
= > D E F G
!quot;?,-+@%?A&BA$..,(B ;+&2+@%?A&BA$..,(B
4@?71+2=03+/9?A9=0=?=02@9:B++C<
;+&2+@%$C&+C,(B !quot;?,-+@%$C&+C,(B
%
$&$$$($
$
5-=+/2>/+*21?=02@
$&$$$!$
&
)
' (
$&$$$'$
!quot;#$! #quot;#$quot; %quot;#$quot; !quot;#$quot; #quot;#$# %quot;#$#
)*+,-.+/*0,-1/12-3/456)/7280+9:;1<
5
15. Evolution in Natural Populations
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) – Ganeshan et al. 1997
565:7
!quot;#$%&'%()*+$&#,-$%.)/.#,#)#,&(
565:5
0()*+$&#,-$.12$$34
56597
56595
56587
56585
56557
< < ;< < < ;<
; ; ; ;
= > D E F G
!quot;?,-+@%?A&BA$..,(B ;+&2+@%?A&BA$..,(B
;+&2+@%$C&+C,(B !quot;?,-+@%$C&+C,(B
565:7
!quot;#$%&'%()*+$&#,-$%.)/.#,#)#,&(
565:5
0()*+$&#,-$.12$$34
56597
56595
56587
4@?71+2=03+/9?A9=0=?=02@9:B++C<
%
$&$$$($
$
56585
5-=+/2>/+*21?=02@
$&$$$!$
56557
&
D D
; ;
)
' (
$&$$$'$
<=> EFG
!quot;#$! #quot;#$quot; %quot;#$quot; !quot;#$quot; #quot;#$# %quot;#$#
!quot;?,-+@%?A&BA$..,(B ;+&2+@%?A&BA$..,(B
)*+,-.+/*0,-1/12-3/456)/7280+9:;1<
;+&2+@%$C&+C,(B !quot;?,-+@%$C&+C,(B
6
16. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
www.dicktruedesign.com/PRINTS/prints.fin&feather.htm
7
17. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
www.dicktruedesign.com/PRINTS/prints.fin&feather.htm
7
18. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
www.dicktruedesign.com/PRINTS/prints.fin&feather.htm
7
19. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
Is there evidence for a genetic basis to the migration shift?
British parents: German young:
WNW (279°) SW (227°)
8
20. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
Is there evidence for a genetic basis to the migration shift?
British parents: British offspring: German young:
WNW (279°) WNW (273°) SW (227°)
8
21. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
British parents:
WNW (279°)
British offspring:
WNW (273°)
German young:
SW (227°)
Source: Berthold et al. 1992. Rapid microevolution of migratory behaviour in a wild bird species.
Nature 360: 668-670. 9
22. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
British parents:
WNW (279°)
British offspring:
WNW (273°)
German young:
SW (227°)
Source: Berthold et al. 1992. Rapid microevolution of migratory behaviour in a wild bird species.
Nature 360: 668-670. 9
23. Evolution in Natural Populations
Blackcap migration – Berthold et al. 1992
British parents:
WNW (279°)
British offspring:
WNW (273°)
German young:
SW (227°)
Source: Berthold et al. 1992. Rapid microevolution of migratory behaviour in a wild bird species.
Nature 360: 668-670. 9
24. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
10
25. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
26. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
27. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
28. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
29. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
30. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
31. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
32. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
Hypochaeris radicata
www.missouriplants.com/Yellowalt/Hypochaeris_radicata_page.html
Lactuca muralis
biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php?Genus=Mycelis&Species=muralis
12
33. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
Hypochaeris radicata
www.missouriplants.com/Yellowalt/Hypochaeris_radicata_page.html
Lactuca muralis
www.bartleby.com/61/imagepages/A4achene.html
biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php?Genus=Mycelis&Species=muralis
12
34. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
Hypochaeris radicata
Dispersal ability (VP/VA)
(Mean ± SD)
Main- Island
land (Old)
Source: Cody and Overton. 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant
populations. J. of Ecology 84:53-61.
11
13
35. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
Hypochaeris radicata
Lactuca muralis
Dispersal ability (VP/VA)
Dispersal ability (VP/VA)
(Mean ± SD)
(Mean ± SD)
Mainland 1–4 5–7 8–9 10+
Main- Island
Age (years)
land (Old)
Source: Cody and Overton. 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant
populations. J. of Ecology 84:53-61.
11
13
36. Evolution in Natural Populations
Dispersal in island plant populations – Cody & Overton 1996
Hypochaeris radicata
Lactuca muralis
Dispersal ability (VP/VA)
Dispersal ability (VP/VA)
(Mean ± SD)
(Mean ± SD)
Mainland 1–4 5–7 8–9 10+
Main- Island
Age (years)
land (Old)
Source: Cody and Overton. 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant
populations. J. of Ecology 84:53-61.
11
13
Notes de l'éditeur
FINISHED WITH THIS SLIDE, LECTURE 3 2007
HIV: A retrovirus (virus particle carries RNA, not DNA) that causes AIDS in humans
As we know, HIV has a very high mutation rate, allowing it to quickly thwart the defenses of the immune system and drugs.
env gene encodes surface glycoprotein of virus
Seems very likely to be involved in very early stages of infection of a cell
Sequenced regions of the env gene from six children who were infected with HIV during pregnancy
Sequences were determined at four different time points from ~12 viral clones each time
Initially, all viruses within a child were similar. Over time, however, the viral sequences changed
Ganeshan et al. illustrated these changes using a phylogenetic tree, which places sequences that are similar to one another close together
(Branch distance between two sequences on the tree is related to the number of sequence differences between them.)
D, E, F appeared to have a stronger immune response.
How might we explain the faster rate of evolution in D, E, F?
Selection
Higher mutation rate
How can we tease these apart?
FINISHED HERE, LECTURE 3 2008
Sequenced regions of the env gene from six children who were infected with HIV during pregnancy
Sequences were determined at four different time points from ~12 viral clones each time
Initially, all viruses within a child were similar. Over time, however, the viral sequences changed
Ganeshan et al. illustrated these changes using a phylogenetic tree, which places sequences that are similar to one another close together
(Branch distance between two sequences on the tree is related to the number of sequence differences between them.)
D, E, F appeared to have a stronger immune response.
How might we explain the faster rate of evolution in D, E, F?