3. Nociceptive vs Neuropathic Pain Mixed Type Caused by a combination of both primary injury and secondary effects Nociceptive Pain Caused by activity in neural pathways in response to potentially tissue-damaging stimuli Neuropathic Pain Initiated or caused by primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system Postoperative pain Mechanical low back pain Sickle cell crisis Arthritis Postherpetic neuralgia Neuropathic low back pain CRPS* Sports/exercise injuries *Complex regional pain syndrome Central post- stroke pain Trigeminal neuralgia Distal polyneuropathy (eg, diabetic, HIV)
12. Goals of Neuropathic Pain Management Treat/prevent recurrence of pain-causing condition Reduce pain Improve physical/psychologic function Improve quality of life
16. APPROACHES TO THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROPATHIC PAIN Monotherapy Combinations Additional Measures First-line TCA Low-dose TCA+ AE Paracetamol Acupuncture Physiotherapy Anti-epileptic (AE) Second-line Alternative antidepressant Opioid with TCA or AE Opioid Capsaicin Third-line Alternative opioids Intrathecal drug delivery Neuromodulation
17. Management of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Managing Neuropathic Pain: New Approaches For Today's Clinical Practice Charles E. Argoff, MD, www.medscape.com Parameters Significance Tight glucose control Can reverse the changes but only if the neuropathy and diabetes is recent in onset. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA’s) e.g. Amitriptyline, Nortriptyline Effective but suffer from multiple side effects that are dosage dependent Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI’s) e.g. Fluoxetine, Paroxetine, Sertraline and Citalopram FDA not approved, no more efficacious than placebo in several controlled trials. Antiepileptic drugs (AED’s) e.g. Gabapentin & Pregabalin Emerging as first line treatment for painful neuropathy. Methylcobalamin Exerts neuroprotective effects, regenerates myelin sheath
22. How does Pregabalin work??? Pregabalin binds with high affinity to the alpha2-delta site ( voltage-gated calcium channels) in Neurons Reduces the calcium-dependent release of several neurotransmitters (Glutamate , Substance P) Increases neuronal GABA levels Reduces neuropathic pain & also exerts anticonvulsive and anxiolytic effects
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. Results – Weekly least-squares mean pain scores Improvement in the Pregabalin group was evident at week 1 and this improvement was maintained at every weekly time point through week 13 Research article, Joseph C Arezzo* et.al, BMC Neurology 2008, 8:33 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-8-33
28. Results – Responder rate 49% patients in Pregabalin group responded to ≥50% reduction in mean pain score from baseline to endpoint as compared to 23% in placebo group. Research article, Joseph C Arezzo* et.al, BMC Neurology 2008, 8:33 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-8-33
29. Results - Global improvement On both the clinician-rated and the patient-rated instruments, there was a response favoring Pregabalin compared with placebo CGIC – Clinical Global Impression of Change scales PGIC – Patient Global Impression of Change scales Research article, Joseph C Arezzo* et.al, BMC Neurology 2008, 8:33 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-8-33
30.
31.
32. Results – Change in least-squares mean pain score Significant reductions in end point least-squares mean pain score were observed for all three dosages of Pregabalin i.e.150, 300, and 600 mg/day ROY FREEMAN, MD, et.al, Diabetes Care 31:1448–1454, 2008
33. Results - Proportion of patients meeting improvement from baseline in mean pain score Significant improvements from baseline was observed for all three dosages of Pregabalin i.e.150, 300, and 600 mg/day ROY FREEMAN, MD, et.al, Diabetes Care 31:1448–1454, 2008
34. Results – Survival curve analysis The median time to onset of a sustained (≥ 30% at end point) 1-point improvement was 4 days in patients treated with Pregabalin 600 mg/day, 5 days in patients treated with Pregabalin 300 mg/day, 13 days in patients treated with Pregabalin 150 mg/day, and 60 days in patients receiving placebo. ROY FREEMAN, MD, et.al, Diabetes Care 31:1448–1454, 2008
35.
36.
37. Results – Effect on Mean Weekly Pain scores in DPN Pregabalin produced significant improvements for mean pain scores; mean sleep interference scores; and Total Mood Disturbance versus placebo Rosenstock J, Tuchman M, LaMoreaux L, Sharma U et.al, Pain. 2004 Aug;110(3):628-38.
38.
39.
40.
41. Pregabalin better than Gabapentin…. Feature Pregabalin Gabapentin T max 1 h., Pregebalin SR (3-4 hr) 3.5 h. Absorption Fast Slow Oral Bioavailability > 90 % independent of dose 35% - 57 % dependent of dose Plasma concentrations Predictable & Linear Unpredictable & non-linear Potency based on Plasma conc . 2.5 times more potent - Drug-Drug interactions No Known drug-drug interactions Oral antacids reduce bioavailability by 20 – 30 % Dosage (starting dose) 2 times a day ( 75 to 150 mg/day ), Pregebalin SR (150, 300 mg / day) 3 times a day ( 300 to 900 mg/day ) Overall Pharmacokinetic More stable Less stable At high dosage Fast absorption Less absorption Onset of action 1 – 2 days ≥ 9 days Dose increases Non – linear Linear and predictable Protein binding Varied Predictable levels
Because of the inherent subjective nature of pain, and the fact that the word “pain” itself connotes multiple meanings, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has established a standardized definition of pain. The definition makes several important points: Pain is an unpleasant emotional experience as well as an unpleasant sensory experience. This distinction between the sensory aspects of pain and its emotional (or affective) component has had a significant influence on both research and the treatment of chronic pain. Also emphasized by the IASP in defining pain is that pain is always subjective. If patients regard their experience as pain and if they report it in the same ways as pain caused by tissue damage, it should be accepted as pain. IASP Task Force on Taxonomy. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of Chronic Pain . 2nd ed. Seattle, Wash: IASP Press; 1994:209-214.
Nociceptive, or inflammatory, pain is pain resulting from activity in neural pathways caused by potentially tissue-damaging stimuli. 1 Examples include postoperative pain, arthritis, mechanical low back pain, sickle cell crisis, and sports or exercise injuries. Neuropathic pain is pain caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the peripheral and/or central nervous systems. 2 Examples of peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes include HIV sensory neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and diabetic neuropathy. Examples of central neuropathic pain include central poststroke pain, spinal cord injury pain, trigeminal neuralgia, and multiple sclerosis pain. As indicated by the “mixed type” area on the slide, chronic pain can be of mixed etiology with both nociceptive and neuropathic characteristics. Two types of neuropathic pain—PHN and diabetic neuropathy—will be emphasized within this module. These types of pain are being stressed because the great majority of randomized controlled trials of treatments for neuropathic pain have examined these two disorders, and because our understanding of the mechanisms of neuropathic pain is largely derived from those studies. 1. Portenoy RK, Kanner RM. Definition and Assessment of Pain. In: Portenoy RK, Kanner RM, eds. Pain Management: Theory and Practice . Philadelphia, Pa: FA Davis Company; 1996:4. 2. Galer BS, Dworkin RH. A Clinical Guide to Neuropathic Pain . Minneapolis, Minn: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2000:8-9.
Abstract Background: Recent consensus guidelines recommend pregabalin as a first-tier treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin 600 mg/d (300 mg dosed BID) versus placebo for relieving DPN-associated neuropathic pain, and assessed its safety using objective measures of nerve conduction (NC). Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score (MPS) from daily pain diaries (11-point scale). NC velocity and sensory and motor amplitudes were assessed at baseline, endpoint, and end of follow-up (2 weeks post-treatment). At each timepoint, the median-motor, median-sensory, ulnar-sensory, and peroneal-motor nerves were evaluated. Secondary efficacy measures included weekly MPS and proportion of responders (patients achieving ¡Ý50% reduction in MPS from baseline to endpoint). After 1-weeks' dosage escalation, pregabalin-treated patients received 300 mg BID for 12 weeks.
Results: Eighty-two patients received pregabalin and 85 placebo. Mean durations were 10 years for diabetes and ~5 years for painful DPN. Pregabalin-treated patients had lower MPS than controls (mean difference, -1.28; p <.001). For all four nerves, 95% CIs for median differences in amplitude and velocity from baseline to endpoint and baseline to follow-up included 0 (i.e., no significant difference vs.. placebo). Significant pain improvement among pregabalin-treated patients was evident at week 1 and sustained at every weekly timepoint. More pregabalin-treated patients (49%) than controls (23%) were responders (p <.001).
Results: Eighty-two patients received pregabalin and 85 placebo. Mean durations were 10 years for diabetes and ~5 years for painful DPN. Pregabalin-treated patients had lower MPS than controls (mean difference, -1.28; p <.001). For all four nerves, 95% CIs for median differences in amplitude and velocity from baseline to endpoint and baseline to follow-up included 0 (i.e., no significant difference vs.. placebo). Significant pain improvement among pregabalin-treated patients was evident at week 1 and sustained at every weekly timepoint. More pregabalin-treated patients (49%) than controls (23%) were responders (p <.001).
Results: Eighty-two patients received pregabalin and 85 placebo. Mean durations were 10 years for diabetes and ~5 years for painful DPN. Pregabalin-treated patients had lower MPS than controls (mean difference, -1.28; p <.001). For all four nerves, 95% CIs for median differences in amplitude and velocity from baseline to endpoint and baseline to follow-up included 0 (i.e., no significant difference vs.. placebo). Significant pain improvement among pregabalin-treated patients was evident at week 1 and sustained at every weekly timepoint. More pregabalin-treated patients (49%) than controls (23%) were responders (p <.001).
Conclusion: Pregabalin 600 mg/d (300 mg BID) effectively reduced pain, was well tolerated, and had no statistically significant or clinically meaningful effect on NC in patients with painful DPN. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00159679 Received: 28 February 2008 Accepted: 16 September 2008
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin across the effective dosing range, to determine differences in the efficacy of three times daily (TID) versus twice daily (BID) dosage schedules, and to use time-to-event analysis to determine the time to onset of a sustained therapeutic effect using data from seven trials of pregabalin in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were pooled across seven double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials using pregabalin to treat painful DPN with dosages of 150, 300, and 600 mg/day administered TID or BID. Only one trial included all three of these dosages, and TID dosing was used in four. All studies shared fundamental selection criteria, and treatment durations ranged from 5 to 13 weeks.
RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed that pregabalin significantly reduced pain and pain-related sleep interference associated with DPN (150, 300, and 600 mg/day administered TID vs.. placebo, all P < or = 0.007). Only the 600 mg/day dosage showed efficacy when administered BID (P < or = 0.001). Pain and sleep interference reductions associated with pregabalin appear to be positively correlated with dosage; the greatest effect was observed in patients treated with 600 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the median time to onset of a sustained (> or =30% at end point) 1-point improvement was 4 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 600 mg/day, 5 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 300 mg/day, 13 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 150 mg/day, and 60 days in patients receiving placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema.
RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed that pregabalin significantly reduced pain and pain-related sleep interference associated with DPN (150, 300, and 600 mg/day administered TID vs.. placebo, all P < or = 0.007). Only the 600 mg/day dosage showed efficacy when administered BID (P < or = 0.001). Pain and sleep interference reductions associated with pregabalin appear to be positively correlated with dosage; the greatest effect was observed in patients treated with 600 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the median time to onset of a sustained (> or =30% at end point) 1-point improvement was 4 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 600 mg/day, 5 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 300 mg/day, 13 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 150 mg/day, and 60 days in patients receiving placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema.
RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed that pregabalin significantly reduced pain and pain-related sleep interference associated with DPN (150, 300, and 600 mg/day administered TID vs.. placebo, all P < or = 0.007). Only the 600 mg/day dosage showed efficacy when administered BID (P < or = 0.001). Pain and sleep interference reductions associated with pregabalin appear to be positively correlated with dosage; the greatest effect was observed in patients treated with 600 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the median time to onset of a sustained (> or =30% at end point) 1-point improvement was 4 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 600 mg/day, 5 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 300 mg/day, 13 days in patients treated with pregabalin at 150 mg/day, and 60 days in patients receiving placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pregabalin across its effective dosing range is associated with significant, dose-related improvement in pain in patients with DPN.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, 8-week trial (with subsequent open-label phase) evaluated the effectiveness of pregabalin in alleviating pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). For enrollment, patients must have had at baseline: 1- to 5-year history of DPN pain; pain score > or =40 mm (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ] visual analogue scale); average daily pain score of > or =4 (11-point numerical pain rating scale [0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain]). One hundred forty-six (146) patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 70) or pregabalin 300 mg/day (n = 76). Primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score from daily patient diaries (11-point numerical pain rating scale). Secondary measures included SF-MPQ scores; sleep interference scores; Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC); Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey scores; and Profile of Mood States (POMS) scores. Safety assessment included incidence and intensity of adverse events, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory evaluations. Pregabalin produced significant improvements versus placebo for mean pain scores (P < 0.0001); mean sleep interference scores SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.0001); total SF-MPQ score (P < 0.01); SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.03); PGIC (P = 0.001); and Total Mood Disturbance and Tension-Anxiety components of POMS (P < 0.03). Pain relief and improved sleep began during week 1 and remained significant throughout the study (P < 0.01). Pregabalin was well tolerated despite a greater incidence of dizziness and somnolence than placebo. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and did not result in withdrawal. Pregabalin was safe and effective in decreasing pain associated with DPN, and also improved mood, sleep disturbance, and quality of life.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, 8-week trial (with subsequent open-label phase) evaluated the effectiveness of pregabalin in alleviating pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). For enrollment, patients must have had at baseline: 1- to 5-year history of DPN pain; pain score > or =40 mm (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ] visual analogue scale); average daily pain score of > or =4 (11-point numerical pain rating scale [0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain]). One hundred forty-six (146) patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 70) or pregabalin 300 mg/day (n = 76). Primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score from daily patient diaries (11-point numerical pain rating scale). Secondary measures included SF-MPQ scores; sleep interference scores; Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC); Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey scores; and Profile of Mood States (POMS) scores. Safety assessment included incidence and intensity of adverse events, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory evaluations. Pregabalin produced significant improvements versus placebo for mean pain scores (P < 0.0001); mean sleep interference scores SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.0001); total SF-MPQ score (P < 0.01); SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.03); PGIC (P = 0.001); and Total Mood Disturbance and Tension-Anxiety components of POMS (P < 0.03). Pain relief and improved sleep began during week 1 and remained significant throughout the study (P < 0.01). Pregabalin was well tolerated despite a greater incidence of dizziness and somnolence than placebo. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and did not result in withdrawal. Pregabalin was safe and effective in decreasing pain associated with DPN, and also improved mood, sleep disturbance, and quality of life.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, 8-week trial (with subsequent open-label phase) evaluated the effectiveness of pregabalin in alleviating pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). For enrollment, patients must have had at baseline: 1- to 5-year history of DPN pain; pain score > or =40 mm (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ] visual analogue scale); average daily pain score of > or =4 (11-point numerical pain rating scale [0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain]). One hundred forty-six (146) patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 70) or pregabalin 300 mg/day (n = 76). Primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score from daily patient diaries (11-point numerical pain rating scale). Secondary measures included SF-MPQ scores; sleep interference scores; Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC); Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey scores; and Profile of Mood States (POMS) scores. Safety assessment included incidence and intensity of adverse events, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory evaluations. Pregabalin produced significant improvements versus placebo for mean pain scores (P < 0.0001); mean sleep interference scores SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.0001); total SF-MPQ score (P < 0.01); SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.03); PGIC (P = 0.001); and Total Mood Disturbance and Tension-Anxiety components of POMS (P < 0.03). Pain relief and improved sleep began during week 1 and remained significant throughout the study (P < 0.01). Pregabalin was well tolerated despite a greater incidence of dizziness and somnolence than placebo. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and did not result in withdrawal. Pregabalin was safe and effective in decreasing pain associated with DPN, and also improved mood, sleep disturbance, and quality of life.
Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2005 Jun;14(2):48-54. Effectiveness of vitamin B12 on diabetic neuropathy: systematic review of clinical controlled trials. Sun Y , Lai MS , Lu CJ . Source Department of Neurology, En Chu Kong Hospital, No. 399, Fuhsin Road, San-shia, Taipei, Taiwan. sunyu@ms4.hinet.net Abstract The clinical effectiveness of vitamin B12 and its active coenzyme form on diabetic neuropathy is uncertain. Therefore, we searched the English- and non-English-language literature on this topic by using MEDLINE (Ovid, PubMed), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and related papers. We identified seven randomized controlled trials from June 1954 to July 2004 and reviewed them for the clinical effectiveness of vitamin B12 according to the following parameters: Measurement scales of somatic and autonomic symptoms or signs; vibrometer-detected thresholds of vibration perception; and, electrophysiologic measures such as nerve conduction velocities and evoked potentials. Three studies involved the use of vitamin B complex (including B12) as the active drug, and four used methylcobalamin. Two studies were of fairly good quality (Jadad score = 3/5), and five were of poor quality (Jadad score < or = 2/5). Both the vitamin B12 combination and pure methylcobalamin had beneficial effects on somatic symptoms, such as pain and paresthesia. In three studies, methylcobalamin therapy improved autonomic symptoms. Effects on vibration perception and electrophysiological measures were not consistent. With both the vitamin B12 combination and pure methylcobalamin, symptomatic relief was greater than changes in electrophysiological results. However, more high-quality, double-blind randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effects of vitamin B12 on diabetic neuropathy.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Jan;38(1):14-7. [Effect of mecobalamin on diabetic neuropathies. Beijing Methycobal Clinical Trial Collaborative Group]. [Article in Chinese] Li G . Source Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029. Abstract OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of mecobalamin on diabetic neuropathies. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus were involved in a randomized positive-control clinical trial. 62 cases were treated with mecobalamin 500 microg intramuscularly three times a week for four weeks then followed by 500 microg orally three times a day for additional eight weeks. 46 cases were treated with vitamin B(12) in the same way and served as controls. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after the treatment, spontaneous pain and numbness of limbs were improved by 73% and 75% in the mecobalamin group, which were much higher than those in the controls (36% and 45% respectively). Hypoesthesia, hotness, coldness, oral dryness and dysuria showed better response in the mecobalamin group than in the controls (55% vs 25%, 52% vs 18%, 59% vs 30%, 53% vs 19%, 63% vs 20% respectively). Mecobalamin also benefited nerve reflection and conduction velocity to a certain extent. No obvious side effects were found. CONCLUSION: Mecobalamin might be worthy of use as a safe agent in the treatment of diabetic neuropathies.