SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  4
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
             DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR TRANSPORT-DG VII




COM(95)691




     TOWARDS FAIR AND EFFICIENT PRICING
               IN TRANSPORT




             POLICY OPTIONS FOR INTERNALISING THE
               EXTERNAL COSTS OF TRANSPORT IN
                     THE EUROPEAN UNION
COMMUNICATION BY MR. NEIL KINNOCK
                       TO THE COMMISSION




Transport policy is at the cross-roads. Whilst the fundamental importance of adequate
transport facilities to modern societies and economies is generally recognised, concern about
increasing congestion, environmental consequences and accidents is mounting.

This insight has led to a review of transport policies in many Member States. Calls for debate
at the European level are intensifying and the Cannes Summit has asked that measures should
be taken to review policies to establish fairer competition between modes of transport.

As part of a comprehensive transport strategy, this Green Paper explores ways of making
transport pricing systems fairer and more efficient by giving users and manufacturers
incentives to adjust their transport behaviour. Various possible instruments are identified and
discussed.

The Green Paper argues that fair and efficient pricing should constitute an essential
component of a transport policy strategy and can contribute significantly to reducing some of
the main transport problems (notably congestion, accidents and environmental problems). Its
objective is to launch a broad discussion on this issue.

It is proposed that the Commission :-

       •       approves the attached Green Paper;

       •       agrees to its communication to the European Parliament, the Council of
               Ministers, the Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the
               Regions;

       •       agrees to its publication as a supplement to the EU bulletin.
Table of Contents



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

1.      INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2.      THE EXTERNALITIES OF TRANSPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

        2.1     What are transport externalities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

        2.2     Why do transport externalities matter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

        2.3     How can transport externalities be reduced? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

        2.4     How can externalities be measured? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

        2.5     What are the main transport externalities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3       INSTRUMENTS TO CURB TRANSPORT EXTERNALITIES . . . . . . . . . . 8

        3.1     Criteria for selecting instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

        3.2     Market based instruments and regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

4       INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS AND CONGESTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

        4.1     Why do infrastructure and congestion costs matter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

        4.2     Measuring and charging for infrastructure costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

                4.2.1 What are infrastructure costs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

                4.2.2 How should we charge for infrastructure costs? . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

        4.3     Congestion costs : nature, size and charging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

        4.4     Congestion charging, efficient infrastructure policies and recovering
                infrastructure costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

        4.5     How are we charging for infrastructure and congestion costs now? . . . . 16

                4.5.1 Charging systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

                4.5.2 Infrastructure costs recovery : road, rail and inland waterways . . 17

        4.6     Charging for road infrastructure and congestion costs : policy conclusions 18
5    TRANSPORT ACCIDENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

     5.1      Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

     5.2      Regulatory policies have brought down accidents considerably . . . . . . . 21

     5.3      The cost of road accidents to the Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

     5.4      Possible economic instruments to bring costs closer to users . . . . . . . . . 23

     5.5      Road accident insurances in the Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

     5.6      Towards fair and efficient pricing for accidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

     5.7      Policy conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

6.   AIR POLLUTION FROM TRANSPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

     6.1      Emissions from transport : levels and trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

     6.2      The costs of air pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

     6.3      The current policy approach : scope and limits of regulation . . . . . . . . . 27

              6.3.1 The current policy approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

              6.3.2 Limits of the current policy approach : Differentiated causes and effects
                    of air pollution across Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

     6.4      Reducing emissions from transport : leverage points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

     6.5      Economic instruments as a complement to the existing regulatory approach
                                                                                     29

     6.6      Policy conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

7.   NOISE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

     7.1      Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

     7.2      Existing legislation has only been a mixed success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

     7.3      The costs of the transport noise problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

     7.4      Economic instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

     7.5      Policy conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

Contenu connexe

Similaire à 1 4

AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015
AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015
AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015Dr Lendy Spires
 
Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21
Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21
Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21PatrickTanz
 
RTS 2012 The Future Railway
RTS 2012 The Future RailwayRTS 2012 The Future Railway
RTS 2012 The Future RailwayAmplified Events
 
High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...
High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...
High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Master Thesis - Transport Energy Demand Model
Master Thesis - Transport Energy Demand ModelMaster Thesis - Transport Energy Demand Model
Master Thesis - Transport Energy Demand ModelAlexandra Barraquand
 
Airline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design Integrated Models And Algorithms
Airline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design  Integrated Models And AlgorithmsAirline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design  Integrated Models And Algorithms
Airline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design Integrated Models And AlgorithmsJennifer Roman
 
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.Ira Tobing
 
Trade Sector Briefs, 2015 Edition
Trade Sector Briefs, 2015 EditionTrade Sector Briefs, 2015 Edition
Trade Sector Briefs, 2015 EditionDCFTAProject_2014
 
Real-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information system
Real-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information systemReal-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information system
Real-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information systemLorenzo Sfarra
 
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressedClimate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressedPreety Nadarasapillay
 

Similaire à 1 4 (20)

en 691/95
en 691/95en 691/95
en 691/95
 
Com95 691 En
Com95 691 EnCom95 691 En
Com95 691 En
 
Lessons Learned: Experiences from Baltic SCOPE
Lessons Learned: Experiences from Baltic SCOPELessons Learned: Experiences from Baltic SCOPE
Lessons Learned: Experiences from Baltic SCOPE
 
AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015
AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015
AU-NEPAD African Action Plan 2010-2015
 
vanet_report
vanet_reportvanet_report
vanet_report
 
CASE Network Report 66 - Prospects for EU-Ukraine Economic Relations
CASE Network Report 66 - Prospects for EU-Ukraine Economic RelationsCASE Network Report 66 - Prospects for EU-Ukraine Economic Relations
CASE Network Report 66 - Prospects for EU-Ukraine Economic Relations
 
Aashto08
Aashto08Aashto08
Aashto08
 
Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21
Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21
Minigrid policy toolkit 2014 REN21
 
RTS 2012 The Future Railway
RTS 2012 The Future RailwayRTS 2012 The Future Railway
RTS 2012 The Future Railway
 
High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...
High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...
High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan - Integrated Assessment Final Re...
 
Master Thesis - Transport Energy Demand Model
Master Thesis - Transport Energy Demand ModelMaster Thesis - Transport Energy Demand Model
Master Thesis - Transport Energy Demand Model
 
Airline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design Integrated Models And Algorithms
Airline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design  Integrated Models And AlgorithmsAirline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design  Integrated Models And Algorithms
Airline Fleet Assignment And Schedule Design Integrated Models And Algorithms
 
Imcam166
Imcam166Imcam166
Imcam166
 
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
 
Trade Sector Briefs, 2015 Edition
Trade Sector Briefs, 2015 EditionTrade Sector Briefs, 2015 Edition
Trade Sector Briefs, 2015 Edition
 
Real-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information system
Real-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information systemReal-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information system
Real-time monitoring and delay management of a transport information system
 
CASE Network Report 80 - Economic Feasibility, General Economic Impact and Im...
CASE Network Report 80 - Economic Feasibility, General Economic Impact and Im...CASE Network Report 80 - Economic Feasibility, General Economic Impact and Im...
CASE Network Report 80 - Economic Feasibility, General Economic Impact and Im...
 
LC_Thesis_Final (1).pdf
LC_Thesis_Final (1).pdfLC_Thesis_Final (1).pdf
LC_Thesis_Final (1).pdf
 
CASE Network Report 71 - The New EU Frontier: Perspectives on Enhanced Econom...
CASE Network Report 71 - The New EU Frontier: Perspectives on Enhanced Econom...CASE Network Report 71 - The New EU Frontier: Perspectives on Enhanced Econom...
CASE Network Report 71 - The New EU Frontier: Perspectives on Enhanced Econom...
 
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressedClimate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
 

Plus de dimdouf

Plus de dimdouf (14)

73 76
73 7673 76
73 76
 
65 68
65 6865 68
65 68
 
49 52
49 5249 52
49 52
 
45 48
45 4845 48
45 48
 
41 44
41 4441 44
41 44
 
37 40
37 4037 40
37 40
 
33 36
33 3633 36
33 36
 
29 32
29 3229 32
29 32
 
25 28
25 2825 28
25 28
 
21 24
21 2421 24
21 24
 
17 20
17 2017 20
17 20
 
13 16
13 1613 16
13 16
 
9 12
9 129 12
9 12
 
5 8
5 85 8
5 8
 

1 4

  • 1. EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR TRANSPORT-DG VII COM(95)691 TOWARDS FAIR AND EFFICIENT PRICING IN TRANSPORT POLICY OPTIONS FOR INTERNALISING THE EXTERNAL COSTS OF TRANSPORT IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
  • 2. COMMUNICATION BY MR. NEIL KINNOCK TO THE COMMISSION Transport policy is at the cross-roads. Whilst the fundamental importance of adequate transport facilities to modern societies and economies is generally recognised, concern about increasing congestion, environmental consequences and accidents is mounting. This insight has led to a review of transport policies in many Member States. Calls for debate at the European level are intensifying and the Cannes Summit has asked that measures should be taken to review policies to establish fairer competition between modes of transport. As part of a comprehensive transport strategy, this Green Paper explores ways of making transport pricing systems fairer and more efficient by giving users and manufacturers incentives to adjust their transport behaviour. Various possible instruments are identified and discussed. The Green Paper argues that fair and efficient pricing should constitute an essential component of a transport policy strategy and can contribute significantly to reducing some of the main transport problems (notably congestion, accidents and environmental problems). Its objective is to launch a broad discussion on this issue. It is proposed that the Commission :- • approves the attached Green Paper; • agrees to its communication to the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers, the Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions; • agrees to its publication as a supplement to the EU bulletin.
  • 3. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. THE EXTERNALITIES OF TRANSPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1 What are transport externalities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Why do transport externalities matter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3 How can transport externalities be reduced? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4 How can externalities be measured? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.5 What are the main transport externalities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3 INSTRUMENTS TO CURB TRANSPORT EXTERNALITIES . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1 Criteria for selecting instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2 Market based instruments and regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4 INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS AND CONGESTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.1 Why do infrastructure and congestion costs matter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2 Measuring and charging for infrastructure costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.1 What are infrastructure costs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.2 How should we charge for infrastructure costs? . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.3 Congestion costs : nature, size and charging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.4 Congestion charging, efficient infrastructure policies and recovering infrastructure costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4.5 How are we charging for infrastructure and congestion costs now? . . . . 16 4.5.1 Charging systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4.5.2 Infrastructure costs recovery : road, rail and inland waterways . . 17 4.6 Charging for road infrastructure and congestion costs : policy conclusions 18
  • 4. 5 TRANSPORT ACCIDENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.2 Regulatory policies have brought down accidents considerably . . . . . . . 21 5.3 The cost of road accidents to the Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.4 Possible economic instruments to bring costs closer to users . . . . . . . . . 23 5.5 Road accident insurances in the Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 5.6 Towards fair and efficient pricing for accidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.7 Policy conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6. AIR POLLUTION FROM TRANSPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6.1 Emissions from transport : levels and trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6.2 The costs of air pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.3 The current policy approach : scope and limits of regulation . . . . . . . . . 27 6.3.1 The current policy approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.3.2 Limits of the current policy approach : Differentiated causes and effects of air pollution across Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.4 Reducing emissions from transport : leverage points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.5 Economic instruments as a complement to the existing regulatory approach 29 6.6 Policy conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7. NOISE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 7.2 Existing legislation has only been a mixed success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 7.3 The costs of the transport noise problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.4 Economic instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 7.5 Policy conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35