SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  32
Establishing Effective
   Communication with External
Stakeholders: The Impact of Training

        KELLY C. LOCKHART DODSON
                 COHORT 11
Introduction


     My school and school system
     were splattered all over the
     evening news and all the
     newspapers in Middle Tennessee
     for something that happened in
     a nearby school system.

     Accreditation team
     recommended that the school
     system being studied implement
     a system-wide communication
     plan. (AdvancED, 2008)
Research Questions

Guiding Question:
 What is the effect of the designed
 system-wide communication plan and
 professional development training on
 school administrators’ competencies
 and attitudes related to communicating
 with external stakeholders, especially
 the media?
Research Questions

 Specific Research Question #1: How does the
 designed system-wide communication plan and
 professional development impact administrators’
 knowledge of communication models and theories,
 planning and implementation of a complementary
 school-level communication plan, crisis
 communication management skills, and media
 relations skills.
Research Questions

 Specific Research Question #2: How does the
 designed system-wide communication plan and
 professional development impact administrators’
 application of communication models and theories,
 planning and implementation of a complementary
 school-level communication plan, crisis
 communication management skills, and media
 relations skills.
Research Questions

 Specific Research Question #3: How does the
  designed system-wide communication plan and
  professional development training impact
  administrators’ attitude toward school public
  relations initiatives?
 Specific Research Question #4: What impact do
  critical incidents with media have on administrators’
  attitude toward school public relations initiatives?
Review of Professional Literature

 Communicating with external stakeholders,
  especially the media, is a standard for school
  administrators. (ISSLC, 2008)
 Public perception of public schools is diminishing, as
  accountability and market competiveness increases.
 (Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup, 2009)

 Public perception and public support of public
 schools may increase through building relationships
 with external stakeholders, especially the media. (Bagin
 & Gallagher, 2001)
Review of Professional Literature

 Establishing two-way symmetric communication is
  said to build mutual understanding between a
  formal organization and its “mass” or external
  stakeholders. (Grunig & Hunt, 1984)
 The media is the primary external stakeholder
  through which all the rest of internal and external
  school and district stakeholders may be reached.
 (Pawlas, 1995)
Review of Professional Literature

 Public education was once a cornerstone of
 American Democracy, allowing it to have a once-
 noble brand position. That is no longer the case. (Carr,
 2006)

 As with other studies, perceptions of schools vary
 depending on the polled person’s relationship to a
 public school. Parents of public school children
 connect differently with their schools than
 Americans who do not have children in school. (Phi Delta
 Kappa/Gallup, 2008)
Review of Professional Literature

 Perceptions of school quality vary significantly when
  Americans consider “their” public schools versus the
  public schools depicted in the media.
 The problem is that the majority of people, even on a
  local level, do not have a direct connection to the
  schools through a child (Bagin & Gallagher, 2001;
 http://www.tennessee.gov.tacir/CountyProfile/cheathamprofile.htm).
Review of Professional Literature

 Newspapers are becoming more reader-oriented and
  market-driven. (McManus, 1994; Underwood and Stamm, 1992; Bagdikian, 1985;
  Kwitney, 1990; Reisinger, 1983; Vergobbi, 1992; Briles, 1991; Mauro, 1987; Associated
  Press Managing Editors, 1990)

 Market-driven or market-oriented journalism continues to
  change the culture of U.S. daily newspaper newsrooms.
  (American Journalism Review, 2000)

 A strong market orientation implies that the organization
  will “aggressively seek to determine the kinds of
  information that readers or viewers say that they want or
  need and will provide it.” (Beam, 2000)
Review of Professional Literature

 Traditional media are suffering financially. Annual
  print and online advertising are off $10 billion from
  2006. (Colvin, 2009)
 Newspaper ad revenues have fallen 23% in the last

  two years. (Rosenthal, 2009)
 The journalists who are left are Twittering,
  blogging and filing updates directly to their news
  organizations’ websites, in addition to writing print
  stories. (Colvin, 2009)
Review of Professional Literature

 In local television, news staffs are being cut at
  “unprecedented” rates; revenues fell by 7% in 2008,
  an election year, and ratings are flat across the
  schedule. (Rosenthal, 2009, p. 3)
 At the same time, the audience migration to the
  internet was accelerating. The number of Americans
  who regularly go online for news jumped 19% in the
  last two years. Web traffic to the top 50 news sites
  rose 27% in two years. (Rosenthal, 2009)
Review of Professional Literature

 Partly due to cut costs and to make up for lost or
 more narrowly focused content and to remain
 relevant, news organizations are beginning to join
 forces with institutions they once saw as rivals.
 (Rosenthal, 2009)

 Newspapers and partnering with television stations,
 and newspapers are partnering with online
 platforms, such as Yahoo! (Rosenthal, 2009)
Review of Professional Literature

 Crisis management research shows the need to
 cultivate pre-crisis relationships with stakeholders.
 (Birch, 1994; Couretas, 1985; Fearn-Banks, 1996; Seitel, 1983).

 Crisis researcher Coombs (1999a) perhaps says it
 best: “A favorable pre-crisis relationship reflects a
 favorable organizational relationship. A reputation
 is derived from experiences with the organization,
 the relationship history with stakeholders.” (p. 51)
 Organizations build favorable relationship
 histories by meeting and exceeding stakeholder
 expectations. (Coombs, 1999b)
Review of Professional Literature

 Training is a demonstrated way to increase
 knowledge, skills, and abilities, and also the
 application of new knowledge, skills, and abilities.
 (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2001)

 Attributes of trainees, including motivation,
 attitude, and expectations, can influence training
 effectiveness. (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Wexley & Latham, 1991; Noe, 1986)
Review of Professional Literature

 The two studies found regarding school public relations
  training did not discuss the impact of the training but the
  need for training. (Calvin & Stark, 2003; Graham, 1997)
 Attitude is related to involvement. If one is “involved,”
  one is ready or motivated to receive and to respond to
  messages, issues, and objects. Attitude is defined also
  as increased attentional capacity or as increased
  cognitive activation. (Greenwald & Leavitt, 1984; Cameron, 1993)
 Attitude signifies arousal, interest, and motivation.
  (Slater in Dillard & Pfau, 2002)

 Attitude can acts as a filter also. (Slater in Dillard & Pfau, 2002)
Review of Professional Literature

 Relevance is an antecedent to involvement. (Zaichkowsky,
 1986)

 Critical Incident Technique is used by different
 training bodies as a reflective tool in leadership
 training. In communication training, the type of
 communication critical incidents and a leaders’
 response to the communication critical incident have
 been studied in order to train leaders how to better
 respond in future incidents. (Konig & De Jong, 2004)
Methodology

 Population= 128 administrators from three suburban
  school districts near a large urban district in Tennessee.
 75 administrators made up the population for the
  control group. The control group population came from
  two of three school districts which do not have a
  designated full-time public relations professional.
 43 administrators from the county with the smallest
  Average Daily Membership made up the population for
  the experimental group. They, too, serve a school district
  without a designated full-time public relations
  professional.
Methodology

 Sample=For the control group, the sample included
  willing administrators who took the pre- and posttest. 44
  administrators from two school suburban school districts
  comprised the control group sample.
 For the experimental group, the sample included 30
  school administrators from the same suburban school
  district who took the pre- and posttest and also
  participated in one of two identical one-half day, three-
  hour professional development training sessions.
 Radomization was not required because the population
  for both groups is below 100.
Methodology

 Data gathering began with a review of literature.
 The researcher obtained permission to conduct a study in
  the three suburban school systems and permission to
  conduct research with human subjects by Trevecca’s
  Institutional Review Board in summer 2009.
 The researcher consulted an array of professionals in
  order to design training materials, the system-wide
  strategic communication plan, and the pretest/posttest.
  This process began in summer 2008 and continued for
  one year.
 The pretest/posttest was pilot tested in fall 2009.
Methodology

 Pretest responses were collected from the control and
  experimental groups starting in January 2010. Survey
  Monkey, mail surveys, and in-person visits were utilized
  to gather test responses.
 In May 2010, the designed intervention was conducted
  for the experimental group. Directly after the seminar,
  posttest data was gathered from the experimental group.
 Starting in early May and continuing through June 2010,
  posttest results from the control group were amassed via
  Survey Monkey, mail surveys, and in-person visits.
 Starting in late May 2010, the researcher interviewed five
  participants of the study using the Critical Incident
  Technique in order to answer Research Question #4.
Methodology

 Instrument
The pretest/posttest was created by the researcher
 based on a compilation of published communication
 tests. 58 multiple choice questions gauged
 knowledge and application (Research Questions 1
 and 2.)
Attitude (Research Question 3) was assessed using the
 Personal Involvement Inventory, a semantic
 differential scale that is well published.
The Critical Incident Technique was used to answer
 Research Question 4.
Findings/Conclusions

 Research Question #1: A multiple regression was run to
 investigate the relationship and predictive ability of two
 variables (School System and Pre Communication Knowledge)
 on administrators’ communication knowledge posttest scores.
 The overall model was significant, F (2, 50) = 72.66, p < .001,
 showing that the two variables can significantly predict
 posttest knowledge scores. The R2 = .74, which indicated that
 74% of the variability in the posttest scores could be attributed
 to these two variables. Additionally, both of the individual
 predictors showed a significant relationship to the dependent
 variable (School System: b = 8.019, t = 6.5, p < .001; and Pre
 Communication Knowledge: b = .809, t = 10.1, p < .001.) The
 regression coefficient indicates that the experimental group
 scored 8.02 points better than the control group on the
 posttest while accounting for the pretest.
Findings/Conclusions

 Research Question #2: In order to discover the relationship and
  predictive ability of two variables (School System and Pre
  Communication Application) on administrators’ communication
  application posttest scores, a multiple regression was run. The R
  was .820 and was significant, F (2, 50) = 51.43, p < .001,
  illustrating that posttest application scores are significantly
  predicted by the two variables. The R2 = .67 which indicates that
  67% of the variability in the posttest scores could be accounted for
  by these two variables. Also, both of the individual predictors
  showed a significant relationship to the dependent variable (School
  System: b = 4.072, t = 7.37, p < .001; and Pre Communication
  Application: b = .705, t = 7.71, p < .001.) While accounting for the
  pretest, the regression coefficient denotes that the experimental
  group scored 4.07 points better than the control group on the
  posttest.
Findings/Conclusions

 Research Question #3: Multiple regression was used to
 explore the relationship and predictive ability of two variables
 (School System and Pre Personal Involvement) on
 administrators’ personal involvement posttest scores. The R
 was .771 and was significant, F (2, 49) = 35.85, p < .001,
 showing that this combination of variables can significantly
 predict personal involvement posttest scores. Additionally, R2
 = .59, showing that 59% of the variability in the posttest scores
 for involvement can be accounted for by these two variables.
 Both of the individual predictors showed a significant
 relationship to the dependent variable (School System: b =
 7.106, t = 3.35, p < .01; and Pre Personal Involvement: b =
 .583, t = 8.04, p < .001). What the regression coefficient
 shows is that the experimental group scored 7.106 points
 better than the control group on the posttest while accounting
 for the pretest.
Findings/Conclusions

 Research Question #4: Administrators’ attitudes toward
 school public relations initiatives, as measured by the
 Personal Involvement Inventory, were compared with their
 responses to question #92 regarding an unpleasant incident
 with the media as a school administrator. The result was
 significant. Administrators who said they experienced an
 unpleasant incident with the media as an administrator
 scored significantly “less involved” or had a poorer attitude
 toward school public relations initiatives than administrators
 who had not experienced an unpleasant incident, t (71) =
 2.009, p < .05. Administrators’ scores on the knowledge and
 application portions of the pre/posttest were not significantly
 related to an unpleasant incident with the media as a school
 administrator, however, when statistically analyzed using an
 independent samples t test.
Findings/Conclusions

 Research Question #4: The researcher also
 interviewed five administrators who participated in the
 study. Responses were recorded verbatim. Content
 analysis was performed to organize data for further
 explanation. Two of the critical incidents with the media
 were deemed negative. The remaining three critical
 incidents with the media were deemed positive. 20 of 31
 negative words or phrases came from the two critical
 incidents deemed negative. 25 of 36 positive words or
 phrases came from the three critical incidents deemed
 positive. Positive words included: “relationship,”
 “proactive,” “positive,” “trust,” and “very pleased.”
Findings/Conclusions

 Other findings: In response to Question #91 on the
 pretest/posttest, “Did you receive college instruction
 about communicating with the media as part of your
 schooling for your current job title?,” 30
 experimental and 44 control group participants
 responded. 16.6% of the experimental group
 responded “yes”; whereas, 16 participants, or 36.3%,
 of the control group responded affirmatively. The
 majority of the study participants had not received
 college instruction about communicating with the
 media (N=53 or 71.6%).
Findings/Conclusions

 An independent samples t test was run between the
 respondents’ answer to Question #91 and the pretest
 scores on all three sections of the pretest (knowledge,
 application, and attitude). Study participants who
 received college instruction on communicating with
 the media indicated significantly more involvement
 or better attitudes toward school public relations
 initiatives on the pretest, t (71) =-2.102, p < .05.
 College instruction did not significantly impact
 knowledge or application scores.
Discussion

 Significant posttest data supported the positive
  impact of training materials and professional
  development training on knowledge and application
  of skills needed to communication with external
  stakeholders, especially the media, and also
  administrators’ attitudes toward school public
  relations initiatives.
 Pretest attitudes toward school public relations
  initiatives were also significantly impacted by
  previous college-level instruction and upon
  “unpleasant” critical incidents with media.
Discussion

 The findings are in keeping with previous research on training
  which show that learning and transfer will occur only when
  trainees have both the ability and volition to acquire and
  apply new skills. (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Wexley & Latham, 1991; Noe, 1986)
 The researcher recommends the following:
1. College-level communication courses for administrators as
    part of their school administration licensure programs
2. Communication training on individual school system level
3. Further utilization of Critical Incident Technique in order
    for school administrators to reflect fully on incidents with
    the media.
4. Further use of the Personal Involvement Inventory in
    educational settings
5. Further study of school public relations, especially within
    the area of relationship building

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Powerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis Defence
Powerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis DefencePowerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis Defence
Powerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis Defence
Catie Chase
 
Prepare your Ph.D. Defense Presentation
Prepare your Ph.D. Defense PresentationPrepare your Ph.D. Defense Presentation
Prepare your Ph.D. Defense Presentation
Christian Glahn
 
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...
Donna Madison-Bell
 
Dissertation oral defense presentation
Dissertation   oral defense presentationDissertation   oral defense presentation
Dissertation oral defense presentation
Dr. Naomi Mangatu
 
Ashbaugh dissertation defense presentation
Ashbaugh dissertation defense presentationAshbaugh dissertation defense presentation
Ashbaugh dissertation defense presentation
DRMLAID
 
Thesis Power Point Presentation
Thesis Power Point PresentationThesis Power Point Presentation
Thesis Power Point Presentation
riddhikapandya1985
 
Proposal defense slideshow
Proposal defense slideshowProposal defense slideshow
Proposal defense slideshow
Coby Long
 
Master Thesis Presentation
Master Thesis PresentationMaster Thesis Presentation
Master Thesis Presentation
Wishofnight13
 

Tendances (20)

Oral defense power point
Oral defense power pointOral defense power point
Oral defense power point
 
Powerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis Defence
Powerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis DefencePowerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis Defence
Powerpoint presentation M.A. Thesis Defence
 
Thesis Defense Presentation
Thesis Defense PresentationThesis Defense Presentation
Thesis Defense Presentation
 
Dissertation Proposal Defense
Dissertation Proposal DefenseDissertation Proposal Defense
Dissertation Proposal Defense
 
Prepare your Ph.D. Defense Presentation
Prepare your Ph.D. Defense PresentationPrepare your Ph.D. Defense Presentation
Prepare your Ph.D. Defense Presentation
 
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study on Prison Volunteers in California’s Cor...
 
Dissertation oral defense presentation
Dissertation   oral defense presentationDissertation   oral defense presentation
Dissertation oral defense presentation
 
Ashbaugh dissertation defense presentation
Ashbaugh dissertation defense presentationAshbaugh dissertation defense presentation
Ashbaugh dissertation defense presentation
 
Gary Broils, D.B.A. - Dissertation Defense: Virtual Teaming and Collaboration...
Gary Broils, D.B.A. - Dissertation Defense: Virtual Teaming and Collaboration...Gary Broils, D.B.A. - Dissertation Defense: Virtual Teaming and Collaboration...
Gary Broils, D.B.A. - Dissertation Defense: Virtual Teaming and Collaboration...
 
Example Dissertation Proposal Defense Power Point Slide
Example Dissertation Proposal Defense Power Point SlideExample Dissertation Proposal Defense Power Point Slide
Example Dissertation Proposal Defense Power Point Slide
 
Thesis Power Point Presentation
Thesis Power Point PresentationThesis Power Point Presentation
Thesis Power Point Presentation
 
Oral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
Oral defense presentation_Ennis BrinsonOral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
Oral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
 
Proposal defense slideshow
Proposal defense slideshowProposal defense slideshow
Proposal defense slideshow
 
Research Proposal Presentation
Research Proposal PresentationResearch Proposal Presentation
Research Proposal Presentation
 
My Thesis Defense Presentation
My Thesis Defense PresentationMy Thesis Defense Presentation
My Thesis Defense Presentation
 
M.S. Thesis Defense
M.S. Thesis DefenseM.S. Thesis Defense
M.S. Thesis Defense
 
Master Thesis Presentation
Master Thesis PresentationMaster Thesis Presentation
Master Thesis Presentation
 
Presentation on Research Proposal (Qualitative); Digitalisation & Top Managem...
Presentation on Research Proposal (Qualitative); Digitalisation & Top Managem...Presentation on Research Proposal (Qualitative); Digitalisation & Top Managem...
Presentation on Research Proposal (Qualitative); Digitalisation & Top Managem...
 
Thesis Defense
Thesis Defense Thesis Defense
Thesis Defense
 
Thesis PROPOSAL Defense Presentation - March 26
Thesis PROPOSAL Defense Presentation - March 26 Thesis PROPOSAL Defense Presentation - March 26
Thesis PROPOSAL Defense Presentation - March 26
 

En vedette

Thesis Powerpoint
Thesis PowerpointThesis Powerpoint
Thesis Powerpoint
neha47
 
My research proposal.ppt
My research proposal.pptMy research proposal.ppt
My research proposal.ppt
nanimamat
 
The Research Proposal
The Research ProposalThe Research Proposal
The Research Proposal
guest349908
 

En vedette (11)

Thesis Powerpoint
Thesis PowerpointThesis Powerpoint
Thesis Powerpoint
 
Thesis powerpoint
Thesis powerpointThesis powerpoint
Thesis powerpoint
 
Powerpoint Presentation of PhD Viva
Powerpoint Presentation of PhD VivaPowerpoint Presentation of PhD Viva
Powerpoint Presentation of PhD Viva
 
Masters Thesis Defense Presentation
Masters Thesis Defense PresentationMasters Thesis Defense Presentation
Masters Thesis Defense Presentation
 
Tamishra's ph d presentation
Tamishra's ph d presentationTamishra's ph d presentation
Tamishra's ph d presentation
 
Thesis ppt
Thesis pptThesis ppt
Thesis ppt
 
How to Defend your Thesis Proposal like a Professional
How to Defend your Thesis Proposal like a ProfessionalHow to Defend your Thesis Proposal like a Professional
How to Defend your Thesis Proposal like a Professional
 
My research proposal.ppt
My research proposal.pptMy research proposal.ppt
My research proposal.ppt
 
The Research Proposal
The Research ProposalThe Research Proposal
The Research Proposal
 
Can We Assess Creativity?
Can We Assess Creativity?Can We Assess Creativity?
Can We Assess Creativity?
 
Guided Reading: Making the Most of It
Guided Reading: Making the Most of ItGuided Reading: Making the Most of It
Guided Reading: Making the Most of It
 

Similaire à Dissertation defense power point

Marshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docx
Marshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docxMarshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docx
Marshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docx
alfredacavx97
 
Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...
Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...
Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...
AEJMC Journal of Public Relations Education (JPRE)
 
TERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docx
TERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docxTERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docx
TERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docx
todd191
 
Blackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focus
Blackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focusBlackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focus
Blackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focus
William Kritsonis
 
Multiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted R
Multiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted RMultiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted R
Multiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted R
simisterchristen
 
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docxWhy is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
gauthierleppington
 
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docxWhy is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
washingtonrosy
 
Political Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points) Th.docx
Political Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points)            Th.docxPolitical Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points)            Th.docx
Political Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points) Th.docx
pauline234567
 
ASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docx
ASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docxASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docx
ASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docx
rock73
 
Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...
Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...
Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...
William Kritsonis
 

Similaire à Dissertation defense power point (20)

"Media Relations Instruction and Theory Development: A Relational Dialectical...
"Media Relations Instruction and Theory Development: A Relational Dialectical..."Media Relations Instruction and Theory Development: A Relational Dialectical...
"Media Relations Instruction and Theory Development: A Relational Dialectical...
 
Marshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docx
Marshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docxMarshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docx
Marshall UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Terry L. Hapn.docx
 
Who Teaches Public Relations Writing? An Analysis of Faculty Status of Public...
Who Teaches Public Relations Writing? An Analysis of Faculty Status of Public...Who Teaches Public Relations Writing? An Analysis of Faculty Status of Public...
Who Teaches Public Relations Writing? An Analysis of Faculty Status of Public...
 
Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...
Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...
Brunner, Zarkin, & Yates (2018) What do Employers Want? What Should Faculty T...
 
TERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docx
TERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docxTERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docx
TERRY L. HAPNEYTERRY L. HAPNEYPublic Relations and the School .docx
 
Teaching Brief: Integrating Leadership in Public Relations Education to Deve...
Teaching Brief:  Integrating Leadership in Public Relations Education to Deve...Teaching Brief:  Integrating Leadership in Public Relations Education to Deve...
Teaching Brief: Integrating Leadership in Public Relations Education to Deve...
 
Blackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focus
Blackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focusBlackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focus
Blackbourn,two unique organizational communication systems blackbourn-done focus
 
Ewing, Kim, Kinsky, Moore, & Freberg (2018) Teaching Digital and Social Media...
Ewing, Kim, Kinsky, Moore, & Freberg (2018) Teaching Digital and Social Media...Ewing, Kim, Kinsky, Moore, & Freberg (2018) Teaching Digital and Social Media...
Ewing, Kim, Kinsky, Moore, & Freberg (2018) Teaching Digital and Social Media...
 
Multiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted R
Multiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted RMultiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted R
Multiple Regression Review1) Please explain why the adjusted R
 
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docxWhy is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
 
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docxWhy is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
Why is skilled communication among health professionals so difficu.docx
 
Journal of Public Relations Education (JPRE) Vol. 4, Issue 1 Spring 2018 full...
Journal of Public Relations Education (JPRE) Vol. 4, Issue 1 Spring 2018 full...Journal of Public Relations Education (JPRE) Vol. 4, Issue 1 Spring 2018 full...
Journal of Public Relations Education (JPRE) Vol. 4, Issue 1 Spring 2018 full...
 
"Developing a Blueprint for Social Media Pedagogy: Trials, Tribulations, and ...
"Developing a Blueprint for Social Media Pedagogy: Trials, Tribulations, and ..."Developing a Blueprint for Social Media Pedagogy: Trials, Tribulations, and ...
"Developing a Blueprint for Social Media Pedagogy: Trials, Tribulations, and ...
 
JPRE: Can every class be a Twitter chat? Cross-institutional collaboration an...
JPRE: Can every class be a Twitter chat? Cross-institutional collaboration an...JPRE: Can every class be a Twitter chat? Cross-institutional collaboration an...
JPRE: Can every class be a Twitter chat? Cross-institutional collaboration an...
 
Journal of Public Relations Education - Full Journal
Journal of Public Relations Education - Full JournalJournal of Public Relations Education - Full Journal
Journal of Public Relations Education - Full Journal
 
"Competition and Public Relations Campaigns: Assessing the Impact of Competit...
"Competition and Public Relations Campaigns: Assessing the Impact of Competit..."Competition and Public Relations Campaigns: Assessing the Impact of Competit...
"Competition and Public Relations Campaigns: Assessing the Impact of Competit...
 
Political Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points) Th.docx
Political Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points)            Th.docxPolitical Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points)            Th.docx
Political Thought Paper Guidelines (50 Points) Th.docx
 
ASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docx
ASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docxASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docx
ASSIGNMENT1. discuss software monopoly and its impact with techn.docx
 
Willis (2018) Diagnosing Health Campaigns: A Campaign Evaluation Assignment, ...
Willis (2018) Diagnosing Health Campaigns: A Campaign Evaluation Assignment, ...Willis (2018) Diagnosing Health Campaigns: A Campaign Evaluation Assignment, ...
Willis (2018) Diagnosing Health Campaigns: A Campaign Evaluation Assignment, ...
 
Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...
Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...
Blackbourn, j[1]. m. two unique organizational communication systems 071809 f...
 

Dissertation defense power point

  • 1. Establishing Effective Communication with External Stakeholders: The Impact of Training KELLY C. LOCKHART DODSON COHORT 11
  • 2. Introduction My school and school system were splattered all over the evening news and all the newspapers in Middle Tennessee for something that happened in a nearby school system. Accreditation team recommended that the school system being studied implement a system-wide communication plan. (AdvancED, 2008)
  • 3. Research Questions Guiding Question: What is the effect of the designed system-wide communication plan and professional development training on school administrators’ competencies and attitudes related to communicating with external stakeholders, especially the media?
  • 4. Research Questions  Specific Research Question #1: How does the designed system-wide communication plan and professional development impact administrators’ knowledge of communication models and theories, planning and implementation of a complementary school-level communication plan, crisis communication management skills, and media relations skills.
  • 5. Research Questions  Specific Research Question #2: How does the designed system-wide communication plan and professional development impact administrators’ application of communication models and theories, planning and implementation of a complementary school-level communication plan, crisis communication management skills, and media relations skills.
  • 6. Research Questions  Specific Research Question #3: How does the designed system-wide communication plan and professional development training impact administrators’ attitude toward school public relations initiatives?  Specific Research Question #4: What impact do critical incidents with media have on administrators’ attitude toward school public relations initiatives?
  • 7. Review of Professional Literature  Communicating with external stakeholders, especially the media, is a standard for school administrators. (ISSLC, 2008)  Public perception of public schools is diminishing, as accountability and market competiveness increases. (Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup, 2009)  Public perception and public support of public schools may increase through building relationships with external stakeholders, especially the media. (Bagin & Gallagher, 2001)
  • 8. Review of Professional Literature  Establishing two-way symmetric communication is said to build mutual understanding between a formal organization and its “mass” or external stakeholders. (Grunig & Hunt, 1984)  The media is the primary external stakeholder through which all the rest of internal and external school and district stakeholders may be reached. (Pawlas, 1995)
  • 9. Review of Professional Literature  Public education was once a cornerstone of American Democracy, allowing it to have a once- noble brand position. That is no longer the case. (Carr, 2006)  As with other studies, perceptions of schools vary depending on the polled person’s relationship to a public school. Parents of public school children connect differently with their schools than Americans who do not have children in school. (Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup, 2008)
  • 10. Review of Professional Literature  Perceptions of school quality vary significantly when Americans consider “their” public schools versus the public schools depicted in the media.  The problem is that the majority of people, even on a local level, do not have a direct connection to the schools through a child (Bagin & Gallagher, 2001; http://www.tennessee.gov.tacir/CountyProfile/cheathamprofile.htm).
  • 11. Review of Professional Literature  Newspapers are becoming more reader-oriented and market-driven. (McManus, 1994; Underwood and Stamm, 1992; Bagdikian, 1985; Kwitney, 1990; Reisinger, 1983; Vergobbi, 1992; Briles, 1991; Mauro, 1987; Associated Press Managing Editors, 1990)  Market-driven or market-oriented journalism continues to change the culture of U.S. daily newspaper newsrooms. (American Journalism Review, 2000)  A strong market orientation implies that the organization will “aggressively seek to determine the kinds of information that readers or viewers say that they want or need and will provide it.” (Beam, 2000)
  • 12. Review of Professional Literature  Traditional media are suffering financially. Annual print and online advertising are off $10 billion from 2006. (Colvin, 2009)  Newspaper ad revenues have fallen 23% in the last two years. (Rosenthal, 2009)  The journalists who are left are Twittering, blogging and filing updates directly to their news organizations’ websites, in addition to writing print stories. (Colvin, 2009)
  • 13. Review of Professional Literature  In local television, news staffs are being cut at “unprecedented” rates; revenues fell by 7% in 2008, an election year, and ratings are flat across the schedule. (Rosenthal, 2009, p. 3)  At the same time, the audience migration to the internet was accelerating. The number of Americans who regularly go online for news jumped 19% in the last two years. Web traffic to the top 50 news sites rose 27% in two years. (Rosenthal, 2009)
  • 14. Review of Professional Literature  Partly due to cut costs and to make up for lost or more narrowly focused content and to remain relevant, news organizations are beginning to join forces with institutions they once saw as rivals. (Rosenthal, 2009)  Newspapers and partnering with television stations, and newspapers are partnering with online platforms, such as Yahoo! (Rosenthal, 2009)
  • 15. Review of Professional Literature  Crisis management research shows the need to cultivate pre-crisis relationships with stakeholders. (Birch, 1994; Couretas, 1985; Fearn-Banks, 1996; Seitel, 1983).  Crisis researcher Coombs (1999a) perhaps says it best: “A favorable pre-crisis relationship reflects a favorable organizational relationship. A reputation is derived from experiences with the organization, the relationship history with stakeholders.” (p. 51) Organizations build favorable relationship histories by meeting and exceeding stakeholder expectations. (Coombs, 1999b)
  • 16. Review of Professional Literature  Training is a demonstrated way to increase knowledge, skills, and abilities, and also the application of new knowledge, skills, and abilities. (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2001)  Attributes of trainees, including motivation, attitude, and expectations, can influence training effectiveness. (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Wexley & Latham, 1991; Noe, 1986)
  • 17. Review of Professional Literature  The two studies found regarding school public relations training did not discuss the impact of the training but the need for training. (Calvin & Stark, 2003; Graham, 1997)  Attitude is related to involvement. If one is “involved,” one is ready or motivated to receive and to respond to messages, issues, and objects. Attitude is defined also as increased attentional capacity or as increased cognitive activation. (Greenwald & Leavitt, 1984; Cameron, 1993)  Attitude signifies arousal, interest, and motivation. (Slater in Dillard & Pfau, 2002)  Attitude can acts as a filter also. (Slater in Dillard & Pfau, 2002)
  • 18. Review of Professional Literature  Relevance is an antecedent to involvement. (Zaichkowsky, 1986)  Critical Incident Technique is used by different training bodies as a reflective tool in leadership training. In communication training, the type of communication critical incidents and a leaders’ response to the communication critical incident have been studied in order to train leaders how to better respond in future incidents. (Konig & De Jong, 2004)
  • 19. Methodology  Population= 128 administrators from three suburban school districts near a large urban district in Tennessee.  75 administrators made up the population for the control group. The control group population came from two of three school districts which do not have a designated full-time public relations professional.  43 administrators from the county with the smallest Average Daily Membership made up the population for the experimental group. They, too, serve a school district without a designated full-time public relations professional.
  • 20. Methodology  Sample=For the control group, the sample included willing administrators who took the pre- and posttest. 44 administrators from two school suburban school districts comprised the control group sample.  For the experimental group, the sample included 30 school administrators from the same suburban school district who took the pre- and posttest and also participated in one of two identical one-half day, three- hour professional development training sessions.  Radomization was not required because the population for both groups is below 100.
  • 21. Methodology  Data gathering began with a review of literature.  The researcher obtained permission to conduct a study in the three suburban school systems and permission to conduct research with human subjects by Trevecca’s Institutional Review Board in summer 2009.  The researcher consulted an array of professionals in order to design training materials, the system-wide strategic communication plan, and the pretest/posttest. This process began in summer 2008 and continued for one year.  The pretest/posttest was pilot tested in fall 2009.
  • 22. Methodology  Pretest responses were collected from the control and experimental groups starting in January 2010. Survey Monkey, mail surveys, and in-person visits were utilized to gather test responses.  In May 2010, the designed intervention was conducted for the experimental group. Directly after the seminar, posttest data was gathered from the experimental group.  Starting in early May and continuing through June 2010, posttest results from the control group were amassed via Survey Monkey, mail surveys, and in-person visits.  Starting in late May 2010, the researcher interviewed five participants of the study using the Critical Incident Technique in order to answer Research Question #4.
  • 23. Methodology  Instrument The pretest/posttest was created by the researcher based on a compilation of published communication tests. 58 multiple choice questions gauged knowledge and application (Research Questions 1 and 2.) Attitude (Research Question 3) was assessed using the Personal Involvement Inventory, a semantic differential scale that is well published. The Critical Incident Technique was used to answer Research Question 4.
  • 24. Findings/Conclusions  Research Question #1: A multiple regression was run to investigate the relationship and predictive ability of two variables (School System and Pre Communication Knowledge) on administrators’ communication knowledge posttest scores. The overall model was significant, F (2, 50) = 72.66, p < .001, showing that the two variables can significantly predict posttest knowledge scores. The R2 = .74, which indicated that 74% of the variability in the posttest scores could be attributed to these two variables. Additionally, both of the individual predictors showed a significant relationship to the dependent variable (School System: b = 8.019, t = 6.5, p < .001; and Pre Communication Knowledge: b = .809, t = 10.1, p < .001.) The regression coefficient indicates that the experimental group scored 8.02 points better than the control group on the posttest while accounting for the pretest.
  • 25. Findings/Conclusions  Research Question #2: In order to discover the relationship and predictive ability of two variables (School System and Pre Communication Application) on administrators’ communication application posttest scores, a multiple regression was run. The R was .820 and was significant, F (2, 50) = 51.43, p < .001, illustrating that posttest application scores are significantly predicted by the two variables. The R2 = .67 which indicates that 67% of the variability in the posttest scores could be accounted for by these two variables. Also, both of the individual predictors showed a significant relationship to the dependent variable (School System: b = 4.072, t = 7.37, p < .001; and Pre Communication Application: b = .705, t = 7.71, p < .001.) While accounting for the pretest, the regression coefficient denotes that the experimental group scored 4.07 points better than the control group on the posttest.
  • 26. Findings/Conclusions  Research Question #3: Multiple regression was used to explore the relationship and predictive ability of two variables (School System and Pre Personal Involvement) on administrators’ personal involvement posttest scores. The R was .771 and was significant, F (2, 49) = 35.85, p < .001, showing that this combination of variables can significantly predict personal involvement posttest scores. Additionally, R2 = .59, showing that 59% of the variability in the posttest scores for involvement can be accounted for by these two variables. Both of the individual predictors showed a significant relationship to the dependent variable (School System: b = 7.106, t = 3.35, p < .01; and Pre Personal Involvement: b = .583, t = 8.04, p < .001). What the regression coefficient shows is that the experimental group scored 7.106 points better than the control group on the posttest while accounting for the pretest.
  • 27. Findings/Conclusions  Research Question #4: Administrators’ attitudes toward school public relations initiatives, as measured by the Personal Involvement Inventory, were compared with their responses to question #92 regarding an unpleasant incident with the media as a school administrator. The result was significant. Administrators who said they experienced an unpleasant incident with the media as an administrator scored significantly “less involved” or had a poorer attitude toward school public relations initiatives than administrators who had not experienced an unpleasant incident, t (71) = 2.009, p < .05. Administrators’ scores on the knowledge and application portions of the pre/posttest were not significantly related to an unpleasant incident with the media as a school administrator, however, when statistically analyzed using an independent samples t test.
  • 28. Findings/Conclusions  Research Question #4: The researcher also interviewed five administrators who participated in the study. Responses were recorded verbatim. Content analysis was performed to organize data for further explanation. Two of the critical incidents with the media were deemed negative. The remaining three critical incidents with the media were deemed positive. 20 of 31 negative words or phrases came from the two critical incidents deemed negative. 25 of 36 positive words or phrases came from the three critical incidents deemed positive. Positive words included: “relationship,” “proactive,” “positive,” “trust,” and “very pleased.”
  • 29. Findings/Conclusions  Other findings: In response to Question #91 on the pretest/posttest, “Did you receive college instruction about communicating with the media as part of your schooling for your current job title?,” 30 experimental and 44 control group participants responded. 16.6% of the experimental group responded “yes”; whereas, 16 participants, or 36.3%, of the control group responded affirmatively. The majority of the study participants had not received college instruction about communicating with the media (N=53 or 71.6%).
  • 30. Findings/Conclusions  An independent samples t test was run between the respondents’ answer to Question #91 and the pretest scores on all three sections of the pretest (knowledge, application, and attitude). Study participants who received college instruction on communicating with the media indicated significantly more involvement or better attitudes toward school public relations initiatives on the pretest, t (71) =-2.102, p < .05. College instruction did not significantly impact knowledge or application scores.
  • 31. Discussion  Significant posttest data supported the positive impact of training materials and professional development training on knowledge and application of skills needed to communication with external stakeholders, especially the media, and also administrators’ attitudes toward school public relations initiatives.  Pretest attitudes toward school public relations initiatives were also significantly impacted by previous college-level instruction and upon “unpleasant” critical incidents with media.
  • 32. Discussion  The findings are in keeping with previous research on training which show that learning and transfer will occur only when trainees have both the ability and volition to acquire and apply new skills. (Tannenbaum & Yukl, 1992; Wexley & Latham, 1991; Noe, 1986)  The researcher recommends the following: 1. College-level communication courses for administrators as part of their school administration licensure programs 2. Communication training on individual school system level 3. Further utilization of Critical Incident Technique in order for school administrators to reflect fully on incidents with the media. 4. Further use of the Personal Involvement Inventory in educational settings 5. Further study of school public relations, especially within the area of relationship building