2. Christian Buckley,
Director of Product Evangelism at Axceler
• Microsoft MVP for SharePoint Server
• Prior to Axceler, worked for Microsoft, part of the Microsoft
Managed Services team (now Office365-Dedicated) and worked
as a consultant in the areas of software, supply chain, grid
technology, and collaboration
• Co-founded and sold a software company to Rational Software.
At E2open, helped design, build, and deploy a SharePoint-like
collaboration platform (Collaboration Manager), onboarding
numerous high-tech manufacturing companies, including
Hitachi, Matsushita, Cisco, and Seagate
• Co-authored „Microsoft SharePoint 2010: Creating and
Implementing Real-World Projects‟ link (MS Press, March 2012)
and 3 books on software configuration management.
• Twitter: @buckleyplanet Blog: buckleyplanet.com Email: cbuck@axceler.com
3. Published 2012 by Microsoft Press
Order your copy at http://oreil.ly/qC4loT
Tackle 10 common business problems with
proven SharePoint solutions:
• Set up a help desk solution to track service requests
• Build a modest project management system
• Design a scheduling system to manage resources
• Create a site to support geographically dispersed teams
• Implement a course registration system
• Build a learning center with training classes and
resources
• Design a team blog platform to review content
• Create a process to coordinate RFP responses
• Set up a FAQ system to help users find answers quickly
• Implement a cost-effective contact management system
4. Improving Collaboration since 2007
Mission: To enable enterprises to simplify, optimize, and
secure their collaborative platforms
Delivered award-winning administration and migration
software since 1994, for SharePoint since 2007
Over 2,000 global customers
Dramatically improve the management
of SharePoint
Innovative products that improve security, scalability,
reliability, “deployability”
Making IT more effective and efficient and lower the total
cost of ownership
Focus on solving specific SharePoint
problems (Administration & Migration)
Coach enterprises on SharePoint best practices
Give administrators the most innovative tools available
Anticipate customers’ needs
Deliver best of breed offerings
Stay in lock step with SharePoint development and market trends
10. This is your technical
migration, i.e. the
physical move of
content and “bits”
Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
11. This is the bulk of your
migration – the
planning, reorganization, a
nd transformation of your
legacy SharePoint
environment
10/13/2012 11
12. Move Migrate Upgrade
• Use the procedures for • Use the procedures for • Use the procedures for
moving a farm or migrating a farm or upgrading a farm or
components when you components when you components when you
are changing to are changing to a are changing to a
different hardware. For different platform or different version of
example, use these operating system. For Office SharePoint
procedures if you example, use these Server 2007.
move to computers procedures if you
that have faster change from Microsoft
processors or larger SQL Server 2005 to
hard disks. SQL Server 2008.
13.
14. Migrations Migrations Migrations are Migrations are
are phased are iterative error prone not the end goal
• How and what you • Your planning should • There is no “easy” • Proper planning and
migrate should not be not be limited by the button for migration. change management
determined by the number of migration You can run a dozen policies will help you to
technology you use – it‟s attempts you make, or pre-migration checks be successful with your
about matching the by the volume of and still run into current and future
needs and timing of content being moved. A problems. Admins and migrations. The goals
your content owners healthy migration end users do things that should be a stable
and teams. A migration recognizes the need to are not “by the book.” environment, relevant
should be test the waters, to move Customizations. Third metadata, discoverable
flexible, moving sites sites, content and party tools. Line of content, and happy end
and content based on customizations in business applications users.
end user needs, not the waves, allowing users to that run under the radar.
limitations of the test and provide
technology. feedback.
15. Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
16. Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
17. Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
20. Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
21. 11 strategies you should
consider as part of your
migration planning
22. Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
23. • What works
• What doesn‟t work
• What are the organizational
“must have” requirements
• What are the “nice to
have” features
24. The tendency
is to jump to
solutions
before you
understand the
problem
Email Cell Twitter Blog
cbuck@echotechnology.com 425.246.2823 @buckleyplanet http://buckleyplanet.net
42. • Move content, as-is, into SharePoint and clean up there
• Clean and organize content first, then move to a new structure in
SharePoint
• Migrate content in waves, using the iterations to sort through and
organize your content while in transit, moving some content as-
is, reorganizing and transforming others
44. In Biology, taxonomy is the science dealing with the
description, identification, naming, and
classification of organisms. “however, the term is now
applied in a wider, more general sense and now may
refer to a classification of things, as well as to the
principles underlying such a classification.”
“Metadata provides context for data. Metadata is
used to facilitate the
understanding, characteristics, and management
usage of data. The metadata required for effective data
management varies with the type of data and context
of use.” Wikipedia.org
45. Strategy #7: Plan for tagging,
metadata, and taxonomy
Common Migraines
• Ad-hoc content migration leads to junk in portal
• Legacy content gets migrated slowly, if at all
• Inconsistent taxonomy across farms and site collections
• People author locally - multiplies problems globally
• Authors don‟t apply metadata= “shotgun” approach to
search OR Authors apply metadata without common
classification = better search, but worse authoring
experience
• Portal lacks high fidelity search
• User can‟t find the right content
• As a result, poor portal adoption and low user satisfaction
46. Strategy #7: Plan for tagging,
metadata, and taxonomy
Managed
Metadata
Service
Term
Stores
Improved
Governance
47. • Map out your high level taxonomy (web apps, site
collections) and schemas (Content Types)
• Understand the as-is and to-be, and how it relates to
your metadata
• With Managed Metadata Service in 2010, it is critical that
you set up a governance model to guide this process, or it
will quickly get out of hand
49. CENTRALIZED DECENTRALIZED
• PROS • PROS
• Improves consistency • Requires no planning
• Reduces metadata duplication • Requires little upfront effort
• Easy to update • Works across site collections and
• Easy to support and train on portals
• Allows document-level • CONS
DIP, Workflow, Information • Decreases consistency
Policies, and document templates • Increases metadata duplication
• CONS • Hard to update
• Requires planning • Hard to support and train on
• Requires upfront work • Only allows list-level
• Hard to manage across site Workflow, Information Policies and
collections and portals document templates
• Difficult to reverse
50. Do we lock
Do we
down team
deploy
site creation?
MySites?
Do we
implant
microchips in
their palms?
Common Topics around Centralized
/ Decentralized
51.
52. Strategy #9:
Stage your
platform for
10/13/2012
migration 52
53. • Hardware / software
• Network
• Virtual environments
• Hosting / datacenter
• Downtime / end user impacts
• Communication
• Location of your teams
• Backup/recovery
54. Strategy #10: Decide
Strategy
where and when to
where and when to
involve users
involve users
10/13/2012 54
I was going to include a picture of Brad Pitt, but then I thought – ok, maybe not that cool.
“While Microsoft can provide options for automating migration, these options work best with implementations which have no customizations and a simple structure.” Stephen Cummins, echoTechnologyThe challenge is to do this quickly, so that you minimize user impact and environment downtime.
Microsoft’s easy-to-follow guides. Point and click.There are a number of risks with In Place upgrade: 1) your system will be down, and if the migration does not go well – it could be down for a while 2) disk space will be impacted. You really don’t know how much space is needed 3) no rollback. Doh!With either migration method, you do have a Visual Upgrade, which basically replaces your gradual upgrade in 2007. This allows you to migrate, and through Central Administration, preview your 2007 sites in the 2010 template before committing yourself to it. So you can keep what works, and slowly make the changes over time.
Planning is the key. Let’s discuss the activities leading up to migration, which will drive your method for migration.
My background is technical project management. My company comes from a service background, and our team has participated in hundreds of migrations. From this experience, we’ve created a list of strategic considerations that will help ensure that your migrations are successful.I’d like to walk through them in detail, and I want your thoughts and feedback.And up front, aside from this presentation being available post-conference, I’d like to provide you with a free download of our 11 Strategic Considerations Checklist.
Before I go through this list, I would like to point out that many of these items have circular dependencies. They need to be done in parallel. They’re not meant to be run in order necessarily, but to help guide your planning activities and make your plan more robust and thorough.
Refer to ondemand event by Dux Raymond Sy about SharePoint project planning
There is some consideration of in-place versus database attach, or some hybrid approach.
A strong value proposition of SharePoint is the ability to better organize your content, improve discoverability, and clarify authorship and accessibility by mapping to SharePoint’s permissions. However, one of the primary reasons for delaying a file share migration is the need to go through and “clean up” content so that it can better fit into the SharePoint paradigm. As with any spring cleaning, migrating your file shares presents an opportunity for users and administrators to clean up document versions, reorganize folder structures, clarify content ownership, and update relevant metadata. But is it easier to clean up this content inside or outside of SharePoint?
Why a tortoise? This big guy is from the Galapagos Islands. I was thinking about Darwin’s classification of animals on the islands. Well – specifically, I was thinking about the movie Master and Commander with Russell Crowe and how they stopped on the islands and then had discussions about Darwin, classifications and taxonomy… but that’s neither here nor there.