SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  117
Region at risk:
Visualizing environmental trends
in the American West
April 2013
Executive Summary
2
Inform and advance conservation in the North American West by
analyzing, visualizing, and sharing data on environmental trends.
EcoWest mission
3
This is a summary of six presentations
that illustrate key environmental metrics.
EcoWest decks describe trends in key metrics
Issue Sample metrics
Land Acres protected by land trusts, energy
production on federal lands
Water Per capita water consumption, trends in water
transfers
Biodiversity Number of endangered species and candidates,
biological diversity of ecoregions
Wildfires Size and number of wildfires, suppression costs
Climate Temperature/precipitation projections
Politics Conservation funding, public opinion
Download presentations and other resources
at ecowest.org
Key points
1. Human footprint: Despite the prevalence of public land, many of the West’s
iconic and least disturbed landscapes are vulnerable to human activities, putting
biodiversity and wilderness values at risk.
2. Land use: Population growth is a key driver, but agriculture uses most of the
West’s water and has a bigger footprint than cities and suburbs
3. Water: Growth and climate change are compounding the water crisis by
increasing demands and jeopardizing supplies, but water quality is generally better
out West than back East.
4. Biodiversity: Habitat loss, invasive species, and climate change are the top
threats to the West’s rich array of species and ecosystems.
5. Wildfires: Climate change and the legacy of fire suppression will continue to
make the wildfire season longer, costlier, and more destructive
6. Public opinion: Americans—and Westerners in particular—often support
environmentalists’ goals, but hostility toward the movement may be growing.
7. Funding: Budgets for federal environmental agencies are relatively steady and
ballot measures usually pass, but considerably fewer have been put to voters
during the economic downturn.
4
Overview of trends in key issues
4/26/2013 5
Issue Status Good news Bad news
Land use
Water
Wildfires
Biodiversity
• The West still has large tracts of wilderness
and native habitat that are relatively
undisturbed
• Some extractive industries, such as public
lands logging, pose less of a threat today
• Land trusts are growing in number and
protecting more acres of open space
• Growth is expanding the human footprint
around cities and spreading impacts to
previously unpopulated places
• Even remote public lands are crisscrossed by
roads and suffering from invasive species
• Many public lands are vulnerable to harmful
development under multiple-use doctrine
• Newer power plants are using less water
• Utilities are employing progressive rate
structures to encourage conservation
• The Clean Water Act has reduced pollution in
many waterways
• Water quality in the West is generally better
than in the East
• Demand exceeds supply in overallocated river
basins, creating conflicts over water
• Overpumping is depleting many aquifers and
harming nearby streams/rivers
• Climate change expected to shrink snowpack
and change the timing of peak flows
• Nation’s water infrastructure is crumbling
• Some overgrown forests are being treated with
judicious fuels reduction and prescribed burns
• Land managers are letting some wilderness
fires burn to restore the natural cycle
• Many communities are adopting fire-wise
building practices and mitigating risks
• Overexploitation (hunting and collecting) is
less of a problem today
• Key game species, such as deer, elk, and
pronghorn, have made dramatic recoveries
• Some endangered species have been pulled
back from the brink of extinction
• The backlog of candidates for Endangered
Species Act protection is decreasing
• Climate change posing an existential threat to
some species and compounding traditional
problems, such as habitat loss and invasives
• Freshwater species doing especially poorly
• The conservation status for many species is
unknown and not monitored
• In many areas, wildfires are growing larger,
burning longer, becoming more intense, and
costing more to suppress
• More homes are vulnerable in the wildland-
fire interface and the fire threat may prompt
harmful mechanical treatments
• Climate change is exacerbating the problem
Overview of trends in key issues
4/26/2013 6
Climate
change
Public
opinion
Air
quality
Funding
* Levels of carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide,
and nitrogen dioxide have declined, despite a
growing economy, increasing energy use, and
rising vehicle-miles traveled
* Shift from coal to natural gas is decreasing
local air pollution from power generation
* Particulates and ozone more difficult to control
* Poor air quality is a chronic problem in some
places, and millions of Westerners are still
exposed to toxic air pollution
* Dust-on-snow events are leading to accelerated
melting of snowpack
* Heightened awareness among public and
policymakers of the impacts in West
* Some Western states taking the lead in
mitigation and adaptation
* Much of West expected to get drier and be
subject to more extreme weather/wildfires
* Lack of political will to enact policies to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions
* Species already on the move, but habitat loss
and fragmentation pose obstacles
* Great majority of Americans are concerned
about the quality of the environment
* Strong public support for open space, clean
air, clean water, and other conservation goals
* Many Westerners reject false choice of “jobs
vs. the environment”
* Environment barely registers on national
agenda of top problems
* Recession has slightly weakened support for
environmental protection
* Signs of increasing hostility toward the
environmental movement
* Budgets of federal environmental agencies
have remained fairly steady over past decade
* Conservation ballot measures usually pass at
the polls
* Sequester and fiscal austerity exerting
downward pressure on public spending
* Fewer conservation ballot measure have been
put to voters during recession
Issue Good news Bad news
Energy
* Wind, solar, and other renewables are
making gains, with many Western states
adopting renewable portfolio standards
* Some technologies, including vehicles, are
becoming more efficient
* Fossil fuels continue to dominate the energy
sector and dwarf renewables
* Many wilderness-quality lands are threatened
by energy development, including renewables
Status
Table of contents
7
• Land Use Slides 8-20
• Water Slides 21-34
• Biodiversity Slides 35-49
• Wildfires Slides 50-62
• Energy Slides 63-74
• Public Opinion Slides 75-93
• Funding Slides 105-112
• Climate Change Slides 94-104
LAND USE
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
8
Key points: land use
• Although much of the West is publicly owned, the human footprint
is evident almost everywhere in the region.
• Relatively pristine areas are often protected as wilderness or
national parks, but many of the least developed areas remain
vulnerable due to the multiple-use doctrine.
• The West accounts for a rising share of the nation’s population, with
most growth occurring in and around big cities in an increasingly
urbanized region.
• Some traditional economic sectors, such as logging on public lands,
are in decline, but the West is still home to important mines, farms,
and energy development.
9
30%
53%
45%
85%
50%
69%
57%
48%
42%
37%
42%
30%
19%
Federal lands common in Western states
2%
4%
1%
1%
6%
3%
6%
6%
1%
5%
7%
5%
7%
2% 4%
3%
10%
2%
1%
2%
3%
10%
12%
8%
3%
1%
1%
7%
5%
VT = 8%
NH = 13%
MA = 2%
RI = 0.4%
CT = 0.4%
NJ = 3%
DE = 2%
MD = 3%
DC = 25%
Source: U.S. General Services Administration
Portion of each state
that is federal land
BLM is biggest landowner, followed by Forest Service
10
Much of the West is nominally protected
4/26/2013 11Source: The Nature Conservancy 11
But multiple-use doctrine applies to most BLM, Forest Service land
Humanity’s imprint is already deep, indelible
Source: U.S. Geological Survey 12
Agriculture has largest footprint, often in unpopulated regions
Some of least disturbed areas still vulnerable
13
Many of these areas are not a wilderness or national park
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
The West has many of the nation’s growth hotspots
4/26/2013Source: U.S. Census Bureau 14
California, Southwest, and Washington among biggest gainers
40+
20 to 39
10 to 19
0 to 9
-1 to -9
Less than -9
Comparable data not
available
Numeric change in population by county: 2000-2010
(thousands)
The West’s population is highly concentrated
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census 15
Region known for unpopulated expanses is actually very urbanized
Population by county: 2010
16
In 1940, the West was still pretty lonely territory
Housing density especially low in inland states
17
By 2000, the region’s population had skyrocketed
Not only along West Coast, but also inland
18
It’s expected to be even more crowded by 2030
But much of NV, UT, WY, MT are still unpopulated
Northern spotted owl
ESA listing
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Billions
of
board-
feet Sold
Harvested
Some traditional extractive industries in decline
Source: U.S. Forest Service 19
Timber produced by U.S. national forests
Logging in national forests a shadow of its former self
Much of the West still home to livestock
Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 20
Pasture/Range
Percent of county
0.0 - 11.7
11.8 - 27.5
27.6 - 47.0
47.1 - 70.4
70.5 +
Cattle
1 dot = 10,000 cattle
Cattle found in some very hot, dry areas
ENERGY
21
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
Key points: energy
• The West has become an important player in the nation’s fossil and
renewable energy supply
• New technologies are leading to the development of shale gas
deposits in the West, but the growth rate is expected to be even
greater in the East
• Although the use of fossil fuels still dwarfs renewable supplies, the
West is home to important sites for solar and wind energy that are
seeing increasing development
• All forms of energy development, including renewables, cause
environmental impacts, but efficiency measures, can reduce the
physical footprint of the energy sector
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percent
% of US total for natural gas
% of US total for fossil fuels
Federal lands important for fossil fuel production
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 23
Private, tribal, and state land also home to energy development
Fossil fuel sales fairly steady on public/tribal lands
0
5
10
15
20
25
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
QuadrillionBtu
Sales of fossil fuels produced on federal and Indian lands, 2003-2011
Total Fossil Fuels
Coal
Natural Gas
Crude Oil and Lease Condensate
Natural Gas Plant Liquids
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 24
Government regulations and market forces influence drilling activity
Natural gas displacing coal as wind power increases
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035
Gigawatts
Other/ Renewables
Natural Gas/ Oil
Nuclear
Hydropower
Coal
Additions to U.S. electricity generating capacity
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 25
Renewables now account for much of the new generating capacity
Natural gas least expensive, wind getting close
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Gas: Advanced Combined Cycle
Gas: Conventional Combined Cycle
Hydro
Gas: Advanced CC with CCS
Wind
Conventional Coal
Geothermal
Gas: Advanced Combustion Turbine
Advanced Coal
Advanced Nuclear
Biomass
Gas: Conventional Combustion…
Advanced Coal with CCS
Solar PV
Solar Thermal
2010 $/megawatt-hour
Levelized capital cost
Fixed O&M
Variable O&M (incl. fuel)
Transmission Investment
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 26
Cost of new generation in 2017
Large-scale solar plants are the most costly
Shale gas found throughout the country
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 27
Often in the same locations as conventional gas plays
Hydro, wood, and biofuels are top renewables
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009
QuadrillionBtu
Renewable Energy: Total Consumption and Energy Sources, 1949-2010
Total
Hydroelectric
Wood
Biofuels
Wind
Solar
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 28
Wind power production rising steeply in recent years
Wind, solar, and biomass projected to increase
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Gigawatts
Solid waste/landfill gas
Geothermal
Biomass
Solar
Wind
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 29
Projected growth in non-hydro renewable energy
But at this rate, they’ll still be a small fraction of nation’s portfolio
Wind power has been deployed throughout nation
4/26/2013Source: American Wind Energy Association 30
Location of major wind power installations
Except in the Southeast states, where the potential is poor
Where wind project density is high, project
location is not precise in order to show multiple
projects in a small geographic area. Project
location is based on county.
Sage grouse range overlaps some wind power sites
Source: U.S. Geological Survey, WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife 31
ESA candidate threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation
32
Some Western states in top 10 for solar capacity
Utility projects larger than residential or commercial installations
California
Arizona
New Jersey
Nevada
North Carolina
Massachusetts
Hawaii
Maryland
Texas
New York
MW of PV installed during 2012
Capacity installed (MWdc)
Source: Solar Energy Industries Association
Desert tortoises live in some solar power hotspots
Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Bureau of Land Management 33
Good solar potential extends beyond the desert Southwest
Critical habitat for
desert tortoise
(Mojave subspecies)
Biofuels have biggest footprint, efficiency shrinks impact
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
Efficiency gains (liquids)
Efficiency gains (electricity)
Nuclear power
Geothermal
Coal
Solar thermal
Natural gas
Solar photovoltaic
Petroleum
Hydropower
Wind
Ethanol from sugarcane
Ethanol from corn
Ethanol from cellulose
Electricity from biomass
Biodiesel from soy
Land-use intensity in 2030 (km2/TW-hr/yr)
Source: McDonald et al. (2009) 34
How much land
does it take
to produce energy?
Solar and wind farms can contribute to “energy sprawl”
WATER
35
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
Key points: water
• A limited, unpredictable water supply is a defining feature of the
West, which faces a water crisis that is being compounded by growth
and climate change.
• Overall, we’re becoming more efficient in our water use, but
municipal demand continues to rise along with the region’s growing
population.
• Irrigation and energy continue to dominate the West’s water
use, accounting for nearly 90 percent of withdrawals.
• Although water quality has generally improved, our water
infrastructure is crumbling and the repair bill is contributing to
increasing water costs.
• Water conservation is less expensive than acquiring new supplies
while desalination is both costly and energy intensive.
36
Inherent challenge: aridity west of 100th Meridian
100th
Meridian
Average annual
precipitation:
1951-2002 (inches)
Source: Climate Wizard 37
The Pacific Northwest and highest mountains are exceptions
Western streams top the water quality rankings
38
18.2%
29.0%
45.1%
20.5%
29.0%
25.8%
51.8%
40.0%
27.4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Eastern Highlands
Plains and Lowlands
West
Good Fair Poor Not Assessed
Biological condition of streams
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Nearly half rated in good condition
Withdrawals are leveling even as population grows
39
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
U.S.population,millions
Totalwithdrawals,billionsofgallons/day
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
More efficient power plants require much less water
Withdrawals dominated by power and irrigation
40
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Aquaculture
Commercial
Mining
Livestock
Self-supplied
domestic
Self-supplied
industrial
Public supply
Irrigation
Thermoelectric
power
U.S. water withdrawals (billions of gallons/day)
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
You need energy to deliver clean water, and water to run power plants
Irrigation is the top water user in the West
41
Public Supply
10.8%
Domestic, Self-
Supplied
0.8%
Industrial Self-
Supplied
0.1%
Irrigation
76.2%
Livestock
0.2%
Mining
0.3%
Thermoelectric
11.8%
Water withdrawals in the West, 2005
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
That’s been true for decades, but cities are consuming a rising share
Calif., Southwest, and High Plains face water stress
Source: The Nature Conservancy 42
Growing demands and questionable supplies
Climate change, growth to heighten water conflicts
43
Potential water supply
conflicts by 2025
Source: Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Global Change Research Program
Clash between population trends and needs of endangered species
Indian lands and Native
entities
Unmet rural water needs
Conflict potential - moderate
Conflict potential - substantial
Conflict potential - highly likely
Water Supply Issue Areas
Crumbling water works will cost billions to fix
44
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000
Roads and Bridges
Transit
Drinking Water and Wastewater
Schools
Aviation
Public Parks and Recreation
Hazardous Waste and Solid Waste
Energy
Rail
Inland Waterways
Levees
Dams
Billions
Estimated investment need 2010 - 2015
Estimated Actual Spending
American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act
5-Year Investment Shortfall
Source: American Society of Civil Engineers
One reason why the price of water is rising
Consumer water bills continue to climb
45Source: USA Today
Many utilities in West searching for new supplies
Water bills increased
faster than natural gas
or electricity costs for
American consumers
between 2000-2012
Average change in residential utility costs: 2000-2012
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180%
Natural gas
Electricity
Heating oil
Water
Current dollars
Inflation adjusted
Strategies for saving water in agriculture
46
Potential savings compared to fallowing and land retirement
Source: Pacific Institute
Biggest user has major conservation potential
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Modest crop
shifting
Smart
irrigation
scheduling
Advanced
irrigation
management
Efficient
Irrigation
technology
Fallowing Land
retirement
Water savings
(million acre-
feet per year)
Nearly 60% of water use occurs outside the home
47
Outdoor
Toilets
Clothes
Washers
Showers
Faucets
Leaks Unknown Other Baths Dishwashers
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Gallons per capita
Average household
water use
Source: American Water Works Association
Drought-tolerant landscaping can dramatically reduce water use
Water markets are already functioning in West
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Millionsofacre-feet
Volume of water transfers in the West
Sales
Long-Term Leases
Short-Term Leases
48Source: Brewer et al. (2007)
Agriculture is top source of water transfers
Desalination is very energy intensive—and costly
49
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Local surface water
Recycling
Local groundwater
Water bags
Colorado River
Imperial Irrigation
District
San Francisco Bay Delta
Seawater desalination
Energy intensity, kWh/af
Energy intensity of water sources
in San Diego County
Source: Pacific Institute
Greenhouse gas footprint looms large in California
BIODIVERSITY
50
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
Key points: biodiversity
• Ecosystem and species diversity is one of the hallmarks of the West
and is due to the region’s extremes in elevation, wide variation in
climate, and unique assemblage of ecological communities
• The number of imperiled species continues to rise, but the process of
granting plants and animals Endangered Species Act protection is
highly politicized
• Habitat loss, invasive species, and climate change are among the
greatest threats, but overhunting and illegal collecting are less of a
problem today
51
52
The West’s terrestrial ecoregions:
A mosaic of diversity
Source: The Nature Conservancy
Dry parts of the West are among the most diverse
53Source: The Nature Conservancy
Extremes of topography and climate contribute to biological richness
Number of
plant species
by terrestrial
ecoregion
Threatened: how the IUCN classifies U.S. species
Total
Species
Extinct (EX)
Extinct in the Wild (EW)
Near Threatened (NT)
Least Concern (LC)
Critically Endangered (CR)
Endangered (EN)
Vulnerable (VU)
Threatened
Not Evaluated (NE)
Evaluated
4,926
Data Deficient (DD)
Adequate
Data
54
>200,000
258
11
297
281
579
336
472
2,692
Source: IUCN
Just a fraction of plants and animals have been assessed
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Animals Vascular plants
Apparently
secure
Secure
Other
Vulnerable
Imperiled
Critically
imperiled
Extinct*
* Possibly and
presumed extinct
About 30% of U.S. species are vulnerable or worse
55Source: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States
Animals doing slightly better than plants
Notable endangered species in the West
56
Species Where found? Conflicts and public policy issues
Gray
wolf
Northern Rockies and
Southwest
Opposition from ranchers and others animates
debate over delisting of Northern Rockies
population; Southwest wolves doing poorly.
Salmon Pacific Coast and
Pacific Northwest
Major impacts on dam operations, but also
affected by land-use changes, such as logging of
headwaters habitat.
Spotted
owl
Pacific Coast states
(northern) and
Southwest (Mexican)
Need old-growth forests and have contributed to
significant declines in logging in the Pacific
Northwest.
Desert
tortoise
Mojave Desert of
Southern California
and Nevada
Once threatened to derail growth in Las Vegas;
now coming into conflict with solar energy
proposals.
Delta
smelt
Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta
Continuing to influence management of the hub
in California’s water works.
Canada
lynx
Rocky Mountains Impacts ski industry and other development in
high-elevation areas.
Bush IIBush I ClintonReaganCarterNixon/
Ford
Number of endangered species continues to rise
57
Obama
Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1967
1970
1972
1973
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Number of species protected by the ESA
Listings are supposed to be science-based and ignore economic impacts
Listings influenced by who’s in the White House
58
Average number of
species listed
per year
Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Nixon/Ford Carter Reagan Bush I Clinton Bush II Obama
George W. Bush administration kept a lid on listings
Waiting to board the ark: a backlog of candidates
59
Number of candidates for ESA protection
Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Obama administration has shortened the queue
Endangered species clustered in subset of counties
60Source: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States
Southwest and California are hotspots in West
Number of federally
listed species
1
2-4
5-9
≥10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
All species Plants Mammals Birds Reptiles Amphibians Fish
Habitat loss/degradation Alien species Pollution Overexploitation Disease
Habitat loss and alien species jeopardizing species
61Source: Wilcove et al. (1998)
Major threats to imperiled or listed U.S. species
1998 analysis didn’t address the impact of climate change
Agriculture top driver of habitat loss/degradation
62
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Agriculture
Disruption of fire regimes
Infrastructure, roads
Land conversion for development
Livestock grazing
Logging
Military activities
Mining, oil/gas, geothermal
Outdoor recreation, off-roading
Pollutants
Water development
Source: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States
Top habitat threats
for U.S. endangered species
Unnatural fire regimes even greater threat than development
WILDFIRES
63
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
Key points
• Fire is essential to maintaining ecosystem health in many Western
forests, woodlands, and grasslands, but decades of fire suppression
have caused an unnatural build-up of fuels in some areas.
• Fire activity varies year to year, largely due to the weather, but
blazes are generally getting bigger, burning longer, doing more
damage, and costing more to suppress.
• An increasing number of acres are being treated with mechanical
thinning and prescribed burns, but the backlog is tremendous and
there is some disagreement about where to focus the work.
64
Much of the West is susceptible to wildfires
65Source: USDA Forest Service/Fire Science Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Fire
potential
But natural fire regime varies dramatically in different habitats
Many Western forests filled with more fuel
66
1909 1948 1989
Source: US Forest Service
In drier forests, frequent, low-intensity fires are often natural
Most areas have degraded natural fire regimes
67Source: The Nature Conservancy
Condition of
natural fire
systems
In West, only Pacific NW and Northern/Central Rockies are “intact”
Acres burned varies by year, but overall trend is up
68Source: National Interagency Fire Center
Acres burned by U.S. wildfires: 1961-2012
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
10-year
moving
average
Weather plays key role in severity of fire season
Average size of fires has also increased
69Source: National Interagency Fire Center
Average acreage of U.S. wildfires: 1990-2012
5-year
moving
average
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
Prior to 1990, number of fires was reported differently
Fires consume biggest share of Forest Service budget
70
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
$10
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Billions(2012dollars)
Supplemental/Emergency/Reserve
Other Appropriations
Land Acquisition: LWCF
State and Private Forestry
Forest and Rangeland Research
Capital Improvement and Maintenance
Mandatory Appropriations
National Forest System
Wildland Fire Management
Source: U.S. Forest Service
Agency often taps supplemental emergency funds
Wildfire
management
Many busy fire seasons over the past decade
71Source: National Interagency Fire Center
Days at Preparedness Levels 4 and 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Level 5
Level 4
But some seasons are quiet due to benign weather
Fuels reduction increasing on federal lands
72
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Millions
of acres
Non-WUI other
Non-WUI mechanical
Non-WUI fire
WUI other
WUI mechanical
WUI fire
Fuels treatment on federal lands and
the wildland-urban interface (WUI)
Source: Departments of Agriculture and Interior
Compared to the overall need, it’s a drop in the bucket
Fight fire with fire: prescribed burns
73Source: National Interagency Fire Center
Acres burned in prescribed fires
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Millions
Bureau of Land Management
National Park Service
Bureau of Indian Affairs
US Fish and Wildlife Service
State/Other
US Forest Service
Much cheaper than mechanical thinning, but always a risk of escape
More homes in wildland-urban interface
74Source: U.S. Forest Service
Population growing in fire-prone lands
CLIMATE CHANGE
75
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
Key points
• Temperature
– The West is already warming faster than many parts of the country and
even higher temperatures are expected in the decades to come
• Precipitation
– Models predict the Southwest will get drier and the Pacific Northwest will
get wetter, but the projections elsewhere are more ambiguous
• Water impacts
– Changes to the vital winter snowpack and the timing of the spring
snowmelt will pose challenges to aquatic species and water managers
• Biodiversity impacts
– Plants and animals are expected to move upslope and toward the North
Pole but many barriers stand in the way
• Wildfire impacts
– Warmer temperatures and a thinner snowpack will continue to make the
West’s wildfire season longer and more destructive
76
In West, warming will be greatest in interior
Mean temperature
departure (˚F)
Source: Climate Wizard 77
Projected temperature change by 2080s: High emissions (A2) scenario
Models point to much hotter weather across country
Southwest will get drier, Northwest will get wetter
Average precipitation change
(millimeters)
Source: Climate Wizard 78
Projected precipitation change by 2080s: High emissions (A2) scenario
Precipitation projections more ambiguous than temperature predictions
Spring and summer will be drier in much of West
Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 79
Projected precipitation changes: 2080-2099
Seasonal precipitation patterns critical for wildlife, water managers
Winter Spring
FallSummer
Major precipitation changes by 2020s and 2030s
Source: Tetra Tech , Natural Resources Defense Council 80
The new normal: U.S. climate may be far different in just a decade or two
< -1.0
-1.0-0
0-1.0
1.0-2.0
2.0-4.0
>4.0
Changes in Precipitation 2020-2039 from 1961-1990
inches
Climate change effects on water cycle
Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 81
Less snowfall, more extreme storms, higher evaporation
Hotter/Drier Conditions (Interior West) Hotter/Wetter Conditions (NE and Coasts)
Snowmelt will occur earlier, especially in Northwest
Source: The Nature Conservancy 82
Timing of
spring
snowmelt
Poses challenges to aquatic species, dam managers, and water agencies
River runoff expected to decline in much of West
Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program,; Milly et al. 83
Projected changes in median runoff: 2041-2060 vs. 1901-1970
Colorado River, California, and Great Basin hit hard
-40 -20 -10 -5 -2 2 5 10 20 40
Percent
Temperature and precipitation limit plant distribution
Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 84
Basic ecological parameters are increasingly in flux
Distribution of plant communities
Tropical Subtropical Warm Temperate Cold Temperate Arctic-Alpine
Mean Annual
Temperature (C)
Precipitation(cm)
Enormous variations in elevation and temperature
Death Valley, -282 feet
Mount Whitney, 14,505 feet
Source: Climate Wizard 85
U.S. average
temperatures:
1951-2006
Lowest and tallest points in contiguous U.S. are just 85 miles apart
Annual
average
precip.
(inches)
Wet and dry areas are often in close proximity
Source: Climate Wizard 86
Orographic effect and rain shadows contribute to diversity
Source: U.S. Forest Service 87
MAP SS Current Climate
Hadley S + CO2 (2070-2099)
CCC + CO2 (2070-2099)
Climate change will shift mosaic of ecosystems
Rising CO2 levels will also affect plant growth
Decreasing habitat for coldwater fish
Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 88
Trout, salmon, steelhead severely stressed when air above 70°F
1980-1997 2020s 2040s
Average air temperature (F°)
39 50 59 68 79
Birds are already on the move
89Source: Associated Press, Audubon Society, NOAA
Species moving toward poles, up in elevation, in response to warming
Mountaintop species especially vulnerable
90
Pikas may eventually run out of mountain
Source: Carnegie Institution Department of Global Ecology
Wildfires are arriving earlier and lasting longer
Source: Westerling et al. (2006) 91
Big blazes increased starting in 1980s, mostly due to warming
Western U.S. Forest
Wildfires and Spring-
Summer Temperature
Timing of spring
Snowmelt
Fire Season Length
Climate change expected to make wildfires worse
Source: National Research Council 92
Change in burned area
projected from 1°C warming
A - Cascade Mixes Forest
B - Northern Rocky Mt Forest
C - Middle Rocky Mt. Steppe-Forest
D - Intermountain Semi-Desert
E - Great Plains-Palouse Dry Steppe
F - Sierran Steppe-Mixed Forest
G - California Dry Steppe
H - Intermountain Semi-Desert/ Desert
J - South Rocky Mt. Steppe-Forest
K - American Semi-Desert and Desert
L - Colorado Plateau Semi-Desert
M - Ariz-New Mex. Mts. Semi-Desert
N - Chihuahuan Semi-Desert
Mountain pine beetle attacking lodgepole forests
93
Lack of deep freeze may be responsible for outbreak
PUBLIC OPINION
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
94
Key points: public opinion
• The environment doesn’t rank high on the public’s agenda, but a
majority of Americans remain concerned about a wide variety of
environmental problems
• The public agrees with many of the environmental movement’s
policy goals, but only about a fifth of Americans identify themselves
as active participants
• The Great Recession has shifted public opinion away from
environmental concerns over the past few years and there is some
increasing hostility toward environmentalists
• Air and water pollution tend to be the most worrisome
environmental issues and disasters, such as the BP oil spill, can
cause spikes of interest in environmental issues
95
What’s the most important problem facing the U.S.?
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Welfare
Wars/War (nonspecific)/Fear of war
Wage issues
Unifying the country
The media
Taxes
Poverty/ Hunger/Homelessness
Lack of respect for each other
Lack of military defense
Judicial system/Courts/Laws
International issues, problems
Gap between rich and poor
Fuel/Oil prices
Foreign aid/Focus overseas
Environment/Pollution
Energy/Lack of energy sources
Corporate corruption
Care for the elderly/Medicare
Immigration/Illegal aliens
Ethics/moral/religious/family decline; Dishonesty
Education/Poor education/Access to education
Lack of money
Poor healthcare/hospitals; High cost of healthcare
Federal budget deficit/Federal debt
Dissatisfaction with government
Unemployment/Jobs
Economy in general
1% each
Percent
Source: Gallup
June 2012
survey
96
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Getting better
Getting worse
Same
No opinion
Elections can cause shifts in environmental opinion
Right now, do you think the quality of the environment in the country as a
whole is getting better or worse?
Obama
elected
Source: Gallup 97
Percent
Hostility toward environmental movement rising
Do you think of yourself as an active participant in the environmental
movement; sympathetic towards the movement, but not active; neutral;
or unsympathetic?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Sympathetic, but
not active
Neutral
Active participant
Unsympathetic
No opinion
Source: Gallup 98
Percent
More think environmentalists have done harm
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Definitely more good than harm Probably more good than harm
Probably more harm than good Definitely more harm than good
No opinion
All things considered, do you think the environmental movement in this
nation has done more good than harm, or more harm than good?
Percent
Source: Gallup 99
Environment vs. economy: the Gulf oil spill effect
Do you think that protection of the environment should be given
priority, even at the risk of curbing economic growth, or do you think
economic growth should be given priority, even if the environment suffers
to some extent?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
Protection of the environment should be given priority
Economic growth should be given priority
Gulf oil
spill
Source: Gallup 100
Percent
Environment vs. economy in the West
As part of efforts to improve their state economy and generate jobs as quickly as
possible, some people have proposed reducing protections on land, air and water
that apply to major industries, including construction and agriculture. Would you
prefer your state to reduce these protections or maintain them?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Colorado Utah Wyoming Montana New Mexico
Maintain
Reduce
Percent
Source: State of the Rockies Project 101
Few Westerners want environmental laws relaxed
What is your feeling about the current status of environmental laws?
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Laws too strict, need to be relaxed
Laws strong enough
Laws, enforcement should be left as they are
Laws strong enough, but should be better enforced
Percent
Source: State of the Rockies Project 102
Air and water pollution generate most concern
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Acid rain
Urban sprawl and loss of open space
Global warming
Extinction of plant and animal species
Damage to the ozone layer
Loss of tropical rainforests
Air pollution
Loss of natural habitat for wildlife
Maintenance of freshwater supply for household needs
Pollution of lakes, rivers, and reservoirs
Contamination of soil and water by toxic waste
Pollution of drinking water
Percent
Source: Gallup
What environmental issues are most worrisome?
103
In West, non-pollution issues also rank high
What is the seriousness of the following environmental problems?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Lack of access to lands and rivers for hunting and fishing
Cliamte change
Global warming
Lack of access to public lands
The impact of oil and gas and drilling
The impact of mining
Loss of natural areas
Toxins and pesticides in food and drinking water
Inadequate water supplies
Loss of habitat for fish and wildlife
Funding cuts for state parks, natural area protection, and
water quality
Air pollution and smog
Pollution of rivers, lakes and streams
Loss of family farms and ranches
Poorly-planned growth and development
Extremely Serious
Serious
Source: State of the Rockies Project 104
CONSERVATION FUNDING
105
Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
Key points: conservation funding
• Federal funding
– In real terms, the budgets of major environmental agencies have
been fairly steady over the past decade
– The distribution among different programs also tends to remain
relatively constant
• Ballot measures
– Open-space bonds and other conservation measures usually pass
at the polls but considerably fewer have been put to voters
during the economic downturn
• Philanthropic
– The distribution of funding by issue area changes significantly
from year to year
– Energy and climate-related funding saw big increases between
2007 and 2009
106
How your federal tax dollars are spent
Social Security
21%
Defense
20%
Medicare
13%
Low-income
assistance
9%
Medicaid
8%
Net interest
payments
7%
Unemployment
compensation
5%
Veterans Affairs
3% Education
3%
Law
enforcement/homeland
security
2%
Transportation
2%
Health (not
Medicare/Medicaid)
2%
Management of federal
employees and buildings
1%
Environmental protection
and natural resources
1%
All others
3%
Source: Third Way
Entitlements, defense, and debt overshadow other program
107
Top federal programs related to the environment
$0 $5 $10 $15
Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Forest Service
Clean energy
Energy research, statisics and analysis
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Park Service
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Bureau of Land Management
Department of Interior
Dams, powerplants and reservoirs
U.S. Geological Survey
Coal mine oversight and cleanup
U.S. Terroritories oversight
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Efficient vehicle development
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
Lead hazard control and healthy homes
Energy efficient housing
Ocean oil drilling regulation and natural resource leases
Electric reliability organizations
Billions
Source: Third Way
EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, and Forest Service get most funding
108
Funding for federal agencies tends to be steady
0
5
10
15
20
25
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Billions(2012dollars)
Other
Offices of the Solicitor and Inspector
General
Minerals Management Service/Ocean
Energy Management
Insular Affairs
Office of Special Trustee for American
Indians
Office of Surface Mining
Geological Survey
Bureau of Reclamation
Bureau of Land Management
Department Wide Programs
Fish and Wildlife Service
Departmental Management
Bureau of Indian Affairs
National Park Service
Source: Department of Interior
Department of Interior budget: 2003-2013
Stimulus funds created temporary bump in 2009
109
Land and Water Conservation Fund short-changed
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
Millions(Dollars)
Receipts
received
Fund
appropriations
Source: Department of Interior
Outer Continental Shelf receipts
and LWCF appropriations
Royalties from off-shore drilling diverted to non-conservation programs
110
Conservation ballot measures usually succeed
NumberofMeasuresPassed
Percent
Source: Trust for Public Land
0
50
100
150
200
250
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
Number of measures
Passage rate
But fewer have been put to voters during economic downturn
111
Philanthropic funding varies greatly year-to-year
-100 -50 0 50 100Millions of dollars
Transportation
Toxics
Terrestrial Ecosystems & Land-use
Sustainable Communities
Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems
Population
Material Consumption & Waste Management
International Trade & Finance
Indigenous Populations/Communities
General/Multiple/Undefined
Fresh Water/Inland Water Ecosystems
Environmental Justice
Environmental Health
Energy
Coastal & Marine Ecosystem
Climate/Atmosphere
Biodiversity & Species Preservation
Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association
Change in funding: 2007 -2009
Climate and energy programs recently saw big increases
112
Overall takeaways
• The human footprint in the West is surprisingly large and
agriculture has the biggest physical imprint in the region
• Growth and climate change are compounding the water crisis in a
region with an inherently capricious supply
• Even without climate change, many species would be in
trouble, largely due to habitat loss and invasive species
• Wildfires are generally growing larger and will only get worse as the
region warms and the snowpack thins
• Most Westerners want a vibrant economy and a healthy
environment, but hostility toward environmentalists may be rising
• There’s reason for hope: we’re generally getting cleaner and more
efficient in our use of natural resources
113
114
ecowest.org
Download more slides and other resources
Contact us by e-mailing mitch@ceaconsulting.com
Jon Christensen, Adjunct Assistant Professor and Pritzker
Fellow at the Institute of the Environment and Sustainability
and Department of History at UCLA; former director of Bill
Lane Center for the American West at Stanford.
Robert Glennon, Regents’ Professor and Morris K. Udall
Professor of Law and Public Policy, Rogers College of Law at
the University of Arizona; author of Water Follies and
Unquenchable.
Bruce Hamilton, Deputy Executive Director for the Sierra
Club, where he has worked for more than 35 years; member
of the World Commission on Protected Areas; former Field
Editor for High Country News.
EcoWest advisors
115
Jonathan Hoekstra, head of WWF’s Conservation Science
Program, lead author of The Atlas of Global
Conservation, and former Senior Scientist at The Nature
Conservancy.
Timothy Male, Vice President of Conservation Policy for
Defenders of Wildlife, where he directs the Habitat and
Highways, Conservation Planning, Federal Lands, Oregon
Biodiversity Partnership, and Economics programs.
Thomas Swetnam, Regents' Professor of
Dendrochronology, Director of the Laboratory of Tree-Ring
Research at the University of Arizona, and a leading expert on
wildfires and Western forests.
EcoWest advisors
116
Mitch Tobin
Editor of EcoWest.org
Communications Director at CEA
Caroline Ott
Research Associate at CEA
Matthew Elliott
Principal at CEA
Contributors at California Environmental Associates
117
Max Levine
Associate at CEA
Sarah Weldon
Affiliated consultant at CEA
Micah Day
Associate at CEA
Contact us by e-mailing
mitch@ceaconsulting.com
EcoWest is supported by the
David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Contenu connexe

Tendances

2019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 2019
2019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 20192019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 2019
2019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 2019paul young cpa, cga
 
Impacts of Climate Change
Impacts of Climate ChangeImpacts of Climate Change
Impacts of Climate ChangeACX
 
Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)
Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)
Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)Charles Hernick
 
Geopolitics of Water In The MENA
Geopolitics of Water In The MENAGeopolitics of Water In The MENA
Geopolitics of Water In The MENAcconvery
 
Sample Writing3
Sample Writing3Sample Writing3
Sample Writing3Kevin Choi
 
Environment| Canada| What's Next|
Environment| Canada| What's Next| Environment| Canada| What's Next|
Environment| Canada| What's Next| paul young cpa, cga
 
Environment| What's Next| Canada
Environment| What's Next| CanadaEnvironment| What's Next| Canada
Environment| What's Next| Canadapaul young cpa, cga
 
Managing drought short term strategies in semi arid
Managing drought short term strategies in semi aridManaging drought short term strategies in semi arid
Managing drought short term strategies in semi arideSAT Publishing House
 
Climate Change and National Security
Climate Change and National SecurityClimate Change and National Security
Climate Change and National Securityecspblog
 
State of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nation
State of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nationState of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nation
State of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nationKatelin Breck
 
An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...
An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...
An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...Sayed Mohammad Alavi-Moghaddam
 
Water Security in the Himalayas
Water Security in the HimalayasWater Security in the Himalayas
Water Security in the Himalayasalert10
 
L5 ap water geopolitics
L5 ap water geopoliticsL5 ap water geopolitics
L5 ap water geopoliticsandypinks
 
Human pollution &amp; environment
Human pollution &amp; environmentHuman pollution &amp; environment
Human pollution &amp; environmentKARTIK GHODE
 
Deforestation in obubra local government area the challenges
Deforestation in obubra local government area the challengesDeforestation in obubra local government area the challenges
Deforestation in obubra local government area the challengesAlexander Decker
 
Environmental science 2nd lecture
Environmental science 2nd lectureEnvironmental science 2nd lecture
Environmental science 2nd lectureJasperBarcelona
 
CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS
CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONSCONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS
CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONSNo to mining in Palawan
 

Tendances (20)

2019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 2019
2019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 20192019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 2019
2019 Election| Environment | Water Management| July 2019
 
Capstone Presentation
Capstone PresentationCapstone Presentation
Capstone Presentation
 
Impacts of Climate Change
Impacts of Climate ChangeImpacts of Climate Change
Impacts of Climate Change
 
Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)
Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)
Hernick Inga Presentation Boston University GE519 (5Feb2015)
 
BIO320 Chapter 6
BIO320 Chapter 6BIO320 Chapter 6
BIO320 Chapter 6
 
Geopolitics of Water In The MENA
Geopolitics of Water In The MENAGeopolitics of Water In The MENA
Geopolitics of Water In The MENA
 
Sample Writing3
Sample Writing3Sample Writing3
Sample Writing3
 
Environment| Canada| What's Next|
Environment| Canada| What's Next| Environment| Canada| What's Next|
Environment| Canada| What's Next|
 
Environment| What's Next| Canada
Environment| What's Next| CanadaEnvironment| What's Next| Canada
Environment| What's Next| Canada
 
Managing drought short term strategies in semi arid
Managing drought short term strategies in semi aridManaging drought short term strategies in semi arid
Managing drought short term strategies in semi arid
 
Climate Change and National Security
Climate Change and National SecurityClimate Change and National Security
Climate Change and National Security
 
State of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nation
State of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nationState of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nation
State of the States Report: A new perspective on the wealth of our nation
 
An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...
An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...
An overview of holistic approach transitions towards adaptive management of w...
 
Water Security in the Himalayas
Water Security in the HimalayasWater Security in the Himalayas
Water Security in the Himalayas
 
L5 ap water geopolitics
L5 ap water geopoliticsL5 ap water geopolitics
L5 ap water geopolitics
 
Human pollution &amp; environment
Human pollution &amp; environmentHuman pollution &amp; environment
Human pollution &amp; environment
 
Deforestation in obubra local government area the challenges
Deforestation in obubra local government area the challengesDeforestation in obubra local government area the challenges
Deforestation in obubra local government area the challenges
 
Environmental science 2nd lecture
Environmental science 2nd lectureEnvironmental science 2nd lecture
Environmental science 2nd lecture
 
CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS
CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONSCONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS
CONSEQUENCES OF OUR ACCUMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL VIOLATIONS
 
2012 Annual Report
2012 Annual Report2012 Annual Report
2012 Annual Report
 

Similaire à Region at risk: visualizing environmental trends in the American West

Climate change and its implications on national security
Climate change and its implications on national securityClimate change and its implications on national security
Climate change and its implications on national securityAmith Reddy
 
Global point of view hhes us-1
Global point of view hhes us-1Global point of view hhes us-1
Global point of view hhes us-1Neti Srinivasan
 
National and International Environmental issues
National and International Environmental issues National and International Environmental issues
National and International Environmental issues BeenaMathew11
 
Global Point of view HHES US
Global Point of view HHES USGlobal Point of view HHES US
Global Point of view HHES USryangroup
 
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and PolicyIntegrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and PolicyGeoEngineers, Inc.
 
EVR-1001C Group 3 - Deforestation
EVR-1001C Group 3 - DeforestationEVR-1001C Group 3 - Deforestation
EVR-1001C Group 3 - DeforestationJoshuaCurrier1
 
8.1 the global village_cycles
8.1 the global village_cycles8.1 the global village_cycles
8.1 the global village_cyclesjkoryan
 
Unit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdf
Unit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdfUnit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdf
Unit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdfssuser6d2b3b
 
The Ailing Planet
The Ailing PlanetThe Ailing Planet
The Ailing PlanetMohitRana84
 
Rural Climate Dialogues State Convening Report
Rural Climate Dialogues State Convening ReportRural Climate Dialogues State Convening Report
Rural Climate Dialogues State Convening ReportJefferson Center
 
Climate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in Africa
Climate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in AfricaClimate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in Africa
Climate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in AfricaFAO
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptxShielaSorino1
 
GLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for Journalists
GLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for JournalistsGLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for Journalists
GLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for JournalistsSai Bhaskar Reddy Nakka
 
Global Warming Save Earth
Global Warming Save EarthGlobal Warming Save Earth
Global Warming Save Earthtomjose
 
Deforestation and Climate change.pptx
Deforestation and Climate change.pptxDeforestation and Climate change.pptx
Deforestation and Climate change.pptxSaurabh Patil
 

Similaire à Region at risk: visualizing environmental trends in the American West (20)

Climate change and its implications on national security
Climate change and its implications on national securityClimate change and its implications on national security
Climate change and its implications on national security
 
Global point of view hhes us-1
Global point of view hhes us-1Global point of view hhes us-1
Global point of view hhes us-1
 
Fueling destruction
Fueling destructionFueling destruction
Fueling destruction
 
National and International Environmental issues
National and International Environmental issues National and International Environmental issues
National and International Environmental issues
 
Global Point of view HHES US
Global Point of view HHES USGlobal Point of view HHES US
Global Point of view HHES US
 
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and PolicyIntegrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
 
EVR-1001C Group 3 - Deforestation
EVR-1001C Group 3 - DeforestationEVR-1001C Group 3 - Deforestation
EVR-1001C Group 3 - Deforestation
 
8.1 the global village_cycles
8.1 the global village_cycles8.1 the global village_cycles
8.1 the global village_cycles
 
Unit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdf
Unit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdfUnit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdf
Unit 3 Project - CGC1D.pdf
 
CA Presentation
CA PresentationCA Presentation
CA Presentation
 
The Ailing Planet
The Ailing PlanetThe Ailing Planet
The Ailing Planet
 
Rural Climate Dialogues State Convening Report
Rural Climate Dialogues State Convening ReportRural Climate Dialogues State Convening Report
Rural Climate Dialogues State Convening Report
 
Climate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in Africa
Climate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in AfricaClimate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in Africa
Climate Change: Myth or reality? Potential impact on Food security in Africa
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
 
Climate Change impacts and Wetland Vulnerability
Climate Change impacts and Wetland VulnerabilityClimate Change impacts and Wetland Vulnerability
Climate Change impacts and Wetland Vulnerability
 
GLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for Journalists
GLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for JournalistsGLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for Journalists
GLOBAL WARMING AND ITS EFFECTS Climate Change Workshop for Journalists
 
Global Warming Save Earth
Global Warming Save EarthGlobal Warming Save Earth
Global Warming Save Earth
 
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climateSNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
 
Deforestation and Climate change.pptx
Deforestation and Climate change.pptxDeforestation and Climate change.pptx
Deforestation and Climate change.pptx
 

Plus de Sea to Snow Consulting

EIA's portal compares energy in the 50 states
EIA's portal compares energy in the 50 statesEIA's portal compares energy in the 50 states
EIA's portal compares energy in the 50 statesSea to Snow Consulting
 
Trends in the American West's snowpack
Trends in the American West's snowpackTrends in the American West's snowpack
Trends in the American West's snowpackSea to Snow Consulting
 
How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”
How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”
How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”Sea to Snow Consulting
 
Snow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economy
Snow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economySnow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economy
Snow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economySea to Snow Consulting
 
2013 wildfire season slower than average
2013 wildfire season slower than average2013 wildfire season slower than average
2013 wildfire season slower than averageSea to Snow Consulting
 
Financing land conservation in the West
Financing land conservation in the WestFinancing land conservation in the West
Financing land conservation in the WestSea to Snow Consulting
 
Drop on the planet: visualizations of water on Earth
Drop on the planet:  visualizations of water on EarthDrop on the planet:  visualizations of water on Earth
Drop on the planet: visualizations of water on EarthSea to Snow Consulting
 
Up in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are rising
Up in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are risingUp in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are rising
Up in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are risingSea to Snow Consulting
 
Americans are driving less: the state-by-state story
Americans are driving less: the state-by-state storyAmericans are driving less: the state-by-state story
Americans are driving less: the state-by-state storySea to Snow Consulting
 
Tracking the ripple effects of conservation spending
Tracking the ripple effects of conservation spendingTracking the ripple effects of conservation spending
Tracking the ripple effects of conservation spendingSea to Snow Consulting
 
Colorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the rise
Colorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the riseColorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the rise
Colorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the riseSea to Snow Consulting
 
The black and blue marble: whole Earth views from space
The black and blue marble: whole Earth views from spaceThe black and blue marble: whole Earth views from space
The black and blue marble: whole Earth views from spaceSea to Snow Consulting
 
How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?
How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?
How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?Sea to Snow Consulting
 
Yosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trends
Yosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trendsYosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trends
Yosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trendsSea to Snow Consulting
 
Tracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake Powell
Tracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake PowellTracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake Powell
Tracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake PowellSea to Snow Consulting
 
State of the rockies conservation in the west poll
State of the rockies conservation in the west pollState of the rockies conservation in the west poll
State of the rockies conservation in the west pollSea to Snow Consulting
 
Visualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregions
Visualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregionsVisualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregions
Visualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregionsSea to Snow Consulting
 

Plus de Sea to Snow Consulting (20)

China urban population
China urban populationChina urban population
China urban population
 
EIA's portal compares energy in the 50 states
EIA's portal compares energy in the 50 statesEIA's portal compares energy in the 50 states
EIA's portal compares energy in the 50 states
 
Trends in the American West's snowpack
Trends in the American West's snowpackTrends in the American West's snowpack
Trends in the American West's snowpack
 
How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”
How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”
How energy is produced in the American West, the nation’s “energy breadbasket”
 
Snow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economy
Snow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economySnow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economy
Snow jobs: America's $12 billion winter tourism economy
 
2013 wildfire season slower than average
2013 wildfire season slower than average2013 wildfire season slower than average
2013 wildfire season slower than average
 
Financing land conservation in the West
Financing land conservation in the WestFinancing land conservation in the West
Financing land conservation in the West
 
EcoWest Landscope America
EcoWest Landscope AmericaEcoWest Landscope America
EcoWest Landscope America
 
Our EcoWest SXSW Eco presentation
Our EcoWest SXSW Eco presentationOur EcoWest SXSW Eco presentation
Our EcoWest SXSW Eco presentation
 
Drop on the planet: visualizations of water on Earth
Drop on the planet:  visualizations of water on EarthDrop on the planet:  visualizations of water on Earth
Drop on the planet: visualizations of water on Earth
 
Up in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are rising
Up in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are risingUp in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are rising
Up in smoke: federal wildfire suppression costs are rising
 
Americans are driving less: the state-by-state story
Americans are driving less: the state-by-state storyAmericans are driving less: the state-by-state story
Americans are driving less: the state-by-state story
 
Tracking the ripple effects of conservation spending
Tracking the ripple effects of conservation spendingTracking the ripple effects of conservation spending
Tracking the ripple effects of conservation spending
 
Colorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the rise
Colorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the riseColorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the rise
Colorado floods: heavy precipitation events are on the rise
 
The black and blue marble: whole Earth views from space
The black and blue marble: whole Earth views from spaceThe black and blue marble: whole Earth views from space
The black and blue marble: whole Earth views from space
 
How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?
How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?
How do the 50 states compare in energy use, prices, and spending?
 
Yosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trends
Yosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trendsYosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trends
Yosemite Rim Fire and recent California wildfire trends
 
Tracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake Powell
Tracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake PowellTracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake Powell
Tracking the water supply in Lake Mead and Lake Powell
 
State of the rockies conservation in the west poll
State of the rockies conservation in the west pollState of the rockies conservation in the west poll
State of the rockies conservation in the west poll
 
Visualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregions
Visualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregionsVisualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregions
Visualizing biodiversity through the lens of ecoregions
 

Dernier

Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeRohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeAbdulGhani778830
 
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest2
 
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.NaveedKhaskheli1
 
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming TrendExperience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming TrendFabwelt
 
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdfGerald Furnkranz
 
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkcomplaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkbhavenpr
 

Dernier (8)

Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for JusticeRohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
Rohan Jaitley: Central Gov't Standing Counsel for Justice
 
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global NewsIndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
IndiaWest: Your Trusted Source for Today's Global News
 
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
Global Terrorism and its types and prevention ppt.
 
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming TrendExperience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
Experience the Future of the Web3 Gaming Trend
 
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
16042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
57 Bidens Annihilation Nation Policy.pdf
 
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
15042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfkcomplaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
complaint-ECI-PM-media-1-Chandru.pdfra;;prfk
 

Region at risk: visualizing environmental trends in the American West

  • 1. Region at risk: Visualizing environmental trends in the American West April 2013 Executive Summary
  • 2. 2 Inform and advance conservation in the North American West by analyzing, visualizing, and sharing data on environmental trends. EcoWest mission
  • 3. 3 This is a summary of six presentations that illustrate key environmental metrics. EcoWest decks describe trends in key metrics Issue Sample metrics Land Acres protected by land trusts, energy production on federal lands Water Per capita water consumption, trends in water transfers Biodiversity Number of endangered species and candidates, biological diversity of ecoregions Wildfires Size and number of wildfires, suppression costs Climate Temperature/precipitation projections Politics Conservation funding, public opinion Download presentations and other resources at ecowest.org
  • 4. Key points 1. Human footprint: Despite the prevalence of public land, many of the West’s iconic and least disturbed landscapes are vulnerable to human activities, putting biodiversity and wilderness values at risk. 2. Land use: Population growth is a key driver, but agriculture uses most of the West’s water and has a bigger footprint than cities and suburbs 3. Water: Growth and climate change are compounding the water crisis by increasing demands and jeopardizing supplies, but water quality is generally better out West than back East. 4. Biodiversity: Habitat loss, invasive species, and climate change are the top threats to the West’s rich array of species and ecosystems. 5. Wildfires: Climate change and the legacy of fire suppression will continue to make the wildfire season longer, costlier, and more destructive 6. Public opinion: Americans—and Westerners in particular—often support environmentalists’ goals, but hostility toward the movement may be growing. 7. Funding: Budgets for federal environmental agencies are relatively steady and ballot measures usually pass, but considerably fewer have been put to voters during the economic downturn. 4
  • 5. Overview of trends in key issues 4/26/2013 5 Issue Status Good news Bad news Land use Water Wildfires Biodiversity • The West still has large tracts of wilderness and native habitat that are relatively undisturbed • Some extractive industries, such as public lands logging, pose less of a threat today • Land trusts are growing in number and protecting more acres of open space • Growth is expanding the human footprint around cities and spreading impacts to previously unpopulated places • Even remote public lands are crisscrossed by roads and suffering from invasive species • Many public lands are vulnerable to harmful development under multiple-use doctrine • Newer power plants are using less water • Utilities are employing progressive rate structures to encourage conservation • The Clean Water Act has reduced pollution in many waterways • Water quality in the West is generally better than in the East • Demand exceeds supply in overallocated river basins, creating conflicts over water • Overpumping is depleting many aquifers and harming nearby streams/rivers • Climate change expected to shrink snowpack and change the timing of peak flows • Nation’s water infrastructure is crumbling • Some overgrown forests are being treated with judicious fuels reduction and prescribed burns • Land managers are letting some wilderness fires burn to restore the natural cycle • Many communities are adopting fire-wise building practices and mitigating risks • Overexploitation (hunting and collecting) is less of a problem today • Key game species, such as deer, elk, and pronghorn, have made dramatic recoveries • Some endangered species have been pulled back from the brink of extinction • The backlog of candidates for Endangered Species Act protection is decreasing • Climate change posing an existential threat to some species and compounding traditional problems, such as habitat loss and invasives • Freshwater species doing especially poorly • The conservation status for many species is unknown and not monitored • In many areas, wildfires are growing larger, burning longer, becoming more intense, and costing more to suppress • More homes are vulnerable in the wildland- fire interface and the fire threat may prompt harmful mechanical treatments • Climate change is exacerbating the problem
  • 6. Overview of trends in key issues 4/26/2013 6 Climate change Public opinion Air quality Funding * Levels of carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide have declined, despite a growing economy, increasing energy use, and rising vehicle-miles traveled * Shift from coal to natural gas is decreasing local air pollution from power generation * Particulates and ozone more difficult to control * Poor air quality is a chronic problem in some places, and millions of Westerners are still exposed to toxic air pollution * Dust-on-snow events are leading to accelerated melting of snowpack * Heightened awareness among public and policymakers of the impacts in West * Some Western states taking the lead in mitigation and adaptation * Much of West expected to get drier and be subject to more extreme weather/wildfires * Lack of political will to enact policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions * Species already on the move, but habitat loss and fragmentation pose obstacles * Great majority of Americans are concerned about the quality of the environment * Strong public support for open space, clean air, clean water, and other conservation goals * Many Westerners reject false choice of “jobs vs. the environment” * Environment barely registers on national agenda of top problems * Recession has slightly weakened support for environmental protection * Signs of increasing hostility toward the environmental movement * Budgets of federal environmental agencies have remained fairly steady over past decade * Conservation ballot measures usually pass at the polls * Sequester and fiscal austerity exerting downward pressure on public spending * Fewer conservation ballot measure have been put to voters during recession Issue Good news Bad news Energy * Wind, solar, and other renewables are making gains, with many Western states adopting renewable portfolio standards * Some technologies, including vehicles, are becoming more efficient * Fossil fuels continue to dominate the energy sector and dwarf renewables * Many wilderness-quality lands are threatened by energy development, including renewables Status
  • 7. Table of contents 7 • Land Use Slides 8-20 • Water Slides 21-34 • Biodiversity Slides 35-49 • Wildfires Slides 50-62 • Energy Slides 63-74 • Public Opinion Slides 75-93 • Funding Slides 105-112 • Climate Change Slides 94-104
  • 8. LAND USE Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change 8
  • 9. Key points: land use • Although much of the West is publicly owned, the human footprint is evident almost everywhere in the region. • Relatively pristine areas are often protected as wilderness or national parks, but many of the least developed areas remain vulnerable due to the multiple-use doctrine. • The West accounts for a rising share of the nation’s population, with most growth occurring in and around big cities in an increasingly urbanized region. • Some traditional economic sectors, such as logging on public lands, are in decline, but the West is still home to important mines, farms, and energy development. 9
  • 10. 30% 53% 45% 85% 50% 69% 57% 48% 42% 37% 42% 30% 19% Federal lands common in Western states 2% 4% 1% 1% 6% 3% 6% 6% 1% 5% 7% 5% 7% 2% 4% 3% 10% 2% 1% 2% 3% 10% 12% 8% 3% 1% 1% 7% 5% VT = 8% NH = 13% MA = 2% RI = 0.4% CT = 0.4% NJ = 3% DE = 2% MD = 3% DC = 25% Source: U.S. General Services Administration Portion of each state that is federal land BLM is biggest landowner, followed by Forest Service 10
  • 11. Much of the West is nominally protected 4/26/2013 11Source: The Nature Conservancy 11 But multiple-use doctrine applies to most BLM, Forest Service land
  • 12. Humanity’s imprint is already deep, indelible Source: U.S. Geological Survey 12 Agriculture has largest footprint, often in unpopulated regions
  • 13. Some of least disturbed areas still vulnerable 13 Many of these areas are not a wilderness or national park Source: U.S. Geological Survey
  • 14. The West has many of the nation’s growth hotspots 4/26/2013Source: U.S. Census Bureau 14 California, Southwest, and Washington among biggest gainers 40+ 20 to 39 10 to 19 0 to 9 -1 to -9 Less than -9 Comparable data not available Numeric change in population by county: 2000-2010 (thousands)
  • 15. The West’s population is highly concentrated Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census 15 Region known for unpopulated expanses is actually very urbanized Population by county: 2010
  • 16. 16 In 1940, the West was still pretty lonely territory Housing density especially low in inland states
  • 17. 17 By 2000, the region’s population had skyrocketed Not only along West Coast, but also inland
  • 18. 18 It’s expected to be even more crowded by 2030 But much of NV, UT, WY, MT are still unpopulated
  • 19. Northern spotted owl ESA listing 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Billions of board- feet Sold Harvested Some traditional extractive industries in decline Source: U.S. Forest Service 19 Timber produced by U.S. national forests Logging in national forests a shadow of its former self
  • 20. Much of the West still home to livestock Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 20 Pasture/Range Percent of county 0.0 - 11.7 11.8 - 27.5 27.6 - 47.0 47.1 - 70.4 70.5 + Cattle 1 dot = 10,000 cattle Cattle found in some very hot, dry areas
  • 21. ENERGY 21 Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
  • 22. Key points: energy • The West has become an important player in the nation’s fossil and renewable energy supply • New technologies are leading to the development of shale gas deposits in the West, but the growth rate is expected to be even greater in the East • Although the use of fossil fuels still dwarfs renewable supplies, the West is home to important sites for solar and wind energy that are seeing increasing development • All forms of energy development, including renewables, cause environmental impacts, but efficiency measures, can reduce the physical footprint of the energy sector 22
  • 23. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Percent % of US total for natural gas % of US total for fossil fuels Federal lands important for fossil fuel production Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 23 Private, tribal, and state land also home to energy development
  • 24. Fossil fuel sales fairly steady on public/tribal lands 0 5 10 15 20 25 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 QuadrillionBtu Sales of fossil fuels produced on federal and Indian lands, 2003-2011 Total Fossil Fuels Coal Natural Gas Crude Oil and Lease Condensate Natural Gas Plant Liquids Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 24 Government regulations and market forces influence drilling activity
  • 25. Natural gas displacing coal as wind power increases 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 Gigawatts Other/ Renewables Natural Gas/ Oil Nuclear Hydropower Coal Additions to U.S. electricity generating capacity Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 25 Renewables now account for much of the new generating capacity
  • 26. Natural gas least expensive, wind getting close 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Gas: Advanced Combined Cycle Gas: Conventional Combined Cycle Hydro Gas: Advanced CC with CCS Wind Conventional Coal Geothermal Gas: Advanced Combustion Turbine Advanced Coal Advanced Nuclear Biomass Gas: Conventional Combustion… Advanced Coal with CCS Solar PV Solar Thermal 2010 $/megawatt-hour Levelized capital cost Fixed O&M Variable O&M (incl. fuel) Transmission Investment Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 26 Cost of new generation in 2017 Large-scale solar plants are the most costly
  • 27. Shale gas found throughout the country Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 27 Often in the same locations as conventional gas plays
  • 28. Hydro, wood, and biofuels are top renewables 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009 QuadrillionBtu Renewable Energy: Total Consumption and Energy Sources, 1949-2010 Total Hydroelectric Wood Biofuels Wind Solar Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 28 Wind power production rising steeply in recent years
  • 29. Wind, solar, and biomass projected to increase 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Gigawatts Solid waste/landfill gas Geothermal Biomass Solar Wind Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration 29 Projected growth in non-hydro renewable energy But at this rate, they’ll still be a small fraction of nation’s portfolio
  • 30. Wind power has been deployed throughout nation 4/26/2013Source: American Wind Energy Association 30 Location of major wind power installations Except in the Southeast states, where the potential is poor Where wind project density is high, project location is not precise in order to show multiple projects in a small geographic area. Project location is based on county.
  • 31. Sage grouse range overlaps some wind power sites Source: U.S. Geological Survey, WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife 31 ESA candidate threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation
  • 32. 32 Some Western states in top 10 for solar capacity Utility projects larger than residential or commercial installations California Arizona New Jersey Nevada North Carolina Massachusetts Hawaii Maryland Texas New York MW of PV installed during 2012 Capacity installed (MWdc) Source: Solar Energy Industries Association
  • 33. Desert tortoises live in some solar power hotspots Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Bureau of Land Management 33 Good solar potential extends beyond the desert Southwest Critical habitat for desert tortoise (Mojave subspecies)
  • 34. Biofuels have biggest footprint, efficiency shrinks impact -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Efficiency gains (liquids) Efficiency gains (electricity) Nuclear power Geothermal Coal Solar thermal Natural gas Solar photovoltaic Petroleum Hydropower Wind Ethanol from sugarcane Ethanol from corn Ethanol from cellulose Electricity from biomass Biodiesel from soy Land-use intensity in 2030 (km2/TW-hr/yr) Source: McDonald et al. (2009) 34 How much land does it take to produce energy? Solar and wind farms can contribute to “energy sprawl”
  • 35. WATER 35 Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
  • 36. Key points: water • A limited, unpredictable water supply is a defining feature of the West, which faces a water crisis that is being compounded by growth and climate change. • Overall, we’re becoming more efficient in our water use, but municipal demand continues to rise along with the region’s growing population. • Irrigation and energy continue to dominate the West’s water use, accounting for nearly 90 percent of withdrawals. • Although water quality has generally improved, our water infrastructure is crumbling and the repair bill is contributing to increasing water costs. • Water conservation is less expensive than acquiring new supplies while desalination is both costly and energy intensive. 36
  • 37. Inherent challenge: aridity west of 100th Meridian 100th Meridian Average annual precipitation: 1951-2002 (inches) Source: Climate Wizard 37 The Pacific Northwest and highest mountains are exceptions
  • 38. Western streams top the water quality rankings 38 18.2% 29.0% 45.1% 20.5% 29.0% 25.8% 51.8% 40.0% 27.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Eastern Highlands Plains and Lowlands West Good Fair Poor Not Assessed Biological condition of streams Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nearly half rated in good condition
  • 39. Withdrawals are leveling even as population grows 39 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 U.S.population,millions Totalwithdrawals,billionsofgallons/day Source: U.S. Geological Survey More efficient power plants require much less water
  • 40. Withdrawals dominated by power and irrigation 40 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Aquaculture Commercial Mining Livestock Self-supplied domestic Self-supplied industrial Public supply Irrigation Thermoelectric power U.S. water withdrawals (billions of gallons/day) Source: U.S. Geological Survey You need energy to deliver clean water, and water to run power plants
  • 41. Irrigation is the top water user in the West 41 Public Supply 10.8% Domestic, Self- Supplied 0.8% Industrial Self- Supplied 0.1% Irrigation 76.2% Livestock 0.2% Mining 0.3% Thermoelectric 11.8% Water withdrawals in the West, 2005 Source: U.S. Geological Survey That’s been true for decades, but cities are consuming a rising share
  • 42. Calif., Southwest, and High Plains face water stress Source: The Nature Conservancy 42 Growing demands and questionable supplies
  • 43. Climate change, growth to heighten water conflicts 43 Potential water supply conflicts by 2025 Source: Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Global Change Research Program Clash between population trends and needs of endangered species Indian lands and Native entities Unmet rural water needs Conflict potential - moderate Conflict potential - substantial Conflict potential - highly likely Water Supply Issue Areas
  • 44. Crumbling water works will cost billions to fix 44 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 Roads and Bridges Transit Drinking Water and Wastewater Schools Aviation Public Parks and Recreation Hazardous Waste and Solid Waste Energy Rail Inland Waterways Levees Dams Billions Estimated investment need 2010 - 2015 Estimated Actual Spending American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 5-Year Investment Shortfall Source: American Society of Civil Engineers One reason why the price of water is rising
  • 45. Consumer water bills continue to climb 45Source: USA Today Many utilities in West searching for new supplies Water bills increased faster than natural gas or electricity costs for American consumers between 2000-2012 Average change in residential utility costs: 2000-2012 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% Natural gas Electricity Heating oil Water Current dollars Inflation adjusted
  • 46. Strategies for saving water in agriculture 46 Potential savings compared to fallowing and land retirement Source: Pacific Institute Biggest user has major conservation potential 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Modest crop shifting Smart irrigation scheduling Advanced irrigation management Efficient Irrigation technology Fallowing Land retirement Water savings (million acre- feet per year)
  • 47. Nearly 60% of water use occurs outside the home 47 Outdoor Toilets Clothes Washers Showers Faucets Leaks Unknown Other Baths Dishwashers 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Gallons per capita Average household water use Source: American Water Works Association Drought-tolerant landscaping can dramatically reduce water use
  • 48. Water markets are already functioning in West 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Millionsofacre-feet Volume of water transfers in the West Sales Long-Term Leases Short-Term Leases 48Source: Brewer et al. (2007) Agriculture is top source of water transfers
  • 49. Desalination is very energy intensive—and costly 49 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Local surface water Recycling Local groundwater Water bags Colorado River Imperial Irrigation District San Francisco Bay Delta Seawater desalination Energy intensity, kWh/af Energy intensity of water sources in San Diego County Source: Pacific Institute Greenhouse gas footprint looms large in California
  • 50. BIODIVERSITY 50 Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
  • 51. Key points: biodiversity • Ecosystem and species diversity is one of the hallmarks of the West and is due to the region’s extremes in elevation, wide variation in climate, and unique assemblage of ecological communities • The number of imperiled species continues to rise, but the process of granting plants and animals Endangered Species Act protection is highly politicized • Habitat loss, invasive species, and climate change are among the greatest threats, but overhunting and illegal collecting are less of a problem today 51
  • 52. 52 The West’s terrestrial ecoregions: A mosaic of diversity Source: The Nature Conservancy
  • 53. Dry parts of the West are among the most diverse 53Source: The Nature Conservancy Extremes of topography and climate contribute to biological richness Number of plant species by terrestrial ecoregion
  • 54. Threatened: how the IUCN classifies U.S. species Total Species Extinct (EX) Extinct in the Wild (EW) Near Threatened (NT) Least Concern (LC) Critically Endangered (CR) Endangered (EN) Vulnerable (VU) Threatened Not Evaluated (NE) Evaluated 4,926 Data Deficient (DD) Adequate Data 54 >200,000 258 11 297 281 579 336 472 2,692 Source: IUCN Just a fraction of plants and animals have been assessed
  • 55. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Animals Vascular plants Apparently secure Secure Other Vulnerable Imperiled Critically imperiled Extinct* * Possibly and presumed extinct About 30% of U.S. species are vulnerable or worse 55Source: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States Animals doing slightly better than plants
  • 56. Notable endangered species in the West 56 Species Where found? Conflicts and public policy issues Gray wolf Northern Rockies and Southwest Opposition from ranchers and others animates debate over delisting of Northern Rockies population; Southwest wolves doing poorly. Salmon Pacific Coast and Pacific Northwest Major impacts on dam operations, but also affected by land-use changes, such as logging of headwaters habitat. Spotted owl Pacific Coast states (northern) and Southwest (Mexican) Need old-growth forests and have contributed to significant declines in logging in the Pacific Northwest. Desert tortoise Mojave Desert of Southern California and Nevada Once threatened to derail growth in Las Vegas; now coming into conflict with solar energy proposals. Delta smelt Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Continuing to influence management of the hub in California’s water works. Canada lynx Rocky Mountains Impacts ski industry and other development in high-elevation areas.
  • 57. Bush IIBush I ClintonReaganCarterNixon/ Ford Number of endangered species continues to rise 57 Obama Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1967 1970 1972 1973 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Number of species protected by the ESA Listings are supposed to be science-based and ignore economic impacts
  • 58. Listings influenced by who’s in the White House 58 Average number of species listed per year Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Nixon/Ford Carter Reagan Bush I Clinton Bush II Obama George W. Bush administration kept a lid on listings
  • 59. Waiting to board the ark: a backlog of candidates 59 Number of candidates for ESA protection Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Obama administration has shortened the queue
  • 60. Endangered species clustered in subset of counties 60Source: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States Southwest and California are hotspots in West Number of federally listed species 1 2-4 5-9 ≥10
  • 61. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% All species Plants Mammals Birds Reptiles Amphibians Fish Habitat loss/degradation Alien species Pollution Overexploitation Disease Habitat loss and alien species jeopardizing species 61Source: Wilcove et al. (1998) Major threats to imperiled or listed U.S. species 1998 analysis didn’t address the impact of climate change
  • 62. Agriculture top driver of habitat loss/degradation 62 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Agriculture Disruption of fire regimes Infrastructure, roads Land conversion for development Livestock grazing Logging Military activities Mining, oil/gas, geothermal Outdoor recreation, off-roading Pollutants Water development Source: Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States Top habitat threats for U.S. endangered species Unnatural fire regimes even greater threat than development
  • 63. WILDFIRES 63 Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
  • 64. Key points • Fire is essential to maintaining ecosystem health in many Western forests, woodlands, and grasslands, but decades of fire suppression have caused an unnatural build-up of fuels in some areas. • Fire activity varies year to year, largely due to the weather, but blazes are generally getting bigger, burning longer, doing more damage, and costing more to suppress. • An increasing number of acres are being treated with mechanical thinning and prescribed burns, but the backlog is tremendous and there is some disagreement about where to focus the work. 64
  • 65. Much of the West is susceptible to wildfires 65Source: USDA Forest Service/Fire Science Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire potential But natural fire regime varies dramatically in different habitats
  • 66. Many Western forests filled with more fuel 66 1909 1948 1989 Source: US Forest Service In drier forests, frequent, low-intensity fires are often natural
  • 67. Most areas have degraded natural fire regimes 67Source: The Nature Conservancy Condition of natural fire systems In West, only Pacific NW and Northern/Central Rockies are “intact”
  • 68. Acres burned varies by year, but overall trend is up 68Source: National Interagency Fire Center Acres burned by U.S. wildfires: 1961-2012 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 10-year moving average Weather plays key role in severity of fire season
  • 69. Average size of fires has also increased 69Source: National Interagency Fire Center Average acreage of U.S. wildfires: 1990-2012 5-year moving average 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Prior to 1990, number of fires was reported differently
  • 70. Fires consume biggest share of Forest Service budget 70 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 $10 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Billions(2012dollars) Supplemental/Emergency/Reserve Other Appropriations Land Acquisition: LWCF State and Private Forestry Forest and Rangeland Research Capital Improvement and Maintenance Mandatory Appropriations National Forest System Wildland Fire Management Source: U.S. Forest Service Agency often taps supplemental emergency funds Wildfire management
  • 71. Many busy fire seasons over the past decade 71Source: National Interagency Fire Center Days at Preparedness Levels 4 and 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Level 5 Level 4 But some seasons are quiet due to benign weather
  • 72. Fuels reduction increasing on federal lands 72 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Millions of acres Non-WUI other Non-WUI mechanical Non-WUI fire WUI other WUI mechanical WUI fire Fuels treatment on federal lands and the wildland-urban interface (WUI) Source: Departments of Agriculture and Interior Compared to the overall need, it’s a drop in the bucket
  • 73. Fight fire with fire: prescribed burns 73Source: National Interagency Fire Center Acres burned in prescribed fires 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Millions Bureau of Land Management National Park Service Bureau of Indian Affairs US Fish and Wildlife Service State/Other US Forest Service Much cheaper than mechanical thinning, but always a risk of escape
  • 74. More homes in wildland-urban interface 74Source: U.S. Forest Service Population growing in fire-prone lands
  • 75. CLIMATE CHANGE 75 Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
  • 76. Key points • Temperature – The West is already warming faster than many parts of the country and even higher temperatures are expected in the decades to come • Precipitation – Models predict the Southwest will get drier and the Pacific Northwest will get wetter, but the projections elsewhere are more ambiguous • Water impacts – Changes to the vital winter snowpack and the timing of the spring snowmelt will pose challenges to aquatic species and water managers • Biodiversity impacts – Plants and animals are expected to move upslope and toward the North Pole but many barriers stand in the way • Wildfire impacts – Warmer temperatures and a thinner snowpack will continue to make the West’s wildfire season longer and more destructive 76
  • 77. In West, warming will be greatest in interior Mean temperature departure (˚F) Source: Climate Wizard 77 Projected temperature change by 2080s: High emissions (A2) scenario Models point to much hotter weather across country
  • 78. Southwest will get drier, Northwest will get wetter Average precipitation change (millimeters) Source: Climate Wizard 78 Projected precipitation change by 2080s: High emissions (A2) scenario Precipitation projections more ambiguous than temperature predictions
  • 79. Spring and summer will be drier in much of West Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 79 Projected precipitation changes: 2080-2099 Seasonal precipitation patterns critical for wildlife, water managers Winter Spring FallSummer
  • 80. Major precipitation changes by 2020s and 2030s Source: Tetra Tech , Natural Resources Defense Council 80 The new normal: U.S. climate may be far different in just a decade or two < -1.0 -1.0-0 0-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-4.0 >4.0 Changes in Precipitation 2020-2039 from 1961-1990 inches
  • 81. Climate change effects on water cycle Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 81 Less snowfall, more extreme storms, higher evaporation Hotter/Drier Conditions (Interior West) Hotter/Wetter Conditions (NE and Coasts)
  • 82. Snowmelt will occur earlier, especially in Northwest Source: The Nature Conservancy 82 Timing of spring snowmelt Poses challenges to aquatic species, dam managers, and water agencies
  • 83. River runoff expected to decline in much of West Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program,; Milly et al. 83 Projected changes in median runoff: 2041-2060 vs. 1901-1970 Colorado River, California, and Great Basin hit hard -40 -20 -10 -5 -2 2 5 10 20 40 Percent
  • 84. Temperature and precipitation limit plant distribution Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 84 Basic ecological parameters are increasingly in flux Distribution of plant communities Tropical Subtropical Warm Temperate Cold Temperate Arctic-Alpine Mean Annual Temperature (C) Precipitation(cm)
  • 85. Enormous variations in elevation and temperature Death Valley, -282 feet Mount Whitney, 14,505 feet Source: Climate Wizard 85 U.S. average temperatures: 1951-2006 Lowest and tallest points in contiguous U.S. are just 85 miles apart
  • 86. Annual average precip. (inches) Wet and dry areas are often in close proximity Source: Climate Wizard 86 Orographic effect and rain shadows contribute to diversity
  • 87. Source: U.S. Forest Service 87 MAP SS Current Climate Hadley S + CO2 (2070-2099) CCC + CO2 (2070-2099) Climate change will shift mosaic of ecosystems Rising CO2 levels will also affect plant growth
  • 88. Decreasing habitat for coldwater fish Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program 88 Trout, salmon, steelhead severely stressed when air above 70°F 1980-1997 2020s 2040s Average air temperature (F°) 39 50 59 68 79
  • 89. Birds are already on the move 89Source: Associated Press, Audubon Society, NOAA Species moving toward poles, up in elevation, in response to warming
  • 90. Mountaintop species especially vulnerable 90 Pikas may eventually run out of mountain Source: Carnegie Institution Department of Global Ecology
  • 91. Wildfires are arriving earlier and lasting longer Source: Westerling et al. (2006) 91 Big blazes increased starting in 1980s, mostly due to warming Western U.S. Forest Wildfires and Spring- Summer Temperature Timing of spring Snowmelt Fire Season Length
  • 92. Climate change expected to make wildfires worse Source: National Research Council 92 Change in burned area projected from 1°C warming A - Cascade Mixes Forest B - Northern Rocky Mt Forest C - Middle Rocky Mt. Steppe-Forest D - Intermountain Semi-Desert E - Great Plains-Palouse Dry Steppe F - Sierran Steppe-Mixed Forest G - California Dry Steppe H - Intermountain Semi-Desert/ Desert J - South Rocky Mt. Steppe-Forest K - American Semi-Desert and Desert L - Colorado Plateau Semi-Desert M - Ariz-New Mex. Mts. Semi-Desert N - Chihuahuan Semi-Desert
  • 93. Mountain pine beetle attacking lodgepole forests 93 Lack of deep freeze may be responsible for outbreak
  • 94. PUBLIC OPINION Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change 94
  • 95. Key points: public opinion • The environment doesn’t rank high on the public’s agenda, but a majority of Americans remain concerned about a wide variety of environmental problems • The public agrees with many of the environmental movement’s policy goals, but only about a fifth of Americans identify themselves as active participants • The Great Recession has shifted public opinion away from environmental concerns over the past few years and there is some increasing hostility toward environmentalists • Air and water pollution tend to be the most worrisome environmental issues and disasters, such as the BP oil spill, can cause spikes of interest in environmental issues 95
  • 96. What’s the most important problem facing the U.S.? 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Welfare Wars/War (nonspecific)/Fear of war Wage issues Unifying the country The media Taxes Poverty/ Hunger/Homelessness Lack of respect for each other Lack of military defense Judicial system/Courts/Laws International issues, problems Gap between rich and poor Fuel/Oil prices Foreign aid/Focus overseas Environment/Pollution Energy/Lack of energy sources Corporate corruption Care for the elderly/Medicare Immigration/Illegal aliens Ethics/moral/religious/family decline; Dishonesty Education/Poor education/Access to education Lack of money Poor healthcare/hospitals; High cost of healthcare Federal budget deficit/Federal debt Dissatisfaction with government Unemployment/Jobs Economy in general 1% each Percent Source: Gallup June 2012 survey 96
  • 97. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Getting better Getting worse Same No opinion Elections can cause shifts in environmental opinion Right now, do you think the quality of the environment in the country as a whole is getting better or worse? Obama elected Source: Gallup 97 Percent
  • 98. Hostility toward environmental movement rising Do you think of yourself as an active participant in the environmental movement; sympathetic towards the movement, but not active; neutral; or unsympathetic? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Sympathetic, but not active Neutral Active participant Unsympathetic No opinion Source: Gallup 98 Percent
  • 99. More think environmentalists have done harm 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Definitely more good than harm Probably more good than harm Probably more harm than good Definitely more harm than good No opinion All things considered, do you think the environmental movement in this nation has done more good than harm, or more harm than good? Percent Source: Gallup 99
  • 100. Environment vs. economy: the Gulf oil spill effect Do you think that protection of the environment should be given priority, even at the risk of curbing economic growth, or do you think economic growth should be given priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Protection of the environment should be given priority Economic growth should be given priority Gulf oil spill Source: Gallup 100 Percent
  • 101. Environment vs. economy in the West As part of efforts to improve their state economy and generate jobs as quickly as possible, some people have proposed reducing protections on land, air and water that apply to major industries, including construction and agriculture. Would you prefer your state to reduce these protections or maintain them? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Colorado Utah Wyoming Montana New Mexico Maintain Reduce Percent Source: State of the Rockies Project 101
  • 102. Few Westerners want environmental laws relaxed What is your feeling about the current status of environmental laws? 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Laws too strict, need to be relaxed Laws strong enough Laws, enforcement should be left as they are Laws strong enough, but should be better enforced Percent Source: State of the Rockies Project 102
  • 103. Air and water pollution generate most concern 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Acid rain Urban sprawl and loss of open space Global warming Extinction of plant and animal species Damage to the ozone layer Loss of tropical rainforests Air pollution Loss of natural habitat for wildlife Maintenance of freshwater supply for household needs Pollution of lakes, rivers, and reservoirs Contamination of soil and water by toxic waste Pollution of drinking water Percent Source: Gallup What environmental issues are most worrisome? 103
  • 104. In West, non-pollution issues also rank high What is the seriousness of the following environmental problems? 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Lack of access to lands and rivers for hunting and fishing Cliamte change Global warming Lack of access to public lands The impact of oil and gas and drilling The impact of mining Loss of natural areas Toxins and pesticides in food and drinking water Inadequate water supplies Loss of habitat for fish and wildlife Funding cuts for state parks, natural area protection, and water quality Air pollution and smog Pollution of rivers, lakes and streams Loss of family farms and ranches Poorly-planned growth and development Extremely Serious Serious Source: State of the Rockies Project 104
  • 105. CONSERVATION FUNDING 105 Land Use Water Biodiversity WildfiresEnergy Public Opinion FundingClimate Change
  • 106. Key points: conservation funding • Federal funding – In real terms, the budgets of major environmental agencies have been fairly steady over the past decade – The distribution among different programs also tends to remain relatively constant • Ballot measures – Open-space bonds and other conservation measures usually pass at the polls but considerably fewer have been put to voters during the economic downturn • Philanthropic – The distribution of funding by issue area changes significantly from year to year – Energy and climate-related funding saw big increases between 2007 and 2009 106
  • 107. How your federal tax dollars are spent Social Security 21% Defense 20% Medicare 13% Low-income assistance 9% Medicaid 8% Net interest payments 7% Unemployment compensation 5% Veterans Affairs 3% Education 3% Law enforcement/homeland security 2% Transportation 2% Health (not Medicare/Medicaid) 2% Management of federal employees and buildings 1% Environmental protection and natural resources 1% All others 3% Source: Third Way Entitlements, defense, and debt overshadow other program 107
  • 108. Top federal programs related to the environment $0 $5 $10 $15 Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Forest Service Clean energy Energy research, statisics and analysis National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bureau of Land Management Department of Interior Dams, powerplants and reservoirs U.S. Geological Survey Coal mine oversight and cleanup U.S. Terroritories oversight Mine Safety and Health Administration Efficient vehicle development Natural Resources Conservation Service Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement Lead hazard control and healthy homes Energy efficient housing Ocean oil drilling regulation and natural resource leases Electric reliability organizations Billions Source: Third Way EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, and Forest Service get most funding 108
  • 109. Funding for federal agencies tends to be steady 0 5 10 15 20 25 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Billions(2012dollars) Other Offices of the Solicitor and Inspector General Minerals Management Service/Ocean Energy Management Insular Affairs Office of Special Trustee for American Indians Office of Surface Mining Geological Survey Bureau of Reclamation Bureau of Land Management Department Wide Programs Fish and Wildlife Service Departmental Management Bureau of Indian Affairs National Park Service Source: Department of Interior Department of Interior budget: 2003-2013 Stimulus funds created temporary bump in 2009 109
  • 110. Land and Water Conservation Fund short-changed 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Millions(Dollars) Receipts received Fund appropriations Source: Department of Interior Outer Continental Shelf receipts and LWCF appropriations Royalties from off-shore drilling diverted to non-conservation programs 110
  • 111. Conservation ballot measures usually succeed NumberofMeasuresPassed Percent Source: Trust for Public Land 0 50 100 150 200 250 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 Number of measures Passage rate But fewer have been put to voters during economic downturn 111
  • 112. Philanthropic funding varies greatly year-to-year -100 -50 0 50 100Millions of dollars Transportation Toxics Terrestrial Ecosystems & Land-use Sustainable Communities Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems Population Material Consumption & Waste Management International Trade & Finance Indigenous Populations/Communities General/Multiple/Undefined Fresh Water/Inland Water Ecosystems Environmental Justice Environmental Health Energy Coastal & Marine Ecosystem Climate/Atmosphere Biodiversity & Species Preservation Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association Change in funding: 2007 -2009 Climate and energy programs recently saw big increases 112
  • 113. Overall takeaways • The human footprint in the West is surprisingly large and agriculture has the biggest physical imprint in the region • Growth and climate change are compounding the water crisis in a region with an inherently capricious supply • Even without climate change, many species would be in trouble, largely due to habitat loss and invasive species • Wildfires are generally growing larger and will only get worse as the region warms and the snowpack thins • Most Westerners want a vibrant economy and a healthy environment, but hostility toward environmentalists may be rising • There’s reason for hope: we’re generally getting cleaner and more efficient in our use of natural resources 113
  • 114. 114 ecowest.org Download more slides and other resources Contact us by e-mailing mitch@ceaconsulting.com
  • 115. Jon Christensen, Adjunct Assistant Professor and Pritzker Fellow at the Institute of the Environment and Sustainability and Department of History at UCLA; former director of Bill Lane Center for the American West at Stanford. Robert Glennon, Regents’ Professor and Morris K. Udall Professor of Law and Public Policy, Rogers College of Law at the University of Arizona; author of Water Follies and Unquenchable. Bruce Hamilton, Deputy Executive Director for the Sierra Club, where he has worked for more than 35 years; member of the World Commission on Protected Areas; former Field Editor for High Country News. EcoWest advisors 115
  • 116. Jonathan Hoekstra, head of WWF’s Conservation Science Program, lead author of The Atlas of Global Conservation, and former Senior Scientist at The Nature Conservancy. Timothy Male, Vice President of Conservation Policy for Defenders of Wildlife, where he directs the Habitat and Highways, Conservation Planning, Federal Lands, Oregon Biodiversity Partnership, and Economics programs. Thomas Swetnam, Regents' Professor of Dendrochronology, Director of the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research at the University of Arizona, and a leading expert on wildfires and Western forests. EcoWest advisors 116
  • 117. Mitch Tobin Editor of EcoWest.org Communications Director at CEA Caroline Ott Research Associate at CEA Matthew Elliott Principal at CEA Contributors at California Environmental Associates 117 Max Levine Associate at CEA Sarah Weldon Affiliated consultant at CEA Micah Day Associate at CEA Contact us by e-mailing mitch@ceaconsulting.com EcoWest is supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. Narrative: EcoWest’s mission is to inform and advance conservation in the North American West by analyzing, visualizing, and sharing data on environmental trends.
  2. Narrative: This is a summary of six presentations that illustrate key environmental metrics. Other decks cover land use, water, biodiversity, wildfires, climate, and politics. You can download these presentations and other resources at EcoWest.org.
  3. Narrative: Here are some of the key findings from our research.
  4. Narrative: Here’s another way of summarizing our research. For each topic, we’ve assigned an arrow to illustrate the overall trend and then described both good and bad news related to each topic.
  5. Narrative: Let’s begin by discussing land use patterns and the human footprint in the region.
  6. Narrative: Here are some of the key points.
  7. Narrative: The preponderance of public land is one of the West’s defining features. This map shows what percentage of each state is owned by the federal government. Nevada and Alaska top the list and all Western states have at least 30 percent of their land under federal control. The biggest landowner in the West is the Bureau of Land Management, followed by the Forest Service. Source: U.S. General Services Administration, Federal Real Property Profile 2004URL: http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/ogp/Annual_Report__FY2004_Final_R2M-n11_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdfNotes: Excludes trust properties. Adapted from map in Kennedy, Donald, “Can the West Lead Us to a Better Place?,” Stanford Magazine, May/June 2008. http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/mayjun/features/west.html
  8. Narrative: Because there’s so much federal land in the West, as well as undeveloped state and tribal property, much of the region is nominally protected. Most of the West’s ecoregions—areas that are like ecological neighborhoods--have at least 20 percent of their area protected. The rate is somewhat lower along the California Coast and in the plains east of the Rocky Mountains. Very little land is protected in California’s Central Valley and Oregon’s Willamette Valley. Source: Hoekstra et al. The Atlas Of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2010URL: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas.xml http://app.databasin.org/app/pages/datasetPage.jsp?id=09fe3f2e8cf1402281339f0e17924e9aNotes: We derived estimates of protected area coverage from the World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA, UNEP/IUCN 2007) with supplements for the United States (CBI 2006) and Australia (CAPAD 2006). The WDPA is the most comprehensive global catalog of protected areas and includes data about their sizes, locations, and IUCN classifications of management designation. The WDPA was assembled by a broad alliance of organizations that aimed to maintain a freely available, accurate, and current database that is accepted as a global standard by all stakeholders.The distribution of all protected areas was mapped in a Geographic Information System and then summarized to calculate the total area of all protected areas in each ecoregion and biome, respectively. We included all categories of protected areas in our estimates, except those that lacked location data or that had nonpermanent status. Protected areas with only point location and area data were mapped as circles with appropriate radii. Portions of any protected areas that extended into the marine environment were clipped out. Overlapping protected areas were combined to avoid double-counting errors. The time series of cumulative protected area coverage was derived from the WDPA based on the reported year of designation. The number and total area of different categories of protected areas were calculated based on the IUCN classification assigned to each protected area. These categories indicate the intended management objectives for each protected area, but they do not necessarily predict whether that management is occurring or is effective. Protected areas for which no IUCN category was assigned were not included in these tallies. A note about Antarctica designation of “not applicable”: Antarctica is often regarded as a special case; not owned by a nation, its management falls under the jurisdiction of the twenty-seven nations that are signatories to the Antarctica Treaty System. There are provisions for designation of protected areas under this system, although only small areas have so far been established. At the same time, the general environmental regulations pertaining to the continent and, to some degree, to the surrounding waters are regarded by many as equivalent to, or perhaps stricter than, those applied to many protected areas elsewhere in the world.Data derived from:Collaborative Australian Protected Area Database (CAPAD). 2006. Available on request from the Australian Government, Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts at www.deh.gov.au/parks/nrs/capad. Digital media.Conservation Biology Institute (CBI). 2006. Protected Areas Database (PAD), version 4. Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. Available at www.consbio.org/cbi/projects/PAD. Digital media.UN Environment Programme (UNEP)/International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2007. Protected areas extracted from the 2007 World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). The WDPA is a joint product of UNEP and the IUCN, prepared by UNEP-WCMC and the IUCN WCPA working with Governments, the Secretariats of MEAs, and collaborating NGOs. For further information, contact protectedareas@unep-wcmc.org or go to www.WDPA.org.
  9. Narrative: Although much of the West’s land is protected in some manner, the imprint of humanity on the region has been deep and indelible. Federal agencies grant varying levels of protection to the land they manage, with traditional industries such as logging, mining, and ranching allowed in many areas, but prohibited in many wilderness areas, parks, and other preserves. This map shows the results of an analysis of the human footprint in the West that accounts for a variety of stressors. White indicates areas with the least human impact, followed by green for places where the footprint is minimal, while orange and red areas are where people have done the most to transform native ecosystems. The most heavily impacted areas tend to be near cities, with places like Southern California, the Bay Area, Puget Sound, and the Colorado Front Range showing up clearly. Agriculture is the other big driver here: the Central Valley of California, the Willamette Valley of Oregon, and parts of Southeast Washington and Southern Idaho stand out in this regard. Source: Matthias Leu, Steven E. Hanser, and Steven T. Knick. The Human Footprint In The West: A Large-scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts. Ecological Applications, 18(5), 2008, pp. 1119–1139URL: http://sagemap.wr.usgs.gov/HumanFootprint.aspx http://fresc.usgs.gov/products/papers/1696_Leu.pdf http://fresc.usgs.gov/products/fs/fs-127-03.pdfNotes: Humans have dramatically altered wildlands in the western United States over the past 100 years by using these lands and the resources they provide. Anthropogenic changes to the landscape, such as urban expansion and development of rural areas, influence the number and kinds of plants and wildlife that remain. In addition, western ecosystems are also affected by roads, powerlines, and other networks and land uses necessary to maintain human populations. The cumulative impacts of human presence and actions on a landscape are called the “human footprint.” These impacts may affect plants and wildlife by increasing the number of synanthropic (species that benefit from human activities) bird and mammal predators and facilitating their movements through the landscape or by creating unsuitable habitats. These actions can impact plants and wildlife to such an extent that the persistence of populations or entire species is questionable. The human footprint map focuses on shrubland ecosystems and combines models of habitat use by synanthropic predators (“top-down” effects) and the risk of invasive plant presence (“bottom-up” effects) to estimate the total influence of human activities. Humans have dramatically altered wildlands in the western United States over the past 100 years by using these lands and the resources they provide.  Anthropogenic changes to the landscape, such as urban expansion, construction of roads, power lines, and other networks and land uses necessary to maintain human populations influence the number and kinds of plants and wildlife that remain.  We developed the map of the human footprint for the western United States from an analysis of 14 landscape structure and anthropogenic features:  human habitation, interstate highways, federal and state highways, secondary roads, railroads, irrigation canals, power lines, linear feature densities, agricultural land, campgrounds, highway rest stops, land fills, oil and gas development, and human induced fires.  We used these input layers to develop seven models to estimate the total influence of the human footprint.  These models either explored how anthropogenic features influence wildlife populations via changes in habitat (road-induced dispersal of invasive plants, oil and gas developments, human induced fires, and anthropogenic habitat fragmentation) or predators densities (spatial distribution of domestic and synanthropic avian predators).  The human footprint map is a composite of these seven models.  The final map consists of a 180 meter resolution raster data set with 10 human footprint classes.  Modeling the human footprint across large landscapes also allows researchers to generate hypotheses about ecosystem change and to conduct studies in regions differing in potential impact. Because funding for restoration and conservation projects is limited, and because there is little room for errors in the management of species of concern, land managers are able to maximize restoration and conservation efforts in areas minimally influenced by the human footprint. As such, the human footprint model is an important first step toward understanding the synergistic effects acting on shrublands in the western United States.
  10. Narrative: Many of the white and deep green areas on the map are already protected as wilderness areas, usually in national forests or national parks, but sometimes on land managed by the BLM and Fish and Wildlife Service. Blue indicates the location of wilderness areas in places such as the Sierra Nevada, Mojave Desert, Northern Cascades, and Northern Rockies. Purple shows where national parks and monuments are located. Major parks, such as Yellowstone, Glacier, Death Valley, Yosemite,Grand Canyon, Canyonlands, and Olympic are clearly visible. And pink shows so-called Wilderness Study Areas, which the BLM is currently managing as wilderness but which are not protected by an act of Congress. You can see that these wilderness areas, parks, monuments, and WSAs cover many of the white areas, but not all of them. Most of the other areas that are white or deep green on these maps are public lands, but they are not receiving the special protections afforded to wilderness and parks. Source: Matthias Leu, Steven E. Hanser, and Steven T. Knick. The Human Footprint In The West: A Large-scale Analysis Of Anthropogenic Impacts. Ecological Applications, 18(5), 2008, pp. 1119–1139URL: http://sagemap.wr.usgs.gov/HumanFootprint.aspx http://fresc.usgs.gov/products/papers/1696_Leu.pdf http://fresc.usgs.gov/products/fs/fs-127-03.pdfNotes: Humans have dramatically altered wildlands in the western United States over the past 100 years by using these lands and the resources they provide. Anthropogenic changes to the landscape, such as urban expansion and development of rural areas, influence the number and kinds of plants and wildlife that remain. In addition, western ecosystems are also affected by roads, powerlines, and other networks and land uses necessary to maintain human populations. The cumulative impacts of human presence and actions on a landscape are called the “human footprint.” These impacts may affect plants and wildlife by increasing the number of synanthropic (species that benefit from human activities) bird and mammal predators and facilitating their movements through the landscape or by creating unsuitable habitats. These actions can impact plants and wildlife to such an extent that the persistence of populations or entire species is questionable. The human footprint map focuses on shrubland ecosystems and combines models of habitat use by synanthropic predators (“top-down” effects) and the risk of invasive plant presence (“bottom-up” effects) to estimate the total influence of human activities. Humans have dramatically altered wildlands in the western United States over the past 100 years by using these lands and the resources they provide.  Anthropogenic changes to the landscape, such as urban expansion, construction of roads, power lines, and other networks and land uses necessary to maintain human populations influence the number and kinds of plants and wildlife that remain.We developed the map of the human footprint for the western United States from an analysis of 14 landscape structure and anthropogenic features:  human habitation, interstate highways, federal and state highways, secondary roads, railroads, irrigation canals, power lines, linear feature densities, agricultural land, campgrounds, highway rest stops, land fills, oil and gas development, and human induced fires.  We used these input layers to develop seven models to estimate the total influence of the human footprint.  These models either explored how anthropogenic features influence wildlife populations via changes in habitat (road-induced dispersal of invasive plants, oil and gas developments, human induced fires, and anthropogenic habitat fragmentation) or predators densities (spatial distribution of domestic and synanthropic avian predators).  The human footprint map is a composite of these seven models.  The final map consists of a 180 meter resolution raster data set with 10 human footprint classes.  Modeling the human footprint across large landscapes also allows researchers to generate hypotheses about ecosystem change and to conduct studies in regions differing in potential impact. Because funding for restoration and conservation projects is limited, and because there is little room for errors in the management of species of concern, land managers are able to maximize restoration and conservation efforts in areas minimally influenced by the human footprint. As such, the human footprint model is an important first step toward understanding the synergistic effects acting on shrublands in the western United States.
  11. Narrative: One of the most important factors behind this expanding human imprint is population growth. By 2030, the region is expected to be home to a quarter of all Americans, up from about 0 percent in 1830 and 9 percent in 1930. The West is home to some of the fastest growing counties in the country. This slide shows the change in the number of people living in each county from the 2000 to 2010 census. Growth was especially strong in places like Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas, Southern California, the Colorado Front Range, Albuquerque-Santa Fe, Portland, Seattle, and Salt Lake City.Source: U.S. Census BureauURL: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-01.pdfNotes:
  12. Narrative: Although the West is known for its unpopulated expanses, this map illustrates that the region’s population is very concentrated and urbanized. The diamonds are sized according to a county’s population and you can see how the cities of Southern California—Los Angeles, San Diego, the Inland Empire—really dominate. Add the Bay Area, Portland, Seattle, Spokane, Boise, Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Tucson, Albuquerque, El Paso, and Denver and you’ve accounted for the vast majority of people living west of the 100th meridian.Source: U.S. Census BureauURL: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-01.pdfNotes:
  13. Narrative: By 2000, the West’s population had exploded.Source: Hammer, R. B. S. I. Stewart, R. Winkler, V. C. Radeloff, and P. R. Voss. 2004. Characterizing spatial and temporal residential density patterns across the U.S. Midwest, 1940-1990. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3):183-199. URL: http://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/old/Library/HousingData.phpNotes:
  14. Narrative: Here’s what researchers expect the country to look like in 2030. The West will be home to millions of new residents, but much of Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, and Montana are expected to remain relatively unpopulated.Source: Hammer, R. B. S. I. Stewart, R. Winkler, V. C. Radeloff, and P. R. Voss. 2004. Characterizing spatial and temporal residential density patterns across the U.S. Midwest, 1940-1990. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3):183-199. URL: http://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/old/Library/HousingData.phpNotes:
  15. Narrative: The West’s population and economy continues to grow, but at the same time, some traditional extractive industries, such as public lands logging, are in decline. This graphic shows how much timber was sold and harvested on all national forests, starting at the inception of the Forest Service in 1905 (the lines sometimes diverge because timber may be sold in one year but harvested in another year). There was a big run-up in the post-war era, but then a dramatic decline starting in the late 1980s as restrictions related to the spotted owl and other environmental laws took effect and foreign competition hurt the industry. Source:US Forest ServiceURL:http://www.fs.fed.us/forestmanagement/reports/sold-harvest/documents/1905-2008_Natl_Sold_Harvest_Summary.pdf
  16. Narrative: But plenty of traditional industries remain common in the West. This map illustrates where livestock grazing takes place. The colors show the percent of each county that is cattle pasture or rangeland and each dot represents 10,000 cattle. Livestock production is most heavily concentrated in the nation’s midsection. Out West, the eastern portions of Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico have lots of rangeland, but the black dots indicate that there are plenty of cows found elsewhere, including very hot and dry locations like Arizona and Southern California. Source: U.S. Global Change Research ProgramURL: http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/agriculture.pdfNotes:
  17. Narrative: One industry in the West that shows no signs of decline is the energy sector.
  18. Narrative: Here are some of the key points.
  19. Narrative: Energy development in the West takes place on private, tribal, state, and federal lands. Over time, federal lands have become increasingly important to the nation’s energy supply. This graphic shows that federal lands accounted for about a third of the total for natural gas and all fossil fuels by 2009. However, federal agencies have not continued releasing data in this format.Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy ReviewURL: http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/index.cfm#summary
  20. Narrative: The rate of energy development on public lands was a point of contention in the 2012 presidential election. This graphic shows that the sales of fossil fuels produced on federal and Indian lands has remained relatively constant over the last decade, although natural gas sales have declined slightly. Environmental regulations play a role in determining energy activity on public lands, but so do economic variables, such as commodity prices.Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy ReviewURL: http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/index.cfm#summary http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/sec1_31.pdf
  21. Narrative: For much of the 20th century, coal was the preferred fuel for new generating capacity. We also added hydropower by building major dams, many of them in the West. But more recently, natural gas has been the favored fuel. It has been decades since a new nuclear plant has been built, but wind has been making some gains in the past few years. This graphic looks into the future. Over the next 25 years, natural gas is expected to be the main fuel for new generating capacity, but renewables are also projected to make some inroads.Source: U.S. Energy Information AdministrationURL: www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo
  22. Narrative: The cost of the various energy options plays a major role in the decisions that utilities and state regulators make about building new power plants. This graphic shows the overall costs for 16 different technologies. The cheapest two options at the bottom use natural gas, but renewable resources such as wind and geothermal aren’t too far behind. Solar energy technologies are currently the most expensive. Source: U.S. Energy Information AdministrationURL: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/electricity_generation.cfmNotes:
  23. Narrative: Conventional gas deposits are found throughout the country, and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, but in the West these deposits tend to be concentrated in a few locations, including the Colorado Plateau, Wyoming, Montana, and Northeast Colorado. Shale gas is found in some of the same locations as conventional deposits. In the West, that includes the Four Corners states, Wyoming, Montana, and southern California.Source: U.S. Energy Information AdministrationURL: http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/maps/maps.htm
  24. Narrative: Let’s take a closer look at renewables. This graphic shows that Americans are using more and more power generated from renewable sources, but the bulk is from hydropower and wood. Wind and biofuels are increasing, but solar remains a very minor player.Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy ReviewURL: http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/index.cfm#summary
  25. Narrative: Looking ahead, energy analysts believe that wind will be the biggest gainer among renewables, but solar is expected to make some strides.Source: U.S. Energy Information AdministrationURL: www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/sector_electric_power_all.cfm#powergen
  26. Narrative: The best wind power potential is off the nation’s coastline and in the middle of the country.This map shows that wind power has been deployed in many locations throughout the West and around the country, with the exception of the Southeast.Source: American Wind Energy Association URL: http://www.awea.org/learnabout/publications/reports/upload/3Q2012-Market-Report_Public-Version.pdf Notes:
  27. Narrative: One of the major issues confronting wind power developers in places like Wyoming and Montana is the presence of the greater sage grouse, an imperiled bird that is a candidate for protection under the Endangered Species Act. This map shows the bird’s current and historic range. Source: USGS Sagemap, Michael A. Schroeder, Washington Department of Fish and WildlifeURL: http://rockymountainwild.org/_site/wp-content/uploads/10-032_Sage_Grouse_Range.jpg
  28. Narrative: Several Western states are in the top 10 for solar capacity, with utility-scale projects accounting for the bulk of energy produced.Source: Solar Energy Industries AssociationURL: http://www.seia.org/research-resources/solar-industry-data http://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/2012%20YIR%20State%20Rankings.JPGNotes:
  29. Narrative: Solar energy potential is greatest in the Southwest, but many other parts of the region also have decent solar resources available. A major issue in the deployment of solar energy in the Southwest is the presence of another imperiled animal: the Mojave subspecies of desert tortoise, which is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. This map shows the location of desert tortoise critical habitat in purple.Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Bureau of Land ManagementURL: http://www.nrel.gov/gis/solar.html/http://solareis.anl.gov/Notes: This map shows the potential for solar photovoltaic panels.
  30. Narrative: Although wind and solar power have a number of environmental advantages, they do tend to take up more space than coal and natural gas power plants. This analysis examined the issue of “energy sprawl” and concluded that biofuels have by far the biggest footprint of energy sources because it takes so much land to grow the necessary crops. It’s also worth remembering that the best way to shrink the energy sector’s footprint is to reduce energy demand in the first place through efficiency measures. Source: McDonald RI, Fargione J, Kiesecker J, Miller WM, et al. (2009) Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America. PLoS ONE 4(8): e6802. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006802URL: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0006802Notes:
  31. Narrative: Now let’s move on to water, the lifeblood of the American West.
  32. Narrative: You can see that west of the 100th Meridian, conditions are generally drier, except for the Pacific Northwest and the highest mountains in the region. But what’s perhaps most striking about the West is how varied the precipitation is and how spotty the patterns are, largely due to the influence of mountains and the rain shadows they cast.Source: Climate Wizard URL: http://www.climatewizard.org/ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008320Notes: Climate Wizard is a collaboration between The Nature Conservancy, University of Washington, and University of Southern Mississippi. The first generation of this web-based program—which was recently launched at www.climatewizard.org—allows the user to choose a state or country and see both the climate change that has occurred to date and the climate change that is predicted to occur. Simply put, Climate Wizard can be used to assess how climate has changed over time and to project what future changes are likely to occur in a given area. Climate Wizard represents the first time ever the full range of climate history and impacts for a landscape have been brought together in a user-friendly format. See: Girvetz EH, Zganjar C, Raber GT, Maurer EP, Kareiva P, et al. (2009) Applied Climate-Change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8320
  33. Narrative: One of the bright spots about Western water is that streams and rivers in the region are generally in better shape than those back East. Nearly half of streams were rated in good condition by the EPA in a recent study.Source: Wadeable Streams Assessment, EPA, 2006URL: http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/streamsurvey/upload/2007_5_16_streamsurvey_WSA_Assessment_May2007-2.pdf Notes: These results were based on a macroinvertebrate index of biological condition that weighs several factors, including taxonomic richness, habit and trophic composition, and sensitivity to human disturbance. EPA is currently analyzing the second round of the streams survey, which will also include data on rivers. These results will be available in May of 2012.
  34. Narrative: Per capita water use has also leveled off. One reason is that power plants have shifted to recirculating technologies that withdraw less water. There have also been gains as farmers have shifted from flood to sprinkler irrigation. If you just look at domestic water use, the per capita rate declined slightly from 101 gallons a day in 1995 to 99 in 2005, but the rate varied from 51 gallons a day in Maine to 189 in Nevada.Source: US Geological Survey Water Use in the US 2005URL: http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/
  35. Narrative: Nationwide, irrigation for agriculture and the power sector dominate water withdrawals. Overall, withdrawals peaked in 1980 and have over the past 25 years hovered around 400 billion gallons per day.Source: US Geological Survey Water Use in the US 2005URL: http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/
  36. Narrative:Focusing on the West, we see that irrigation accounts for the vast majority of withdrawals. Irrigation has been by far the largest water user since USGS began collecting data in 1950. Source: US Geological Survey Water Use in the US 2005URL: http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/
  37. Narrative: So what do the West’s water use trends mean for the future availability of water? This map displays water availability by ecoregion based on the ratio of runoff to water use—essentially the supply of surface water vs. the demand for those resources. This calculation does not account for the use of water from alternate sources such as groundwater, desalination, or reuse of wastewater. Nevertheless, huge regions of the West are classified as having some degree of water stress, with the most threatening imbalances occurring in southern Arizona, central and northern California, Nevada, and the western high plains. Source: Hoekstra et al. The Atlas Of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2010URL: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas.xml http://app.databasin.org/app/pages/datasetPage.jsp?id=04aad4fac63e47248b84d5fe2c6d5209Notes:Data derived from:Alcamo, J., P. Döll, T. Henrichs, F. Kaspar, B. Lehner, T. Rösch, and S. Siebert. 2003. Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrological Sciences Journal 48, no. 3: 317-338.Döll, P., F. Kaspar, and B. Lehner. 2003. A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: Model tuning and validation. Journal of Hydrology 270: 105-134.
  38. Narrative: Withincreasing demand and questionable supplies, water conflicts are expected to multiply in the coming years. This map from the US Bureau of Reclamation shows regions in the West where water supply conflicts are likely to occur by 2025. The assessment was based on a combination of factors, including population trends and endangered species’ water needs. The red zones are where the conflicts are most likely to occur. Areas where the potential for conflict is greatest include the San Joaquin River and Bay Delta in California, the Great Salt Lake in Utah, the lower Colorado River, the Mogollon Rim area of Arizona, the Rio Grande River, and the Colorado Front Range. Source: US Climate Change Science Program/ US Bureau of ReclamationURL: http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdf http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/water.pdf
  39. Narrative: The nation’s water works—dams, levees, aqueducts, sewage plants—have come a long way over the past century. They’re a major reason why we’ve been able to settle arid parts of the West and clean up many rivers and streams. But as with the rest of the country’s infrastructure, many elements are in disrepair. Fixing the nation’s water works will cost tens of billions of dollars. Source: American Society of Civil Engineers, Infrastructure Report Card 2009URL: http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
  40. Narrative: Rising infrastructure costs are a major reason why water prices are continuing to climb. This graphic shows that water bills increased faster than natural gas or electricity costs for American consumers between 2000 and 2012. Many experts believe that water rates will keep going up in the West as utilities struggle to find new supplies in response to the increasing demands of a growing population. Higher water prices could also make conservation measures more attractive to individuals, businesses, and water providers.Source: USA TodayURL: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/09/27/rising-water-rates/1595651/Notes: A USA TODAY study of residential water rates over the past 12 years finds that crumbling infrastructure is forcing repairs from coast to coast, with costs more than doubling in 1 of 4 localities.
  41. Narrative: As we saw earlier, irrigation uses the vast majority of water in the West. For that reason, many researchers and nonprofit organizations have focused on ways to increase water efficiency in agriculture. This graphic shows some of the possible conservation strategies and how they measure up compared to fallowing the land or retiring it from agriculture. Source: More With Less: Agricultural Water Conservation and Efficiency in California, Pacific InstituteURL: http://www.pacinst.org/reports/more_with_less_delta/index.htmNotes: According to the report, “smart irrigation scheduling provides a means to evaluate and apply an amount of water sufficient to meet crop requirements at the right time. Despite the promise of irrigation scheduling and other new technologies, California’s farmers still primarily rely on visual inspection or personal experience to determine when to irrigate. Soil or plant moisture sensors, computer models, daily evapotranspiration reports, and scheduling services, which have long been proven effective, are still fairly uncommon, suggesting there is significant room for improvement.”
  42. Narrative: Municipal water use has been growing faster than other sectors, so when it comes to conservation, it also makes sense to focus on water use in the home and businesses. In the US, household water use averaged 172 gallons per person per day in 2005. Nearly 60 percent of water use occurred outside of the home for watering lawns, irrigating landscaping, washing cars, filling pools, and the like. Source: American Water Works AssociationURL: http://www.drinktap.org/consumerdnn/Home/WaterInformation/Conservation/WaterUseStatistics/tabid/85/Default.aspxNotes: Original study: Residential End Uses of Water (Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation, 1999).
  43. Narrative: Let’s move on to another potential solution to the imbalance between water supply and demand in the West: shifting water uses among sectors, especially from low-value agricultural uses to cities. Water markets exist where water users voluntarily agree to buy or sell access to new supplies. These sorts of transfers have been taking place for years, with the majority of volume contracted under short-term leases. Water sales—or the permanent reallocation of water rights—actually account for sixty-seven percent of all transactions, but just thirteen percent of the water transferred. The volume of water transferred since 1987 amounts to about ten times the annual flow of the Colorado River.Source: Jed Brewer, Robert Glennon, Alan Ker, and Gary Libecap. Transferring Water in the American West: 1987 - 2005, 40 Univ. Mich. J.L. Reform 1021 (2007) URL: http://www2.bren.ucsb.edu/~glibecap/MichiganLawReform.pdfNotes:For context, an acre-foot is roughly the volume of water used in one year by an average suburban family household. (http://dnrc.mt.gov/wrd/water_rts/wr_general_info/wrforms/627.pdf)
  44. Narrative: Another potential solution is desalination of ocean water. While the capacity of these plants continues to grow, this water supply solution is an expensive one, mainly due to its high energy consumption. All of our major water sources require some amount of energy, but desalination is typically at the top of the list when it comes to energy intensity. As an example, this graphic illustrates the energy requirements of the water supply options in San Diego County. Seawater desalination would require even more energy than moving freshwater hundreds of miles from the San Francisco-Bay Delta to Southern California. There are also major concerns related to the disposal of the reject brine stream and the impact of desalination on marine and coastal ecosystems. But because freshwater is so limited in the West, some communities along the coast feel they have no choice but to explore desalination.Source: “Desalination, With A Grain of Salt: A California Perspective.” Heather Cooley, Peter H. Gleick, Gary Wolff, Pacific Institute. June 2006URL: http://www.pacinst.org/reports/desalination/desalination_report.pdf
  45. Narrative: Now let’s shift to the West’s biodiversity.
  46. Narrative: The West’s broad spectrum of elevations, temperatures, and precipitation patterns explains why it’s home to such a varied set of ecosystems and species. In Southern Arizona, for instance, the valley bottoms are deserts filled with cacti, but the mountain ranges are two miles above sea level and support lush forests harboring moss and mushrooms. This map shows the West’s various ecoregions, each of which is a unique ecological neighborhood that supports an impressive diversity of plants and animals,many of them found nowhere else on the planet. Source: Hoekstra et al. The Atlas Of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2010URL: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas.xmlNotes: “Ecoregions divide the world into regions of similar habitat. Terrestrial ecoregions draw boundaries that approximate where one set of similar habitats blends with another. Each of the world’s 825 terrestrial ecoregions bounds a natural area in which a unique collection of ecosystems, natural communities, and species is found.”
  47. Narrative: This map shows the number of plant species by terrestrial ecoregion. Worldwide, there are more than 420,000 of the so-called higher order plants: trees, vines, grasses, fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Deserts and arid lands typically have fewer plant species, while tropical rainforests have the most. But in North America, some drier parts of the inland West actually have more plant species than wetter areas along the coast. Compare, for example, the Great Basin in Nevada to Washington State.Source: Hoekstra et al. The Atlas Of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2010.URL: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas.xml http://app.databasin.org/app/pages/datasetPage.jsp?id=43478f840ac84173979b22631c2ed672Notes:Kier et al. (2005) estimated the number of plant species in each terrestrial ecoregion.
  48. Narrative: On the global level, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, or IUCN, has evaluated more than 61,000 of the earth’s species. That’s just a fraction of the total named species, and an even smaller share of the total number of species. Here’s the breakdown for the U.S. Scientists believe the nation is home to at least 200,000 species, but they have only evaluated about 5,000 of them, and half of those are considered “data deficient.” The IUCN classifies 269 species as extinct or extinct in the wild and places nearly 1,200 in the three threatened categories. Source: IUCN Red ListURL: http://www.iucnredlist.org/Notes: Excludes 10 “lower risk/conservation dependent” species.EXTINCT (EX) A taxon is Extinct when there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. A taxon is presumed Extinct when exhaustive surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal, seasonal, annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an individual. Surveys should be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon&apos;s life cycle and life form.EXTINCT IN THE WILD (EW) A taxon is Extinct in the Wild when it is known only to survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well outside the past range. A taxon is presumed Extinct in the Wild when exhaustive surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal, seasonal, annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an individual. Surveys should be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon&apos;s life cycle and life form.CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR) A taxon is Critically Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Critically Endangered, and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.ENDANGERED (EN) A taxon is Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Endangered, and it is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild.VULNERABLE (VU) A taxon is Vulnerable when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the criteria A to E for Vulnerable, and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. NEAR THREATENED (NT) A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future.LEAST CONCERN (LC) A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category.DATA DEFICIENT (DD) A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. A taxon in this category may be well studied, and its biology well known, but appropriate data on abundance and/or distribution are lacking. Data Deficient is therefore not a category of threat. Listing of taxa in this category indicates that more information is required and acknowledges the possibility that future research will show that threatened classification is appropriate. It is important to make positive use of whatever data are available. In many cases great care should be exercised in choosing between DD and a threatened status. If the range of a taxon is suspected to be relatively circumscribed, and a considerable period of time has elapsed since the last record of the taxon, threatened status may well be justified.NOT EVALUATED (NE) A taxon is Not Evaluated when it is has not yet been evaluated against the criteria.
  49. Narrative: Overall, about 30 percent of plants and animals in the U.S. are considered vulnerable or worse according to this ranking system used by The Nature Conservancy and state governments. Source: Stein, Bruce A., Lynn S. Kutner, Jonathan S. Adams, Nature Conservancy (U.S.), and Association for Biodiversity Information. Precious Heritage : The Status of Biodiversity in the United States.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.URL: http://www.natureserve.org/publications/preciousHeritage.jsp Notes:
  50. Narrative: Now let’s turn to a subset of imperiled species: the plants and animals that have received protection under the Endangered Species Act, or ESA. There are more than 1,200 endangered species in the U.S., but a small fraction tends to generate the lion’s share of attention. Here are some of the notable endangered species in the West, where they’re found, and how they’ve figured into public policy debates. Although species protected by the ESA sometimes do have significant economic and regulatory impacts, most of the plants and animals protected by the law are not lighting rods for controversy. Source: EcoWest.org, photos by Mitch Tobin or from Wikipedia.URL: ecowest.org
  51. Narrative: This chart shows how many species have been listed as threatened or endangered, on a cumulative basis. Although the ESA was enacted in 1973, some species were listed under a precursor to the law in the late 1960s. Species are supposed to be added to the endangered list solely on the basis of biology and whether they’re endangered, regardless of the economic impact, but many studies of the act have found that politics frequently intrude in the listing process. If you overlay the terms of the U.S. presidents, you can see that listings really leveled off during George W. Bush’s two terms.Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceURL: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ http://www.fws.gov/ecos/ajax/tess_public/pub/speciesCountByYear.jsp
  52. Narrative: Here we see how many species each president listed under the ESA, on average, per year in office. Environmentalists had a tough time getting species listed during George W. Bush’s two terms, but the rate under Ken Salazar’s Interior Department is less than half the rate when Bruce Babbitt was in charge of Interior during the Clinton administration.Source: Center for Biological Diversity, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Marris, Emma, “Endangered Species Chart a FreshCourse,” Nature online, March 10, 2009.URL: http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/ http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090310/full/news.2009.148.htmlNotes: Table does not include delistings or the 131 species listed before 1974.
  53. Narrative: Many species that the Fish and Wildlife Service has judged at risk of extinction are not receiving protection from the ESA. Hundreds of species have been declared as “candidates,” meaning their listing is biologically “warranted but precluded” by budgetary constraints. This list is akin to the queue waiting to board Noah’s Ark and has been the subject of some recent litigation. The Obama administration has made some progress is reducing the number of candidates from about 250 at the start of the first term to 192 in November 2012.Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceURL: http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/pub/SpeciesReport.do?listingType=C
  54. Narrative: Where do endangered species live? This map analyzes endangered species by counties. You can see that there is often considerable variation within single states like California and Nevada, where one county may have more than 10 listed species while an adjoining county has none. Hawaii, the Pacific Coast, the Southwest, Appalachia, and Florida stand out for their large number of listed species, but many U.S. counties, especially in the Midwest, have no threatened or endangered species.Source: Stein, Bruce A., Lynn S. Kutner, Jonathan S. Adams, Nature Conservancy (U.S.), and Association for Biodiversity Information. Precious Heritage : The Status of Biodiversity in the United States.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.URL: hhttp://www.natureserve.org/publications/preciousHeritage.jsp
  55. Narrative: Why are species at risk? This analysis looked at a broader category—species listed under the ESA and those classified as imperiled—and analyzed why they were in jeopardy. Habitat loss and degradation is the biggest threat, followed by alien species. There are some differences depending on the type of species: reptiles, for instance, are subject to overexploitation because of a brisk black market while birds are subject to diseases like avian malaria and West Nile virus. Source: Wilcove, David S., et al., “Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the UnitedStates: Assessing the Relative Importance of Habitat Destruction, Alien Species, Pollution,Overexploitation, and Disease.” Bioscience 48 (1998): 607–615.URL: http://apps.edf.org/documents/836_bioscience.pdf
  56. Narrative: Here’s another look at threats to endangered species. This graphic shows the share of federal endangered, threatened, and proposed species that have been harmed by various types of habitat loss and degradation. You can see that agriculture and the disruption of fire regimes top the list.Source: Stein, Bruce A., Lynn S. Kutner, Jonathan S. Adams, Nature Conservancy (U.S.), and Association for Biodiversity Information. Precious Heritage : The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.URL: http://www.natureserve.org/publications/preciousHeritage.jsp
  57. Narrative: Let’s move on to wildfires, a driving force in many Western forests and grasslands.
  58. Narrative: Wildfires are a natural part of many Western ecosystems, but the risk of wildfires varies greatly from place to place. In some regions, such as the California desert, there isn’t much fuel to burn, though some parts of the Southwest are being invaded by non-native grasses that are flammable. Aside from the West and Alaska, states in the South are most likely to burn. It’s important to remember that Western forests, woodlands, and grasslands vary greatly in their natural fire regimes. In some, wildfires used to be a frequent visitor, returning every few years, while others would burn every few centuries in big, stand-replacing blazes.Source: USDA Forest Service/Fire Science Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research StationURL: http://app.databasin.org/app/pages/datasetPage.jsp?id=1375575d0756499aa7fd6759f89840b4Notes: “Wildland Fire Potential delineates areas based on fire intensity, weather, frequency, and size, which was then classified into a relative ranking of fire potential from very low to very high. Fire severity is based on surface fuels potential and crown fire potential. Surface fuel potential was based on calculated values of rate of spread and flame lengths, using the national Fuel Characterization Classification Systems. Crown fire potential was based on assigning relative classes of fire intensity to a current vegetation cover type map. Fire weather potential is based on the average number of days per year the relative energy release component was above the 95th percentile from 1980 to 2005, and the average number of days a year that experienced extreme fire weather based on thresholds of temperature, wind, and humidity from 1982 to 1997. Fire frequency and size is based on the number of 1/10 acres fires or greater per million acres and the number of 500-acre fires or greater per million acres from 1986 to 1996.”
  59. Narrative: The preceding map showed the current risk of wildfires in the West, but to understand the issue it’s critical to go back in time. Western forests have undergone some dramatic changes over the past century. Logging and other human activities have certainly led to the outright loss of some forested areas, but even places that have escaped chainsaws and bulldozers have changed in character. This sequence of images shows how one spot in the Bitterroot National Forest in Montana changed from 1909 to 1948 to 1989. Fire suppression has caused a proliferation of smaller trees and other fuel that can allow wildfires to burn very intensely and reach into the canopy. In some areas, such as the ponderosa pine forests founds in drier parts of the interior West, frequent, low-intensity burns used to visit the woods, sparked by lightning or set by Native Americans, and clear out the underbrush. But in other forests, such as the lodgepole pines of the Rockies, infrequent, high-intensity burns were the norm.Source: U.S. Forest ServiceURL:http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr120.pdfNotes:“Forest development on the Bitterroot National Forest in Montana in a ponderosa pine stand after harvest (1909) in which fire was excluded since 1895. Note the changes in vertical arrangement and horizontal continuity in forest stand structure. In general many of today’s ponderosa pine forests contain higher densities of fire-intolerant species and suppressed trees than historical forests.”
  60. Narrative: This map shows the condition of natural fire systems, by terrestrial ecoregion. Green indicates where the natural fire regime is more or less intact, pink shows degraded areas, and orange depicts very degraded areas. In the United States, the coastal mountains of Northern California, Oregon, and Washington, and parts of the central and northern Rockies have intact fire systems. But many parts of the intermountain West, as well as the Southeast and Great Lakes region, have degraded conditions.Source: Hoekstra et al. The Atlas Of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2010.URL: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas.xml http://app.databasin.org/app/pages/datasetPage.jsp?id=bc0f2102d5044d9aaeb3569802da3b3eNotes: Spatial data on the status and trends of fire regimes were developed under the Global Fire Partnership, a collaboration of nongovernment and academic institutions and summarized in Shlisky et al. (2007). The fire regime and its status and trends were established through a formal expert workshop process. Workshops were held around the world from 2004 to 2006.
  61. Narrative: The number of wildfires and acreage burned varies a lot from year to year, from around 1 million to 10 million acres annually—but there has been an upward trend in recent years. The blue line represents a 10-year moving average. Source:National Interagency Fire CenterURL:http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_stats_totalFires.htmlNotes:2004 fires and acres do not include state lands for North Carolina; figures prior to 1983 may be revised as NICC verifies historical data; stats after 1983 were compiled by states and agencies.
  62. Narrative: Another way of looking at this data is to calculate the average size of fires. Because we’re dividing the total acreage burned by the total number of fires, we run into a problem with a change in reporting on the number of fires in the 1980s, but if you look at the past two decades or so, you can see that the mean size of wildfires has been increasing. Source:National Interagency Fire CenterURL:http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_stats_totalFires.htmlNotes:2004 fires and acres do not include state lands for North Carolina; figures prior to 1983 may be revised as NICC verifies historical data; stats after 1983 were compiled by states and agencies.
  63. Narrative: Wildfires are one of the reasons why the federal government created the Forest Service at the start of the 20th century. Over the past few decades, fire-related costs have consumed an increasing share of the agency’s budget. Here’s how the Forest Service spent its money over the past 10 years. The red bar is for wildland fire management, but sometimes bad fire years have forced the agency to rely on supplemental and emergency appropriations from Congress. Aside from fires, the next biggest category of spending is for running the national forest system, shown in green.Source:US Forest ServiceURL: http://www.fs.fed.us/aboutus/budget/
  64. Narrative: One way of gauging wildfire activity is to look at how many days the federal government was operating under various preparedness levels. The National Interagency Fire Center uses five categories, similar to the now-abandoned Homeland Security threat levels. Preparedness level 5 is reserved for the most active times, while under level 4 the competition for firefighting resources is a bit less intense, and so on down to level 1, when not much is happening as far as fires go. This graphic shows how many days the government was under levels 4 and 5. Aside from 2004, 2009, and 2010, it’s been a challenging time for firefighters.Source:National Interagency Fire CenterURL:http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.htmlNotes:See historical fire summaries
  65. Narrative: Because many forests and woodlands have too much fuel due to fire suppression, the government has been trying to step up its thinning on federal lands. This graphic distinguishes between a couple of different types of fuels treatments. The first distinction is between activity taking place within and beyond the wildland-urban interface. Known by its acronym, the WUI is where property and residents are at risk of wildfires, although the definition is somewhat controversial. The fuels treatment primarily consists of thinning with chainsaws (“mechanical”) and prescribed burns (“fire”). The total acreage has been climbing in recent years, but it’s important to remember that these treatments are just a drop in the bucket. By some estimates there are 190 million acres of federal lands at elevated risk for wildfires. Source:US Departments of Interior and AgricultureURL:http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/resources/reports/documents/healthyforests/2009/FY2009HFAccomplishments.pdf
  66. Narrative: Prescribed fires are an important tool for reducing excess fuels. On a per acre basis, they are less expensive than mechanical thinning projects and they can do tremendous good for forest ecosystems by reintroducing fire to where it is natural. But conditions have to be just right to set a prescribed fire so that it doesn’t turn into a disastrous wildfire. That’s happened occasionally in the West, such as the 2000 Cerro Grande Fire in Los Alamos, NM, and many in the public remain skeptical or outright opposed to fires because of the risks and smoke. This graphic shows that the number of acres burned in prescribed fires has generally been increasing over the past dozen years. Most of the burns happen on Forest Service land. Source:National Interagency Fire CenterURL:http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.htmlNotes:See historical fire summaries
  67. Narrative: An increasing number of homes in the West lie within the so-called wildland-urban interface (WUI), where wildfires pose a direct threat to homes and businesses. This map shows the location of the WUI. Every Western state has some of these areas, but they are especially common in California, Oregon, and Washington.Source: USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET)URL: http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=9a3dadc489264df89540ef6379724deaNotes: This map service provides a raster dataset representing US wildland-urban interface (WUI) areas in high severity forested types in 2000. The data essentially represents where there is a high degree of urban and suburban sprawl coming into contact with forests. The map shows presence/absence as 1/0.
  68. Let’s turn to climate change, which is already having a major impact in the American West.
  69. Narrative: It’sexpected to get warmer across the nation, but the increases will likely be greatest in the Interior West, Midwest, and at higher latitudes.Source: Climate Wizard URL: http://www.climatewizard.org/ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008320Notes: Climate Wizard is a collaboration between The Nature Conservancy, University of Washington, and University of Southern Mississippi. The first generation of this web-based program—which was recently launched at www.climatewizard.org—allows the user to choose a state or country and see both the climate change that has occurred to date and the climate change that is predicted to occur. Simply put, Climate Wizard can be used to assess how climate has changed over time and to project what future changes are likely to occur in a given area. Climate Wizard represents the first time ever the full range of climate history and impacts for a landscape have been brought together in a user-friendly format. See: Girvetz EH, Zganjar C, Raber GT, Maurer EP, Kareiva P, et al. (2009) Applied Climate-Change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8320
  70. Narrative: Changing precipitation patterns will obviously affect the West’s water supply and many scientists believe that climate change will be most conspicuous in the hydrological cycle. This map illustrates what’s expected to happen with precipitation under a high-emissions scenario. The Southwest and California are expected to get drier, while the Pacific Northwest is projected to get wetter. Source: Climate Wizard URL: http://www.climatewizard.org/ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008320Notes: Climate Wizard is a collaboration between The Nature Conservancy, University of Washington, and University of Southern Mississippi. The first generation of this web-based program—which was recently launched at www.climatewizard.org—allows the user to choose a state or country and see both the climate change that has occurred to date and the climate change that is predicted to occur. Simply put, Climate Wizard can be used to assess how climate has changed over time and to project what future changes are likely to occur in a given area. Climate Wizard represents the first time ever the full range of climate history and impacts for a landscape have been brought together in a user-friendly format. See: Girvetz EH, Zganjar C, Raber GT, Maurer EP, Kareiva P, et al. (2009) Applied Climate-Change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8320
  71. Narrative: These maps show projected future changes in precipitation relative to the recent past as simulated by 15 climate models. The simulations are for late in the 21st century, under a higher emissions scenario. While projections for precipitation are cloudier than those for temperature, climate models are showing that in the spring, northern areas are likely to get wetter, while southern areas are expected to get drier. There’s less certainty where the transition between wetter and drier areas will occur, but the hatched areas indicate where confidence is highest. Source: U.S. Global Change Research ProgramURL: http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdfNotes:
  72. Narrative: The previous maps looked at projections for the end of the 21st century, but this map focuses on period between 2020 and 2039, which isn’t that far away. Compared to the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, large portions of the West, especially at lower latitudes, are expected to get drier, while the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies are projected to get wetter. Source: Tetra Tech/NRDCURL: http://rd.tetratech.com/climatechange/projects/nrdc_climate.aspNotes:
  73. Narrative: This graphic summarizes how climate change will impact the nation’s water supply. The Interior West is expected to get not only hotter but drier and be susceptible to worse droughts. In winter, the higher temperatures will mean less precipitation falling as snow, more as rain, which will have major effects on the region’s rivers, many of which are dependent on the melting snowpack. Hotter temperatures mean higher evaporation rates, greater water use, and potentially more conflicts over water. Source: U.S. Global Change Research ProgramURL: http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdfNotes:
  74. Narrative: The West’s snowpack and the timing of the spring and summer snowmelt are critical ingredients in the region’s water supply. For many rivers in the West, spring and summer runoff contributes 50 – 80% of annual flow. The timing of this snowmelt discharge ranges from as early as February in some of the rivers along the Pacific coast to as late as June for rivers in the Rocky Mountains. Over the next thirty years, however, the surge of snowmelt that feeds Western rivers is expected to come dramatically earlier. This map shows the projected change in peak snowmelt timing from 1975 to 2040, by freshwater ecoregion. Source: Hoekstra et al. The Atlas Of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities to Make a Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2010URL: http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas.xml http://app.databasin.org/app/pages/datasetPage.jsp?id=7819b679e4104e46952ce3a79e0cd7b5
  75. Narrative: Add it all up and we’re expecting to see pretty significant declines in runoff in much of the West, with steep declines expected in the lower Colorado River Basin. This map shows projected changes in median runoff for 2041-2060, relative to a 1901-1970 baseline, are mapped by water-resource region. Colors indicate percentage changes in runoff. Hatched areas indicate greater confidence due to strong agreement among model projections. White areas indicate divergence among model projections. A 10 to 20 percent decline is expected throughout California, the Great Basin, the Upper Colorado River, the Rio Grande, and the Arkansas. Source: U.S. Global Change Research Program, Milly et alURL: http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdfNotes:
  76. Narrative: Now let’s shift to climate change’s impact on biodiversity in the West and its impressive array of plants, animals, and ecosystems. Temperatureand precipitation play critical roles in determining the distribution of plant communities around the globe. Plant distributions, in turn, determine what types of animals are found in various places. This graphic shows how the climate zones compare for various types of plant communities. Because climate change is expected to affect both temperature and precipitation, major shifts in plant communities are projected in the West and elsewhere.Source: U.S. Global Change Research ProgramURL: http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp//Library/nationalassessment/overviewecosystems.htmNotes: Both temperature and precipitation limit the distribution of plant communities. The climate (temperature and precipitation) zones of some of the major plant communities (such as temperate forests, grasslands, and deserts) in the U.S. are shown in this figure. Note that the grasslands zone encompasses a wide range of environments. This zone can include a mixture of woody plants with the grasses. The shrublands and woodlands of the West are examples of grass/woody vegetation mixes that occur in the zone designated as grasslands. With climate change, the areas occupied by these zones will shift relative to their current distribution. Plant species are expected to shift with their climate zones. The new plant communities that result from these shifts are likely to be different from current plant communities because individual species will very likely migrate at different rates and have different degrees of success in establishing themselves in new places.
  77. Narrative: One of the West’s most striking aspects is the enormous variation in elevation, temperature, precipitation—and therefore ecosystems—that are found in a small area. The scorching desert of Death Valley, 282 feet below sea level and the lowest point on the continent, is only 85 miles away from the snow-capped peak of Mount Whitney, 14,505 feet above sea level and the tallest point in the contiguous 48 states.Source: Climate Wizard URL: http://www.climatewizard.org/ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008320Notes: Climate Wizard is a collaboration between The Nature Conservancy, University of Washington, and University of Southern Mississippi. The first generation of this web-based program—which was recently launched at www.climatewizard.org—allows the user to choose a state or country and see both the climate change that has occurred to date and the climate change that is predicted to occur. Simply put, Climate Wizard can be used to assess how climate has changed over time and to project what future changes are likely to occur in a given area. Climate Wizard represents the first time ever the full range of climate history and impacts for a landscape have been brought together in a user-friendly format. See: Girvetz EH, Zganjar C, Raber GT, Maurer EP, Kareiva P, et al. (2009) Applied Climate-Change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8320
  78. Narrative: Same goes with precipitation. Look, for example, at Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. The Cascade Mountains are among the wettest areas in the country, but to their east, precipitation is scant, except for the higher elevations of the Northern Rockies. The result is an amazing variety of ecosystems, ranging from rainforests to deserts, in a relatively compact area. Because some plants and animals require a warmer, drier climate, while others need cooler, wetter weather, the diversity of species can be tremendous in just one corner of one state. Source: Climate Wizard URL: http://www.climatewizard.org/ http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi/10.1371/journal.pone.0008320Notes: Climate Wizard is a collaboration between The Nature Conservancy, University of Washington, and University of Southern Mississippi. The first generation of this web-based program—which was recently launched at www.climatewizard.org—allows the user to choose a state or country and see both the climate change that has occurred to date and the climate change that is predicted to occur. Simply put, Climate Wizard can be used to assess how climate has changed over time and to project what future changes are likely to occur in a given area. Climate Wizard represents the first time ever the full range of climate history and impacts for a landscape have been brought together in a user-friendly format. See: Girvetz EH, Zganjar C, Raber GT, Maurer EP, Kareiva P, et al. (2009) Applied Climate-Change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8320
  79. Narrative: Because climate change will affect future temperatures, precipitation patterns, and other elements of the weather, the mosaic of ecosystems in the West is going to be rearranged. This map shows the current conditions, as well as the results from two climate models. The West currently includes arid lands in the Southwest deserts, conifer forests at higher elevations, and shrubs, woodlands, and grasslands in between. The models not only factor in changing temperature and precipitation but also account for increasing levels of carbon dioxide, which promotes plant growth. You can see that in the Southwest, a large portion of the arid land deserts are replaced with grasslands, shrubs, or woodlands. In the Great Basin, there’s a shift from shrubs to savannas. Source: U.S. Forest ServiceURL: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/mdr/mapss/about/modeloutput/sim_usvegdist.shtmlNotes:
  80. Narrative: Let’s take a closer look at some specific examples of species that will be impacted by climate change. This series of maps shows average air temperatures in August for the Pacific Northwest. Levels above 70°F can severely stress coldwater fish, such as trout, salmon, and steelhead by raising water temperatures. You can see that major warming is expected in the region over the next few decades.Source: U.S. Global Change Research ProgramURL: http://downloads.climatescience.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdfNotes: Increasing air temperatures lead to rising water temperatures, which increase stress on coldwater fish such as trout, salmon, and steelhead. August average air temperature above 70°F is a threshold above which these fish are severely stressed. Projected temperatures for the 2020s and 2040s under a higher emissions scenario suggest that the habitat for these fish is likely to decrease dramatically.
  81. Narrative: Researchers are already documenting a northward movement of birds and other species in response to warming temperatures. This graphic shows results from an analysis of 40 years of data from the Audubon Society’s Christmas Bird Count. Many species are wintering farther north in response to the changing climate.Source: Associated Press, Audubon Society, NOAAURL: http://birdsandclimate.audubon.org/Notes: Nearly 60% of the 305 species found in North America in winter are on the move, shifting their ranges northward by an average of 35 miles. Audubon scientists analyzed 40 years of citizen-science Christmas Bird Count data — and their findings provide new and powerful evidence that global warming is having a serious impact on natural systems. Northward movement was detected among species of every type, including more than 70 percent of highly adaptable forest and feeder birds.
  82. Narrative: In some cases, species will be able to fly, swim, crawl, hop, or otherwise move to more suitable habitat. But sometimes there will be insurmountable obstacles. The pika, for example, faces a challenging future because it can only retreat uphill so far. Eventually, it will run out of mountain. The map on the left shows currently suitable habitat for the pika, but the map on the right shows what’s expected by 2100 if climate change continues. According to this projection, vast areas that are now home to pikas will be too warm to support the species.Source: Scott Loarie, Carnegie Institution Department of Global EcologyURL: http://earthjustice.org/news/press/2009/lawsuit-filed-to-protect-american-pika-under-california-endangered-species-actNotes:
  83. Narrative: Scientists have already found that the warming experienced over the past few decades in the West has led to an increase in wildfire activity. One paper concluded that “large wildfire activity increased suddenly and markedly” starting in the mid-1980s, with most of the change due to a warming climate rather than fire suppression. Higher temperatures led to a thinner snowpack that melted earlier in spring, leading to more-flammable conditions in summer. The scientists looked at more than 1,100 large blazes that broke out from 1970 onward. Compared to the 1970–1986 period, wildfires in the 1987–2003 time frame were four times as frequent and burned more than six times the acreage. The length of the wildfire season increased an average of 78 days.Source: Westerling et al. “Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity.” Science 18 August 2006: 313 (5789), 940-943. Published online,July 6, 2006.URL: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/313/5789/940.full.pdfNotes:
  84. Narrative: Looking ahead, climate change is projected to make the West’s wildfire season even worse. This map shows how various ecoregions are expected to fare if global average temperatures increase by 1°C. In many areas, the median annual area burned is projected to increase more than 100 percent. Climate change is expected to make the Southwest drier, lead to more severe droughts, and cause a thinning of the mountain snowpack that delays the onset of fire season and supplies the bulk of the water in Western rivers and reservoirs.Source: Climate Stabilization Targets: Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts over Decades to Millennia. National Research Council. 2011.URL: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12877Notes: Percent increase (relative to 1950-2003) in median annual area burned for ecoprovinces of the West with a 1°C increase in global average temperature. Changes in temperature and precipitation were aggregated to the ecoprovince level using the suite of models in the CMIP3 archive. Climate-fire models were derived from National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) climate division records and observed area burned data following methods discussed in Littell et al. (2009).
  85. Narrative: Warming temperatures and the lack of deep freezes may be responsible for increased activity by mountain pine beetles and other forest insects. This photo shows dead lodgepole pines near Rocky Mountain National Park in Colorado.Source: WikipediaURL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mountain_pine_beetle_damage_in_Rocky_Mountain_National_Park.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dendroctonus_ponderosae.jpg
  86. Narrative: Now let’s take a look at some polling on environmental issues, both nationally and in the West. Most of the slides that follow are based on longstanding surveys conducted by the Gallup Organization. Some other polls examine the views of Westerners in particular, but they haven’t been around for very long so they don’t say much about long-term trends.
  87. Narrative: Before we delve intopublic opinion on environmental issues, it’s important to remember that the environment usually ranks very low on the public’s agenda. When Gallup asks Americans “what’s the most important problem facing the nation,” only one or two percent of people will say it’s the environment or energy issues. This graphic shows the public’s ranking for June 2012.Source: GallupURL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/155162/Satisfaction-Slips-Slightly.aspxNotes: Responses with less than 1 percent excluded
  88. Narrative: Although few Americans rate the environment as the nation’s top priority, a majority has consistently said that they worry about the quality of the environment. President Obama’s election could help explain why there was a shift in the public’s outlook between March 2008 and March 2009. When asked to rate the trajectory of environmental quality, more Americans still think things are getting worse, but that gap narrowed substantially after Obama took office and has remained relatively constant since then.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
  89. Narrative: Most Americans say they’re concerned about environmental issues, but fewer than one in five consider themselves active participants in the environment movement. About 40 percent consider themselves sympathetic but not active. The percentage of people saying they were “unsympathetic” to the environmental movement has risen slightly in recent years, to about 10 percent, while the fraction describing themselves as neutral has climbed to about 30 percent. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes: No data for 2009
  90. Narrative: Some increasing hostility toward the environmental movement is also seen in this graphic. The percentage of people saying the movement has definitely or probably done more harm than good has risen since 1992. But, overall, a plurality of Americans say the movement has probably done more good than harm. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
  91. Narrative: The economic downturn appears to have weakened support for environmental protection. When asked about balancing environmental and economic priorities, an increasing percentage of people say that economic growth should be given a priority. In some polls during the 1980s and 1990s, twice as many people said the environment was more important, but starting about 10 years ago, that gap narrowed and eventually reversed. Gallup also asked this question right after the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill and registered a jump in the share of Americans favoring environmental protection, but that spike appears to have been temporary.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
  92. Narrative: The previous slides showed results from national polls conducted by Gallup. In this graphic, we focus on five Rocky Mountain states. When residents of Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Montana and New Mexico were asked in 2011 about balancing the environment and economy, the vast majority of respondents argued for maintaining environmental regulations. This poll from Colorado College generally found strong support for environmental protection, especially for public lands.Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL:http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
  93. Narrative: In these five Western states, some of them quite conservative,nearly 50 percent of respondents feel that environmental laws are tough enough but should be better enforced. Only 10 percent of people surveyed thought that environmental laws need to be relaxed.Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL: http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
  94. Narrative:Which environmental issues generate the most worry among Americans? Pollution and contamination issues concerned a majority of Americans a great deal, but some issues that the environmental movement concentrates on, such as global warming and the extinction of plant and animal species, registered less concern, while some issues that the environmental movement has shifted away from, such as the ozone layer and acid rain, still cause plenty of worry among some Americans.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
  95. Narrative: The survey of voters in five Western states—Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Montana—also revealed that non-pollution issues rank high in the region. More than 80 percent of Westerners describe poorly planned growth and development and the loss of family farms and ranches as “serious” or “extremely serious” problems. As with the national surveys, global warming and climate change are seen as less troubling than other environmental issues, yet more than half of the Westerners surveyed still described these problems as serious or extremely serious. Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL:http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
  96. Narrative:Finally, let’s take a look a funding for conservation.
  97. Narrative: First, let’s examine the overall federal budget. As with public opinion, the environment ranks near the bottom when it comes to federal spending priorities. This pie chart shows where your federal tax dollars are spent, using data from 2011. More than half the budget is consumed by Social Security, Defense, and Medicare. Environmental protection and natural resources receive about 1 percent of the federal budget. There are a few other environmental programs in the other slices, such as clean energy development and conservation of farmland, but their share of the pie is also tiny.Source: Third WayURL: http://www.thirdway.org/taxreceiptNotes:
  98. Narrative: This chart shows the top federal programs related to the environment. You can see that the big federal agencies, such as the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, and Forest Service account for the vast majority of federal spending. Energy-related programs also rank high.Source: Third WayURL: http://www.thirdway.org/taxreceiptNotes:
  99. Narrative: The Department of Interior, home to a number of key environmental agencies, has also had a relatively constant budget over the past decade, aside from a jump in 2009 related to the fiscal stimulus.Source: Department of InteriorURL: http://www.doi.gov/budget/ http://www.doi.gov/budget/budget_general/bgindex.html
  100. Narrative: The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is another major source of federal funding for Western conservation, but over the past few decades Congress has diverted more than half of the fund—$17 billion—to non-conservation purposes. Initially, the LWCF was funded through sales of surplus federal real property, motorboat fuel taxes, and fees for recreation use of federal lands. But today, most LWCF funding comes from the royalties that energy companies pay when they drill offshore on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). This graph shows that about $900 million is deposited into the LWCF every year, but money that isn’t appropriated by Congress remains in the U.S. Treasury and can be spent on other federal programs. Since 1980, Congress has diverted as much as 85 percent of the LWCF. Source: Department of InteriorURL: http://www.doi.gov/budget/budget_general/bgindex.htmlNotes:
  101. Narrative: Let’s take a look at another important source for conservation funding: open space bonds and other ballot measures that are put to voters in state and local elections. Since 1988, American voters have approved nearly 1,800 ballot measures that have generated more than $57 billion for conservation. Funding peaked in 2008 when some $8 billion was approved. Conservation measures generally do well at the polls, in part because backers tend to avoid placing them on ballots when the chances of passage are low, such as during a recession. The green line in this graphic shows the percentage of conservation-related ballot measures that passed each year. On average 74 percent are approved, but in some years the rate has approached 90 percent. The number of measures tends to be lower in off-year elections and peaked in 2004. In recent years, with the economy in the doldrums, fewer measures have been placed on ballots.Source: Trust for Public LandURL: https://www.quickbase.com/db/bbqna2qct?a=dbpage&amp;pageID=10Notes:
  102. Narrative: Finally, let’s turn to environmental philanthropy. Foundations and other donors are critical sources of funding for conservation groups, but there is only limited data available on spending patterns in the philanthropic sector. Our best source of information comes from the Environmental Grantmakers Association. EGA has conducted two studies in recent years of the funding priorities of its members, which include the major foundations. However, only some of this data is available to the public. From 2007 to 2009, there was a big shift from terrestrial, coastal, marine and biodiversity issues to climate and energy. You can see that funding priorities change a lot from year to year, unlike federal budgets, which tend to be fairly steady over time. Source: Environmental Grantmakers AssociationURL: http://ega.org/sites/default/files/pubs/summaries/Executive%20Summary%20TTF%20v3%20small.pdfNotes: