The document summarizes a project that used mobile technology to provide guided walks around Nottingham Castle focusing on the 1831 Reform Riots. It investigated using location-aware audio to teach history outdoors. Two guided walks were conducted - one led by community historians, the other using a mobile app. The project explored how technology can convey different historical perspectives and promote empathy. It assessed learning outside versus inside and the impact of individual versus group guides. The results provided insights into informal mobile learning of history in public spaces.
Hidden Histories: a Towards Pervasive Media feasibility study
1. Hidden Histories:To the Castle! A riotous happening, orchestrated by Claire Taylor, Elizabeth FitzGerald & Mike Cravenwith People’s Histreh
2. Developed existing interest between local community history group and academics in School of History TPM enabled multidisciplinary approach and for other colleagues to be brought into the mix Investigated how located audio can be used to provide opportunities for historical learning in public history Case study of the 1831 Reform Riot in Nottingham, content initiated by the community group Conducted 2 types of guided walk: People-led Technology-led Overview of the project
3. Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality Augurscope (Equator, Notts), 2003 – group history tour around to Nottingham Castle using laptop/GPS unit on wheels - Superposition of past scenes and narration. Mobile experiences Riot! 1831 (Bristol, Mobile Bristol), 2004 History Unwired (MIT/Dept. Architecture, Venice), 2005 - Both location aware neighbourhood audio tours using the voices of historical citizens Examples of related work
4. Can mobile technology be used to convey historical empathy and learning of contested perspectives from different historical sources, in an history walk format? Main questions to the participants in the walk: Who were the rioters? What motivated them to engage in their direct action? Academic research questions Historical focus Educational focus User experience What are we trying to find out?
5. Historical literacy concerning the Reform Riots in Nottingham, asking: What happened in the period of the riots? Historical empathy with the people involved: What were this period and these events like for different people? Historical interpretation: how were these events and their causes viewed from differing and/or conflicting perspectives? Historical research areas Attaining historicalliteracy Experiencing ‘empathy’ with historical subjects Responding to & evaluating accounts from a variety of perspectives
6. Learning in location Whatdifferences arise from learning in location compared to elsewhere (e.g. indoors; round a table etc)? Factors affecting learner preferences Do you like learning in location? Why – or why not? Group versus individual tour guides How did the audio guide technology affect group dynamics? Educational research areas
7. Preferences for location based audio guides What did you or didn't you like about using the audio guide to learn about the Reform Riot? Experience of using smart phone technology What were your experiences (good, bad or neither) in using a handheld (mobile) device to help your learning? Comparing people-led and technology-led modalities What were the important differences between the two types of guided walk? How did they affect the user experience? User experience research areas
8. Planning meeting [Sept/Oct 2010] People-led guided walk [Oct 2010] Recording of audio files [Jan 2011] Technology-led guided walk [Feb 2011] Stages in the project
9. Route, narrative, source materials and handouts were organised by members of People’s Histreh Emphasis on experiences and aspirations of ‘ordinary people’ of Nottingham as starting point for understanding the riots Self-directed ‘active learning’ – carried out intuitively ‘Learning by doing’ Use the walk as a way of disseminating what they have learned Stage 1 – Planning meeting
10.
11.
12. Stage 2 – To the Castle! ‘people-led’ walk Photos courtesy of Alan Lodge, Nottingham Indymedia
13.
14. New audio files recorded by People’s Histreh What software/platform to use for playback of geolocated audio? User requirements Potential tech solutions TrailsCymru / Peoples Collection Wales OOKL Layar or Wikitude WildMaps Broadcastr 7scenes Failsafe – use mp3 files stored on the handheld device with paper map Stage 3 – Audio: recording and playback
15. Stage 4 – To the Castle! ‘technology-led’ walk
17. Difficult to draw comparisons between the two walks – too many variables that could not be predicted or controlled Still analysing data from user questionnaires Historical aspects: historical literacy (facts), empathy, interpretation Educational aspects: informal learning; learning in location User experience aspects: visibility vs invisibility of tech; group vs individual; affordances of each walk Main findings
21. Detailed questionnaire analysis Academic publications Explore tensions between amateur/professional and authoring/presentation of media Issues of trust and authenticity in relation to the source material and how it is presented Feedback to People’s Histreh – potential for future walks Future research into different variables relating to pervasive media, particularly in relation to user-generated content Where next…?
22. Claire Taylor, School of History claire.k.taylor@nottingham.ac.uk Elizabeth FitzGerald, Learning Sciences Research Institute elizabeth.fitzgerald@nottingham.ac.uk Mike Craven, MATCH, Faculty of Engineering michael.craven@nottingham.ac.uk People’s Histreh http://peopleshistreh.wordpress.com A massive thanks to all those who participated in the walks and who gave us valuable feedback on this project, also to Faye Taylor and Robert Jones who assisted in the research. Thanks for listening…
Notes de l'éditeur
The aim of the Walk is to engage and educate the audience. By discussing and defining ‘educate’ with the historians we settled on three objectives 1/ To improve historical ‘literacy’ about the Reform Riots in Nottingham, asking: What happened in the period of the riots? (original questionnaire 2, 4 & 5; new questionnaire ) 2/ To encourage empathy with historical subjects as a specific kind of historical knowledge/understanding, asking: What were this period and these events like for different kinds of people? (original questionnaire 2, 5, 6 & 7 a, b & c; new questionnaire ) .3/ To encourage conclusions to be drawn through evaluating conflicting historical interpretations: What can we conclude from how these events and their causes were viewed from differing perspectives? (original questionnaire 2, 5 & 7d; new questionnaire ) . From the historians’ perspective, these levels of historical understanding have a hierarchical relationship, in that level 1 must be attained before level 2, and level 2 before level 3.
A planning meeting was held with the community historians. Individuals took on aspects of work towards the presentation of the material on the walk as (narrated, source-based and visual materials such as maps, copies of documents in the form of a trail guide). This is a process of self-directed ‘active learning’, similar to that fostered within the School of History at UoN. It is learning achieved through the selection, understanding and employment historical subject matter and sources. The history group does this ‘actively learning’ quite intuitively, to the extent that participants do not comment that this is what they are doing. In other words, the community historians themselves are learning about the Reform Riots by putting on a guided walk. They are also using the walk as a way of disseminating what they have learned and encouraging a way of viewing the past that stresses the experiences and aspirations of the ordinary people of Nottingham as the starting point for understanding the Riots.