KAIST 2011 가을학기 Revolution of Science and Technology - Designer Baby Debate 관련 발표자료입니다.

1. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

2. Introduction(1)
We‟re smart and intelligent… But we still have problems

3. Introduction(2)
You might want to choose..
Blue Eyes??? World Star???
Non-Smoking???

4. Introduction(3)
Are we to play God??

5. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

6. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견1 ;
질병을 고칠 수 있는 이득이 있다
Arguments #1 For
There are benefits of being able to
cure disease
정수황

7. Poll
Many parents want to
choose for their child‟s
traits

8. PGD?
(Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis)
It takes place before implantation
To search for genetic mutations
that could develop into a
chronic disease.

9. List of disorders that could be treated using PGD

10. Phone call with Lisa Nash
Lisa Nash

11. Which lifestyle would you wish
your children to have?

12. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견1
현재 맞춤아기 기술은 질병치료에 사용하기는 부족하다
Against 1
It is too early to apply current „designer
baby‟ technology for medical purposes
강성민

13. No technique that guarantees 100%
Genetic diseases are Usually determined by
Hard to distinguish
not Y/N problems not static properties
diseased embryo
(ex. Hormones)
Distributed
properties
or

14. No technique that guarantees 100%
As a result of probability calculation, many
healthy babies would be dead
Probability Would be dead
Calculation

15. No technique that guarantees 100%
Genetic disease is not caused by only
one gene
Dangerous!
gene2
gene1
gene3
Genetic
Disease
Some tests are dangerous Not caused by one gene

16. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견2 ;
기술적인 문제는 해결될 수 있다.
Arguments #1 For
Technical problems can be resolved
구태균

17. Example of Amazing Technical Improvement
Who could imagine we could
throw an object to thousands
kilometers away?

18. Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #1

20. Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #2

21. Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #3
Human Genome Project

22. Cost required to sequence individual human genome

23. We will provide
Genome Analysis for
5000 dollars.

24. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

25. What if the technology
develops?
If it becomes available?

26. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견2
맞춤아기는 계급의 발생을 초래한다 – 사회적 측면
Designer babies lead to a discriminative “class-
oriented” society
이남일

27. Movie GATTACA (1997)

28. Movie GATTACA (1997)

29. Hierarchy Generation
Negative Cycle

30. Gap Between Classes
The gap in society as it exists today will get wider

31. Cost required to sequence individual human genome

32. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견3
경제적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 발전해야 한다
Arguments #3 For
From the economic perspective, designer
babies should be developed
발표자 ; 배재완

33. Cost of PGD vs Cost of medical
treatment
PGD is more economical than medical treatment

34. Cost of PGD vs Cost of medical
treatment
PGD Medical treatment
• IVF ($ 10,000) • Antibiotic treatment
• ICSI ($ 1,500 ~ 2,500) • Gene therapy
• Embryo biopsy • Chest therapy
($ 1,500 ~ 2,500) • Drug
• •
• •
• •

35. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견3
윤리학적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 실행될 수 없다.
Against #3.
From an ethical perspective, „designer babies‟
should not be permitted..
권동욱

36. Money vs. Life(1)
Do you really think that the economic
advantages overwhelm the value of lives?

37. Money vs. Life(2)
We must not try to
Life is much valuable
compare life w/
than Money
money

38. Designer Baby as an Accessory
Parents expect their child as a product
or accessory for their tastes.

39. Disposal of Designer Babies

40. 8 Stage cell is not a Life
Implantation is even not occurred.
We do not consider it as a baby.
Numerous 8 stage cells died
naturally (not intended)
It‟s just a material for
research.

41. 41

42. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견4
장애인들이 현재보다 더 소외될 것이다.
Against #4.
The disabled will become even more
isolated and discriminated upon.
유태선

43. Process
The disabled will become even more isolated and discriminated upon.
Be more National Overall condition
minor class Support will for the disabled
decrease gets worse

44. The disorder problem would not be changed.
Consumer Reports
: N. 소비자고발
Disorder
(90% is acquired)

45. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견5
자식에게 좋은 조건을 제공해주는 것은 부모의 당연한 책임이다.
As parents, it is a dutiful responsibility to provide their
children with the best possible conditions.
전승제

46. Parents do For their kid..
Parents do their best for their Offspring
Mencius
: N. 맹자
Like that!

47. Parents‟ Mind ; Mencius mother 3-times moving
Parents do their best for their Offspring
Mencius Mother
: N. 맹모
Mencius Mother 3-
times Moving
: 맹모삼천지교
Like that!

48. Designing is Reasonable
Design their baby is parent‟s authority

49. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견5
아이들도 자신의 인생을 선택할 권리가 있다.
Against #5.
The children, too, have the rights to
make their own decisions.
성영제

50. Video Clip – My Sister‟s Keeper (2009)

51. Deaf Choose Deaf?
Story of Lesbian couple
with hearing disorder
Deaf not obstacle

52. Fundamental right
Designer baby ignore the most fundamental right for human

53. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
Designer Babies
Yes or No?
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

54. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
반대의견6
진화론적으로 생물의 다양성을 감소시킨다.
Against #6.
The diversity of living organisms will
decrease from an evolutionary perspective
김승민

55. Evolution Aspects(1)
Designer Baby would be design to have contemporary good
genetic character
Why am I Genetically
looks so fat? Recombine
SLIM
FAT SLIM
SLIM
Now

56. Evolution Aspects(2)
This Unstable gene pool would cause extinction or
bottleneck effect
Only Fat People would
survive in glacial epoch
Glacial Epoch
FAT SLIM
FAT SLIM

57. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
찬성의견6
보기 좋은 떡이...
Designer baby is real evolution
배재완

58. Which world do you want?
VS

59. Which world do you want?
VS

61. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina Park
Final Presentation
CONCLUSION
Yes or No?
강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,
배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균

62. Arguments FOR PGD
Technological prospect
Economic benefits
Parents‟ rights to choose
World full of perfect
people! :)

63. Arguments AGAINST Unreliable technology
“Class” society
Babies = product
EYES
Handicap discrimination
FACE
BODY
Child‟s freedom restrained
IQ
EQ

64. Yes? No? => Need for boundaries
YES NO

65. What‟s Your Verdict?
65