Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study: Sept. 17, 2013 Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee

1. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Fairfax County
Countywide Transit
Network Study
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Transportation Committee
September 17, 2013
Department of Transportation
1

2. Presentation Context
County of Fairfax, Virginia
This presentation summarizes
materials presented at the
July 10, 2013 public workshop
held at the Fairfax County
Government Center.
It also incorporates
subsequent changes made in
response to stakeholder
comment to clarify the
relationship between the
Proposed High Quality Transit
Network Concept and
corridors under current study.
Department of Transportation
2

3. Study Purpose
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Establish most effective way
to serve the County’s needs to
accommodate planned growth
over the long term by
improving public transit
usage.
Update Enhanced Public
Transportation Corridors
(EPTC) with High Quality
Transit Network (HQTN) and
further define modes, right-ofway, and station locations.
Department of Transportation
3

4. Study Process
County of Fairfax, Virginia
We are at the third of our four stages of public
involvement and review:
• Goals/Objectives (July 2012)
• Functions (November 2012)
• Proposed High Quality Transit Network
Concept (July 2013)
• Final Concept (Spring/Summer 2014)
Our next steps are to:
• Continue stakeholder engagement
• Consider refinements
• Develop additional details on
alignments, stations, and costs
• Finalize recommendations
Department of Transportation
4

5. Land Use Concept
County of Fairfax, Virginia
The proposed
2050 High
Quality Transit
Network
supports the
County’s
future
development
concept by
focusing
service on
activity centers
Department of Transportation
5

6. High Quality Transit
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Defining elements of a
High Quality Transit
Network include
providing improved
travel speeds and
reliable travel times,
typically on exclusive
right-of-way.
Commuter rail,
Metrorail, LRT, and
BRT are all examples
of High Quality Transit
modes.
Department of Transportation
6

7. Transit Corridor Function
County of Fairfax, Virginia
The type of premium transit service appropriate for each corridor will
reflect the traveler needs and land use context in that corridor.
Destination corridors, like the Crystal
City Potomac Yards transitway,
connect neighborhoods to multiple
activity centers, functioning primarily to
provide access.
Commuter corridors, like Virginia
Railway Express, primarily serve one
major activity center and tend to focus
on journey-to-work trips and function
primarily to provide mobility.
Source: Center for Transit Oriented Development
Department of Transportation
District circulators, like the planned
Tysons Circulator, enhance mobility
within an activity center or group of
adjacent centers.
7

8. Functional Concepts
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Mobility
Access
The November 2012 public meeting presented different functional concepts for a
High Quality Transit Network. The access focus attracted more total transit riders
whereas the mobility focus provided better access to regional jobs. Both had a
similar benefit in reducing vehicle travel.
Department of Transportation
8

9. Alternative Concepts
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Mobility focus
Connect activity centers
within Fairfax County
and adjacent
jurisdictions with high
speed commuter
corridors that best
serve longer-distance
trips.
Department of Transportation
9

10. Alternative Concepts
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Accessibility focus
Connect activity centers
within Fairfax County and
adjacent jurisdictions with
high access transitways
(light rail or bus rapid
transit) destination
corridors that best serve
shorter-distance trips
Department of Transportation
10

11. Alternative Concepts
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Blended approach
Orange Line Extension
Blend mobility and
accessibility
approaches with Orange
Line Metrorail extension
in I-66 corridor as
envisioned in
Comprehensive Plan
Department of Transportation
11

12. Alternative Concepts
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Blended approach
Blue Line Extension
Blend mobility and
accessibility
approaches with Blue
Line Metrorail extension
in I-95 corridor in
contrast to
Comprehensive Plan
Department of Transportation
12

13. Alternative Concepts
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Constituents value multiple objectives:
• Increase access to destinations
• Include both high demand
commuter and Transit Oriented
Development (TOD) destination
corridors
• Increase transit ridership
• Take cars off the road
• Encourage TOD
• Support Countywide vision for
Four concepts were reviewed in
November. The Proposed High
managed growth
Quality Transit Network Concept
• Be affordable
utilizes the best ideas from each for
• Be understandable/usable
a context-sensitive fit to individual
corridor needs.
• Be connected
Department of Transportation
13

14. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Network Concept
The Proposed High Quality
Transit Network Concept
builds upon the existing and
Constrained Long Range Plan
(CLRP) transit investments to
create an interconnected
network of commuter and
destination corridors,
supported by connecting
express bus routes.
Department of Transportation
14

15. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
Existing High Quality
Transit Network
elements serving Fairfax
County include Metrorail
and VRE with supportive
express bus services on
HOV/HOT lanes.
Department of Transportation
15

16. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
Constrained
Long Range
Plan transit connections
provide starting point for
Proposed HQTN Concept:
• Silver Line (Metrorail)
• Columbia Pike (Streetcar)
• Beauregard/Van Dorn
Transitway (TBD)
Department of Transportation
16

17. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
These concepts are being
coordinated with current
studies:
• Route 1 Alternatives Analysis
• Route 7 Alternatives Analysis
(Tysons to Alexandria)
• Route 7 High Occupancy Toll
Lane Study (North of DTR)
• I-66 Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS)
Tested Transit Network includes modes in ongoing study corridors for complete Network;
Additional coordination and outreach will be needed to develop study recommendations.
Department of Transportation
17

18. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
Commuter Corridors provide
capacity to connect Fairfax
County with other
jurisdictions for longerdistance trips as region
expands over time:
• High Capacity Transit in Orange
Line Corridor
• Metrorail Blue Line Extension
Department of Transportation
18

19. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
Destination Corridors provide
service to support access to
and within transit-oriented
development along linear
corridors:
• Route 1 (Richmond Highway)
High Capacity Transit
• Route 7 High Capacity Transit
east of Tysons
• Route 28 LRT/BRT
• Merrifield/McLean LRT/BRT
Department of Transportation
19

20. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
North-South Express Bus
Services connect activity
centers and transit services
in radial corridors and
provide flexibility for throughrouting:
• I-495 (Beltway) Express
(Enhanced)
• Fairfax County Parkway
• Route 28
• Bus lanes may also include
HOV/HOT
Department of Transportation
20

21. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Proposed Concept Elements
East-West Express Bus
Services support HQTN
services, augment grid of
direct and flexible transit
connections:
• Route 50 – Orange Line bus
bridge function
• Route 236 – continuation of
Alexandria transitway
• Express bus route mileage at
least 50% managed lanes
Department of Transportation
21

22. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Tested Network Elements
Adds: 104 miles and 53 stations to
CLRP
(of which, 61 miles and 35 stations
are in Fairfax County)
The full 104-mile system has:
• 31 miles & 9 Stations Metrorail
• 73 miles & 44 Stations
LRT/BRT
Supported by:
• 114 miles & 21 stations
Express Bus
Final Network Concept to be defined in coordination with ongoing studies.
Department of Transportation
22

23. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Department of Transportation
Measures of Effectiveness
23

24. County of Fairfax, Virginia
Measures of Effectiveness
• Capital cost per
passenger is a measure
of cost effectiveness.
• Higher cost projects can
bear higher capital costs
per passenger due to
operating efficiencies
• New Starts approvals
indicate current
federal/local funding
climate
• Tested Transit Network
projects compare
favorably
Department of Transportation
24

25. Supporting Policies
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Transit-oriented community
designs promote safe and
effective pedestrian and
bicyclist access to stations.
Feeder bus, park and ride
(beyond existing or
TDP/CLRP spaces), and
circulator systems provide
broader access to
commuter services and
increased coverage within
larger activity centers.
Tested Transit Network includes modes in ongoing study corridors to complete network;
Additional coordination and outreach will be needed to develop study recommendations.
Department of Transportation
25

26. Public outreach
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Department of Transportation
26

27. Next Steps
County of Fairfax, Virginia
• Response to comments
and further stakeholder
coordination
• Network refinements
• Evaluation of network
performance
• Mode, ROW, station, and
typical section
requirements
• Implementation phasing,
timing, and funding
strategies
• Comprehensive Plan
Amendment(s)
Department of Transportation
27

28. Questions?
County of Fairfax, Virginia
Thomas Burke (Fairfax County DOT)
thomas.burke@fairfaxcounty.gov
703-877-5600
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/fcdot/2050transitstudy/
http://www.fairfaxcountydot.ideascale.com/
Department of Transportation
28