SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  20
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
1
The Current Situation
•   George Washington Region includes the City of
    Fredericksburg and the Counties of Caroline,                      Existing
                                                                     Congested
    King George, Stafford and Spotsylvania                           Corridors


•   FAMPO area includes the City of Fredericksburg
    and the Counties of Stafford and Spotsylvania

•   FAMPO is governed by a Policy Committee -
    eleven elected and non-elected voting members
     –   Non voting members include:
         •   Caroline and King George Counties
         •   Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
         •   Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation
             (DRPT)
         •   Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board Member

•   Transportation issues exist already and will
    worsen in the future unless addressed
    appropriately




                                                                          1
Long Range Transportation Plan Overview
•   Plan is an update to the 2035 Plan, which
    made major changes to Regional                        Map of
    transportation planning                             the Region


•   Plan addresses the region’s future
    transportation system for all modes
     –   Highways
     –   Bicycles and Pedestrians
     –   Transit and Transportation Demand Management
         (TDM)
     –   Freight
     –   Aviation

•   Plan is comprised of two parts
     –   Needs: not constrained by revenues
     –   Constrained: constrained by forecasted
         revenues

•   Regional dialogue is needed to address the
    constrained plan’s financing assumptions

•   Plan is a significant policy document for the
    region

                                                                2
Historic Growth and Development
•   Region has a population of more than 327,000
    people                                                  Existing
                                                           Population
•   George Washington Region is the fastest-growing in      Density

    Virginia

•   Over 400% increase in Region’s population since
    1970

•   Growth in Spotsylvania and Stafford Counties
     –   70% of all recent residential development in
         the Region has occurred in these counties
     –   75% of the recent commercial development
         has occurred in these counties

•   Recent growth has created opportunities and
    challenges
     –   More services
     –   Increase in home values
                                                         Person Per Square Mile
     –   More jobs                                            0-1,200

     –   More traffic and congestion                          1,201-3,100
                                                              3,101 - 5,800
     –   Increased air pollution                              5,801 - 12,100
     –   Environmental impacts                                12,101 - 23,800



                                                                        3
Future Growth and Development
•   Region is forecasted to grow to about 617,000
                                                                2040
    persons by 2040                                           Population
                                                               Density
•   Region will remain the fastest growing in Virginia

•   Future growth is likely to be low density and
    largely suburban with pockets of density
    identified in local Comprehensive Plans

•   Opportunities will increase
     –   Auto-orientation will remain
     –   Property values are likely to increase
     –   More jobs will come to the Region

•   Challenges will become more acute
     –   Public transportation choices
         will be limited
     –   Transportation funding challenges
         will increase
     –   Congestion will increase                        Person Per Square Mile

     –   Mobility will decrease                               0-1,200
                                                              1,201-3,100
     –   Auto-orientation                                     3,101 - 5,800
                                                              5,801 - 12,100
                                                              12,101 - 23,800


                                                                            4
Land Use and Transportation
•   Regional Land Use Scenario Planning Study
    initiated in 2009
                                                                                                                Future Land Use
•   Purpose of study was to explore and debate local                                                              Assumptions

    and Regional growth visions, their trade-offs and
    alternative futures
•   5 Growth Scenarios examined
    -   Decentralized Growth
    -   Green Print
    -   Compact Centers & Corridors
    -   Jobs/Housing Balance
    -   Comprehensive Plans

•   Comprehensive Plans Scenario used
    as inputs to the FAMPO travel demand
    model to develop 2040 LRTP

                                         Civic & Institutional                Regional Airport

                                         Heavy Industry                       Rural Crossroads

                                         Light Industry                       Rural Living

                                         Large-Lot Residential Neighborhood   Suburban Commercial Center

                                         Metropolitan Center                  Small-Lot Suburban Neighborhood

                                         Multifamily Suburban Neighborhood    Suburban Office Center

                                         Mobile Home Community                Town Center

                                         Military Base                        Transit Oridented Development

                                         Mixed Use Neighborhood               Urban Development Area
                                                                                                                         5
                                         Preserved Open Space                 Working Farm
Land Use and Transportation
•   The State encourages land use considerations in transportation planning

•   Federal Law (“MAP-21”) allows multiple scenarios to be
    considered in MPO Long Range Plans

•   Land use decisions are and will be controlled by local
    governments, while FAMPO has developed an advisory
    Scenario Planning model that is integrated into its
    long range planning process

•   This modeling capability allows the Region and/or local governments to explore the
    implications which different land use patterns and transportation investment strategies
    have on the Region as a whole or on individual localities

•   Example models developed could show potential decreases in highway needs,
    depending on land use policies adopted by local governments

•   Data, models and other tools will continue to be available to local governments for
    their use in local planning efforts



                                                                                              6
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
•   Region faces significant increases in
                                                          2040
    travel demand over the next 27 years            Congestion Levels
                                                     With No Highway
                                                      Improvements
•   Without improvements to the
    transportation system…
     –   Congestion will increase on the region’s
         most important transportation corridors
     –   People’s mobility will be reduced
     –   Region’s economic
         competitiveness may decrease

•   Current funding levels are not
    forecasted to be sufficient to cover
    future transportation needs




                                                               7
Regional Needs Plan
•   Plan is not fiscally constrained

•   Five needs plans were developed (for both Urban and Rural areas)
     –   Highway Needs Plan
     –   Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
     –   Transit and Transportation Demand Management Plan
     –   Freight Plan
     –   Aviation Plan




                                                                       8
Highway Needs
•   Major routes and facilities will struggle to       Regional
                                                       Highway
    meet travelers’ demand                            Needs Plan
     –   Interchanges with I-95
     –   Major corridors such as I-95, US 1, US 17,
         Route 208, Route 630, Route 610…and
         others

•   Many bridges will need rehabilitation
    and/or replacement

•   Highway plan mitigates the majority of
    Regional traffic congestion and other
    transportation issues

•   Carries a significant cost – $12.4 billion
    (includes $365 million of bicycle and
    pedestrian needs Region-wide)




                                                              9
Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs
•   Closely coordinated with the highway plan
                                                 Bicycle and
                                                 Pedestrian
•   Would increase people’s non-vehicular        Needs Plan
    mobility

•   Would close gaps in the existing network

•   Would create a complete system of
    sidewalks, bikeways, trails and other
    facilities




                                                      10
Transit and Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
                         Needs
•   Focused on two different transit markets                Transit and
                                                          Transportation
     –   Regional market: George Washington Region
                                                             Demand
     –   Commuter market: I-95 corridor                    Management
                                                            Needs Plan
•   Increased FRED services in the region
•   Increased commuter services in the I-95 corridor
     –   VRE services increased and service extended to
         Spotsylvania County
     –   Express bus service to Washington DC
         and the Pentagon/Crystal City
     –   Park and ride lot capacity increased
     –   Transit centers created to support park
         and ride lots

•   Current TDM programs augmented
     –   Vanpool and rideshare

•   People’s mobility will increase, but, outside
    the I-95 corridor, congestion will not be
    impacted significantly
•   Overall plan represents a significant
    expenditure – $1.5 billion

                                                               11
Forecasted Needs Plan Outcomes
•   Resulting congestion if all highway
    projects in Needs Plan are built

•   Still some congestion on I-95, primary
    and secondary routes in the urbanized
    area

•   Very little congestion in rural area




                                               12
Financially Constrained Plan
•   Recommended improvements are
    revenue constrained                              Transportation Revenue and Cost Summary
                                                                     Transportation Needs
•   Extent of projects is limited                                 Area
                                            Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian
                                                                                                         Cost*
                                                                                                      $10,781,338,000
                                            Non-Urban Highway/Bicycle and Pedestrian                   $1,428,199,000
•   Many of the Region’s highways will      Subtotal Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs            $12,209,537,000

    remain congested                        Transit/TDM Operations                                       $608,800,000
                                            Transit/TDM Capital                                          $896,900,000
•   Fewer pedestrian and bicycle projects   Subtotal Transit/TDM Needs                                 $1,505,700,000

    will be implemented                     2040 Total Needs                                          $13,715,237,000

                                                                   Transportation Revenues
•   Less transit service and fewer TDM                            Area                             Revenue Forecast
    programs will be operated               Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian                     $1,202,411,000
                                            I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes                                        $2,119,555,000
                                            Non-Urban Highway/Bicycle and Pedestrian                    $250,000,000
                                            Subtotal Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian                  $3,571,966,000
                                            Revenues

                                            Transit/TDM Operations                                       $247,990,000
                                            Transit/TDM Capital                                           $80,948,000
                                            Subtotal Transit/TDM Revenues                                $328,938,000

                                            2040 Total Revenues                                        $3,900,904,000

                                                               Transportation Funding Summary
                                            Total Needs                                               $13,715,237,000
                                            Total Revenues                                             $3,900,904,000
                                                                                                    $9,814,333,000
                                            Funding Shortfall
                                            Note: *Costs are inflated at 3% annually to the needed year of
                                            implementation
                                                                                                              13
Constrained Highway and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans
•   Projects identified based on fiscal constraint and prioritization
•   Prioritization methodology adopted by the FAMPO Policy Committee
•   Ranks projects based on factors
     –   Current and Future Congestion
     –   Safety and Security
     –   Environmental Impact
     –   Public and Community Support
     –   Ease of Implementation and Funding
     –   Economic Growth and Efficient Land Use

•   Approximately $3.3 billion available for projects (including $2.1 billion for
    HOT/HOV Lane projects)




                                                                                    14
Constrained Highway and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans
•   Address congestion and mobility in a limited area

•   Considerable investment in transportation regionally

•   $ 138.6 million reserved for smaller-scale projects             Constrained
                                                                    Highway Plan

•   Fully-funded high profile projects
     –   I-95 Express Lanes
     –   Reconstruction/relocation of the I-95/Route 630
     –   Replacement of the Falmouth Bridge on U.S. 1
     –   Completion of Fall Hill Avenue improvements
     –   Extension of Mary Washington Boulevard
     –   Widening of U.S. 17 (Stafford and Spotsylvania Counties)
     –   Improvements to Onville Road

•   Significant Projects for Engineering and Studies
     –   I-95 Rappahannock River Crossing
     –   I-95 improvements in the Jackson Gateway
         area of Spotsylvania County
     –   Improvements to Lafayette Boulevard
     –   Widening of U.S. 1 (Regionwide)




                                                                                   15
Forecasted Constrained Highway Plan Outcomes
•   Resulting highway congestion if all projects in
    the Constrained Plan are built

•   Still significant congestion on I-95, US Routes
    1 & 17, as well as a number of primary and
    secondary routes throughout the FAMPO Area




                                                      16
Forecasted Constrained Transit and TDM Plan
                         Outcomes
•   Virginia Railway Express
     –   Extension of service to Spotsylvania County


•   FRED
     –   Due to financial constraints, FRED service remains
         constant

    Park and Ride Expansion
     –   Consolidation of park and ride lots
         with expansions to remaining lots
     –   4,000 new parking spaces created


•   Transportation Demand Management
    Improvements
     –   Capital assistance for vanpools
     –   Increased guaranteed ride home program
     –   Carpool and vanpool incentives
         (for riders and drivers)
     –   Marketing initiatives




                                                              17
Comment on the Plan
•   Public comment period for the LRTP is from January 29, 2013 to March 18, 2013

•   Please submit your input via the following:
     – USPS: 406 Princess Anne Street, Fredericksburg, VA 22401

     –    Website: http://www.fampo.gwregion.org/public-notices or
         http://www.fampo.gwregion.org/transportation-planning-documents/long-range-
         transportation-planning

     – Email: fampo@gwregion.org

     – Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FAMPO1VA

     – In person: During the public hearing scheduled to earlier than 7:10 p.m. on March 18,
       2013.

•   A public hearing to adopt the final LRTP will be held on March 18, 2013




                                                                                         18
20

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Map 21 webinar 081312
Map 21 webinar 081312Map 21 webinar 081312
Map 21 webinar 081312AmericaBikes
 
Rural Transportation Planning Trends and Issues
Rural Transportation Planning Trends and IssuesRural Transportation Planning Trends and Issues
Rural Transportation Planning Trends and IssuesRPO America
 
Transit supportive guidelines overview
Transit supportive guidelines   overviewTransit supportive guidelines   overview
Transit supportive guidelines overviewOntarioEast
 
CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.
CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.
CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.OV Consulting
 
Port Royal Community Plan
Port Royal Community PlanPort Royal Community Plan
Port Royal Community PlanGary Mitchell
 
Creating great neighborhoods along el camino real
Creating great neighborhoods along el camino realCreating great neighborhoods along el camino real
Creating great neighborhoods along el camino realgbeltalliance
 
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016Fairfax County
 
Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...
Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...
Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...Environmental Initiative
 
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016Fairfax County
 
Show me the money apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money apa presentation 9-17-10SJO Land Consultants LLC
 
MAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack Schenendorf
MAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack SchenendorfMAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack Schenendorf
MAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack Schenendorfnssga
 

Tendances (15)

Map 21 webinar 081312
Map 21 webinar 081312Map 21 webinar 081312
Map 21 webinar 081312
 
Rural Transportation Planning Trends and Issues
Rural Transportation Planning Trends and IssuesRural Transportation Planning Trends and Issues
Rural Transportation Planning Trends and Issues
 
Transit supportive guidelines overview
Transit supportive guidelines   overviewTransit supportive guidelines   overview
Transit supportive guidelines overview
 
CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.
CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.
CDOT Presentation given at Statewide Transit Plan MPO Meetings Spring 2014.
 
Jnnurm uig overview
Jnnurm uig overviewJnnurm uig overview
Jnnurm uig overview
 
Amrut ppt
Amrut pptAmrut ppt
Amrut ppt
 
Port Royal Community Plan
Port Royal Community PlanPort Royal Community Plan
Port Royal Community Plan
 
Creating great neighborhoods along el camino real
Creating great neighborhoods along el camino realCreating great neighborhoods along el camino real
Creating great neighborhoods along el camino real
 
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Dec. 13, 2016
 
Grid Un-Locked - Week 2
Grid Un-Locked - Week 2Grid Un-Locked - Week 2
Grid Un-Locked - Week 2
 
Grid Un-Locked - Week 1
Grid Un-Locked - Week 1Grid Un-Locked - Week 1
Grid Un-Locked - Week 1
 
Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...
Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...
Policy Forum Series: Zimmerman - Transit Oriented Development-Addressing the ...
 
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016
Reston Transportation Funding Plan: Funding Scenarios Continued: Sept. 26, 2016
 
Show me the money apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money apa presentation 9-17-10
 
MAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack Schenendorf
MAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack SchenendorfMAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack Schenendorf
MAP-21: What's in it for my business? presented by Jack Schenendorf
 

Similaire à 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary

LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...
LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...
LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...LTC @ CSUSB
 
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview PresentationYour Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview PresentationMarti Donley
 
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.132040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13CHCRPA
 
Sustainable transportation for smart cities
Sustainable transportation for smart citiesSustainable transportation for smart cities
Sustainable transportation for smart citiesJIT KUMAR GUPTA
 
P L A N 2040 April May Online Public Meeting
P L A N 2040  April  May  Online  Public  MeetingP L A N 2040  April  May  Online  Public  Meeting
P L A N 2040 April May Online Public MeetingARC
 
Plan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and Goals
Plan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and GoalsPlan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and Goals
Plan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and GoalsARC
 
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingPlan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingARC
 
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingPlan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingARC
 
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingPlan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingguest95dd2e1
 
Planning Partnerships in No. Arizona
Planning Partnerships in No. ArizonaPlanning Partnerships in No. Arizona
Planning Partnerships in No. ArizonaRPO America
 
Sarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility Study
Sarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility StudySarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility Study
Sarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility StudyGrowSmart Maine
 
Visualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft Plan
Visualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft PlanVisualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft Plan
Visualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft PlanFairfax County
 
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and TransportationPlanning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and TransportationRPO America
 
Cities, Suburbs, the Region and Hinterland
Cities, Suburbs, the Region and HinterlandCities, Suburbs, the Region and Hinterland
Cities, Suburbs, the Region and HinterlandGAURAV. H .TANDON
 
Warner Robins MSA: Potential Market for Industry and Technology Corridor
Warner Robins MSA:  Potential Market for Industry and Technology CorridorWarner Robins MSA:  Potential Market for Industry and Technology Corridor
Warner Robins MSA: Potential Market for Industry and Technology CorridorShermaine M. Perry, MPA
 
Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable
Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable
Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Tom Christoffel
 
South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)
South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)
South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)Travel Oregon
 

Similaire à 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary (20)

LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...
LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...
LTC, Jack R. Widmeyer Transportation Research Conference, Going to San Bernar...
 
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview PresentationYour Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation
Your Vision, Our Future - General Overview Presentation
 
Hull rpo2012
Hull rpo2012Hull rpo2012
Hull rpo2012
 
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.132040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
2040 RTP Leadership Symposium II 3.13.13
 
Sustainable transportation for smart cities
Sustainable transportation for smart citiesSustainable transportation for smart cities
Sustainable transportation for smart cities
 
P L A N 2040 April May Online Public Meeting
P L A N 2040  April  May  Online  Public  MeetingP L A N 2040  April  May  Online  Public  Meeting
P L A N 2040 April May Online Public Meeting
 
Plan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and Goals
Plan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and GoalsPlan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and Goals
Plan 2040 Online Public Meeting #1: Vision and Goals
 
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingPlan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
 
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingPlan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
 
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meetingPlan 2040 april may online public meeting
Plan 2040 april may online public meeting
 
Rolling Climate Change, Transportation & Land Use Planning into One Innovativ...
Rolling Climate Change, Transportation & Land Use Planning into One Innovativ...Rolling Climate Change, Transportation & Land Use Planning into One Innovativ...
Rolling Climate Change, Transportation & Land Use Planning into One Innovativ...
 
Planning Partnerships in No. Arizona
Planning Partnerships in No. ArizonaPlanning Partnerships in No. Arizona
Planning Partnerships in No. Arizona
 
Urbanization in Pakistan
Urbanization in PakistanUrbanization in Pakistan
Urbanization in Pakistan
 
Sarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility Study
Sarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility StudySarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility Study
Sarah Devlin - Gorham East West Corridor Feasibility Study
 
Visualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft Plan
Visualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft PlanVisualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft Plan
Visualize 2045: Highlights from the Draft Plan
 
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and TransportationPlanning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
Planning Tools for Linking Rural Development and Transportation
 
Cities, Suburbs, the Region and Hinterland
Cities, Suburbs, the Region and HinterlandCities, Suburbs, the Region and Hinterland
Cities, Suburbs, the Region and Hinterland
 
Warner Robins MSA: Potential Market for Industry and Technology Corridor
Warner Robins MSA:  Potential Market for Industry and Technology CorridorWarner Robins MSA:  Potential Market for Industry and Technology Corridor
Warner Robins MSA: Potential Market for Industry and Technology Corridor
 
Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable
Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable
Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable
 
South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)
South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)
South Lincoln county, Workshop Presentation (Feb 28, 2012)
 

Plus de Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (8)

Potomac Heritage National ScenicTrail Presentation
Potomac Heritage National ScenicTrail PresentationPotomac Heritage National ScenicTrail Presentation
Potomac Heritage National ScenicTrail Presentation
 
Federal Transportation Reauthorization Update
Federal Transportation Reauthorization UpdateFederal Transportation Reauthorization Update
Federal Transportation Reauthorization Update
 
HB2 District Grant Program Allocation Formula
HB2 District Grant Program Allocation FormulaHB2 District Grant Program Allocation Formula
HB2 District Grant Program Allocation Formula
 
95 Express Lanes Update
95 Express Lanes Update95 Express Lanes Update
95 Express Lanes Update
 
FAMPO Update on I-95 Corridor Study Phase I
FAMPO Update on I-95 Corridor Study Phase IFAMPO Update on I-95 Corridor Study Phase I
FAMPO Update on I-95 Corridor Study Phase I
 
FAMPO House Bill 2 Updates and Draft Funding Plan
FAMPO House Bill 2 Updates and Draft Funding PlanFAMPO House Bill 2 Updates and Draft Funding Plan
FAMPO House Bill 2 Updates and Draft Funding Plan
 
FAMPO FY 2017-2022 CMAQ/RSTP Program Development
FAMPO FY 2017-2022 CMAQ/RSTP Program DevelopmentFAMPO FY 2017-2022 CMAQ/RSTP Program Development
FAMPO FY 2017-2022 CMAQ/RSTP Program Development
 
Draft 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
Draft 2040 Long Range Transportation PlanDraft 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
Draft 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
 

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary

  • 1. 1
  • 2. The Current Situation • George Washington Region includes the City of Fredericksburg and the Counties of Caroline, Existing Congested King George, Stafford and Spotsylvania Corridors • FAMPO area includes the City of Fredericksburg and the Counties of Stafford and Spotsylvania • FAMPO is governed by a Policy Committee - eleven elected and non-elected voting members – Non voting members include: • Caroline and King George Counties • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) • Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) • Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board Member • Transportation issues exist already and will worsen in the future unless addressed appropriately 1
  • 3. Long Range Transportation Plan Overview • Plan is an update to the 2035 Plan, which made major changes to Regional Map of transportation planning the Region • Plan addresses the region’s future transportation system for all modes – Highways – Bicycles and Pedestrians – Transit and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) – Freight – Aviation • Plan is comprised of two parts – Needs: not constrained by revenues – Constrained: constrained by forecasted revenues • Regional dialogue is needed to address the constrained plan’s financing assumptions • Plan is a significant policy document for the region 2
  • 4. Historic Growth and Development • Region has a population of more than 327,000 people Existing Population • George Washington Region is the fastest-growing in Density Virginia • Over 400% increase in Region’s population since 1970 • Growth in Spotsylvania and Stafford Counties – 70% of all recent residential development in the Region has occurred in these counties – 75% of the recent commercial development has occurred in these counties • Recent growth has created opportunities and challenges – More services – Increase in home values Person Per Square Mile – More jobs 0-1,200 – More traffic and congestion 1,201-3,100 3,101 - 5,800 – Increased air pollution 5,801 - 12,100 – Environmental impacts 12,101 - 23,800 3
  • 5. Future Growth and Development • Region is forecasted to grow to about 617,000 2040 persons by 2040 Population Density • Region will remain the fastest growing in Virginia • Future growth is likely to be low density and largely suburban with pockets of density identified in local Comprehensive Plans • Opportunities will increase – Auto-orientation will remain – Property values are likely to increase – More jobs will come to the Region • Challenges will become more acute – Public transportation choices will be limited – Transportation funding challenges will increase – Congestion will increase Person Per Square Mile – Mobility will decrease 0-1,200 1,201-3,100 – Auto-orientation 3,101 - 5,800 5,801 - 12,100 12,101 - 23,800 4
  • 6. Land Use and Transportation • Regional Land Use Scenario Planning Study initiated in 2009 Future Land Use • Purpose of study was to explore and debate local Assumptions and Regional growth visions, their trade-offs and alternative futures • 5 Growth Scenarios examined - Decentralized Growth - Green Print - Compact Centers & Corridors - Jobs/Housing Balance - Comprehensive Plans • Comprehensive Plans Scenario used as inputs to the FAMPO travel demand model to develop 2040 LRTP Civic & Institutional Regional Airport Heavy Industry Rural Crossroads Light Industry Rural Living Large-Lot Residential Neighborhood Suburban Commercial Center Metropolitan Center Small-Lot Suburban Neighborhood Multifamily Suburban Neighborhood Suburban Office Center Mobile Home Community Town Center Military Base Transit Oridented Development Mixed Use Neighborhood Urban Development Area 5 Preserved Open Space Working Farm
  • 7. Land Use and Transportation • The State encourages land use considerations in transportation planning • Federal Law (“MAP-21”) allows multiple scenarios to be considered in MPO Long Range Plans • Land use decisions are and will be controlled by local governments, while FAMPO has developed an advisory Scenario Planning model that is integrated into its long range planning process • This modeling capability allows the Region and/or local governments to explore the implications which different land use patterns and transportation investment strategies have on the Region as a whole or on individual localities • Example models developed could show potential decreases in highway needs, depending on land use policies adopted by local governments • Data, models and other tools will continue to be available to local governments for their use in local planning efforts 6
  • 8. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan • Region faces significant increases in 2040 travel demand over the next 27 years Congestion Levels With No Highway Improvements • Without improvements to the transportation system… – Congestion will increase on the region’s most important transportation corridors – People’s mobility will be reduced – Region’s economic competitiveness may decrease • Current funding levels are not forecasted to be sufficient to cover future transportation needs 7
  • 9. Regional Needs Plan • Plan is not fiscally constrained • Five needs plans were developed (for both Urban and Rural areas) – Highway Needs Plan – Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Transit and Transportation Demand Management Plan – Freight Plan – Aviation Plan 8
  • 10. Highway Needs • Major routes and facilities will struggle to Regional Highway meet travelers’ demand Needs Plan – Interchanges with I-95 – Major corridors such as I-95, US 1, US 17, Route 208, Route 630, Route 610…and others • Many bridges will need rehabilitation and/or replacement • Highway plan mitigates the majority of Regional traffic congestion and other transportation issues • Carries a significant cost – $12.4 billion (includes $365 million of bicycle and pedestrian needs Region-wide) 9
  • 11. Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs • Closely coordinated with the highway plan Bicycle and Pedestrian • Would increase people’s non-vehicular Needs Plan mobility • Would close gaps in the existing network • Would create a complete system of sidewalks, bikeways, trails and other facilities 10
  • 12. Transit and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Needs • Focused on two different transit markets Transit and Transportation – Regional market: George Washington Region Demand – Commuter market: I-95 corridor Management Needs Plan • Increased FRED services in the region • Increased commuter services in the I-95 corridor – VRE services increased and service extended to Spotsylvania County – Express bus service to Washington DC and the Pentagon/Crystal City – Park and ride lot capacity increased – Transit centers created to support park and ride lots • Current TDM programs augmented – Vanpool and rideshare • People’s mobility will increase, but, outside the I-95 corridor, congestion will not be impacted significantly • Overall plan represents a significant expenditure – $1.5 billion 11
  • 13. Forecasted Needs Plan Outcomes • Resulting congestion if all highway projects in Needs Plan are built • Still some congestion on I-95, primary and secondary routes in the urbanized area • Very little congestion in rural area 12
  • 14. Financially Constrained Plan • Recommended improvements are revenue constrained Transportation Revenue and Cost Summary Transportation Needs • Extent of projects is limited Area Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian Cost* $10,781,338,000 Non-Urban Highway/Bicycle and Pedestrian $1,428,199,000 • Many of the Region’s highways will Subtotal Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs $12,209,537,000 remain congested Transit/TDM Operations $608,800,000 Transit/TDM Capital $896,900,000 • Fewer pedestrian and bicycle projects Subtotal Transit/TDM Needs $1,505,700,000 will be implemented 2040 Total Needs $13,715,237,000 Transportation Revenues • Less transit service and fewer TDM Area Revenue Forecast programs will be operated Urban Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian $1,202,411,000 I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes $2,119,555,000 Non-Urban Highway/Bicycle and Pedestrian $250,000,000 Subtotal Highways/Bicycle and Pedestrian $3,571,966,000 Revenues Transit/TDM Operations $247,990,000 Transit/TDM Capital $80,948,000 Subtotal Transit/TDM Revenues $328,938,000 2040 Total Revenues $3,900,904,000 Transportation Funding Summary Total Needs $13,715,237,000 Total Revenues $3,900,904,000 $9,814,333,000 Funding Shortfall Note: *Costs are inflated at 3% annually to the needed year of implementation 13
  • 15. Constrained Highway and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans • Projects identified based on fiscal constraint and prioritization • Prioritization methodology adopted by the FAMPO Policy Committee • Ranks projects based on factors – Current and Future Congestion – Safety and Security – Environmental Impact – Public and Community Support – Ease of Implementation and Funding – Economic Growth and Efficient Land Use • Approximately $3.3 billion available for projects (including $2.1 billion for HOT/HOV Lane projects) 14
  • 16. Constrained Highway and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans • Address congestion and mobility in a limited area • Considerable investment in transportation regionally • $ 138.6 million reserved for smaller-scale projects Constrained Highway Plan • Fully-funded high profile projects – I-95 Express Lanes – Reconstruction/relocation of the I-95/Route 630 – Replacement of the Falmouth Bridge on U.S. 1 – Completion of Fall Hill Avenue improvements – Extension of Mary Washington Boulevard – Widening of U.S. 17 (Stafford and Spotsylvania Counties) – Improvements to Onville Road • Significant Projects for Engineering and Studies – I-95 Rappahannock River Crossing – I-95 improvements in the Jackson Gateway area of Spotsylvania County – Improvements to Lafayette Boulevard – Widening of U.S. 1 (Regionwide) 15
  • 17. Forecasted Constrained Highway Plan Outcomes • Resulting highway congestion if all projects in the Constrained Plan are built • Still significant congestion on I-95, US Routes 1 & 17, as well as a number of primary and secondary routes throughout the FAMPO Area 16
  • 18. Forecasted Constrained Transit and TDM Plan Outcomes • Virginia Railway Express – Extension of service to Spotsylvania County • FRED – Due to financial constraints, FRED service remains constant Park and Ride Expansion – Consolidation of park and ride lots with expansions to remaining lots – 4,000 new parking spaces created • Transportation Demand Management Improvements – Capital assistance for vanpools – Increased guaranteed ride home program – Carpool and vanpool incentives (for riders and drivers) – Marketing initiatives 17
  • 19. Comment on the Plan • Public comment period for the LRTP is from January 29, 2013 to March 18, 2013 • Please submit your input via the following: – USPS: 406 Princess Anne Street, Fredericksburg, VA 22401 – Website: http://www.fampo.gwregion.org/public-notices or http://www.fampo.gwregion.org/transportation-planning-documents/long-range- transportation-planning – Email: fampo@gwregion.org – Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FAMPO1VA – In person: During the public hearing scheduled to earlier than 7:10 p.m. on March 18, 2013. • A public hearing to adopt the final LRTP will be held on March 18, 2013 18
  • 20. 20