SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  32
The British Film Industry – SECTION A LO:  To identify who does what within the British Film industry (PRODUCERS) LO:  To evaluate how the British Film industry competes globally (AUDIENCE) and retains profitability Thinking question:  Why have a British film industry?
Who does what in the British Film Industry? Aims to  support,  develop and  promote  the art forms of the moving image  An independent, non-governmental body which  classifies  and  censors  film, video as well as computer and console-based games released in the UK. The official UK agency for international cultural relations. Its Film Department  promotes new British films  (features and shorts),  internationally  principally through festivals and showcases.  Promotes understanding and appreciation of Britain's rich film and  television heritage  and culture.  Government backed lead agency for film in the UK ensuring that the  economic, cultural and educational aspects of film are effectively represented  at home and abroad.
Main British Production Companies Can you name films by these production companies? Ext:  Who dominates the  UK film industry?
How do British films compete globally? Ext:  How are they distinct from Hollywood blockbusters?
Most bankable star?
The Top 10 list as of 2009 (in order of 'bankable' value): 1.  Will Smith 2.  Johnny Depp 3.  Brad Pitt 4.  Tom Hanks 5.  George Clooney 6.  Will Ferrell 7.  Reese Witherspoon 8.  Nicolas Cage 9.  Leonardo DiCaprio 10.  Russell Crowe
Weekend 20 Mar - 22 Mar 2009 UK box office Rank Title Country of Origin Weekend Gross Distributor % change on last week Weeks on release Number of cinemas Site average Total Gross to date 1 Marley & Me USA £2,166,270 20th Century Fox -51 2 476 £4,551 £8,164,343 2 Paul Blart: Mall Cop USA £1,289,513 Sony Pictures 1 375 £3,439 £1,289,513 3 Duplicity USA £796,244 Universal 1 356 £2,237 £796,244 4 Lesbian Vampire Killers UK £648,634 Momentum 1 362 £1,792 £648,634 5 Watchmen USA/Can £594,510 Paramount -58 3 381 £1,560 £7,556,596 6 Gran Torino USA £484,808 Warner Bros. -41 5 311 £1,559 £6,659,193 7 Slumdog Millionaire UK £416,356 Pathé -45 11 384 £1,084 £30,471,084 8 The Young Victoria UK £387,399 Momentum -39 3 379 £1,022 £3,550,675 9 Bolt USA £201,250 Disney -58 6 441 £456 £17,546,419 10 Bronson UK £161,880 Vertigo -37 2 109 £1,485 £581,211 11 Confessions of a Shopaholic USA £158,414 Disney -63 5 307 £516 £8,051,255 12 The Unborn USA £126,630 Universal -68 4 188 £674 £3,669,708 13 Hotel for Dogs USA/Ger £119,041 Paramount -58 6 404 £295 £6,670,932 14 The Age of Stupid UK £101,752 Dogwoof 1 20 £5,088 £101,752 15 Il Divo Ita/Fra £71,952 Artificial Eye 1 30 £2,398 £71,952   Total   £7,724,653       4,523  £1,708 £95,829,511
Find star struck article from pack: Read and underline evidence for stars attracting an audience and star persona Answer this: How much do you agree with  ‘ Hollywood films have movie stars.  That’s why they are more appealing to UK audiences than UK films.’
Starter task: WITHOUT LOOKING LIST: 1.  The  5 main film bodies  in the UK who oversee the production, promotion and classification of UK films (ext:  explain what each do) 2.  The  5 main production companies  and  five films  they have made
HOMEWORK: Brit-flick Kick-Ass tops US box office I want you to find out why On paper/blog post a detailed response and as much evidence as you can find Consider:  Why is it deemed a Brit-flick? Who stars it in and how has this helped it succeed How was it marketed? Who distributed the film? We will feedback next Tuesday
RECAP What do stars bring to a film? Why do Producers use certain stars?
RECAP What do stars bring to a film? Why do Producers use certain stars? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
How else do British films compete globally?
GENRE  as a tool How does  genre  help sell films? Genre helps to meet  audience expectations .  If the audience can assume the genre from the trailer, film posters etc, they can make an informed judgement on whether they wish to see it or not.  If their expectations are met, they are satisfied and will recommend the film to others, leading to higher box office figures. An example of misleading genre expectations: By 2006, Julia Roberts’ 31 films had grossed over $2 billion and she had been involved in more $100 million movies than any other female star BUT Julia Roberts and Mona Lisa Smile Budget $65 million (large chunk of which was Robert’s fee) North American gross $63 million WHY???  Not a typical Hollywood model ending which led to younger audiences being left unsatisfied and no love interests featured to drive the romance of the story.
Working Title formula for the ultimate ROMCOM Using stars and genre to maximum effect Combine 2 popular genres – Hybrid – ROMANCE & COMEDY Deemed ‘chick-flick’ with a large female audience – so a strong female lead Richard Curtis – screenwriter – linked to this genre Hugh Grant – likeable and adaptable This led to securing Julia Roberts (one of the most bankable stars) and succeeded in making
Now I want you to find a recent successful film that has used genre and stars effectively: Note down: The stars The genre The Production Budget The Gross takings And anything else that you think made it successful (consider marketing, distribution company etc)
Weekend 9-11 April UK box office – audience consumption http://infidelmovie.com/landing-trailer/
End thought: Would the world be different if we relied only on the American film industry?
British cinema since 2000:  The new century has so far been a relatively successful one for the British film industry. Many British films have found a wide international audience, and some of the independent production companies, such asWorking Title, have secured financing and distribution deals with major American studios. Working Title scored three major international successes, all starring Hugh Grant, with the romantic comedies  Bridget Jones's Diary (2001), which grossed $254 million worldwide; the sequel Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, which earned $228 million; and Richard Curtis's directorial debut Love Actually (2003), which grossed $239 million. At the same time, critically-acclaimed films such as Gosford Park (2001), Pride and Prejudice (2005), The Constant Gardener (2005), The Queen (2006) and The Last King of Scotland (2006) also brought prestige to the British film industry. Although all of these films were financed and distributed by American film companies, so there was little financial benefit to the industry itself.
In 2008, British releases included the costume dramas  The Duchess and Brideshead Revisited, the documentary Man On Wire and a new comedy-drama from Mike Leigh Happy Go Lucky. However the year was dominated by a single film: Slumdog Millionaire, an Indian story that was filmed entirely in Mumbai with a mostly Indian cast, though with a British director (Danny Boyle), producer (Christian Colson), screenwriter (Simon Beaufoy) and star (Dev Patel) and the film was all-British financed via Film4 and Celador. Slumdog Millionaire has received worldwide critical acclaim. It has won four Golden Globes, seven BAFTA Awards and eight Academy Awards, including Best Director and Best Film. This was the first entirely-British financed film since Hamlet in 1948 to win the Best Picture Oscar.
Despite increasing competition from film studios in Australia and Eastern Europe (especially the Czech Republic), British studios such as Pinewood, Shepperton and Leavesden remained successful in hosting major foreign productions such as  Finding Neverland, V for Vendetta, Closer, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Corpse Bride, United 93, The Phantom of the Opera, The Golden Compass, Sweeney Todd, Mamma Mia!, The Wolf Man, Fantastic Mr. Fox and Nine.The film industry remains an important earner for the British economy.
Tug used search marketing for Slumdog Millionaire’s UK Launch  Tug used search marketing to create online awareness & user engagement for Slumdog Millionaire’s UK launch   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PR Log (Press Release) – Mar 13, 2009 – Tug, an independent search engine marketing agency located in Shoreditch, London, recently impressed Pathe’s UK marketing team with the ability of PPC and SEO to play a key role in the film release marketing mix. Pathe approached Tug to use search engine marketing to drive targeted awareness, engagement and relevant traffic within a tight budget, for their new release, Slumdog Millionaire. December 08, Tug launched a PPC campaign across the major UK search engines targeting UK movie goers, the niche Indian market and independent film enthusiasts. Using a combination of keyword testing & bid management and ad testing & copy optimisation, Tug increased click throughs and drove the cost per click down throughout the campaign. Tug also used SEO techniques to optimise the film’s flash microsite. A short link building campaign was put in place to get the site to top position for ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ searches in the UK. In addition, Tug launched a banner campaign across the Google content network of websites on a cost per click model. Standard banners as well as click to play video ads were served on relevant sites targeted at the chosen audiences. The cost model meant that banner impressions and even the trailers viewed within them were free – making awareness and engagement free. Ultimately Tug drove over 75,000 new visitors to the Slumdog Microsite, displayed the trailer online 73,000 times and served over 21 Million ad impressions for only £13,000 over a 5 week burst. Pathe are pleased with their first foray into search marketing and are working with Tug to develop a search marketing toolkit for subsequent film releases in the UK.
This research uncovered an audience typology that helped to inform the department’s ongoing audience development activities. Briefly, the cinema types uncovered were as follows:  Mainstream : unlikely ever to view anything other than major ‘Hollywood’ style blockbusters.  Mainstream plus : generally mainstream, but apt to see less mainstream films on a few occasions.  Aficionados : tend to view a mix of films, including major foreign language titles, and can be encouraged to become even more adventurous in their viewing choices.  Film Buffs1 : eschew mainstream films in favour of more extreme, esoteric, challenging and difficult subject matter (specialised) films.  AUDIENCE TYPES
Other UK films – 9-11 April 2010
Now answer this question: Looking at the evidence, is the UK film industry attracting the mainstream audiences as well as last year?
Questions for Box Office results ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
HOMEWORK Case Study Article ,[object Object],[object Object]
Facts in focus •  UK cinema admissions reached 162 million, up 4% on 2006. •  Box office receipts were £821 million, up 8% on 2006. •  516 films were released for a week or more in the UK and Republic  of Ireland, an increase of 2% on 2006 and 58% more than in 1998. •  UK films, including co-productions, accounted for 21% of releases and 29% of the market by value, up 10% on last year. •  The top 100 films earned almost 91% of the gross box office, 2% more than in 2006.
[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
CULTURAL TEST ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
How dominant is British Film in the industry? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Contenu connexe

Tendances

What is a british film funding
What is a british film   fundingWhat is a british film   funding
What is a british film fundingNaamah Hill
 
British film industry and technology
British film industry and technologyBritish film industry and technology
British film industry and technologyjphibbert
 
Working Title Case Study
Working Title Case StudyWorking Title Case Study
Working Title Case Studykingedmedia
 
British film vs american film
British film vs american filmBritish film vs american film
British film vs american filmA2mediashola
 
Working Title Films
Working Title FilmsWorking Title Films
Working Title Filmsheadacheau
 
Working title history
Working title historyWorking title history
Working title historyguestaaaa19
 
UK cinema Warp films & Working titles
UK cinema Warp films & Working titlesUK cinema Warp films & Working titles
UK cinema Warp films & Working titlesHamza94
 
What determines a british film
What determines a british filmWhat determines a british film
What determines a british filmCaponEmily
 
Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1
Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1
Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1Ms Olive
 
Working title films[1]
Working title films[1]Working title films[1]
Working title films[1]ecclestona
 
Warp Films and working title films
Warp Films  and working title films Warp Films  and working title films
Warp Films and working title films CaponEmily
 
G322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revisionG322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revisionMrSouthworth
 
US Film Industry 2016
US Film Industry 2016US Film Industry 2016
US Film Industry 2016Naamah Hill
 
Working title presentation
Working title presentationWorking title presentation
Working title presentationhallidayhannah
 
This is england case study more
This is england case study moreThis is england case study more
This is england case study moreNicolavickery
 

Tendances (20)

What is a british film funding
What is a british film   fundingWhat is a british film   funding
What is a british film funding
 
British film industry and technology
British film industry and technologyBritish film industry and technology
British film industry and technology
 
Working Title Case Study
Working Title Case StudyWorking Title Case Study
Working Title Case Study
 
British film vs american film
British film vs american filmBritish film vs american film
British film vs american film
 
Working title
Working titleWorking title
Working title
 
Working Title Films
Working Title FilmsWorking Title Films
Working Title Films
 
Working title history
Working title historyWorking title history
Working title history
 
UK cinema Warp films & Working titles
UK cinema Warp films & Working titlesUK cinema Warp films & Working titles
UK cinema Warp films & Working titles
 
Working title films
Working title filmsWorking title films
Working title films
 
Working title
Working titleWorking title
Working title
 
G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked
G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That RockedG322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked
G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked
 
What determines a british film
What determines a british filmWhat determines a british film
What determines a british film
 
Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1
Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1
Hollywood golden era and contemporary Hollywood 1
 
Working title films[1]
Working title films[1]Working title films[1]
Working title films[1]
 
Warp Films and working title films
Warp Films  and working title films Warp Films  and working title films
Warp Films and working title films
 
G322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revisionG322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revision
 
Film 4 part 1
Film 4   part 1Film 4   part 1
Film 4 part 1
 
US Film Industry 2016
US Film Industry 2016US Film Industry 2016
US Film Industry 2016
 
Working title presentation
Working title presentationWorking title presentation
Working title presentation
 
This is england case study more
This is england case study moreThis is england case study more
This is england case study more
 

Similaire à The british film industry 2 SECTION A

Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210banksryan4
 
The uk film industry as film studies
The uk film industry as film studiesThe uk film industry as film studies
The uk film industry as film studiestcasman
 
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)cskinner1
 
Warp and Working Titles
Warp and Working TitlesWarp and Working Titles
Warp and Working TitlesEllieWeedon
 
Working Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan BanksWorking Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan Banksbanksryan4
 
Working titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPWorking titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPtaliasmith
 
Film distribution hand out
Film distribution hand outFilm distribution hand out
Film distribution hand outhasnmedia
 
Distribution lesson1 24.11.11
Distribution lesson1 24.11.11Distribution lesson1 24.11.11
Distribution lesson1 24.11.11Shaun Grimsley
 
British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)Armthorpe Media
 
Revision working title and tbtr
Revision   working title and tbtrRevision   working title and tbtr
Revision working title and tbtrlatymermedia
 
Dredd and some stuff stolen from another teacher
Dredd and some stuff stolen from another teacherDredd and some stuff stolen from another teacher
Dredd and some stuff stolen from another teacherMr Smith
 
British film companies working titles
British film companies working titlesBritish film companies working titles
British film companies working titleswardmancharlie2230
 
Shifty case study
Shifty case studyShifty case study
Shifty case studyNaamah Hill
 

Similaire à The british film industry 2 SECTION A (20)

Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210Workingtitle 160616084210
Workingtitle 160616084210
 
Working titles
Working titlesWorking titles
Working titles
 
The uk film industry as film studies
The uk film industry as film studiesThe uk film industry as film studies
The uk film industry as film studies
 
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
Warp and Working Titles
Warp and Working TitlesWarp and Working Titles
Warp and Working Titles
 
Working Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan BanksWorking Title - Ryan Banks
Working Title - Ryan Banks
 
Working titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPWorking titles andWARP
Working titles andWARP
 
Film distribution hand out
Film distribution hand outFilm distribution hand out
Film distribution hand out
 
Distribution lesson1 24.11.11
Distribution lesson1 24.11.11Distribution lesson1 24.11.11
Distribution lesson1 24.11.11
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)
 
Revision working title and tbtr
Revision   working title and tbtrRevision   working title and tbtr
Revision working title and tbtr
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
Dredd and some stuff stolen from another teacher
Dredd and some stuff stolen from another teacherDredd and some stuff stolen from another teacher
Dredd and some stuff stolen from another teacher
 
British film companies working titles
British film companies working titlesBritish film companies working titles
British film companies working titles
 
Shifty case study
Shifty case studyShifty case study
Shifty case study
 
Distribution
DistributionDistribution
Distribution
 
G322 Section B Shifty Case Study
G322 Section B Shifty Case StudyG322 Section B Shifty Case Study
G322 Section B Shifty Case Study
 

Plus de filmcgs

Year 12 music2
Year 12 music2Year 12 music2
Year 12 music2filmcgs
 
Year 12 music
Year 12 musicYear 12 music
Year 12 musicfilmcgs
 
Music industry g322
Music industry g322Music industry g322
Music industry g322filmcgs
 
Hardware
HardwareHardware
Hardwarefilmcgs
 
Section b genre SECTION B
Section b genre SECTION BSection b genre SECTION B
Section b genre SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Rep of crime comp SECTION B
Rep of crime comp SECTION BRep of crime comp SECTION B
Rep of crime comp SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Social realism as a genre SECTION B
Social realism as a genre SECTION BSocial realism as a genre SECTION B
Social realism as a genre SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Film tc SECTION B
Film tc SECTION BFilm tc SECTION B
Film tc SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Narrative SECTION B
Narrative SECTION BNarrative SECTION B
Narrative SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Social realism as a genre 2 SECTION B
Social realism as a genre 2 SECTION BSocial realism as a genre 2 SECTION B
Social realism as a genre 2 SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Ltb representation SECTION B
Ltb representation SECTION BLtb representation SECTION B
Ltb representation SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
Bullet boy intro SECTION B
Bullet boy intro SECTION BBullet boy intro SECTION B
Bullet boy intro SECTION Bfilmcgs
 
SECTION B revision
SECTION B revisionSECTION B revision
SECTION B revisionfilmcgs
 
British film lesson SECTION A
British film lesson SECTION ABritish film lesson SECTION A
British film lesson SECTION Afilmcgs
 
Section a revision SECTION A
Section a revision SECTION ASection a revision SECTION A
Section a revision SECTION Afilmcgs
 
Recap and funding SECTION A
Recap and funding SECTION ARecap and funding SECTION A
Recap and funding SECTION Afilmcgs
 
Kick ass case study SECTION A
Kick ass case study SECTION AKick ass case study SECTION A
Kick ass case study SECTION Afilmcgs
 
Kick Ass Case Study, CGS
Kick Ass Case Study, CGSKick Ass Case Study, CGS
Kick Ass Case Study, CGSfilmcgs
 
Marketing, CGS
Marketing, CGSMarketing, CGS
Marketing, CGSfilmcgs
 
Audiences P1, CGS
Audiences P1, CGSAudiences P1, CGS
Audiences P1, CGSfilmcgs
 

Plus de filmcgs (20)

Year 12 music2
Year 12 music2Year 12 music2
Year 12 music2
 
Year 12 music
Year 12 musicYear 12 music
Year 12 music
 
Music industry g322
Music industry g322Music industry g322
Music industry g322
 
Hardware
HardwareHardware
Hardware
 
Section b genre SECTION B
Section b genre SECTION BSection b genre SECTION B
Section b genre SECTION B
 
Rep of crime comp SECTION B
Rep of crime comp SECTION BRep of crime comp SECTION B
Rep of crime comp SECTION B
 
Social realism as a genre SECTION B
Social realism as a genre SECTION BSocial realism as a genre SECTION B
Social realism as a genre SECTION B
 
Film tc SECTION B
Film tc SECTION BFilm tc SECTION B
Film tc SECTION B
 
Narrative SECTION B
Narrative SECTION BNarrative SECTION B
Narrative SECTION B
 
Social realism as a genre 2 SECTION B
Social realism as a genre 2 SECTION BSocial realism as a genre 2 SECTION B
Social realism as a genre 2 SECTION B
 
Ltb representation SECTION B
Ltb representation SECTION BLtb representation SECTION B
Ltb representation SECTION B
 
Bullet boy intro SECTION B
Bullet boy intro SECTION BBullet boy intro SECTION B
Bullet boy intro SECTION B
 
SECTION B revision
SECTION B revisionSECTION B revision
SECTION B revision
 
British film lesson SECTION A
British film lesson SECTION ABritish film lesson SECTION A
British film lesson SECTION A
 
Section a revision SECTION A
Section a revision SECTION ASection a revision SECTION A
Section a revision SECTION A
 
Recap and funding SECTION A
Recap and funding SECTION ARecap and funding SECTION A
Recap and funding SECTION A
 
Kick ass case study SECTION A
Kick ass case study SECTION AKick ass case study SECTION A
Kick ass case study SECTION A
 
Kick Ass Case Study, CGS
Kick Ass Case Study, CGSKick Ass Case Study, CGS
Kick Ass Case Study, CGS
 
Marketing, CGS
Marketing, CGSMarketing, CGS
Marketing, CGS
 
Audiences P1, CGS
Audiences P1, CGSAudiences P1, CGS
Audiences P1, CGS
 

The british film industry 2 SECTION A

  • 1. The British Film Industry – SECTION A LO: To identify who does what within the British Film industry (PRODUCERS) LO: To evaluate how the British Film industry competes globally (AUDIENCE) and retains profitability Thinking question: Why have a British film industry?
  • 2. Who does what in the British Film Industry? Aims to support, develop and promote the art forms of the moving image An independent, non-governmental body which classifies and censors film, video as well as computer and console-based games released in the UK. The official UK agency for international cultural relations. Its Film Department promotes new British films (features and shorts), internationally principally through festivals and showcases. Promotes understanding and appreciation of Britain's rich film and television heritage and culture. Government backed lead agency for film in the UK ensuring that the economic, cultural and educational aspects of film are effectively represented at home and abroad.
  • 3. Main British Production Companies Can you name films by these production companies? Ext: Who dominates the UK film industry?
  • 4. How do British films compete globally? Ext: How are they distinct from Hollywood blockbusters?
  • 6. The Top 10 list as of 2009 (in order of 'bankable' value): 1. Will Smith 2. Johnny Depp 3. Brad Pitt 4. Tom Hanks 5. George Clooney 6. Will Ferrell 7. Reese Witherspoon 8. Nicolas Cage 9. Leonardo DiCaprio 10. Russell Crowe
  • 7. Weekend 20 Mar - 22 Mar 2009 UK box office Rank Title Country of Origin Weekend Gross Distributor % change on last week Weeks on release Number of cinemas Site average Total Gross to date 1 Marley & Me USA £2,166,270 20th Century Fox -51 2 476 £4,551 £8,164,343 2 Paul Blart: Mall Cop USA £1,289,513 Sony Pictures 1 375 £3,439 £1,289,513 3 Duplicity USA £796,244 Universal 1 356 £2,237 £796,244 4 Lesbian Vampire Killers UK £648,634 Momentum 1 362 £1,792 £648,634 5 Watchmen USA/Can £594,510 Paramount -58 3 381 £1,560 £7,556,596 6 Gran Torino USA £484,808 Warner Bros. -41 5 311 £1,559 £6,659,193 7 Slumdog Millionaire UK £416,356 Pathé -45 11 384 £1,084 £30,471,084 8 The Young Victoria UK £387,399 Momentum -39 3 379 £1,022 £3,550,675 9 Bolt USA £201,250 Disney -58 6 441 £456 £17,546,419 10 Bronson UK £161,880 Vertigo -37 2 109 £1,485 £581,211 11 Confessions of a Shopaholic USA £158,414 Disney -63 5 307 £516 £8,051,255 12 The Unborn USA £126,630 Universal -68 4 188 £674 £3,669,708 13 Hotel for Dogs USA/Ger £119,041 Paramount -58 6 404 £295 £6,670,932 14 The Age of Stupid UK £101,752 Dogwoof 1 20 £5,088 £101,752 15 Il Divo Ita/Fra £71,952 Artificial Eye 1 30 £2,398 £71,952   Total   £7,724,653       4,523 £1,708 £95,829,511
  • 8. Find star struck article from pack: Read and underline evidence for stars attracting an audience and star persona Answer this: How much do you agree with ‘ Hollywood films have movie stars. That’s why they are more appealing to UK audiences than UK films.’
  • 9. Starter task: WITHOUT LOOKING LIST: 1. The 5 main film bodies in the UK who oversee the production, promotion and classification of UK films (ext: explain what each do) 2. The 5 main production companies and five films they have made
  • 10. HOMEWORK: Brit-flick Kick-Ass tops US box office I want you to find out why On paper/blog post a detailed response and as much evidence as you can find Consider: Why is it deemed a Brit-flick? Who stars it in and how has this helped it succeed How was it marketed? Who distributed the film? We will feedback next Tuesday
  • 11. RECAP What do stars bring to a film? Why do Producers use certain stars?
  • 12.
  • 13. How else do British films compete globally?
  • 14. GENRE as a tool How does genre help sell films? Genre helps to meet audience expectations . If the audience can assume the genre from the trailer, film posters etc, they can make an informed judgement on whether they wish to see it or not. If their expectations are met, they are satisfied and will recommend the film to others, leading to higher box office figures. An example of misleading genre expectations: By 2006, Julia Roberts’ 31 films had grossed over $2 billion and she had been involved in more $100 million movies than any other female star BUT Julia Roberts and Mona Lisa Smile Budget $65 million (large chunk of which was Robert’s fee) North American gross $63 million WHY??? Not a typical Hollywood model ending which led to younger audiences being left unsatisfied and no love interests featured to drive the romance of the story.
  • 15. Working Title formula for the ultimate ROMCOM Using stars and genre to maximum effect Combine 2 popular genres – Hybrid – ROMANCE & COMEDY Deemed ‘chick-flick’ with a large female audience – so a strong female lead Richard Curtis – screenwriter – linked to this genre Hugh Grant – likeable and adaptable This led to securing Julia Roberts (one of the most bankable stars) and succeeded in making
  • 16. Now I want you to find a recent successful film that has used genre and stars effectively: Note down: The stars The genre The Production Budget The Gross takings And anything else that you think made it successful (consider marketing, distribution company etc)
  • 17. Weekend 9-11 April UK box office – audience consumption http://infidelmovie.com/landing-trailer/
  • 18. End thought: Would the world be different if we relied only on the American film industry?
  • 19. British cinema since 2000: The new century has so far been a relatively successful one for the British film industry. Many British films have found a wide international audience, and some of the independent production companies, such asWorking Title, have secured financing and distribution deals with major American studios. Working Title scored three major international successes, all starring Hugh Grant, with the romantic comedies Bridget Jones's Diary (2001), which grossed $254 million worldwide; the sequel Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, which earned $228 million; and Richard Curtis's directorial debut Love Actually (2003), which grossed $239 million. At the same time, critically-acclaimed films such as Gosford Park (2001), Pride and Prejudice (2005), The Constant Gardener (2005), The Queen (2006) and The Last King of Scotland (2006) also brought prestige to the British film industry. Although all of these films were financed and distributed by American film companies, so there was little financial benefit to the industry itself.
  • 20. In 2008, British releases included the costume dramas The Duchess and Brideshead Revisited, the documentary Man On Wire and a new comedy-drama from Mike Leigh Happy Go Lucky. However the year was dominated by a single film: Slumdog Millionaire, an Indian story that was filmed entirely in Mumbai with a mostly Indian cast, though with a British director (Danny Boyle), producer (Christian Colson), screenwriter (Simon Beaufoy) and star (Dev Patel) and the film was all-British financed via Film4 and Celador. Slumdog Millionaire has received worldwide critical acclaim. It has won four Golden Globes, seven BAFTA Awards and eight Academy Awards, including Best Director and Best Film. This was the first entirely-British financed film since Hamlet in 1948 to win the Best Picture Oscar.
  • 21. Despite increasing competition from film studios in Australia and Eastern Europe (especially the Czech Republic), British studios such as Pinewood, Shepperton and Leavesden remained successful in hosting major foreign productions such as Finding Neverland, V for Vendetta, Closer, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Corpse Bride, United 93, The Phantom of the Opera, The Golden Compass, Sweeney Todd, Mamma Mia!, The Wolf Man, Fantastic Mr. Fox and Nine.The film industry remains an important earner for the British economy.
  • 22. Tug used search marketing for Slumdog Millionaire’s UK Launch Tug used search marketing to create online awareness & user engagement for Slumdog Millionaire’s UK launch   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PR Log (Press Release) – Mar 13, 2009 – Tug, an independent search engine marketing agency located in Shoreditch, London, recently impressed Pathe’s UK marketing team with the ability of PPC and SEO to play a key role in the film release marketing mix. Pathe approached Tug to use search engine marketing to drive targeted awareness, engagement and relevant traffic within a tight budget, for their new release, Slumdog Millionaire. December 08, Tug launched a PPC campaign across the major UK search engines targeting UK movie goers, the niche Indian market and independent film enthusiasts. Using a combination of keyword testing & bid management and ad testing & copy optimisation, Tug increased click throughs and drove the cost per click down throughout the campaign. Tug also used SEO techniques to optimise the film’s flash microsite. A short link building campaign was put in place to get the site to top position for ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ searches in the UK. In addition, Tug launched a banner campaign across the Google content network of websites on a cost per click model. Standard banners as well as click to play video ads were served on relevant sites targeted at the chosen audiences. The cost model meant that banner impressions and even the trailers viewed within them were free – making awareness and engagement free. Ultimately Tug drove over 75,000 new visitors to the Slumdog Microsite, displayed the trailer online 73,000 times and served over 21 Million ad impressions for only £13,000 over a 5 week burst. Pathe are pleased with their first foray into search marketing and are working with Tug to develop a search marketing toolkit for subsequent film releases in the UK.
  • 23. This research uncovered an audience typology that helped to inform the department’s ongoing audience development activities. Briefly, the cinema types uncovered were as follows: Mainstream : unlikely ever to view anything other than major ‘Hollywood’ style blockbusters. Mainstream plus : generally mainstream, but apt to see less mainstream films on a few occasions. Aficionados : tend to view a mix of films, including major foreign language titles, and can be encouraged to become even more adventurous in their viewing choices. Film Buffs1 : eschew mainstream films in favour of more extreme, esoteric, challenging and difficult subject matter (specialised) films. AUDIENCE TYPES
  • 24. Other UK films – 9-11 April 2010
  • 25. Now answer this question: Looking at the evidence, is the UK film industry attracting the mainstream audiences as well as last year?
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28. Facts in focus • UK cinema admissions reached 162 million, up 4% on 2006. • Box office receipts were £821 million, up 8% on 2006. • 516 films were released for a week or more in the UK and Republic of Ireland, an increase of 2% on 2006 and 58% more than in 1998. • UK films, including co-productions, accounted for 21% of releases and 29% of the market by value, up 10% on last year. • The top 100 films earned almost 91% of the gross box office, 2% more than in 2006.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.