A very brief introduction to TDR criteria, historic context of digipres, and innovations in web based emulation.

1. AN INCOMPLETE CRASH COURSE IN
DIGITAL PRESERVATION [IN 20 MIN]
WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE TRAC CRITERIA & CHECKLIST

2. • CONTEXT
• HISTORIC CASES
• OVERVIEW OF TRAC CHECKLIST
• TOOLS
• PROJECTS OF NOTE

3. CONTEXT
STAKEHOLDERS
LIBRARIES + ARCHIVES
MUSEUMS + GALLERIES
GOVERNMENTS
SCIENCE & MEDICINE
PRIVATE SECTOR
INDIVIDUALS

4. CONTEXT
DONOR COMMUNITIES
AUTHORS + WRITERS
ARTISTS + COLLECTORS
CORPORATE OFFICES
SCIENTISTS + DOCTORS

5. CONTEXT
MATERIALS
RARE BOOKS & MANUSCRIPTS
FINE ART
PERSONAL PAPERS
FINANCIAL / LEGAL
GEOSPATIAL / MAPS
RESEARCH DATA

6. HISTORIC CASES

10. DOOMED

11. • 1986 DOMESDAY PROJECT
• 1999 HARDLY ANY SYSTEMS LEFT
• 1999 CAMILEON BEGINS WORK
• 2001 ADRIAN PEARCE BEGINS
• 2002 CAMILEON EMULATION
• 2003 BBC DIGITAL MASTERS
• 2004 PEARCE PUBLISHES DATA
• 2008 PEARCE DIES, SO DOES SITE
• PRESENT: HTTP://WWW.BBC.CO.UK/HISTORY/DOMESDAY

12. AFTER A LOT OF ££ AND EFFORT

13. TRAC CRITERIA & CHECKLIST

14. TRAC CRITERIA & CHECKLIST
WHAT IS IT ?

15. A. ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
A.1 GOVERNANCE AND VIABILITY
1. MISSION STATEMENT
2. SUCCESSION / CONTINGENCY PLAN

16. A. ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
A.2 STRUCTURE AND STAFFING
1. PROPER STAFF POSITIONS
2. ENOUGH STAFF
3. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

17. A. ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
A.3 PROCEDURAL ACCOUNTABILITY
1. COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED
2. MECHANISMS FOR REVIEW OF PROCEDURE
3. WRITTEN LEGAL POLICY RE: PERMISSIONS
4. PERIODIC TECH UPDATE
5. USER FEEDBACK
6. GENERAL TRANSPARENCY &
ACCOUNTABILITY

18. A. ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
A.4 FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
1. SHORT & LONG TERM BUSINESS PLAN
2. ANNUAL [AT LEAST] REVIEW OF PLAN
3. TRANSPARENT & COMPLIANT FINANCIALS

19. A. ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
A.5 CONTRACTS, LICENSES, LIABILITIES
1. DEPOSIT AGREEMENTS [INCLUDING
PRESERVATION RIGHTS]
2. TRACK AND MANAGE INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY

20. B. DIGITAL OBJECT MANAGEMENT
B.1 ACQUISITION AND INGEST
1. IDENTIFY PROPERTIES TO PRESERVE
2. SPECIFY METADATA REQUIRED AT INGEST
3. ABLE TO AUTHENTICATE SOURCE
4. SUFFICIENT PHYSICAL CONTROL
5. APPROPRIATE FEEDBACK TO DEPOSITOR
7. RECORD OF ALL PRESERVATION ACTIONS

21. B. DIGITAL OBJECT MANAGEMENT
B.2 CREATING AN ARCHIVABLE PACKAGE
1. WRITTEN DEFINITION OF ALL AIP’S
2. DOCUMENTATION OF SIP => AIP PROCESS
3. NAMING CONVENTION FOR IDENTIFIERS
4. REPRESENTATION / FORMAT INFORMATION
5. DOCUMENTED PROCESS FOR ‘RENDER’

22. B. DIGITAL OBJECT MANAGEMENT
B.3 PRESERVATION PLANNING
1. DOCUMENTED PRESERVATION STRATEGIES
2. OBSOLESCENCE MONITORING MECHANISMS
3. MEANS TO CHANGE 1 BASED ON 2
4. EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS

23. B. DIGITAL OBJECT MANAGEMENT
B.4 ARCHIVAL STORAGE
1. PRESERVE CONTENT INFORMATION
2. ACTIVELY MONITOR FIXITY INFORMATION

24. B. DIGITAL OBJECT MANAGEMENT
B.5 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
1. SPECIFY MINIMUM METADATA
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCOVERABILITY
2. MEET THIS REQUIREMENT
3. DEMONSTRABLE REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY

25. B. DIGITAL OBJECT MANAGEMENT
B.6 ACCESS MANAGEMENT
1. COMMUNICATE ACCESS OPTIONS
2. POLICY FOR DOCUMENTATION OF ACCESS
3. RESPECTFUL OF ACCESS AGREEMENTS
4. DOCUMENTED ACCESS POLICIES
5. LOG INAPPROPRIATE ACCESS
6. DISSEMINATE COPIES OF ORIGINAL
OBJECTS TRACEABLE TO THE ORIGINAL

26. C. TECHNOLOGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, SECURITY
C.1 SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE
1. REPOSITORY RUNS ON WELL SUPPORTED
SYSTEMS (I.E. LINUX/UNIX)
2. ADEQUATE SUPPORT FOR BACKUP
3. REPOSITORY MANAGES BACKUPS
5. MECHANISMS TO DETECT, REPORT, AND ACT
UPON CASES OF CORRUPTION
6. HARD/SOFTWAREWARE UPGRADE
PROCEDURE
7. MEANS TO TEST SYSTEM CHANGES

27. C. TECHNOLOGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, SECURITY
C.2 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES
1. HARDWARE / SOFTWARE APPROPRIATE TO
DESIGNATED COMMUNITY & SERVICES

28. C. TECHNOLOGY, INFRASTRUCTURE, SECURITY
C.3 SECURITY
1. SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF DATA, PERSONNEL,
PHYSICAL PLANT, AND SECURITY NEEDS.
2. STAFF HAVE AUTHORIZATION RELEVANT TO
ROLE WITHIN SYSTEM
3. WRITTEN DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND
RECOVERY PLAN.
4. OFFSITE BACKUPS. OFFSITE RECOVERY
PLAN.

29. TOOLS

39. PRESERVATION PLANNING
SUSTAINABLE FORMATS
1. DISCLOSURE
2. ADOPTION
3. TRANSPARENCY / SELF DOCUMENTATION
4. EXTERNAL DEPENDENCIES
5. PATENT ISSUES
6. DRM

40. PRESERVATION PLANNING
SUSTAINABLE FORMATS
IDENTIFICATION?

41. PRESERVATION PLANNING
SUSTAINABLE FORMATS
JHOVE
UNIX FILE UTILITY FITS
FIDO
DROID

42. Evaluation of
Characterisation Tools
Part 1: Identification
Authors
Johan van der Knijff, National Library of the Netherlands
Carl Wilson, British Library
September 2011

43. COOL PROJECTS
- OR -
OK SO YOU’VE PRESERVED THIRTY
YEARS OF DISK IMAGES. NOW WHAT.

51. EMULATION
[DEMO]

61. Digital Forensics
and Born-Digital Content
in Cultural Heritage
Collections
by Matthew G. Kirschenbaum
Richard Ovenden
Gabriela Redwine
with research assistance from Rachel Donahue
December 2010
Council on Library and Information Resources
Washington, D.C.

62. Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics
Alin C. Popescu and Hany Farid ?
Department of Computer Science at Dartmouth College
Abstract. A digitally altered photograph, often leaving no visual clues of having been tampered with, can
be indistinguishable from an authentic photograph. As a result, photographs no longer hold the unique
stature as a definitive recording of events. We describe several statistical techniques for detecting traces of
digital tampering in the absence of any digital watermark or signature. In particular, we quantify statistical
correlations that result from specific forms of digital tampering, and devise detection schemes to reveal these
correlations.
1 Introduction
The advent of low-cost and high-resolution digital cameras, and sophisticated photo-editing software, has
made it remarkably easy to manipulate and alter digital images. In addition, digital forgeries, often leaving no

63. SOAA_SP10 23/5/06 3:33 PM Page 159
T H E A M E R I C A N A R C H I V I S T
“The Old Version Flickers More”:
Digital Preservation from the
User’s Perspective
Margaret L. Hedstrom, Christopher A. Lee, Judith S. Olson,
Clifford A. Lampe
Abstract
Most criteria for evaluating digital preservation strategies are based on needs and require-
ments from the archivist’s perspective. In the CAMiLEON Project, we wanted to learn what
significant properties users consider worth preserving. In this article, we present the results
of two experiments that used human subjects to learn about user preferences for different
formats of preserved digital objects. We tested subjects’ reactions to digital materials that were

64. A FEW PEOPLE TO FOLLOW
[INCOMPLETE LIST, BUT OH WELL]
@TEXTFILES @MKIRSCHENBAUM
@KARIKRAUS
@ITPARCHIVE
@AVPRESERVE
@UMD_MITH
@JUSPAR
@JENGUILIANO
@JONVOSS
@EMORYDISC
@DOUGRESIDE @READYRESOURCES
@EUANC
AND MANY MORE……