3. The size of a group DOES affect the groups overall
behavior. But it depend on the variable we look at. For
example:
Timing in completing the task
Smaller group faster
Individual perform better
Problem Solving
Large group more consistent
Good for gaining diverse input
*The most important finding about the size of group concerns Social Loafing.*
4. What is Social Loafing??
Definition: The tendency for individuals to expend less effort
when working collectively than when working individually.
Explanation: Group performance increases with group size,
but the addition of new members has diminishing returns on
productivity.
Situation: In making the video for group assignment.
The productivity of group of four members may be better
than the three, but the individual productivity of each
member declines.
6. Cohesive Group:
The degree to which members are attracted to each other and motivated to stay
in the group.
Advantages Of Group Cohesiveness:
Shared values
Group loyalty
Familiarity of group members
Effective communication
Disadvantages of Group Cohesiveness:
Lowered productivity
Lack of creativity
Lack of innovation
9. Diversity Group
The degree to which members of group are similar to, or different from, one another.
Good implication
• More likely to have diverse abilities and information
• Variety of viewpoint
• More effective on creativity demanding the task and problem solving
Bad implication
• Less satisfied with the group, less cohesive, and promotes conflict
• Some people may be find difficulty in learning to work with each other and solving
problem.
•These difficulty seem to dissipate with time. (Take time for diverse group to learn how
to work through disagreement and different approaches to solving problem)
10. Question 8:
What are the strength
and weaknesses of group
(versus individual)
decision making?
11. • More complete information and
knowledge
• More output
• Offered increased in diversity view
• More approaches and alternatives
• Increased acceptance of a solution
Strengths
• Time consuming
• Conformity pressure
• Discussion can be dominated by
one or a few members
• Ambiguous responsibility
Weaknesses
12. References
•Robbins, Stephen P., and Tim Judge. Organizational Behavior. 15th ed. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2013
•"Advantages & Disadvantages of Group Cohesiveness & Productivity." Small
Business. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
•Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 6. (Nov. - Dec., 1996), pp. 615-631. URL:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1047-
7039%28199611%2F12%297%3A6%3C615%3ADDCAWG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z
•The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 2. (Apr., 1996), pp. 402-
433. URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0363-
7425%28199604%2921%3A2%3C402%3ASFCTUT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-5