Contenu connexe Similaire à DFR Methods Survey 2014 (20) Plus de Accendo Reliability (20) DFR Methods Survey 20141. DFR Methods Survey 2014
Scoring: 4 = 100%, top priority, always done
3 = >75%, use normally, expected
2 = 25% - 75%, variable use
1 = <25%, only occasional use
0 = not done or discontinued
- = not visible, no comment
Management:
q Goal setting for organization
q Priority of quality & reliability improvement
q Management attention & follow up (goal ownership)
Design:
q Documented hardware design cycle
q Goal setting by product or module
q Priority of Q&R vs performance, cost, schedule
q Design for Reliability (DFR) training
q Preferred technology selection/standardization
q Component qualification testing
q OEM selection & testing to equal internal requirements
q Fault Tree Analysis/Reliability Block Diagrams (FTA/RBD)
q Failure/root cause analysis
q Statistically-designed engineering experiments
q Accelerated Stress/Life Testing (ALT)
q Design & derating rules
q Design reviews/design rule checking
q Finite Element Analysis (FEA) or simulations
q Failure rate estimation/prediction
q Thermal design & measurements
q Design tolerance analysis
q Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
q Environmental (design margin) testing
q Highly accelerated life testing (HALT)
q Physics of Failure analysis
q Lessons-learned database
q Design Defect Tracking (DDT)
q Ownership of quality & reliability goals
Manufacturing:
q Design for manufacturability (DFM)
q Priority of Q&R vs schedule & cost
q Quality training programs
q Statistical Process Control (SPC/SQC)
q Total Quality Management (TQM)
q Internal process audits (written reports)
q Vendor (& OEM) process audits
q Incoming inspection/sampling
q Component burn-in
q Assembly-level environmental stress screening (ESS)
q Product-level environmental stress screening (ESS)
q Defect Detection & Tracking (DD&T)
q Corrective Action Reports
q Ownership of quality & reliability goals