SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  18
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Module # 3 Lecture Appellate Procedure
Overview Notice of Appeal Filings Briefs of the Parties Trial Court Record Amicus Curiae Briefs Oral Argument Decision Appeal of Appellate Court Decision State Supreme Court United States Supreme Court
Hypothetical Denise was charge with drug possession in King County Superior Court Prior to trial Denise sought to have the drugs she was arrested for possessing suppressed because of an illegal search and seizure by the Police Denise’s motion in limine was denied. At trial Denise properly objected to the drugs being admitted on the “record” Denise was convicted Denise now appeals her conviction under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, sec 7 of the Washington Constitution.
Notice of Appeal Denise is called the Petitioner or the Appellant The State is called the Respondent or the Appellee  Denise MUST file a NOTICE OF APPEAL with the TRIAL court where she was convicted. It is improper to file directly to the Intermediate Court of Appeals The Notice of Appeal is then forwarded to the proper Appellate Court In this case Division 1 of the Washington Court of Appeals.
Court of Appeals Mandatory Appeals In all case the losing party has the right to one appeal The Court of Appeals must at least review the briefs and make a decision The Court of Appeals cannot deny Denise’s appeal Indigent Defendants If a defendant had appointed counsel at trial, they have the right to appointed counsel on his or her initial appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.
Filing of Briefs After the Notice of Appeal has been filed Parties file Appellate Brief with the Court of Appeals See sample on course website Also must submit the Trial Court Record This is the transcript of the trial, including all pretrial motions hearings Costs Petitioner must pay for the Trial Court Record to be “prepared.” If Indigent, may file a motion seeking a “waiver” of the cost
Appellate Brief MOST IMPORTANT part of any Appeal Appeals are often won and lost “on the briefs” DO NOT confuse with a CASE BRIEF It is a legal document in which the Petitioner argues why the Trial court got it wrong Conversely defendant argues why the trial court got it correct An Appellate Brief describes: ISSUE(S): highlights a problem or problem with the lower court decision Highlights relevant case law Applies the facts of the case, supported by the record, to the relevant case law
Appellate Brief Structure Title Page: Identifies the Parties, Petitioner, Respondent, Appellate Court, and docket number Table of Contents Table of Authorities Constitutional provisions Statutes Case law
Appellate Brief Structure Assignment of Errors Errors: tells court where the lower court error ISSUES:  Formed as question asking whether under a particular law/constitutional provision the law court erred Written in a manner suggesting that there was or was not error  Statement of the Case Details the case’s procedural history Lists the facts of the case as contained in the Record Summary of Argument  Synopsis of party case in regard to the controlling law
Appellate Brief Structure Argument  Section Sections: one section of each ISSUE Identifies and discusses relevant law Constitution, Statute, Case Law, Rules Analyzes the facts of the case against the relevant law State’s a conclusion in support of a party’s position
Oral Argument Intermediate Court: three (3) Judges Only Lawyers make arguments No witnesses No NEW evidence Essentially a discussion between the Parties and the Judges about the case
Oral Argument Procedure Petitioner Respondent Petitioner reserves time for rebuttal Each side, generally, has 10-30 minutes to make their case Judges may interrupt lawyers and ask questions Generally, does not change a Judges position, but on occasion and effective oral argument can “sway” the court
Decision Judges will “conference” after a case has been argued Will vote: Affirm or Reverse Can be Unanimous (3-0) or Split (2-1) Write a decision: Published or Unpublished Majority Dissent Decision: applied law to facts and decides which party wins; make create new law depending on the circumstances See sample State v. Young on website
Appeal of Appellate Court Decision Losing party can appeal Highest Court: i.e. State Supreme Court Both WA has 9 Justices Justices must agree to hear a case Discretionary Appeal: court can decide whether to “hear” the case; can deny Same procedure as below Briefs Oral Argument  Decision: ALL decisions are published
Review of State Supreme Court Decision Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Must involve a Federal “Case or Controversy” Writ of Certiorari: order to lower court to send case for review Requires 4 justices to agree to hear the case Procedure essentially the same as below SCOTUS decisions are FINAL and cannot be appealed
Lecture Review Must file NOTICE OF APPEAL in the TRIAL COURT Documents submitted to Appellate Court Appellate Brief Trial Record Appellate Brief’s importance Most important part of every appeal Persuasive document advocating for  a party’s position Review sample document on website
Lecture Review Oral Argument Procedure Petitioner Respondent Petitioner’s reserve time Conference Vote on case’s outcome Majority and Dissenting Opinion Decision Written discussion of case’s outcome
Lecture Review Appeal to the State Supreme Court Discretionary review Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States Case or Controversy Four Justices must agree to hear the case Writ of Certiorari  SCOTUS decision CANNOT be appealed

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Ch 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial ProcessCh 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial Processrharrisonaz
 
Law unit 1 roles of legal personnel
Law unit 1 roles of legal personnelLaw unit 1 roles of legal personnel
Law unit 1 roles of legal personnelA.B. P.G
 
The role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law makingThe role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law makingCrystal Delosa
 
Ch 20 Appeals Process
Ch 20 Appeals ProcessCh 20 Appeals Process
Ch 20 Appeals Processrharrisonaz
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk PowerpointLaw-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpointlawexchange.co.uk
 
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court StructuresLegal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court StructuresMichael Bromby
 
Federal Courts
Federal CourtsFederal Courts
Federal Courtsprofseitz
 
Organization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court SystemOrganization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court SystemBryan Toth
 
Courtatwork
CourtatworkCourtatwork
CourtatworkMs_Allen
 
Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid
Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid
Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid mcmillslaw
 
judicial precedent revision powerpoint
judicial precedent revision powerpointjudicial precedent revision powerpoint
judicial precedent revision powerpointcharlotte6898
 
The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2thorogl01
 
Ch 14 – The Trial
Ch 14 – The TrialCh 14 – The Trial
Ch 14 – The Trialmrmiller22
 

Tendances (20)

Introduction to Legal Research
Introduction to Legal Research Introduction to Legal Research
Introduction to Legal Research
 
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial ProcessCh 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
 
Law unit 1 roles of legal personnel
Law unit 1 roles of legal personnelLaw unit 1 roles of legal personnel
Law unit 1 roles of legal personnel
 
The role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law makingThe role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law making
 
Ch 20 Appeals Process
Ch 20 Appeals ProcessCh 20 Appeals Process
Ch 20 Appeals Process
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk PowerpointLaw-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
 
The Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United StatesThe Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States
 
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court StructuresLegal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court Structures
 
Federal Courts
Federal CourtsFederal Courts
Federal Courts
 
Organization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court SystemOrganization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court System
 
Courtatwork
CourtatworkCourtatwork
Courtatwork
 
Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid
Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid
Howell v. Hamilton Meats and Haygood v. Escabedo: Will Nevada Adopt Paid
 
Courts system
Courts systemCourts system
Courts system
 
judicial precedent revision powerpoint
judicial precedent revision powerpointjudicial precedent revision powerpoint
judicial precedent revision powerpoint
 
The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2
 
Ch03
Ch03Ch03
Ch03
 
Chapter 4 Detailed
Chapter 4 DetailedChapter 4 Detailed
Chapter 4 Detailed
 
Litigation
LitigationLitigation
Litigation
 
Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
 
Ch 14 – The Trial
Ch 14 – The TrialCh 14 – The Trial
Ch 14 – The Trial
 

En vedette

The court of appeal & denning debate
The court of appeal & denning debateThe court of appeal & denning debate
The court of appeal & denning debateMiss Hart
 
Courts ppt 2010 11
Courts ppt 2010 11Courts ppt 2010 11
Courts ppt 2010 11Miss Hart
 
The court of appeal powers 2010 11
The court of appeal powers 2010 11The court of appeal powers 2010 11
The court of appeal powers 2010 11Miss Hart
 
Denning & ca 2010 11
Denning & ca 2010 11Denning & ca 2010 11
Denning & ca 2010 11Miss Hart
 
Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)
Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)
Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)Miss Hart
 
Appeals 2013
Appeals 2013Appeals 2013
Appeals 2013Miss Hart
 
Mechanics of precedent 2012
Mechanics of precedent 2012Mechanics of precedent 2012
Mechanics of precedent 2012Miss Hart
 

En vedette (7)

The court of appeal & denning debate
The court of appeal & denning debateThe court of appeal & denning debate
The court of appeal & denning debate
 
Courts ppt 2010 11
Courts ppt 2010 11Courts ppt 2010 11
Courts ppt 2010 11
 
The court of appeal powers 2010 11
The court of appeal powers 2010 11The court of appeal powers 2010 11
The court of appeal powers 2010 11
 
Denning & ca 2010 11
Denning & ca 2010 11Denning & ca 2010 11
Denning & ca 2010 11
 
Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)
Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)
Supreme Court & Practice Statement (2012)
 
Appeals 2013
Appeals 2013Appeals 2013
Appeals 2013
 
Mechanics of precedent 2012
Mechanics of precedent 2012Mechanics of precedent 2012
Mechanics of precedent 2012
 

Similaire à Module # 3 Lecture

Wk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal systemWk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal systemSungho Cho
 
Module # 2 Civil Trial
Module # 2 Civil Trial Module # 2 Civil Trial
Module # 2 Civil Trial greggmorphew
 
Welcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourt
Welcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourtWelcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourt
Welcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourtNajahJacobs
 
Pleadings and pretrial matters
Pleadings and pretrial mattersPleadings and pretrial matters
Pleadings and pretrial matterskdouat
 
How To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docx
How To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docxHow To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docx
How To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docxwellesleyterresa
 
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal TrialCh 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal Trialrharrisonaz
 
ACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docx
ACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docxACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docx
ACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docxbartholomeocoombs
 
Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010mbe247tv
 
The Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In Arizona
The Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In ArizonaThe Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In Arizona
The Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In ArizonaWeinberger Law Firm
 
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docx
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docxIn summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docx
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docxbradburgess22840
 
Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13Rick Fair
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3gbrand
 
Marionv orlando
Marionv orlandoMarionv orlando
Marionv orlandomzamoralaw
 

Similaire à Module # 3 Lecture (20)

Court procedures
Court proceduresCourt procedures
Court procedures
 
Wk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal systemWk1 1 u.s. legal system
Wk1 1 u.s. legal system
 
Module # 2 Civil Trial
Module # 2 Civil Trial Module # 2 Civil Trial
Module # 2 Civil Trial
 
Welcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourt
Welcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourtWelcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourt
Welcome to Legal Research Writing and MootCourt
 
Chapter 4 Condensed
Chapter 4 CondensedChapter 4 Condensed
Chapter 4 Condensed
 
Pleadings and pretrial matters
Pleadings and pretrial mattersPleadings and pretrial matters
Pleadings and pretrial matters
 
How To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docx
How To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docxHow To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docx
How To Brief a Case Confusion often arises over the term le.docx
 
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal TrialCh 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
 
ACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docx
ACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docxACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docx
ACC 150THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESSWith Doreen .docx
 
Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010Appellateprocess05072010
Appellateprocess05072010
 
Judicial precedent
Judicial precedentJudicial precedent
Judicial precedent
 
Chapter 9
Chapter 9Chapter 9
Chapter 9
 
The Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In Arizona
The Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In ArizonaThe Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In Arizona
The Anatomy Of A Civil Lawsuit In Arizona
 
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docx
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docxIn summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docx
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docx
 
Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13Govt 2305-Ch_13
Govt 2305-Ch_13
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3
 
The Courts Take 2
The Courts Take 2The Courts Take 2
The Courts Take 2
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
Marionv orlando
Marionv orlandoMarionv orlando
Marionv orlando
 

Module # 3 Lecture

  • 1. Module # 3 Lecture Appellate Procedure
  • 2. Overview Notice of Appeal Filings Briefs of the Parties Trial Court Record Amicus Curiae Briefs Oral Argument Decision Appeal of Appellate Court Decision State Supreme Court United States Supreme Court
  • 3. Hypothetical Denise was charge with drug possession in King County Superior Court Prior to trial Denise sought to have the drugs she was arrested for possessing suppressed because of an illegal search and seizure by the Police Denise’s motion in limine was denied. At trial Denise properly objected to the drugs being admitted on the “record” Denise was convicted Denise now appeals her conviction under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, sec 7 of the Washington Constitution.
  • 4. Notice of Appeal Denise is called the Petitioner or the Appellant The State is called the Respondent or the Appellee Denise MUST file a NOTICE OF APPEAL with the TRIAL court where she was convicted. It is improper to file directly to the Intermediate Court of Appeals The Notice of Appeal is then forwarded to the proper Appellate Court In this case Division 1 of the Washington Court of Appeals.
  • 5. Court of Appeals Mandatory Appeals In all case the losing party has the right to one appeal The Court of Appeals must at least review the briefs and make a decision The Court of Appeals cannot deny Denise’s appeal Indigent Defendants If a defendant had appointed counsel at trial, they have the right to appointed counsel on his or her initial appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.
  • 6. Filing of Briefs After the Notice of Appeal has been filed Parties file Appellate Brief with the Court of Appeals See sample on course website Also must submit the Trial Court Record This is the transcript of the trial, including all pretrial motions hearings Costs Petitioner must pay for the Trial Court Record to be “prepared.” If Indigent, may file a motion seeking a “waiver” of the cost
  • 7. Appellate Brief MOST IMPORTANT part of any Appeal Appeals are often won and lost “on the briefs” DO NOT confuse with a CASE BRIEF It is a legal document in which the Petitioner argues why the Trial court got it wrong Conversely defendant argues why the trial court got it correct An Appellate Brief describes: ISSUE(S): highlights a problem or problem with the lower court decision Highlights relevant case law Applies the facts of the case, supported by the record, to the relevant case law
  • 8. Appellate Brief Structure Title Page: Identifies the Parties, Petitioner, Respondent, Appellate Court, and docket number Table of Contents Table of Authorities Constitutional provisions Statutes Case law
  • 9. Appellate Brief Structure Assignment of Errors Errors: tells court where the lower court error ISSUES: Formed as question asking whether under a particular law/constitutional provision the law court erred Written in a manner suggesting that there was or was not error Statement of the Case Details the case’s procedural history Lists the facts of the case as contained in the Record Summary of Argument Synopsis of party case in regard to the controlling law
  • 10. Appellate Brief Structure Argument Section Sections: one section of each ISSUE Identifies and discusses relevant law Constitution, Statute, Case Law, Rules Analyzes the facts of the case against the relevant law State’s a conclusion in support of a party’s position
  • 11. Oral Argument Intermediate Court: three (3) Judges Only Lawyers make arguments No witnesses No NEW evidence Essentially a discussion between the Parties and the Judges about the case
  • 12. Oral Argument Procedure Petitioner Respondent Petitioner reserves time for rebuttal Each side, generally, has 10-30 minutes to make their case Judges may interrupt lawyers and ask questions Generally, does not change a Judges position, but on occasion and effective oral argument can “sway” the court
  • 13. Decision Judges will “conference” after a case has been argued Will vote: Affirm or Reverse Can be Unanimous (3-0) or Split (2-1) Write a decision: Published or Unpublished Majority Dissent Decision: applied law to facts and decides which party wins; make create new law depending on the circumstances See sample State v. Young on website
  • 14. Appeal of Appellate Court Decision Losing party can appeal Highest Court: i.e. State Supreme Court Both WA has 9 Justices Justices must agree to hear a case Discretionary Appeal: court can decide whether to “hear” the case; can deny Same procedure as below Briefs Oral Argument Decision: ALL decisions are published
  • 15. Review of State Supreme Court Decision Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Must involve a Federal “Case or Controversy” Writ of Certiorari: order to lower court to send case for review Requires 4 justices to agree to hear the case Procedure essentially the same as below SCOTUS decisions are FINAL and cannot be appealed
  • 16. Lecture Review Must file NOTICE OF APPEAL in the TRIAL COURT Documents submitted to Appellate Court Appellate Brief Trial Record Appellate Brief’s importance Most important part of every appeal Persuasive document advocating for a party’s position Review sample document on website
  • 17. Lecture Review Oral Argument Procedure Petitioner Respondent Petitioner’s reserve time Conference Vote on case’s outcome Majority and Dissenting Opinion Decision Written discussion of case’s outcome
  • 18. Lecture Review Appeal to the State Supreme Court Discretionary review Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States Case or Controversy Four Justices must agree to hear the case Writ of Certiorari SCOTUS decision CANNOT be appealed