SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  69
Operations Management Session 6 –  Inventory Management
Learning Objectives ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Learning Objectives ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Amazon.com ,[object Object],[object Object]
Amazon.com ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Amazon.com ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Inventory ,[object Object],[object Object]
Functions of Inventory ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Types of Inventory ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Material Flow Cycle Figure 12.1 Input Wait for Wait to Move Wait in queue Setup Run Output inspection be moved time for operator time time Cycle time 95% 5%
Inventory Management ,[object Object],[object Object]
ABC Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ABC Analysis Item Stock Number Percent of Number of Items Stocked Annual Volume (units) x Unit Cost = Annual Dollar Volume Percent of Annual Dollar Volume Class #10286 20% 1,000 $ 90.00 $ 90,000 38.8% A #11526 500 154.00 77,000 33.2% A #12760 1,550 17.00 26,350 11.3% B #10867 30% 350 42.86 15,001 6.4% B #10500 1,000 12.50 12,500 5.4% B 72% 23%
ABC Analysis Item Stock Number Percent of Number of Items Stocked Annual Volume (units) x Unit Cost = Annual Dollar Volume Percent of Annual Dollar Volume Class #12572 600 $ 14.17 $ 8,502 3.7% C #14075 2,000 .60 1,200 .5% C #01036 50% 100 8.50 850 .4% C #01307 1,200 .42 504 .2% C #10572 250 .60 150 .1% C 8,550 $232,057 100.0% 5%
ABC Analysis Figure 12.2 A Items B Items C Items Percent of annual dollar usage 80  – 70  – 60  – 50  – 40  – 30  – 20  – 10  – 0  – | | | | | | | | | | 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of inventory items
ABC Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ABC Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Record Accuracy ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Control of Service Inventories ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Holding, Ordering, and Setup Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Holding Costs Table 12.1 Category Cost (and range) as a Percent of Inventory Valu e Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance) 6%  (3 - 10%) Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost) 3%  (1 - 3.5%) Labor cost 3%  (3 - 5%) Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory) 11%  (6 - 24%) Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3%  (2 - 5%) Overall carrying cost 26%
Holding Costs Table 12.1 Category Cost (and range) as a Percent of Inventory Valu e Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance) 6%  (3 - 10%) Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost) 3%  (1 - 3.5%) Labor cost 3%  (3 - 5%) Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory) 11%  (6 - 24%) Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3%  (2 - 5%) Overall carrying cost 26% Holding costs vary considerably depending on the business, location, and interest rates. Generally greater than 15%, some high tech items have holding costs greater than 50%.
Inventory Models for Independent Demand ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Need to determine when and how much to order
Basic EOQ Model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Important assumptions
Inventory Usage Over Time Figure 12.3 Order quantity = Q (maximum inventory level) Usage rate Average inventory on hand Q 2 Minimum inventory Inventory level Time 0
Minimizing Costs Objective is to minimize total costs Table 11.5 Annual cost Order quantity Curve for total cost of holding and setup Holding cost curve Setup (or order) cost curve Minimum total cost Optimal order quantity (Q*)
The EOQ Model Q = Number of pieces per order Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ) D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item S = Setup or ordering cost for each order H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year Annual setup cost = (Number of orders placed per year)  x (Setup or order cost per order) Annual demand Number of units in each order Setup or order cost per order = Annual setup cost =  S D Q =  (S) D Q
The EOQ Model Q = Number of pieces per order Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ) D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item S = Setup or ordering cost for each order H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year Annual holding cost = (Average inventory level)  x (Holding cost per unit per year) Order quantity 2 =  (Holding cost per unit per year) =  (H) Q 2 Annual setup cost =  S D Q Annual holding cost =  H Q 2
The EOQ Model Q = Number of pieces per order Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ) D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item S = Setup or ordering cost for each order H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year Optimal order quantity is found when annual setup cost equals annual holding cost Solving for Q* Annual setup cost =  S D Q Annual holding cost =  H Q 2 D Q S  =  H Q 2 2DS = Q 2 H Q 2  = 2DS/H Q* =  2DS/H
An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units S = $10 per order H = $.50 per unit per year Q* = 2DS H Q* = 2(1,000)(10) 0.50 =  40,000  = 200 units
An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units  Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order H = $.50 per unit per year = N =  = Expected number of orders Demand Order quantity D Q* N =  = 5 orders per year  1,000 200
An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year = T = Expected time between orders Number of working  days per year N T =  = 50 days between orders 250 5
An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost TC =  (5)($10) + (100)($.50) = $50 + $50 = $100 TC =  S  +  H D Q Q 2 TC =  ($10) +  ($.50) 1,000 200 200 2
Robust Model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
An EOQ Example Management underestimated demand by 50% D = 1,000 units  Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days Total annual cost increases by only 25% TC =  S  +  H D Q Q 2 TC =  ($10) +  ($.50) = $75 + $50 = $125 1,500 200 200 2 1,500 units
An EOQ Example Actual EOQ for new demand is 244.9 units D = 1,000 units  Q* = 244.9 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days TC = $61.24 + $61.24 = $122.48 Only 2% less than the total cost of $125 when the order quantity was 200 TC =  S  +  H D Q Q 2 TC =  ($10) +  ($.50) 1,500 244.9 244.9 2 1,500 units
Reorder Points ,[object Object],[object Object],= d x L ROP = Lead time for a new order in days Demand per day d =  D Number of working days in a year
Reorder Point Curve Figure 12.5 Q* ROP (units) Inventory level (units) Time (days) Lead time = L Slope = units/day = d
Reorder Point Example Demand = 8,000 iPods per year 250 working day year Lead time for orders is 3 working days ROP = d x L = 8,000/250 = 32 units = 32 units per day x 3 days = 96 units d =   D Number of working days in a year
Production Order Quantity Model ,[object Object],[object Object]
Production Order Quantity Model Figure 12.6 Inventory level Time Demand part of cycle with no production Part of inventory cycle during which production (and usage) is taking place t Maximum inventory
Production Order Quantity Model Q = Number of pieces per order  p = Daily production rate H = Holding cost per unit per year  d = Daily demand/usage rate t = Length of the production run in days = (Average inventory level) x Annual inventory holding cost Holding cost  per unit per year = (Maximum inventory level)/2 Annual inventory level =  – Maximum inventory level Total produced during the production run Total used during the production run = pt – dt
Production Order Quantity Model Q = Number of pieces per order  p = Daily production rate H = Holding cost per unit per year  d = Daily demand/usage rate t = Length of the production run in days However, Q = total produced = pt ; thus t = Q/p =  – Maximum inventory level Total produced during the production run Total used during the production run = pt – dt Maximum inventory level = p  – d  = Q  1 – Q p Q p d p Holding cost =  (H) =  1 –  H  d p Q 2 Maximum inventory level 2
Production Order Quantity Model Q = Number of pieces per order  p = Daily production rate H = Holding cost per unit per year  d = Daily demand/usage rate D = Annual demand Q 2  = 2DS H[1 - (d/p)] Q* = 2DS H[1 - (d/p)] p Setup cost = (D/Q)S Holding cost =   HQ[1 - (d/p)] 1 2 (D/Q)S =  HQ[1 - (d/p)] 1 2
Production Order Quantity Example D = 1,000 units  p = 8 units per day S = $10  d = 4 units per day H = $0.50 per unit per year Q* = 2DS H[1 - (d/p)] = 282.8 or 283 hubcaps Q* =  =  80,000 2(1,000)(10) 0.50[1 - (4/8)]
Production Order Quantity Model When annual data are used the equation becomes Note: Q* = 2DS annual demand rate annual production rate H  1 – d = 4 =  = D Number of days the plant is in operation 1,000 250
Quantity Discount Models ,[object Object],[object Object],Total cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost TC =  S +  H + PD D Q Q 2
Quantity Discount Models Table 12.2 A typical quantity discount schedule Discount Number Discount Quantity Discount (%) Discount Price (P) 1 0 to 999 no discount $5.00 2 1,000 to 1,999 4 $4.80 3 2,000 and over 5 $4.75
Quantity Discount Models ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Steps in analyzing a quantity discount
Quantity Discount Models Figure 12.7 1,000 2,000 Total cost $ 0 Order quantity Q* for discount 2 is below the allowable range at point a and must be adjusted upward to 1,000 units at point b a b 1st price break 2nd price break Total cost curve for discount 1 Total cost curve for discount 2 Total cost curve for discount 3
Quantity Discount Example Calculate Q* for every discount Q* = 2DS IP Q 1 * =  = 700 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(5.00) Q 2 * =  = 714 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.80) Q 3 * =  = 718 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.75)
Quantity Discount Example Calculate Q* for every discount Q* = 2DS IP Q 1 * =  = 700 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(5.00) Q 2 * =  = 714 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.80) Q 3 * =  = 718 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.75) 1,000 — adjusted 2,000 — adjusted
Quantity Discount Example Table 12.3 Choose the price and quantity that gives the lowest total cost Buy 1,000 units at $4.80 per unit Discount Number Unit Price Order Quantity Annual Product Cost Annual Ordering Cost Annual Holding Cost Total 1 $5.00 700 $25,000 $350 $350 $25,700 2 $4.80 1,000 $24,000 $245 $480 $24,725 3 $4.75 2,000 $23.750 $122.50 $950 $24,822.50
Probabilistic Models and Safety Stock ,[object Object],[object Object],ROP = d x L + ss Annual stockout costs = the sum of the units short x the probability x the stockout cost/unit  x the number of orders per year
Probabilistic Demand Figure 12.8 Safety stock 16.5 units ROP   Place order Inventory level Time 0 Minimum demand during lead time Maximum demand during lead time Mean demand during lead time Normal distribution probability of demand during lead time Expected demand during lead time (350 kits) ROP = 350 + safety stock of 16.5 = 366.5 Receive order Lead time
Probabilistic Demand Safety stock Probability of no stockout 95% of the time Mean demand 350 ROP = ? kits Quantity Number of  standard deviations 0 z Risk of a stockout (5% of area of normal curve)
Probabilistic Demand Use prescribed service levels to set safety stock when the cost of stockouts cannot be determined ROP = demand during lead time + Z  dLT where Z = number of standard deviations  dLT  = standard deviation of demand during lead time
Probabilistic Example Average demand =    = 350 kits Standard deviation of demand during lead time =   dLT  = 10 kits 5% stockout policy (service level = 95%) Using Appendix I, for an area under the curve of 95%, the Z = 1.65 Safety stock = Z  dLT  = 1.65(10) = 16.5 kits Reorder point = expected demand during lead time + safety stock = 350 kits + 16.5 kits of safety stock = 366.5 or 367 kits
Other Probabilistic Models ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],When data on demand during lead time is not available, there are other models available
Other Probabilistic Models Demand is variable and lead time is constant ROP = (average daily demand  x lead time in days) + Z  dLT where  d = standard deviation of demand per day  dLT =   d   lead time
Probabilistic Example Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 15 Standard deviation = 5 Lead time is constant at 2 days 90% service level desired Z for 90% = 1.28 From Appendix I Safety stock is about 9 iPods ROP = (15 units x 2 days) + Z  dlt = 30 + 1.28(5)(  2) = 30 + 9.02 = 39.02 ≈ 39
Other Probabilistic Models Lead time is variable and demand is constant ROP = (daily demand x average lead time in days) = Z x (daily demand) x   LT where  LT = standard deviation of lead time in days
Probabilistic Example Daily demand (constant) = 10 Average lead time = 6 days Standard deviation of lead time =   LT  = 3 98% service level desired Z for 98% = 2.055 From Appendix I ROP = (10 units x 6 days) + 2.055(10 units)(3) = 60 + 61.65 = 121.65 Reorder point is about 122 cameras
Other Probabilistic Models Both demand and lead time are variable ROP = (average daily demand  x average lead time) + Z  dLT where  d = standard deviation of demand per day  LT = standard deviation of lead time in days  dLT = (average lead time x   d 2 )  + (average daily demand) 2  x   LT 2
Probabilistic Example Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 150 Standard deviation =   d  = 16 Average lead time 5 days (normally distributed) Standard deviation =   LT  = 1 day 95% service level desired Z for 95% = 1.65 From Appendix I ROP = (150 packs x 5 days) + 1.65  dLT = (150 x 5) + 1.65  (5 days x 16 2 ) + (150 2  x 1 2 ) = 750 + 1.65(154) = 1,004 packs
Fixed-Period (P) Systems ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fixed-Period (P) Systems Figure 12.9 On-hand inventory Time Q 1 Q 2 Target quantity (T) P Q 3 Q 4 P P
Fixed-Period (P) Example Order amount (Q) = Target (T) - On-hand inventory - Earlier orders not yet received + Back orders Q = 50 - 0 - 0 + 3 = 53 jackets 3 jackets are back ordered No jackets are in stock It is time to place an order Target value = 50
Fixed-Period Systems ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

Inventory 1.1
Inventory 1.1Inventory 1.1
Inventory 1.1
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 
24867879 inventory-management-control-lecture-3
24867879 inventory-management-control-lecture-324867879 inventory-management-control-lecture-3
24867879 inventory-management-control-lecture-3
 
Opc least unit cost
Opc   least unit costOpc   least unit cost
Opc least unit cost
 
MRP and ERP
MRP and ERPMRP and ERP
MRP and ERP
 
Just In Time
Just In TimeJust In Time
Just In Time
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 
AGGREGATE PRODUCTION PLANNING
AGGREGATE PRODUCTION PLANNING AGGREGATE PRODUCTION PLANNING
AGGREGATE PRODUCTION PLANNING
 
inventory management ppt
inventory management pptinventory management ppt
inventory management ppt
 
The EOQ Model
The EOQ ModelThe EOQ Model
The EOQ Model
 
Inventory control
Inventory controlInventory control
Inventory control
 
Inventory management
 Inventory management Inventory management
Inventory management
 
material requirements planning
material requirements planningmaterial requirements planning
material requirements planning
 
Rsh qam11 ch06 ge
Rsh qam11 ch06 geRsh qam11 ch06 ge
Rsh qam11 ch06 ge
 
Aggregate Production Planning
Aggregate Production PlanningAggregate Production Planning
Aggregate Production Planning
 
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systems
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systemsCh12 jit+&+lean+systems
Ch12 jit+&+lean+systems
 
Inventory Management
Inventory ManagementInventory Management
Inventory Management
 
Aggregate planning
Aggregate planningAggregate planning
Aggregate planning
 
CHAPTER 3 System and design Capacity.pptx
CHAPTER 3 System and design Capacity.pptxCHAPTER 3 System and design Capacity.pptx
CHAPTER 3 System and design Capacity.pptx
 
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT
INVENTORY MANAGEMENTINVENTORY MANAGEMENT
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT
 

En vedette

Economic Order Quantity Models
Economic Order Quantity ModelsEconomic Order Quantity Models
Economic Order Quantity ModelsShashank Shekhar
 
Base Hospitality Pres 08
Base Hospitality Pres   08Base Hospitality Pres   08
Base Hospitality Pres 08Petewebb
 
Accounts receivable, inventory, and total quality management
Accounts receivable, inventory, and total quality managementAccounts receivable, inventory, and total quality management
Accounts receivable, inventory, and total quality managementKhalid Aziz
 
Sap fundamentals
Sap fundamentalsSap fundamentals
Sap fundamentalsZiko2K7
 
Inventory Man2
Inventory Man2Inventory Man2
Inventory Man2ajithsrc
 
Zhou Bicycle Company ppf
Zhou Bicycle Company ppfZhou Bicycle Company ppf
Zhou Bicycle Company ppfJuliana Brudiu
 
The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...
The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...
The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...Proformative, Inc.
 
Operation Management ( ICWA Inter)
Operation Management  ( ICWA Inter)Operation Management  ( ICWA Inter)
Operation Management ( ICWA Inter)Ulhas Wadivkar
 
Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis
Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis
Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis Dushyant Bheda
 
Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02
Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02
Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02jasonhian
 

En vedette (20)

Heizer 12
Heizer 12Heizer 12
Heizer 12
 
Economic Order Quantity Models
Economic Order Quantity ModelsEconomic Order Quantity Models
Economic Order Quantity Models
 
Base Hospitality Pres 08
Base Hospitality Pres   08Base Hospitality Pres   08
Base Hospitality Pres 08
 
Chapter 2_OM
Chapter 2_OMChapter 2_OM
Chapter 2_OM
 
Accounts receivable, inventory, and total quality management
Accounts receivable, inventory, and total quality managementAccounts receivable, inventory, and total quality management
Accounts receivable, inventory, and total quality management
 
Chapter 5_OM
Chapter 5_OMChapter 5_OM
Chapter 5_OM
 
Sap fundamentals
Sap fundamentalsSap fundamentals
Sap fundamentals
 
MGT366 Ch12
MGT366 Ch12MGT366 Ch12
MGT366 Ch12
 
Chapter 4_OM
Chapter 4_OMChapter 4_OM
Chapter 4_OM
 
Logistics
LogisticsLogistics
Logistics
 
Inventory Man2
Inventory Man2Inventory Man2
Inventory Man2
 
Zhou Bicycle Company ppf
Zhou Bicycle Company ppfZhou Bicycle Company ppf
Zhou Bicycle Company ppf
 
Chapter 7_OM
Chapter 7_OMChapter 7_OM
Chapter 7_OM
 
Forecasting
ForecastingForecasting
Forecasting
 
The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...
The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...
The Planning Way - Best Practices in Effective Variable Compensation Budgetin...
 
Operation Management ( ICWA Inter)
Operation Management  ( ICWA Inter)Operation Management  ( ICWA Inter)
Operation Management ( ICWA Inter)
 
Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis
Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis
Old Oregon Wood Store Case Analysis
 
Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02
Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02
Inventory management 091104161506 Phpapp02
 
Evolution of the pom
Evolution of the pomEvolution of the pom
Evolution of the pom
 
5 labour wastage
5 labour wastage5 labour wastage
5 labour wastage
 

Similaire à Chapter 6_OM

Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory managementAdnan Khan
 
Inventory management ppt @ bec doms
Inventory management ppt @ bec domsInventory management ppt @ bec doms
Inventory management ppt @ bec domsBabasab Patil
 
OM_4.ppt
OM_4.pptOM_4.ppt
OM_4.pptsengar3
 
C9 inventory management
C9 inventory managementC9 inventory management
C9 inventory managementhakimizaki
 
C9 inventory management
C9 inventory managementC9 inventory management
C9 inventory managementhakimizaki
 
Topic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptx
Topic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptxTopic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptx
Topic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptxHassanHani5
 
Lession - 1(Inventory Management).pptx
Lession - 1(Inventory Management).pptxLession - 1(Inventory Management).pptx
Lession - 1(Inventory Management).pptxRajeevRanjan743854
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory managementKuldeep Uttam
 
Sfe inventory management
Sfe inventory managementSfe inventory management
Sfe inventory managementArif Mahmood
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory managementAngelaMaurya
 
3. good inventory-management-edited-ppt
3. good  inventory-management-edited-ppt3. good  inventory-management-edited-ppt
3. good inventory-management-edited-pptshahidch44
 
19 inventory management
19 inventory management19 inventory management
19 inventory managementVIBHASH SINGH
 
Inventory Management System | Finance
Inventory Management System | FinanceInventory Management System | Finance
Inventory Management System | FinanceTransweb Global Inc
 
EOQ_EDITED (1).ppt
EOQ_EDITED (1).pptEOQ_EDITED (1).ppt
EOQ_EDITED (1).pptssuserc008c5
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory managementKaizer Dave
 

Similaire à Chapter 6_OM (20)

5A-INVENTORY MGT.ppt
5A-INVENTORY MGT.ppt5A-INVENTORY MGT.ppt
5A-INVENTORY MGT.ppt
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 
Inventory management ppt @ bec doms
Inventory management ppt @ bec domsInventory management ppt @ bec doms
Inventory management ppt @ bec doms
 
OM_4.ppt
OM_4.pptOM_4.ppt
OM_4.ppt
 
C9 inventory management
C9 inventory managementC9 inventory management
C9 inventory management
 
C9 inventory management
C9 inventory managementC9 inventory management
C9 inventory management
 
Topic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptx
Topic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptxTopic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptx
Topic 4 Inventory Management Model.pptx
 
Lession - 1(Inventory Management).pptx
Lession - 1(Inventory Management).pptxLession - 1(Inventory Management).pptx
Lession - 1(Inventory Management).pptx
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 
Eoq model
Eoq modelEoq model
Eoq model
 
Ops5
Ops5Ops5
Ops5
 
Sfe inventory management
Sfe inventory managementSfe inventory management
Sfe inventory management
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 
3. good inventory-management-edited-ppt
3. good  inventory-management-edited-ppt3. good  inventory-management-edited-ppt
3. good inventory-management-edited-ppt
 
19 inventory management
19 inventory management19 inventory management
19 inventory management
 
Inventory Management System | Finance
Inventory Management System | FinanceInventory Management System | Finance
Inventory Management System | Finance
 
Inventory models
Inventory modelsInventory models
Inventory models
 
EOQ_EDITED (1).ppt
EOQ_EDITED (1).pptEOQ_EDITED (1).ppt
EOQ_EDITED (1).ppt
 
Inventory notes
Inventory notesInventory notes
Inventory notes
 
Inventory management
Inventory managementInventory management
Inventory management
 

Dernier

Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfAddepto
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningLars Bell
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupFlorian Wilhelm
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr BaganFwdays
 
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESSALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESmohitsingh558521
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteDianaGray10
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfMounikaPolabathina
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 

Dernier (20)

Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
 
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESSALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test SuiteTake control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
Take control of your SAP testing with UiPath Test Suite
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 

Chapter 6_OM

  • 1. Operations Management Session 6 – Inventory Management
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10. The Material Flow Cycle Figure 12.1 Input Wait for Wait to Move Wait in queue Setup Run Output inspection be moved time for operator time time Cycle time 95% 5%
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13. ABC Analysis Item Stock Number Percent of Number of Items Stocked Annual Volume (units) x Unit Cost = Annual Dollar Volume Percent of Annual Dollar Volume Class #10286 20% 1,000 $ 90.00 $ 90,000 38.8% A #11526 500 154.00 77,000 33.2% A #12760 1,550 17.00 26,350 11.3% B #10867 30% 350 42.86 15,001 6.4% B #10500 1,000 12.50 12,500 5.4% B 72% 23%
  • 14. ABC Analysis Item Stock Number Percent of Number of Items Stocked Annual Volume (units) x Unit Cost = Annual Dollar Volume Percent of Annual Dollar Volume Class #12572 600 $ 14.17 $ 8,502 3.7% C #14075 2,000 .60 1,200 .5% C #01036 50% 100 8.50 850 .4% C #01307 1,200 .42 504 .2% C #10572 250 .60 150 .1% C 8,550 $232,057 100.0% 5%
  • 15. ABC Analysis Figure 12.2 A Items B Items C Items Percent of annual dollar usage 80 – 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – 20 – 10 – 0 – | | | | | | | | | | 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of inventory items
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21. Holding Costs Table 12.1 Category Cost (and range) as a Percent of Inventory Valu e Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance) 6% (3 - 10%) Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost) 3% (1 - 3.5%) Labor cost 3% (3 - 5%) Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory) 11% (6 - 24%) Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3% (2 - 5%) Overall carrying cost 26%
  • 22. Holding Costs Table 12.1 Category Cost (and range) as a Percent of Inventory Valu e Housing costs (building rent or depreciation, operating costs, taxes, insurance) 6% (3 - 10%) Material handling costs (equipment lease or depreciation, power, operating cost) 3% (1 - 3.5%) Labor cost 3% (3 - 5%) Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and insurance on inventory) 11% (6 - 24%) Pilferage, space, and obsolescence 3% (2 - 5%) Overall carrying cost 26% Holding costs vary considerably depending on the business, location, and interest rates. Generally greater than 15%, some high tech items have holding costs greater than 50%.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25. Inventory Usage Over Time Figure 12.3 Order quantity = Q (maximum inventory level) Usage rate Average inventory on hand Q 2 Minimum inventory Inventory level Time 0
  • 26. Minimizing Costs Objective is to minimize total costs Table 11.5 Annual cost Order quantity Curve for total cost of holding and setup Holding cost curve Setup (or order) cost curve Minimum total cost Optimal order quantity (Q*)
  • 27. The EOQ Model Q = Number of pieces per order Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ) D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item S = Setup or ordering cost for each order H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year Annual setup cost = (Number of orders placed per year) x (Setup or order cost per order) Annual demand Number of units in each order Setup or order cost per order = Annual setup cost = S D Q = (S) D Q
  • 28. The EOQ Model Q = Number of pieces per order Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ) D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item S = Setup or ordering cost for each order H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year Annual holding cost = (Average inventory level) x (Holding cost per unit per year) Order quantity 2 = (Holding cost per unit per year) = (H) Q 2 Annual setup cost = S D Q Annual holding cost = H Q 2
  • 29. The EOQ Model Q = Number of pieces per order Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ) D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item S = Setup or ordering cost for each order H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year Optimal order quantity is found when annual setup cost equals annual holding cost Solving for Q* Annual setup cost = S D Q Annual holding cost = H Q 2 D Q S = H Q 2 2DS = Q 2 H Q 2 = 2DS/H Q* = 2DS/H
  • 30. An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units S = $10 per order H = $.50 per unit per year Q* = 2DS H Q* = 2(1,000)(10) 0.50 = 40,000 = 200 units
  • 31. An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order H = $.50 per unit per year = N = = Expected number of orders Demand Order quantity D Q* N = = 5 orders per year 1,000 200
  • 32. An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year = T = Expected time between orders Number of working days per year N T = = 50 days between orders 250 5
  • 33. An EOQ Example Determine optimal number of needles to order D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost TC = (5)($10) + (100)($.50) = $50 + $50 = $100 TC = S + H D Q Q 2 TC = ($10) + ($.50) 1,000 200 200 2
  • 34.
  • 35. An EOQ Example Management underestimated demand by 50% D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days Total annual cost increases by only 25% TC = S + H D Q Q 2 TC = ($10) + ($.50) = $75 + $50 = $125 1,500 200 200 2 1,500 units
  • 36. An EOQ Example Actual EOQ for new demand is 244.9 units D = 1,000 units Q* = 244.9 units S = $10 per order N = 5 orders per year H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days TC = $61.24 + $61.24 = $122.48 Only 2% less than the total cost of $125 when the order quantity was 200 TC = S + H D Q Q 2 TC = ($10) + ($.50) 1,500 244.9 244.9 2 1,500 units
  • 37.
  • 38. Reorder Point Curve Figure 12.5 Q* ROP (units) Inventory level (units) Time (days) Lead time = L Slope = units/day = d
  • 39. Reorder Point Example Demand = 8,000 iPods per year 250 working day year Lead time for orders is 3 working days ROP = d x L = 8,000/250 = 32 units = 32 units per day x 3 days = 96 units d = D Number of working days in a year
  • 40.
  • 41. Production Order Quantity Model Figure 12.6 Inventory level Time Demand part of cycle with no production Part of inventory cycle during which production (and usage) is taking place t Maximum inventory
  • 42. Production Order Quantity Model Q = Number of pieces per order p = Daily production rate H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rate t = Length of the production run in days = (Average inventory level) x Annual inventory holding cost Holding cost per unit per year = (Maximum inventory level)/2 Annual inventory level = – Maximum inventory level Total produced during the production run Total used during the production run = pt – dt
  • 43. Production Order Quantity Model Q = Number of pieces per order p = Daily production rate H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rate t = Length of the production run in days However, Q = total produced = pt ; thus t = Q/p = – Maximum inventory level Total produced during the production run Total used during the production run = pt – dt Maximum inventory level = p – d = Q 1 – Q p Q p d p Holding cost = (H) = 1 – H d p Q 2 Maximum inventory level 2
  • 44. Production Order Quantity Model Q = Number of pieces per order p = Daily production rate H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand/usage rate D = Annual demand Q 2 = 2DS H[1 - (d/p)] Q* = 2DS H[1 - (d/p)] p Setup cost = (D/Q)S Holding cost = HQ[1 - (d/p)] 1 2 (D/Q)S = HQ[1 - (d/p)] 1 2
  • 45. Production Order Quantity Example D = 1,000 units p = 8 units per day S = $10 d = 4 units per day H = $0.50 per unit per year Q* = 2DS H[1 - (d/p)] = 282.8 or 283 hubcaps Q* = = 80,000 2(1,000)(10) 0.50[1 - (4/8)]
  • 46. Production Order Quantity Model When annual data are used the equation becomes Note: Q* = 2DS annual demand rate annual production rate H 1 – d = 4 = = D Number of days the plant is in operation 1,000 250
  • 47.
  • 48. Quantity Discount Models Table 12.2 A typical quantity discount schedule Discount Number Discount Quantity Discount (%) Discount Price (P) 1 0 to 999 no discount $5.00 2 1,000 to 1,999 4 $4.80 3 2,000 and over 5 $4.75
  • 49.
  • 50. Quantity Discount Models Figure 12.7 1,000 2,000 Total cost $ 0 Order quantity Q* for discount 2 is below the allowable range at point a and must be adjusted upward to 1,000 units at point b a b 1st price break 2nd price break Total cost curve for discount 1 Total cost curve for discount 2 Total cost curve for discount 3
  • 51. Quantity Discount Example Calculate Q* for every discount Q* = 2DS IP Q 1 * = = 700 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(5.00) Q 2 * = = 714 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.80) Q 3 * = = 718 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.75)
  • 52. Quantity Discount Example Calculate Q* for every discount Q* = 2DS IP Q 1 * = = 700 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(5.00) Q 2 * = = 714 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.80) Q 3 * = = 718 cars/order 2(5,000)(49) (.2)(4.75) 1,000 — adjusted 2,000 — adjusted
  • 53. Quantity Discount Example Table 12.3 Choose the price and quantity that gives the lowest total cost Buy 1,000 units at $4.80 per unit Discount Number Unit Price Order Quantity Annual Product Cost Annual Ordering Cost Annual Holding Cost Total 1 $5.00 700 $25,000 $350 $350 $25,700 2 $4.80 1,000 $24,000 $245 $480 $24,725 3 $4.75 2,000 $23.750 $122.50 $950 $24,822.50
  • 54.
  • 55. Probabilistic Demand Figure 12.8 Safety stock 16.5 units ROP  Place order Inventory level Time 0 Minimum demand during lead time Maximum demand during lead time Mean demand during lead time Normal distribution probability of demand during lead time Expected demand during lead time (350 kits) ROP = 350 + safety stock of 16.5 = 366.5 Receive order Lead time
  • 56. Probabilistic Demand Safety stock Probability of no stockout 95% of the time Mean demand 350 ROP = ? kits Quantity Number of standard deviations 0 z Risk of a stockout (5% of area of normal curve)
  • 57. Probabilistic Demand Use prescribed service levels to set safety stock when the cost of stockouts cannot be determined ROP = demand during lead time + Z  dLT where Z = number of standard deviations  dLT = standard deviation of demand during lead time
  • 58. Probabilistic Example Average demand =  = 350 kits Standard deviation of demand during lead time =  dLT = 10 kits 5% stockout policy (service level = 95%) Using Appendix I, for an area under the curve of 95%, the Z = 1.65 Safety stock = Z  dLT = 1.65(10) = 16.5 kits Reorder point = expected demand during lead time + safety stock = 350 kits + 16.5 kits of safety stock = 366.5 or 367 kits
  • 59.
  • 60. Other Probabilistic Models Demand is variable and lead time is constant ROP = (average daily demand x lead time in days) + Z  dLT where  d = standard deviation of demand per day  dLT =  d lead time
  • 61. Probabilistic Example Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 15 Standard deviation = 5 Lead time is constant at 2 days 90% service level desired Z for 90% = 1.28 From Appendix I Safety stock is about 9 iPods ROP = (15 units x 2 days) + Z  dlt = 30 + 1.28(5)( 2) = 30 + 9.02 = 39.02 ≈ 39
  • 62. Other Probabilistic Models Lead time is variable and demand is constant ROP = (daily demand x average lead time in days) = Z x (daily demand) x  LT where  LT = standard deviation of lead time in days
  • 63. Probabilistic Example Daily demand (constant) = 10 Average lead time = 6 days Standard deviation of lead time =  LT = 3 98% service level desired Z for 98% = 2.055 From Appendix I ROP = (10 units x 6 days) + 2.055(10 units)(3) = 60 + 61.65 = 121.65 Reorder point is about 122 cameras
  • 64. Other Probabilistic Models Both demand and lead time are variable ROP = (average daily demand x average lead time) + Z  dLT where  d = standard deviation of demand per day  LT = standard deviation of lead time in days  dLT = (average lead time x  d 2 ) + (average daily demand) 2 x  LT 2
  • 65. Probabilistic Example Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 150 Standard deviation =  d = 16 Average lead time 5 days (normally distributed) Standard deviation =  LT = 1 day 95% service level desired Z for 95% = 1.65 From Appendix I ROP = (150 packs x 5 days) + 1.65  dLT = (150 x 5) + 1.65 (5 days x 16 2 ) + (150 2 x 1 2 ) = 750 + 1.65(154) = 1,004 packs
  • 66.
  • 67. Fixed-Period (P) Systems Figure 12.9 On-hand inventory Time Q 1 Q 2 Target quantity (T) P Q 3 Q 4 P P
  • 68. Fixed-Period (P) Example Order amount (Q) = Target (T) - On-hand inventory - Earlier orders not yet received + Back orders Q = 50 - 0 - 0 + 3 = 53 jackets 3 jackets are back ordered No jackets are in stock It is time to place an order Target value = 50
  • 69.