Scarborough (2009) Energia Renovable, Ruta Para El Desarrollo Economico
•Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF•
0 j'aime•344 vues
JF Scarborough III Lima, 24 de abril de 2009
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (16)
Similaire à Scarborough (2009) Energia Renovable, Ruta Para El Desarrollo Economico
Similaire à Scarborough (2009) Energia Renovable, Ruta Para El Desarrollo Economico (20)
Plus de GVEP International Latinoamérica
Plus de GVEP International Latinoamérica (19)
Dernier
Dernier (16)
Scarborough (2009) Energia Renovable, Ruta Para El Desarrollo Economico
- 1. Energ í a Renovable: Ruta para el Desarrollo Econ ó mico
- 5. Desafíos Cambio Climático
- 9. Electrificación Rural: Claves Criterios Objetivos Soporte Monitoreo / Feedback
- 10. Energía Eólica: Potencial *Global Wind Energy Council al al al al
- 12. Metas del DOE Science Discovery Innovation Lower GHG emissions Clean, Secure Energy Economic Prosperity National Security
- 14. Cambio Climatico EE.UU. 6,000 m tons/ año total Millones de 291 122
- 15. RE para Bajar Emisiones: Ejemplo EE.UU. Evitar Emisiones Bajar el costo del cumplimiento del régimen de carbono en $145,000,000,000
- 16. La Meta La meta de un país o región es lograr tener una indústria local fuerte y sostenible que provea de energía verde al mercado.
- 18. Crear Demanda RFPs / Ofertas competitivas por parte del gobierno y/o las empresas e l é ctricas Leyes estandares y transparentes Créditos para la producción Créditos para la inversión Tarifas de Conección Estándares del portafolio de Renovables (RPS) La combinación de estas reglas e incentivos puede ayudar a la creación de un mercado sostenible.
- 20. Participación de los Grupos de Interés Empresas Universidades y Laboratorios Eléctricas y usuarios finales Org. Reguladores
- 22. Plataforma para el Éxito Creación del Cluster Inversión Indústria Local Sostenible
- 23. Ohio: Problemas / Desafíos Polución to
- 24. Ohio: Programas
- 25. Ohio: Clusters
- 26. Conclusiones: Como Enfrentar los Desafíos * Recuperación de los Costos * Financiamiento Acceso a la transmisión Intermitencia * Diseño holístico del sistema * Normas y permisos estándares Enfasis en el D.E.
Notes de l'éditeur
- What I want to share is some of my experiences and thoughts on how renew energy can be a tool for econ dev
- After first 3 points: what we have done is create a strategy whereby we work with govs, both fed & state, to implement programs and plans that will attract investment and create new local economies around renewable energy. What we have learned is that the right strategies can create interesting market opportunities for investors while creating a sustainable local market.
- Right now we’re facing a lot of challenges worldwide—in US, europe and here in latin america. Although each region has its own challenges, there are several that are almost universal.
- Seguridad—in US we tend to buy energy from people who hate us so if we can lower imports it has many other benefits Diversification—give example of financial portfolio. There are those who will say 100% RE is good but I don’t think so—just like in your portfolio you want a solid mix of risk & return DE—RE is great for job creation. It’s why obama is so focused on this—we lost over 2m jobs last year
- Mention 33 job/MW
- Tech– talk about cookers, hot water heating, irrigation, pumping and other - also make sure to mention right kind of system—50w system design very different from grid-tied 300kw - model—concession, dist, retail or other (sale through microcredits) $-- need to mention that costs are coming down and that there are new ways of recouping (carbon trade, etc.) Politica—avoid probs from past. Competition can reduce corruption. Objective standards, transparent rules. Technology agnostic
- 1 understand resources. Measure, etc 5 market—offtake agreements, customers 6siting—just because it is windy doesn’t mean it’s a good site 7 understand economics—many factors including differences in size, financing structures, incentives can mean huge diff in IRR 9 socios—turbine mfgs, project devs, O&M issues, logistics TAKING ALL OF THIS INTO ACCOUNT WILL HELP YOU FACE CHALLENGES
- *ITC allowed to take as a grant *solar other benefits include removal of caps, extention of bonus depreciation, 5 yr carryback on NOL, remedy for AMT *PTC allowed to convert to ITC then to grant (temporary provision) *transmission study to be done in 09. up to $6b for specific regions to construct lines
- Talk through graphic then say “used to be a very big number; now, after the bailout it doesn’t seem so big but still….”
- RE is expensive and needs govt support. It won’t forever but today the reality is that it does *coal, nuclear, nat gas have been supported for decades and are ahead in competitive & technology dev However it’s worth supporting—today is as expensive as it gets whereas other forms will only get moreso
- Use a holistic approach—bring everyone to the table. Make sure you leverage existing assets to get the most out of the program and create the most local value
- Govt support & communication of their vision Availability of I+D resources Clear, standard & reasonable laws & regs Stable market demand Multiple company participants All lead to creation of a cluster in a particular region which is very attractive for investment
- Intro-they’re suffering a lot with lots of problems. MENTION THAT CA / NJ ARE BETTER KNOWN BUT AREN’T AS INTERESTING AS EXAMPLES DUE TO THE $ THEY SPENT. Energy—mention old grid & blackouts Rust belt—everything (steel, auto, machinery) gone to china. Unemployment up
- Realizing the challenges they were facing, they did a study 10 years ago to identify new growth industries that would leverage what they had. One industry they identified was r.e. *Adv energy fund: funded through riders on utility bill. For projects *wind supp chain effort—identify cos that could switch (500) and existing providers (80), help them retrain, retool. Provide intros to OEMs. Originally funded at $1.3m but now self sustaining through membership *Ed Tech Centers: helping trad mfgs retool (help with tech issues) * Wind Working group federal program to bring all stakeholders to the table to discuss the issues (siting, enviro, policy, etc.). State formed coalition and very little funding needed ($30-$75k/ year) *3 rd frontier: 10 years, $1b to identify & invest in new technologies for the state. All stkeholders involved (unis, R&D, VCs, entrepreneuer programs)
- The clear vision, demand creation, infrastructure development, stakeholder involvement etc. let to this wind component structure Then discuss toledo solar cluster Then talk iso example—after looking at 20+ states they just annouced they will build a factory in ohio
- Econ—compare with REAL cost of fossil fuels = health, enviro cleanup, subsidies of the past Holistic design—Xcel puts in gas turbines for 6% of system (with 30% wind) to solve intermittancy Politica– emphasis on econ dev benefits / job creation / creation of new customers for utilities , new tax rev for gov