AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
Opinion leadership on twitter xu ica2013
1. Predicting Opinion Leadership in
Twitter Networks
The Case of the Wisconsin Recall Election
•
Weiai Xu, Department of Communication, SUNY-Buffalo
weiaixu@buffalo.edu
•
Yoonmo Sang, Department of Radio-Television-Film, University of Texas –
Austin
•
Stacy Blasiola, Department of Communication, University of Illinois at
Chicago
•
Corresponding author: Dr.Han Woo Park, Associate Professor, the
Department of Media & Communication, YeungNam University, South Korea
1
2. Opinion leadership in digital age is the
ability to influence online information flow.
It means
grab others’ attention and persuade
others to maximize the attention.
On Twitter, opinion leadership means
getting your message retweeted.
2
3. Characteristics associated with opinion leaders (see Rogers, 2003):
opinion leaders are:
1. well-informed
2.socially connected
3. involved in specific issues or topics
4. highly regarded by others,
etc.
Are these characteristics still relevant in digital
age?
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed. ed.). New York: Free Press. 3
4. In this project, we test how opinion leadership
in Twitter relates to
1. social connectivity
2. involvement
3. user identity
4
5. What does connectivity means?
• Twitter forms information flow networks
• Graph: Twitter hashtag #wirecall
A higher
betweenness
centrality
means a higher
level of
connectivity
5
6. What does involvement means?
• General involvement: Twitter users’ political
involvement
• Situational involvement: issue involvement,
whether a user is interested in or personally
affected by the WI recall election
6
7. Three ways to infer whether a user is involved:
• user’s geographic location (in WI or not)
• Self-disclosure of political identity on Twitter
profile
• The content of tweets
7
8. Location info on Twitter profile
Self-disclosure of political identity on Twitter profile
8
9. Tweets indicating a hierarchy of involvement
Engaging
tweets
action
Explicitly ask other users to engage in certain acts
community
information
Providing original feedback
Simply passing along others’ messages
Higher proportion of engaging tweets = more involved
9
10. What does identity means?
• Individual user or organizational users
(e.g. news media, advocacy groups,
government agencies, etc.)
• News media or non-news-media
10
11. Data Profile
•
Data-mining: most recent 1500 tweets every two
hours, from 5-29-2012 to 6-5-2012
•
1000 users randomly sampled from 8957 Twitter
users that tweeted #wirecall during the timeframe
•
The sampled users sent 3546 tweets containing the
hashtag #wirecall
11
13. • Involvement indicated by geographic location
positively predicts the ability in getting retweeted.
13
14. • Involvement indicated by self-disclosure of political
identity: no significant results.
14
15. • Organizational users more likely to get retweeted.
• But no significant differences in the ability to get retweets
between Twitter users of traditional news media and nonmedia.
15
16. The takeaway
• Characteristics associated with traditional opinion leaderships
are still relevant in Twitter communication
• the flexibility of inferring online users’ characteristics (e.g.
involvement and social connectivity) using actual behavioral
data instead of self-reported data
• Methodologically, combing network analysis with content
analysis in studying online behavior
16
17. Future directions
• Combining behavior data and perception data (content
analysis + network analysis + survey)
• Connectivity in various types of networks (issue network
vs. general Twitter network)
• Non-issue specific
• longitudinal analysis
17