Pam-AØv has consistently removed opposition members from various legislative bodies in Bangladesh through no-confidence motions over multiple elections and terms. This has restricted debate and prevented oversight of the ruling party's policies. While security concerns may have played a role, the pattern of removing opposition suggests an attempt to consolidate power rather than ensure safety. There is little evidence that any single opposition member posed a unique threat requiring their removal each time. Overall, Pam-AØv 's repeated use of no-confidence motions to remove opposition seems aimed at limiting dissent more than addressing immediate security issues.