Utilization of virtual microscopy in a cooperative group setting
Strategies for Growth and Survival of Pathology Departments
1. Evolution of Strategies for
Survival and Growth in
Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine
Robert Boorstein, MD, PhD
2. Strategies for Survival and Growth
in Pathology of Medicine
Consolidation
Automation
Specialization
Quality Management and Integrated
Decision Making
3. Strategy
A plan, method, or series of maneuvers or
stratagems for obtaining a specific goal or result
(dictionary.com)
The science of military command, or the science
of projecting campaigns and directing great
military movements (Websters)
The commitment of resources in support of the
mission in pursuit of defined and measurable
ends (NYU Stern Business School).
4. Strategies for Survival and Growth
in Pathology of Medicine
Consolidation
Automation
Specialization
Quality Management and Integrated
Decision Making
5. Types of Laboratory Consolidations
Across institutions
Within institutions, parallel services
Within institutions, different services
6. Pressures for Consolidation (Push)
Personnel Costs
Equipment Costs
Regulatory Burdens
Demands for Space
Closure of Residency Programs
7. Pressures for Consolidation (Pull)
High- throughput, high capital cost
equipment
Centralized and standardized LIS and HIS
systems
Unified corporate leadership
9. Development of a consolidated
laboratory network
Bellevue Hospital
Lincoln Hospital
Metropolitan Hospital
Harlem Hospital
Coler/GoldwaterHospitals
10. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporatio
11. Laboratory Organization, South Manhattan
Healthcare Network and Generations
Plus/Northern Manhattan Health Network
Large central referral facility on the
Bellevue site
Full service specialized and routine clinical
laboratory services
Full service academic anatomic pathology
services
Stat and point of care services appropriate for
trauma, tertiary care and primary care
services
12. Laboratory Organization, South Manhattan
Healthcare Network and Generations
Plus/Northern Manhattan Health Network
Acute care facilities
Anatomic Pathology (surgical pathology,
frozen sections, cytology)
Rapid Response Laboratories
Chronic care facilities
Rapid Response Laboratories
Ambulatory care facilities
Sample collection only
13. Flow of work to Bellevue
Bellevue Hospital Laboratory
Metropolitan
Belvis
(Rapid Response and AP)
Lincoln
Morrisania
(Rapid Response and AP)
Harlem
Renaissance
(Rapid Response and AP)
Coler Goldwater
Gouverneur
(Rapid Response)
14. Effect of consolidation, impact of
network on overall volume at Bellevue
Area Network %
Clinical Laboratories 60%
Surgical Pathology 5%
Autopsy 55%
Cytology 75%
16. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
At the organization level
At the department/operations level
Clear mission
Information management
Transport
Flexibility
17. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
At the organization level
At the department/operations level
No turning back!!!
Clear mission
Information management
Transport
Flexibility
18. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
Clear mission
Information management
Transport
Flexibility
19. NYCHHC Strategic Priorities
HHC has set several strategic priorities to insure that we continue the
improvements and innovations that have distinguished New York City's
public hospital system in the months and years ahead.
Patient Safety - HHC's multi-year campaign to reduce medical errors, prevent
infections, pneumonia and cardiac arrests.
Quality & Safety Performance - HHC publishes its quality record, inviting public
comparison with state and national performance averages.
Access to Healthcare - Providing Quality Healthcare for ALL New Yorkers.
Technology - HHC has marked its place as a medical innovator by investing in
advanced, integrated technology throughout its facilities.
Modernization - HHC's ongoing capital program to ensure that our public
hospitals continue to provide state-of-the-art medical treatment.
20. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
Clear mission
At the level of organization
At the level of the department
Within each division
Information management
Transport
Flexibility
21. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
Clear mission
Information management
Singlesystem across all facilities
Commitment to paperless ordering and resulting
Bar-coding of all samples
Transport
Flexibility
22. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
Clear mission
Information management
Transport
Essential
Responsive to client needs
Reality based
Flexibility
23. Factors for successful consolidation
Clear leadership
Clear mission
Information management
Transport
Flexibility
Planning cannot predict all eventualities
At go live, willingness to adjust while moving forward
Can judiciously skip less critical components of a
consolidation, as long as key objectives are attained
24. Factors inhibiting successful
consolidation efforts
Failure to recognize and respect clinical
needs of new clients
In conclusion, our system has benefited from the consolidation efforts and the
implementation of the TLA system. The actual dollar savings are predicated on
the remaining hospitals coming live and their willingness or ability to make the
necessary staff reductions. Although our system remains in the growth phase, we
have realized our efficiencies in TAT for those hospitals brought live. Clinical Chemistry 46: 751-
756, 2000
Labor instability
Politics, institutional and community
Unpredictable events
26. Consolidation, Phase 2: Coordinated
Delivery of Laboratory service to all
sites
Integrated management structure (2001-
2002)
Standardization of test menus, normal
ranges, and clinical indications (2003)
Standardization of all major laboratory
systems (2003-2008)
Automation of accessioning and sample
handling at referral sites (2003-2008?)
27. Phase 2, continued
Autopsy to Bellevue (2002+)
All Lincoln cytology to Bellevue (2003)
29. Benefits of Consolidation
Reduction of unit labor costs.
Reduction of unit capital costs.
Reduction of unit space costs.
Standardization of quality at high level.
30. Strategies for Survival and Growth
in Pathology of Medicine
Consolidation
Automation
Specialization
Quality Management and Integrated
Decision Making
31. Increased Role of Automation in
the clinical laboratory
Reduction of manual
processes
Reduced error rate in
aliquotting and specimen
movement
Improved turnaround time
Reduction in sample
volumes needed for
analysis
32. Benefits of automation
Run more tests.
Test in fewer sites.
Operate with fewer instruments.
Retain lower operating costs.
Employ relatively less skilled labor.
Use more automation in a paperless
environment.
http://www.devicelink.com/ivdt/archive/99/07/010.html
33. Automation strategies
Total laboratory automation (i.e. Beth Israel, NY
Cornell, North Shore, Mt Sinai).
High upfront capital costs (10-20 million)
High demand on IS infrastructure
Networked, modular, incremental automation (HHC
model) Highly efficient analytical instruments, handling
high volumes with redundancy
Automated sample handling, and sorting, utilizing tracked
systems
Automation at referral sites
Core laboratory
34. Steps in automation
Front end processing
Transfer to analytical systems
Distribution to analytic instruments
Analytical instrumentation
Verification
Back end processing and storage
35. Thinking about automation
What is the real goal of automation?
If the goal is labor saving, which steps really use
the most labor?
If the goal is quality or time savings, automating
which steps will give those benefits?
If the goal is to increase capacity (and thus
reduce unit labor costs), is the business really
available, and what are the barriers to serving
new customers?
36. Assessing success in automation
“Laboratory A” core lab currently
processes 2500–3000 tests per day.
Since it implemented automation with
robotics, the lab has increased test
volume by 20%, reduced sample
turnaround times by 11%, and saved
$100,000 in staff salaries.
http://www.devicelink.com/ivdt/archive/99/07/010.html
37. Return on investment
Total laboratory automation often
consumed $15-20 million in Capital costs
for acquisition, site preparation, relocation
and transition costs.
Which of the successes are due not to the
main automation, but to concurrent
processes that make sense independent
of TLA?
38. Laboratory Workload and Cost sharing
80% of the costs in the laboratory belongs to the pre-
and post analytical processes, only 20% to the
analytical part...
39. Factors for success
Work station consolidation
Front end automation (accessioning,
centrifugation, aliqotting)
Improved informatics (bar coding, no
paper)
Changes in labor rules
40. Steps in automation
Front end processing
Accessioning, centrifugation, aliquotting
Remote order entry, bar coding
Transfer to analytical system
Distribution to analytic instruments
Analytical instrumentation
Workstation Consolidation
Verification
Back end processing and storage
Electronic Reporting
41. Steps in automation
Front end processing
Accessioning, centrifugation, aliquotting
Remote order entry, bar coding
Transfer to analytical system
Distribution to analytic instruments
Analytical instrumentation
Workstation Consolidation
Verification
Back end processing and storage
Electronic Reporting
42. Recipes for failure
Extended delays in implementation due to
complexity and demands on IT
Loss of leverage with vendors
Lock in old technology
Increased need for high paid staff
Inability to reduce staff
Failure to reach planned, and paid for, growth
“The lab currently processes 4000 tests per day, and
has the capability to expand to more than 25,000
tests per day”
43. Factors essential for laboratory growth,
perhaps more important than automation
Work station consolidation
Front end automation
Specimen ID and tracking
Billing and Collections
Transport
Customer Service
44. Automation can follow growth:
Modular incremental automation
Minimal upfront capital or site preparation
costs.
Equipment amortized into reagent
purchases.
Scalable
Ongoing instrument modernization
46. Lab Area Manufacturer Model
Individual Components
Chemistry Beckman Coulter DxC
AU
Analyzer Interfaces Roche
OCD
Abbott /Toshiba
Modular
250, 950
Aeroset, 80FR,
200FR
Immuno Beckman Coulter DxI
Abbott AxSym, Architect
Siemens Centaur
Siemens Atlas and Centaur Stago R Tosoh AIA21
OCD Eci
Fujirebio Lumipulse F
Coag Beckman Coulter TOP-LAS
Stago Sta-r
Sysmex CA-6000
Heme Beckman Coulter LH 750/755
Sysmex HST
Roche Modular OCD 950, 250, ECI
Urinalysis Siemens Atlas
Sysmex UA-2000
Trademarks are property of the respective
Manufacturers
47. Single Testing and Sample
Management Workstation!
Sample
Management
CBC, Diff,
A1c Retic Testing
Tes
ti ng
Smear staining
Smear
preparation
Frees-up non-productive
labor!
48. Strategies for Survival and Growth
in Pathology of Medicine
Consolidation
Automation
Specialization
Quality Management and Integrated
Decision Making
49. What drives Specialization
Build on existing expertise (supply)
Meet needs of existing clients, leveraging
existing transport, IT, and customer
service relationships (demand)
51. Programs built on Existing
Strengths
Cytology
Neuropathology
Cytogenetics
Hemoglobin Analysis
Tuberculosis
GC/Chlamydia
52. Programs built de novo based on
clinical need
HIV, HBV, HCV viral loads
Maternal Fetal Defect testing
Lead testing
GC/Chlamydia/HPV
Colon Cancer Screening Colon Sentry
60. Project Findings Show Asian
American New Yorkers Have a High
Burden of Hepatitis B Infection
NEW YORK, August 9, 2005 –The
Center for the Study of Asian American Health at New
York University School of Medicine, the central
coordinating agency for the NYC Asian American
Hepatitis B Program has received a total of $2.6 million
to continue its work in screening, educating, vaccinating,
and treating Asian Americans in New York City for
hepatitis B. $1.7 million of the grant is from the New York
City Council with the remainder as matching funds from
the New York State and City Departments of Health. The
Program is a made up of a coalition of healthcare and
community-based organizations across the city.
61. Strategies for Survival and Growth
in Pathology of Medicine
Consolidation
Automation
Specialization
Quality Management and Integrated
Decision Making
62. Leadership in Patient Safety Goal
implementation
Patient and specimen ID
Critical Values
63. Test use rationalization
CK-MB vs troponin
Lipase vs amylase
Algorithm based thyroid function testing
64. Involvement in core measures related to
quality and reimbursement
Diabetes management and HgbA1C
Nosocomial infections
Timeliness of treatment of pneumonia
Stat TAT
65. Bellevue Hospital Center
South Manhattan Healthcare Network
462 First Ave & 27th St, New York, NY 10016
ER Turnaround Time Timeline
Emergency/STATS Test TAT Timeline (minutes)
0' 16' 56' 89'
Order Draw Received Resulted
Order to Draw: 16 minutes
Order to Received: 56 minutes
Order to Resulted: 89 minutes
Draw to Received: 40 minutes
Draw to Resulted: 73 minutes
Received to Resulted: 33 minutes
66. Roles in new programs
HIV screening
Stroke program
67. Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
Stroke Monitor 2007
MONTH # OF STROKES CBC TAT < 15' PT/APTT TAT <30' BMP TAT<30' COMMENT
DECEMBER 2 4 14 29
JANUARY 6 3.4 21.6 18.6 one stroke specime trax to BB
FEBRUARY 6 3.2 24.8 19.4 1 hmlz,1 not announced
MARCH 11 3.2 20.7 17 1 stroke with only Coag Reque
APRIL 8 2.7 14.9 14.3 2 hemolyzed
MAY 8 5.5 17.2 15.4 2 hemolyzed
JUNE 6 4.2 11.2 13.8 1 chem hemolyzed
JULY 13 3 17 18.5
AUGUST 12 3.5 20 14
SEPTEMBER 11 2.8 19.8 17.6 chem4hml-ptptt-1qns
OCTOBER 10 4.6 14 16.5 chem1 heml-ptptt-2qns
NOVEMBER 11 2.9 14.9 11.9
DECEMBER 5 8 17.4 19.6
68. Driving home quality principles
New pathology system, LIS and Anatomic
Remote order entry with bar codes
Results to Doctors’ queues
Voice recognition at grossing.
Integrated reporting
Double label, computer directed cassette labeling
Etched slides with barcodes.
69. Conclusions
People are crucial
Success is built on common vision
Resources must be committed
Needs and solutions are local
70. Future trends
Laboratory Consolidation
Driven by Resource Issues, personnel and capital
Oversight of test utilization
Accountable Care Organizations, Insurers, Capitation
Algorithm based results
Competition from sole source branded products
Brca1, OncotypeDX, etc.