SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Introduction to Higher Level Thinking
Marzano’s New Taxonomy
Marzano's New Taxonomy is made up of three systems and
the Knowledge Domain, all of which are important for thinking and
learning.

• Self-System: When faced with the option of starting a new task,
decides whether to continue the current behavior or engage in the
new activity

• Metacognitive System: sets goals and keeps track of how well they
are being achieved

•Cognitive System: processes all the necessary information

•Knowledge Domain: provides the content.
Marzano’s New Taxonomy

              1 Self           2
              System               1   Continue the behavior or
                                       engage in the new activity


Start a new task       4           2   Sets goals and keeps tracks


                   Cognitive
                    System         3   Processes all the
                                       information

                       3           4   The Knowledge Domain
                                       provides the content
Marzano’s New Taxonomy
Gallagher and Aschner Taxonomy
 Gallagher and Aschner classifies their taxonomy in three
 categories (Aschner, Gallagher, Perry, & Afsar, 1961).

 •Recall: Recall questions are simply questions that causes the
 student to remember similar to the "remember" stage in the
 revised Bloom's Taxonomy.

 •Convergent :Convergent questions are those that require
 students to give only one response.

 •Divergent. Divergent questions are those that require more
 than one response.
Gallagher and Aschner Taxonomy



Convergent
                                 Divergent




                  Recall
Gallagher and Aschner Taxonomy

              Low Order Convergent
  Level I     Students engage in reproductive thinking

              High Order Convergent
  Level II    Students engage in the initial levels of
              productive thinking
              Low Order Divergent
  Level III   Students think critically about information

              High Order Divergent
  Level IV    Students perform original thinking
Walsh and Sattes Taxonomy

Walsh and Sattes' Taxonomy is based on
research focusing classroom questioning. Their
questioning taxonomy is based on three-level systems:

•Recall Level: level corresponds to the revised Bloom's
Taxonomy cognitive level remember.

•Use Level: mainly states to use or do something with
what you learned.

•Create Level: means to use their imagination on what
was learned.
Walsh and Sattes Taxonomy

              Recall


    Use                     Create


    Classroom Questioning
Walsh and Sattes Taxonomy

           Evaluate, Check, Coordinate, Detect,
    3rd    Monitor, Test, Critique, Judge, Generate,
  Create   Plan, Produce, Hypothesize, Design,
           Construct
           Understand, Interpret, Exemplify, Classify,
   2nd     Summarize, Infer, Compare, Explain,
   Use     Apply, Execute, Implement, Analyze,
           Differentiate, Organize, Attribute
   1st     Remember, Recognize, Identify, Retrieve

  Recall

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

How should we use Multiple Intelligences?
How should we use Multiple Intelligences?How should we use Multiple Intelligences?
How should we use Multiple Intelligences?Cristina Protacio, LPT
 
K12 english - dec 19, 2012
K12   english - dec 19, 2012K12   english - dec 19, 2012
K12 english - dec 19, 2012Rizalina Alvarez
 
Bloom's taxonomy powerpoint
Bloom's taxonomy powerpointBloom's taxonomy powerpoint
Bloom's taxonomy powerpointYashika Cole
 
Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)
Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)
Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)Mi Amor
 
Gagne's theory on learning and instruction
Gagne's theory on learning and instructionGagne's theory on learning and instruction
Gagne's theory on learning and instructionSabeena PS
 
Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...
Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...
Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...Carlo Magno
 
Affective learning competency
Affective learning competencyAffective learning competency
Affective learning competencyCyra Mae Soreda
 
New K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education program
New K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education programNew K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education program
New K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education programRogelio Arcelon
 
K to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guide
K to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guideK to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guide
K to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guideNoel Tan
 
Gagne’s Conditions of Learning
Gagne’s Conditions of LearningGagne’s Conditions of Learning
Gagne’s Conditions of LearningAngel Mae Longakit
 
Performance assessment using grasps
Performance assessment  using graspsPerformance assessment  using grasps
Performance assessment using graspsShyne De Vera
 
Assessment in the affective domain
Assessment in the affective domainAssessment in the affective domain
Assessment in the affective domainCyra Mae Soreda
 

Viewers also liked (19)

How should we use Multiple Intelligences?
How should we use Multiple Intelligences?How should we use Multiple Intelligences?
How should we use Multiple Intelligences?
 
K12 english - dec 19, 2012
K12   english - dec 19, 2012K12   english - dec 19, 2012
K12 english - dec 19, 2012
 
Fs5 episode1-120323075556-phpapp02
Fs5 episode1-120323075556-phpapp02Fs5 episode1-120323075556-phpapp02
Fs5 episode1-120323075556-phpapp02
 
Bloom's taxonomy powerpoint
Bloom's taxonomy powerpointBloom's taxonomy powerpoint
Bloom's taxonomy powerpoint
 
Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)
Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)
Field Study 5 (learning activity 3)
 
Gagne's theory on learning and instruction
Gagne's theory on learning and instructionGagne's theory on learning and instruction
Gagne's theory on learning and instruction
 
Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...
Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...
Guidelines in Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Performance/Pr...
 
Fs 3 episode 1
Fs 3 episode 1Fs 3 episode 1
Fs 3 episode 1
 
Affective learning competency
Affective learning competencyAffective learning competency
Affective learning competency
 
Taxonomias de bloom y marzano 1
Taxonomias de bloom y marzano 1Taxonomias de bloom y marzano 1
Taxonomias de bloom y marzano 1
 
New K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education program
New K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education programNew K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education program
New K12 assessment in the k to 12 basic education program
 
K to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guide
K to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guideK to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guide
K to 12 mechanical drafting teacher's guide
 
Assessment in Affective Domain
Assessment in Affective DomainAssessment in Affective Domain
Assessment in Affective Domain
 
Table of specifications
Table of specificationsTable of specifications
Table of specifications
 
FS 5 - Episode 5
FS 5 - Episode 5FS 5 - Episode 5
FS 5 - Episode 5
 
FS 5 - Episode 4
FS 5 - Episode 4FS 5 - Episode 4
FS 5 - Episode 4
 
Gagne’s Conditions of Learning
Gagne’s Conditions of LearningGagne’s Conditions of Learning
Gagne’s Conditions of Learning
 
Performance assessment using grasps
Performance assessment  using graspsPerformance assessment  using grasps
Performance assessment using grasps
 
Assessment in the affective domain
Assessment in the affective domainAssessment in the affective domain
Assessment in the affective domain
 

Similar to Hlt presentation 1

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational ObjectivesBloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational ObjectivesEzr Acelar
 
Bloom and anderson taxonomy
Bloom and anderson taxonomy Bloom and anderson taxonomy
Bloom and anderson taxonomy Ivanna Zakiyah
 
Presentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptx
Presentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptxPresentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptx
Presentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptxIndraMani6
 
Bloom's Taxonomy
Bloom's TaxonomyBloom's Taxonomy
Bloom's TaxonomySALINI S
 
Canon of classification
Canon of classificationCanon of classification
Canon of classificationavid
 
High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...
High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...
High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...Tasneem Ahmad
 
blooms taxonomy.docx
blooms taxonomy.docxblooms taxonomy.docx
blooms taxonomy.docxNelizaSalcedo
 
bloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdf
bloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdfbloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdf
bloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdfNabEel80440
 
2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf
2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf
2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdfHafiz20006
 
Objective related principle in teaching
Objective related principle in teachingObjective related principle in teaching
Objective related principle in teachingJane Romero
 
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive Domain
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive DomainTaxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive Domain
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive DomainNirmala Roberts
 
Module 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptx
Module 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptxModule 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptx
Module 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptxvictormiralles2
 
Domains of Learning.pptx
Domains of Learning.pptxDomains of Learning.pptx
Domains of Learning.pptxSaleem Ashraf
 
blooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptx
blooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptxblooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptx
blooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptxApurva Dwivedi
 
meeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptx
meeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptxmeeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptx
meeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptxAfrioPasaribu106
 

Similar to Hlt presentation 1 (20)

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational ObjectivesBloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
 
Bloom and anderson taxonomy
Bloom and anderson taxonomy Bloom and anderson taxonomy
Bloom and anderson taxonomy
 
Presentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptx
Presentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptxPresentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptx
Presentation on Revised Blooms Taxonomy.pptx
 
Bloom's Taxonomy
Bloom's TaxonomyBloom's Taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy
 
Bloom's Taxonomy
Bloom's TaxonomyBloom's Taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy
 
Bloom's taxonomy
Bloom's taxonomyBloom's taxonomy
Bloom's taxonomy
 
Canon of classification
Canon of classificationCanon of classification
Canon of classification
 
High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...
High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...
High and low order learning and bloom taxonomy. (https://www.youtube.com/chan...
 
blooms taxonomy.docx
blooms taxonomy.docxblooms taxonomy.docx
blooms taxonomy.docx
 
bloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdf
bloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdfbloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdf
bloomstaxonomyrevised-110923015928-phpapp02.pdf
 
Learning domains dr swati
Learning domains dr swatiLearning domains dr swati
Learning domains dr swati
 
2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf
2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf
2 Writing Behavioral Objectives Taxonomy of educational objectives (2).pdf
 
Systems
SystemsSystems
Systems
 
Systems
SystemsSystems
Systems
 
Objective related principle in teaching
Objective related principle in teachingObjective related principle in teaching
Objective related principle in teaching
 
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive Domain
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive DomainTaxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive Domain
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives - The Cognitive Domain
 
Module 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptx
Module 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptxModule 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptx
Module 16 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.pptx
 
Domains of Learning.pptx
Domains of Learning.pptxDomains of Learning.pptx
Domains of Learning.pptx
 
blooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptx
blooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptxblooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptx
blooms taxonomy micro teaching.pptx
 
meeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptx
meeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptxmeeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptx
meeting2 blooms taxonomy revised.pptx
 

Hlt presentation 1

  • 1. Introduction to Higher Level Thinking
  • 2. Marzano’s New Taxonomy Marzano's New Taxonomy is made up of three systems and the Knowledge Domain, all of which are important for thinking and learning. • Self-System: When faced with the option of starting a new task, decides whether to continue the current behavior or engage in the new activity • Metacognitive System: sets goals and keeps track of how well they are being achieved •Cognitive System: processes all the necessary information •Knowledge Domain: provides the content.
  • 3. Marzano’s New Taxonomy 1 Self 2 System 1 Continue the behavior or engage in the new activity Start a new task 4 2 Sets goals and keeps tracks Cognitive System 3 Processes all the information 3 4 The Knowledge Domain provides the content
  • 5. Gallagher and Aschner Taxonomy Gallagher and Aschner classifies their taxonomy in three categories (Aschner, Gallagher, Perry, & Afsar, 1961). •Recall: Recall questions are simply questions that causes the student to remember similar to the "remember" stage in the revised Bloom's Taxonomy. •Convergent :Convergent questions are those that require students to give only one response. •Divergent. Divergent questions are those that require more than one response.
  • 6. Gallagher and Aschner Taxonomy Convergent Divergent Recall
  • 7. Gallagher and Aschner Taxonomy Low Order Convergent Level I Students engage in reproductive thinking High Order Convergent Level II Students engage in the initial levels of productive thinking Low Order Divergent Level III Students think critically about information High Order Divergent Level IV Students perform original thinking
  • 8. Walsh and Sattes Taxonomy Walsh and Sattes' Taxonomy is based on research focusing classroom questioning. Their questioning taxonomy is based on three-level systems: •Recall Level: level corresponds to the revised Bloom's Taxonomy cognitive level remember. •Use Level: mainly states to use or do something with what you learned. •Create Level: means to use their imagination on what was learned.
  • 9. Walsh and Sattes Taxonomy Recall Use Create Classroom Questioning
  • 10. Walsh and Sattes Taxonomy Evaluate, Check, Coordinate, Detect, 3rd Monitor, Test, Critique, Judge, Generate, Create Plan, Produce, Hypothesize, Design, Construct Understand, Interpret, Exemplify, Classify, 2nd Summarize, Infer, Compare, Explain, Use Apply, Execute, Implement, Analyze, Differentiate, Organize, Attribute 1st Remember, Recognize, Identify, Retrieve Recall

Editor's Notes

  1. Marzano's New Taxonomy is made up of three systems and the Knowledge Domain, all of which are important for thinking and learning. The three systems are the Self-System, the Metacognitive System, and the Cognitive System. When faced with the option of starting a new task, the Self-System decides whether to continue the current behavior or engage in the new activity; the Metacognitive System sets goals and keeps track of how well they are being achieved; the Cognitive System processes all the necessary information, and the Knowledge Domain provides the content.
  2. Gallagher and Aschner classifies their taxonomy in three categories (Aschner, Gallagher, Perry, & Afsar, 1961).  They are: recall, convergent and divergent.  Recall questions are simply questions that causes the student to remember similar to the "remember" stage in the revised Bloom's Taxonomy.  Convergent questioning are those that require students to give only one response.  The questions that require more than one response are called divergent questions. 
  3. Gallagher and Aschner classifies their taxonomy in three categories (Aschner, Gallagher, Perry, & Afsar, 1961).  They are: recall, convergent and divergent.  Recall questions are simply questions that causes the student to remember similar to the "remember" stage in the revised Bloom's Taxonomy.  Convergent questioning are those that require students to give only one response.  The questions that require more than one response are called divergent questions. 
  4. Walsh and Sattes' Taxonomy is based on research focusing classroom questioning.  Their questioning taxonomy is based on three-level systems: recall, use and create.  The recall level corresponds to the revised Bloom's Taxonomy cognitive level remember.  The use level mainly states to use or do something with what you learned.  The last level create means to use their imagination on what was learned. 
  5. Gallagher and Aschner classifies their taxonomy in three categories (Aschner, Gallagher, Perry, & Afsar, 1961).  They are: recall, convergent and divergent.  Recall questions are simply questions that causes the student to remember similar to the "remember" stage in the revised Bloom's Taxonomy.  Convergent questioning are those that require students to give only one response.  The questions that require more than one response are called divergent questions.